3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Newboy question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-28-04, 02:40 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
philg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Newboy question

Ok, now this may seem real trivial to you guys and i've tried to look it up but i can't seem to find the basic info that i need so here goes:
I just want to confirm the engine size of an rx7. I was under the impression that it was made up of 2 rotary cylinders of 650cc each - making a basic engine size of 1.3. Now, looking through the auto trader magazine i've seen ads that claim that they are selling an rx7 with a 2.6 litre engine so there are a couple of possibilities -
1. I'm flat out wrong
2. The seller is mistaken - thinking that one rotor is 1300cc
3. They've snuck 2 extra rotors in!

Sorry for such a simple question but it's been bugging me for days!

Many Thanks
Phil
philg is offline  
Old 04-28-04, 02:43 PM
  #2  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (6)
 
Section8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 1,807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You'll find that most people have no idea what a rotary engine is, or that their car even has a rotary. In other cases, the online classified site does not have a rotary engine option, so the seller will just pick anything.

For all intents and purposes, you are correct, it's a 2 rotor engine that would displace 1.3 liters compared in the conventional sense to a piston engine. I really doubt that you'll see too many 3 and 4 rotor cars for sale on sites like autotrader.
Section8 is offline  
Old 04-28-04, 02:44 PM
  #3  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (13)
 
fd3s_rx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sac., CA
Posts: 2,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FD=two rotors, twin turbos, 1.3 liters.

that's all
fd3s_rx7 is offline  
Old 04-28-04, 02:46 PM
  #4  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
philg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just what i thought - thanks very much for the quick replies
philg is offline  
Old 04-28-04, 02:53 PM
  #5  
Cheap Bastard

iTrader: (2)
 
adam c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Posts: 8,370
Received 50 Likes on 42 Posts
You can measure displacement in two ways for a "standard engine" FD. The manufacturer claims 1300cc, which is what most people have come to accept.

However, some of the "racing organizations" have re-rated the displacement to 2600cc. As I recall, this was done to move the RX7 into a faster classification, and take away the advantage it had over "true" 1300cc engines.
adam c is offline  
Old 04-28-04, 02:53 PM
  #6  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
philg,

Here's a link that you can read:

https://www.rx7club.com//showthread....hreadid=269803

While it doesn't necessarily answer the question, it will give you a reason why some people refer to it as 2.6.
Mahjik is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
_Tones_
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
10
05-25-21 05:37 AM
Nosferatu
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
09-05-15 02:13 PM



Quick Reply: Newboy question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 PM.