3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

My Rx-8's cooling system VS Rx-7's. LOL

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-19-04, 12:42 PM
  #26  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
 
ZeroBanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Buckhead
Posts: 3,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by DCrosby
Remind us again which one has a turbo ??
I dont get it. I didn't even post this about the FD overheating, I posted this because the Rx-8 appears to "Under heat". I found it amusing considering the FD's rep.
Old 01-19-04, 12:49 PM
  #27  
Belligerent Security

 
Fumanchu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Pulling you over
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey Zero... I thought your FD didn't have cooling problems after you took the front plate off



Sounds like to me your RX8 and FD have problems.



Or your just making up some lame story.
Old 01-19-04, 01:00 PM
  #28  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
 
ZeroBanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Buckhead
Posts: 3,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Fumanchu
Hey Zero... I thought your FD didn't have cooling problems after you took the front plate off



Sounds like to me your RX8 and FD have problems.



Or your just making up some lame story.
What is your problem with me? Why must you attack me?

why would I make this story up? And this has nothing to with my license plate. I have never overheated my Rx-7 since I replaced the radiator fans (2 times), AST (1 time), overflow tank (1 time), Throttle body hose (2 times), Upper radiator hose (1 time).

The FD's water temps rise like the nasdaq in 1999 on a hot day when I climb a hill. As I said earlier although my water temps in my FD (and this is like last summer) when Im going to reno rise very high (105+) so I turn my heater on. yes I may be going to extreme but its an FD, if something can go wrong it will.

please refrain from attacking me.
Old 01-19-04, 01:05 PM
  #29  
sexy no jutsu

 
scratchjunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: planet arium
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
zero has a very nice fd.
Old 01-19-04, 01:21 PM
  #30  
Eh

iTrader: (56)
 
djseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 6,544
Received 333 Likes on 189 Posts
Originally posted by ZeroBanger
Actually, while the renesis will run more hot with a turbo, I would highly doubt it will have any cooling issues. For 1 the radiator is very big, 2 the opening under the car is simply sick, and lastly its sealed very well. My money says there will bo need to upgrade the cooling system when a turbo gets installed. The rx-8 in general is far better engineered than the FD.
.
If i am correct I thought the 8s were blowing up within 1500 miles due to a coolant seal failure. Not trying to be an *** but I dont think the renesis is that much of a great advancement in the rotary world. We are still yet to see someone put a lot of miles on a turboed 8 to see how the seals will hold up.
Old 01-19-04, 01:25 PM
  #31  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
 
ZeroBanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Buckhead
Posts: 3,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by djseven
If i am correct I thought the 8s were blowing up within 1500 miles due to a coolant seal failure. Not trying to be an *** but I dont think the renesis is that much of a great advancement in the rotary world. We are still yet to see someone put a lot of miles on a turboed 8 to see how the seals will hold up.
no they haven't been blowing up within 1500 miles (I have 1550, lol). There have been a handfull that have had coolant seals leak and got a new engine. The last I heard out of nearly 15,000 US cars sold, 80 had replaced engines. While I agree that number is much higher than it should be, the theory is the problem is with the assembly of the engine and in the scheme of things its insignificant (unless its your engine).

The engine is so superior to the 13B and 13B-REW. Its meets emissions, makes way more hp, gets better gas mileage (I drive both, I know) has a higher redline, weighs less, is smoother and quite frankly.....Better.
Old 01-19-04, 01:26 PM
  #32  
Senior Member

 
doncojones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Like any other form of bad news about something on the internet, I'd wager a guess that the problems with the RX-8 occur with far less frequency than we may have been led to believe.

All ZeroBanger said was that when ascending and descending freaking mountains that temps in both of his cars fluctuate and noted the differences. Many of you seem convinced there's some kind of problem or that he's an idiot and I don't get it.
Old 01-19-04, 01:33 PM
  #33  
Eh

iTrader: (56)
 
djseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 6,544
Received 333 Likes on 189 Posts
Originally posted by ZeroBanger
no they haven't been blowing up within 1500 miles (I have 1550, lol). There have been a handfull that have had coolant seals leak and got a new engine. The last I heard out of nearly 15,000 US cars sold, 80 had replaced engines. While I agree that number is much higher than it should be, the theory is the problem is with the assembly of the engine and in the scheme of things its insignificant (unless its your engine).

The engine is so superior to the 13B and 13B-REW. Its meets emissions, makes way more hp, gets better gas mileage (I drive both, I know) has a higher redline, weighs less, is smoother and quite frankly.....Better.
Speaking of hp what is the final # mazda released for the 8s. I know they changed it quite a few times and is it the reason for the buy back option? Not to familiar with the N/A 13bs but I thought they were around 180 hp. So I was just wondering how much more power the renesis had and was the weight of the 13b-rew with the turbos or without. Not trying to argue just trying to learn the differences. Also compare ride quality of the two if you dont mind.
Old 01-19-04, 01:41 PM
  #34  
STi Boxer power!

 
Scrapiron7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by djseven
Speaking of hp what is the final # mazda released for the 8s. I know they changed it quite a few times and is it the reason for the buy back option? Not to familiar with the N/A 13bs but I thought they were around 180 hp. So I was just wondering how much more power the renesis had and was the weight of the 13b-rew with the turbos or without. Not trying to argue just trying to learn the differences. Also compare ride quality of the two if you dont mind.
180rwhp? that's weak.
Old 01-19-04, 02:58 PM
  #35  
rawrrr

 
|aFk| LiMiTz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Insane Gideo...my sig is kristen kreuk, she is my soon to be wife.....jk...
hottie
Old 01-19-04, 02:59 PM
  #36  
Full Member

 
rotaryhardcore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe the final US figure is 238hp, I don't know if that's to the rear wheels.

It was, on release, announced as 247hp. I'm not sure if this was to keep the claim that the Renisis meets future emmissions requirements (for 2006, and I don't recall which standard that was).

Although the Renesis is good engineering, it only equals its peers accomplishments.

It by no means competes with some of the latest German big blocks; some with better gas mileage (than the Renesis), and a ULEV certification. I realize it isn't fair to compare the Renesis with these $70k+ vehicles, but it seems some of the RX-8 advocates would like to put it's powertrain on a pedestal with them.

I like it! The RX-8 is a practical sports car and well suited for the current market. It is not in the same segment as the FD3S RX-7, which is a super-car. It is in a segment more like the original RX-7, the rogue.

The RX-8 is great engineering for the time, so were our awe-inspiring FD's.

-C
Old 01-19-04, 03:26 PM
  #37  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
 
ZeroBanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Buckhead
Posts: 3,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by djseven
Speaking of hp what is the final # mazda released for the 8s. I know they changed it quite a few times and is it the reason for the buy back option? Not to familiar with the N/A 13bs but I thought they were around 180 hp. So I was just wondering how much more power the renesis had and was the weight of the 13b-rew with the turbos or without. Not trying to argue just trying to learn the differences. Also compare ride quality of the two if you dont mind.
The n/a 13B was 160 HP at its peak. This engine is 247 HP (Japanese version). The us version was also going to be 247 but they could not meet a new regulation that required the cats to live 100,000 miles. They reduced the power to reduce the heat to meet that requirement in the US.

You cant dyno an rx-8 because its ECU will cut the power to the wheels (even with traction control off). This is not an issue in racing the car, just on the dyno.

The weight of the 13Brew with the turbos was some 390 lbs. I dont have the exact numbers with me, but the engine itself is 30 pct lighter than the 13B-rew and is smaller (12 inches high) actually the same hight as the transmission.

There is no comparison to the ride quality of the FD vs the RX-8. The FD is very harsh and is put together like crap. Its cheap plastic that just breaks, squeeks, rattles and squeels. You hit a bump or a pothole and as you know it just jars you. The rx-8 has a very, very refind feel and is quick. It soaks up pot holes and un-even surfaces. The really cool thing is that the car gives you feed back from the road. You know you hit a bump, but it doesn't transmit to the chassis or your body.

Having said all of that the FD has much higher limits in most catagories. While the steering, chassis and stabililty during braking is fars superior in the rx-8, grip, overall handling and power are far superior in the rx-7. The rx-8 gives you a very smooth ride but isn't quite as neutral as the FD. You feel SLIGHT body roll during a turn, but its very very minor. Interms of fun, both cars are equally fun, but on the street the rx-8 is superior. It gives you a level of confidence that the FD doesn't. It offers 95 pct of the handling of the FD without the punishing ride. Take the FD around a corner at 75 MPH and hit a pothole or a bump in the road. Then do the same with the Rx-8. It grips so hard and you feel like you can keep pushing it harder and harder.

If you remember just prior to production mazda showed an rx-8 and an rx-8 in the twisties. During the turns the rx-8 easily caught up to the rx-7. During the straigts the rx-7 easily put distance on the rx-8, but again as soon as the turns came the rx8 gained ground again. I was very skeptical about this when I first saw it. But after driving them both hard I understand it. An average driver in the rx-8 would beat an average driver in the FD in the "twisties". A very good driver in the FD will easily beat one in the rx-8. Watch the top gear video it describes alot of this to you.

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/andy.wray/topgear.wmv
Old 01-19-04, 03:34 PM
  #38  
The bomb is in the toy!1!

iTrader: (4)
 
cloud9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Dallas Tx.
Posts: 2,179
Received 265 Likes on 154 Posts
why are all you guys being so critical of zero's story.... thats the only lame part of this thread......
Old 01-19-04, 03:45 PM
  #39  
Freudian slip

iTrader: (1)
 
BOTTLEFED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Pocatello, ID
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It sounds like Mazda may have over engineered the Renesis' cooling system to make up for the FD's faults.

The temps should not not drop when coasting. As stated before, the temp is measured at the engine and if the thermostat is closed, the engine should easily be able to maintain that temp, even in below-freezing temps. However, I wouldn't worry to much about it.

I personally did not like the RX-8's styling at first but it has grown on me. It's definitely not in the same league as the FD, but not bad for the cars that have been coming out lately.

Also, Zerobanger, you initially called it an FE. Is it really considered the fourth-generation of RX-7s? I don't consider it in the same class and it doesn't even carry the name.
Old 01-19-04, 03:48 PM
  #40  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
 
ZeroBanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Buckhead
Posts: 3,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by BOTTLEFED
It sounds like Mazda may have over engineered the Renesis' cooling system to make up for the FD's faults.

The temps should not not drop when coasting. As stated before, the temp is measured at the engine and if the thermostat is closed, the engine should easily be able to maintain that temp, even in below-freezing temps. However, I wouldn't worry to much about it.

I personally did not like the RX-8's styling at first but it has grown on me. It's definitely not in the same league as the FD, but not bad for the cars that have been coming out lately.

Also, Zerobanger, you initially called it an FE. Is it really considered the fourth-generation of RX-7s? I don't consider it in the same class and it doesn't even carry the name.
the sig "FB", "FC","FD" and "FE" are all chassis codes. you can find the letters in the VIN. I'm not saying the rx-8 is or is not a replacement for the rx-7, but its definately the FE.

Remember, the RX series has had all different types of cars, station wagons...even a truck? sedans, 2 seat sportscars and the what ever you consider it Rx-8. There may not even be a new rx-7. If there is I will sell my FD for it, not my Rx-8.
Old 01-19-04, 04:58 PM
  #41  
Senior Member

 
David Beale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To start off, I will say I really like the RX-8. I'm building piggyback fuel controllers for it (Canzoomer's Stage 1). Lots of fun. Best engineered rotary car yet!

A few facts:
The water pump runs off the belt.
The power steering is electric (EPS) as is the air pump.
The RX-8 has the same temp gauge setup as the RX-7 - it's a go/no go readout.
The engine produces around 220 HP (we measure 180 to 210 HP at the wheels, depending on mods. - 180 in stock EPAII configuration). Not bad for a N/A rotary.
Most cars will get too cool going downhill on long mountain pass'. Both my RX-7 and my Pathfinder do.
My RX-7 gets better fuel economy than my friends RX-8 - both city driving and highway cruising. I found this kind of funny (he doesn't). My car probably runs about as lean as it can without det.
You can dyno your RX-8. Just remove the bolts for the rear ABS sensors, back onto the dyno, pull the sensors out and tape out of harms way. Do your dyno runs with DSC turned off (hold button 5 sec.), but keep the runs to less than 20 sec. per pull. Put the sensors back in before driving off the dyno, but put the bolts in after driving off the dyno (if you drop them into the dyno rollers you will have to leave the car there until you can get replacements).
I thought the 1st gen was not an FB (everyone here calls it that except Mazda). The RX-8 is an FE. IF the next RX-7 is built, it would probably be an FF. Suitable designation, I'd say (F'ing Fast!).

As for how fast the RX-8 is, my friend's car (he is known as Canzoomer) is now close to stock RX-7 territory. Handling is at least as good as an RX-7, maybe better. Yes, the power is down. Interior appointments are far and above the RX-7. Cup holders, comfortable rear seats. It has LEDs in the dash doing things for you before you even put in the key! The RX-8 is amazing with DSC and ABS. It's pretty hard to "get in over your head". The car will save you. There have been several posts by owners whose lives have been saved by that car. The RX-7 has the right combination of power and handling to get us in over our heads too often!
Old 01-19-04, 05:00 PM
  #42  
No it's not Turbo'd

 
DCrosby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Posts: 2,511
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by doncojones
Many of you seem convinced there's some kind of problem or that he's an idiot and I don't get it.
All I'm saying is if you take an FC T2 and an FC N.A. you'll find the N.A. has lower temps with the same Coolant mods... due to the fact that Turbo Chargeing creates heat, so what he's saying 1 Isn't news, and 2 he's not even close to comparing the same car, as I did with the FC....
Old 01-19-04, 05:18 PM
  #43  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
 
ZeroBanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Buckhead
Posts: 3,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
David,

thank you for your post that was great. The only thing I would like to add, the 220 hp was a result of the last minute de-tuning that mazda did. Otherwise the engine definately makes more. Probably makes closer to 240 flywheel.

And about the gas mileage. My 94 rx7 has about 350 rwhp and is ported, etc. In the beginning I found that I was getting better gas mileage in the FD. It took awhile to realize but in general I am at lower RPM in the FD, and I believe that is why.

during my trip to reno I did some tests. I have taken my FD many times on the same trip. On the way back during several 95 mile stretches I put on the cruise control at various RPM's to see my gas mileage in the rx-8 and compared to my 94 Rx7. I would get 25 MPG in my FD with the cruise control on at 3000 RPM on the highway. In my Rx-8 I got 30.22 under the same conditions, same road. I was very shocked by that number, but its what I got.

Keep in mind, I was at 3000 RPM 6th gear. That translates to about 60 MPH vs 80 in the FD.

During my normal driving to work keeping a steady foot on the gas, I take highway and some city mixed, I get about 18-19 in the FD, my Rx-8 gets 20-21.

When I push the FD hard I almost never get less than 16 MPG, 17 is normal. With my Rx-8 its comparable. I need to do some more testing with 91 octain to see my gas mileage when I am abusing the 8 in comparison to the FD.
Old 01-19-04, 05:22 PM
  #44  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
 
ZeroBanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Buckhead
Posts: 3,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by DCrosby
All I'm saying is if you take an FC T2 and an FC N.A. you'll find the N.A. has lower temps with the same Coolant mods... due to the fact that Turbo Chargeing creates heat, so what he's saying 1 Isn't news, and 2 he's not even close to comparing the same car, as I did with the FC....
I dont think you understand why I made this thread. I thought it was funny that my rx-8 almost "Underheats" while the FD almost "overheats". turning the heat on in the summer with the FD driving up a hill and turning the heat off in the Rx8 going down a hill during the winter has some humor, dont you think?

Thats all it is about. I'm sure driving down a mountain pass in 30 degee weather the FC's needle doesn't go almost completely to the left side, does it?
Old 01-19-04, 07:22 PM
  #45  
tnt
Full Member

 
tnt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Miami
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This has got to be the most pathetic forum in the world.... David has been the only one with useful info everyone else has flamed zero for telling a story that did not put the FD on a pedestal, get over it, knock that chip off all of your shoulders... if the FD was the greatest car ever produced they would not need the amount of maintenance and TLC that they require to keep them running well.... If you guys had wanted reliability you would have done what i did and got rid of the rotary and put a NISSAN engine in... why can't you guys just except that the RX8 is what most budget sports car are heading towards---> less power more reliabilty and 4 seats...... Good Luck zerobanger enjoy both cars don't pay attention to all these idiots....

Shaun
Old 01-19-04, 07:53 PM
  #46  
Full Member

 
1 2 NV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: everywhere
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i would also assume its cold around reno, thats prolly 90% of the problem.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Th0m4s
Build Threads
25
02-26-19 02:04 AM
highspeedrider
Introduce yourself
6
08-19-15 03:44 AM



Quick Reply: My Rx-8's cooling system VS Rx-7's. LOL



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 PM.