3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

New chip...runs like ish!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 22, 2004 | 06:24 PM
  #1  
racerfoo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 615
Likes: 1
From: Southwest Missouri
New chip...runs like ish! (dyno)

The chip is an XS chip, similar to M2 stage 3 or pettit, tuned for stock port motor, full bolt on, and 14.7lbs max.

My mods: intake, downpipe, hollow main cat, 3" catback, non-seq.

Boost on this run was 12lbs.



After this run, I swapped back to the stock ecu, turned the boost down to 8-9lbs, and dynoed 250hp/243tq. Almost 4lbs of boost difference, and only 10hp. I dont know what is making my car run so bad with the chip. I posted this in the dyno section too, but theres not as much traffic there, and this is more of a tech question anyways.

Last edited by racerfoo; May 22, 2004 at 06:30 PM.
Reply
Old May 22, 2004 | 06:36 PM
  #2  
Rotor Nut.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,163
Likes: 2
From: RI
try changing the plugs. 9's all around would be good since you had a decent amount of mods.
Reply
Old May 22, 2004 | 07:26 PM
  #3  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Have you tried calling/contacting XS and talking to them about their ECU?
Reply
Old May 22, 2004 | 07:30 PM
  #4  
PVerdieck's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Full bolt on may include intercooler upgrade. You don't have one. It might be running different a/f because of that.
Reply
Old May 22, 2004 | 10:05 PM
  #5  
reza's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,252
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Do you have the graph of the stock ECU runs, both hp/torge and RPM/AFR?

Maybe we can see the difference from the AFR.
Reply
Old May 22, 2004 | 10:40 PM
  #6  
racerfoo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 615
Likes: 1
From: Southwest Missouri
Sure, I'll post up my stock runs. I only have a print-out of 3 stock runs, and this crap run on the same page. Its kinda hard to read, but you guys can take a look.

Also, I'm already running 9s all around, I changed them out about 3000 miles ago. I havnt checked to see how they are doing, but on the stock ECU, they appear to be running fine.

I didnt purchase the chip from XS, so I was hesitant to call and ask them. But looking at my stock ecu AFR compared to my chip AFR...the stock ECU is just as rich on a few of the runs. It was getting leaner as I ran, possibly due to heatsoak? But the first run after I switched back to the stock ECU, I flatlined on 10 a/f, because the graph didnt read any lower.
Reply
Old May 22, 2004 | 10:49 PM
  #7  
racerfoo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 615
Likes: 1
From: Southwest Missouri
Stock ecu runs.....you can see the bad run in there, and the AFR at the bottom. The other blue line was my next run, labeled at the top as RunFile_375.drf. This run my AFR was pegged at 10 from 5500 - 7200. It peaked at 251hp, but quite a bit less torque (I think it was around 235, but it got cut off and I dont remember it).

Reply
Old May 23, 2004 | 12:14 AM
  #8  
reza's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,252
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Look at the blue AFR compare to green/red AFR line. Looks like the XS ECU is too rich.
Reply
Old May 23, 2004 | 12:19 AM
  #9  
racerfoo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 615
Likes: 1
From: Southwest Missouri
One of the blue AFR lines is also from the stock ECU run. It is hard to see, but you can see along the bottom from 5500-7200 where it runs flat on 10, it makes the border dissappear. That is with the stock ECU, it was richer with no cutting out missing problems. You can see where it comes back into the AFR plot at 7200 and continues toward 11AFR till i shut down at 7800.

The AFR from the XS ecu is the blue line on the top in the AFR plot, and chops up and stops at around 7000rpm.

Last edited by racerfoo; May 23, 2004 at 12:24 AM.
Reply
Old May 23, 2004 | 01:59 AM
  #10  
artguy's Avatar
WTB** Very Low Miles 94-95
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
From: Tejas
i will tell you the problem. xs does an absolutely horrible job with their maps. your car is not tuned for your mods even with that chip. get a power fc. sell that POS and have a REAL tuner do the work.

their horse **** maps cost me my motor...and my 1300 dollar ianetti ceramic apex seals. their timing maps were trash...and their fuel maps were a MESS.

Lamers. how many engines need to be lost because of their **** tuning?


Jason
Reply
Old May 23, 2004 | 10:54 AM
  #11  
mad_7tist's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 0
From: tampa
you trusted 1300 apex seals to a 400 ecu? WOW
Reply
Old May 23, 2004 | 11:59 AM
  #12  
Nameless's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Their tuning was done on his (artguy) Power FC if I remember correctly.

The chipped ECUs are always super rich to maintain a margin of safety so I guess its starting to affect your performance.
Reply
Old May 23, 2004 | 12:10 PM
  #13  
particleeffect's Avatar
omgwtfposlol
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
From: Orange City, FL
yes, iirc they even tuned artguy's PFC ON his car (as you would expect but i take it they do some mail tuning)on their dyno.
Reply
Old May 23, 2004 | 12:39 PM
  #14  
RotaSpinna69's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Same thing is happening to me with my FD...i have a Pettit chip...
Reply
Old May 23, 2004 | 02:10 PM
  #15  
Sonny's Avatar
R1derful
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
From: N Cali
Man, the air/fuel ratio for the XS chip looks horrid!

That thing is incredibly lean before 5000 rpm. This isn't the first horror story I've heard about their ECU's. I almost got one and called them and they basically told me that it was not a supported product any more and that no help was available.

The stock ECU is rich, but at least the air/fuel curve is somewhat flat. Even if you richened up the XS setup (below 5000 rpm) by increasing the fuel pressure or injector size, it will be super rich up top.

An SAFC would help you out, but it opens a whole different can of worms.

Time to sell that puppy and get a standalone or an ECU tuned specifically for your car.

Sonny
Reply
Old May 23, 2004 | 02:21 PM
  #16  
artguy's Avatar
WTB** Very Low Miles 94-95
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
From: Tejas
the air fuels on my dyno tuned power fc they did look terrrrrrible too. so terrible my bank account now looks terrible because i had to GET A NEW ENGINE BUILT.

Thanks xs. How about I post those maps sometime...hell, I will even post your top secret timing maps (in other words HALF ASSED).

cheers


J
Reply
Old May 23, 2004 | 02:36 PM
  #17  
GoRacer's Avatar
Speed Mach Go Go Go
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 2
From: My 350Z Roadster kicks my RX7's butt
With the possible exception of M2, all the upgraded ECU's are pretty much the same thing (mine is Superchips). The PROM is removed and read by their computer (or whatever company that does it for them), the maps are changed from economy to high performance. So if you originaly ran 87 octane, you now have to run 91. The new mapping is burned on a new EPROM and soldered in (which is why you have to send in your ECU). The fule cut is raised to one bar except for the Pettit unlimited which has no fuel cut which is a oxymoron (so to speak) because the fuel system maxes out at 1 bar. If you use a seperate fuel computer it will overide the fuel cut anyhow. I don't think XS made their own chips because of equipment costs.
Reply
Old May 23, 2004 | 09:57 PM
  #18  
artguy's Avatar
WTB** Very Low Miles 94-95
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
From: Tejas
the problem isnt with the chips...the problem is with the horseshit careless tuning they do.

when i go pick up my car next week i will get printouts of their maps to post for everyone to see how they fukk people over.
Reply
Old May 23, 2004 | 10:16 PM
  #19  
Fumanchu's Avatar
Belligerent Security
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Pulling you over
Originally posted by artguy
the problem isnt with the chips...the problem is with the horseshit careless tuning they do.

when i go pick up my car next week i will get printouts of their maps to post for everyone to see how they fukk people over.

Tell us how you REALLY feel Artguy!@
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2004 | 12:47 PM
  #20  
cruiser's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
From: Slovenia, Europe
I'm starting to see a pattern here on the preprogrammed ECUs - FDs with these ECUs and street port (including mine) usually fall on their face after 6.5k RPM. So its either a flow problem OR the mixture is too rich OR the spark is not strong enough (improving the latter with some HKS TP would probbably fix the 2nd cause also I think).

Any other opinions on this ?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dexter snoek
New Member RX-7 Technical
4
Sep 29, 2015 09:18 AM
Broke_A_Baller
Race Car Tech
8
Sep 24, 2015 09:27 PM
ZaqAtaq
New Member RX-7 Technical
2
Sep 5, 2015 08:57 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:26 AM.