Need a "WOW" picture: 3rd Gen
not really a bg
01-26-04, 12:52 PM
#103
http://streetcarforums.com/showthrea...0&highlight=tj
This guy doesnt post often but I think you will like the car.
David
This guy doesnt post often but I think you will like the car.
David
01-26-04, 04:43 PM
#106
Cropped too tightly, should have used a higher speed film. And depth of field has nothing to do with what you are talking about. You cannot have perfect depth of field in a picture, it’s irrelevant. All depth of field would mean is that the whole car is sharp, front the driver side of the car to the passenger side. Don’t use technical jargon if you don’t know what it means. And who are you to say its "professional quality"?
01-26-04, 05:23 PM
#107
PV = nRT
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New Zealand (was California)
Posts: 2,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know exactly the "technical jargon" I'm referring to.
Until you produce professional results - sit the **** down, child. Work on your sentence parsing skills, as well.
Until you produce professional results - sit the **** down, child. Work on your sentence parsing skills, as well.
01-26-04, 06:39 PM
#108
I won't let go
It was somewhat professional. Taken with a Canon Eos 10D if I remember. Unfortunately for me, the guy taking it was a **** and sent me the JPG and not the apparent original. I had it worked on by my dad and ended up printing it 11X17 on archival matte from Epson on an Epson Stylus P2000. Looks absolutely amazing. I got ripped off from the photo guys (I'll post them tomorrow as I don't have the card right this second) as the original quality was spotty, color was off and the number and quality of pics was way too low.
Anyway, if a higher speed "film" (it was digital as mentioned above) were used, then the sense of motion would have been reduced. Might as well have taken the pic of the thing standing still. There's another one like the one above, but catches more of the tail.
Anyway, if a higher speed "film" (it was digital as mentioned above) were used, then the sense of motion would have been reduced. Might as well have taken the pic of the thing standing still. There's another one like the one above, but catches more of the tail.
01-26-04, 08:31 PM
#112
Originally posted by clayne
I know exactly the "technical jargon" I'm referring to.
Until you produce professional results - sit the **** down, child. Work on your sentence parsing skills, as well.
I know exactly the "technical jargon" I'm referring to.
Until you produce professional results - sit the **** down, child. Work on your sentence parsing skills, as well.
Oh yeah and i aint gotta prove **** to you. I have better things i can waste my time on.
Last edited by SpoolinRX; 01-26-04 at 08:42 PM.
