3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Midpipe Muffler Horsepower Numbers!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 15, 2002 | 11:17 PM
  #26  
dclin's Avatar
Perpetual Project
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,667
Likes: 2
From: Texas
What hiflow cat was it you were using, BTW?
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2002 | 12:00 AM
  #27  
Flybye's Avatar
It's never fast enough...
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,760
Likes: 3
From: Miami - Given 1st place as the POOREST city in the US as per the federal government
I talked to Borla about their heat resistance to the exhaust temps of a rotary. They told me the same stuff they make their muflers out of is what they pack their mufflers with. Aircraft Stainless steel packing.

I've had their original CB for over 50k miles with no problems and no sign of it falling apart ANYWHERE.

Also, their XR1s have been known to cause a 1-2hp loss when COMPARED to a straight pipe....
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2002 | 12:14 AM
  #28  
DRAG0NEER's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
From: bay area
Originally posted by Apexi


Yes, but do you have actual numbers, or just going from observations?

I'm surprised to see that out of all the people on the forum, a very small percentage seems to have actual numbers (ie/ dyno or at least GTECH).
I'm just saying my setup enables me to switch between good torque/okay top-end/quiet to okay torque/very good top-end/loud. Therefore, I do not believe that having actual dyno numbers is a requirement to this justification.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2002 | 02:41 AM
  #29  
billyrohm's Avatar
Man who sold his 7
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Mechanicville, NY
APEXI

Was the muffler you installed the same size as the straight pipe? Something you should check.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2002 | 03:18 AM
  #30  
Apexi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: EA
Yup, the muffler is a 3" straight through. Well from all the feedback thus far, I've come to the conclusion that it must be either ignition related (spark plugs) or AFR related (running too rich?).

I've noticed before with the midpipe, I could not get lower than 11-12psi boost, even with a ported wastegate. Now with the muffler/midpipe I can control boost to wherever I want it, even down to 8psi, so it's definitely adding some flow restricition.

I'm determined to figure it out. I've had my AFC richen my fuel 3-4% at 7,000-8,000 RPM just for safety. That seemed to be fine with the straight midpipe, but maybe too rich with the muffler. So I zeroed it all out, and went for some test again today. My numbers seemed to be getting close to where they were before, within 5 HP of the midpipe, but I'd say the results are inconclusive at the moment, since there was too much variance in the measurements. I couldn't get in solid runs since there was too much local traffic, and therefore I had to move around here and there, and ended up doing the runs on different roads.

I'm just going to wait for a clear night (it's been raining straight for 2 weeks), and do some good solid runs at my usual strip when I get the chance.

I'll post up the results.

Last edited by Apexi; Nov 16, 2002 at 03:21 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2002 | 04:13 PM
  #31  
kwikrx7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
From: Mechanicsburg, PA USA
Although I can't find the numbers or links anywhere, I have heard of some people with HF cats making as much or a little less than people with midpipes. One guy dynoed at KDR and found no change at all in going from a midpipe to a HF cat, just a little different curve. For dyno purposes I'm sure the midpipe would get you the high peak numbers that everyone wants to see. Like I said, I felt a bit more power up above 6K rpms with a midpipe but the car didn't feel as powerful overall as it does with my HF cat.

I know Rich (Goodfellas) dynoed at 337 rwhp with a midpipe at 13 psi and 368 rwhp with a HF cat at 15 psi - meaning they would be pretty close. I guess it just depends on the car. The Borla XR1 seems like the happy medium though.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2002 | 06:01 PM
  #32  
Apexi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: EA
Originally posted by kwikrx7
Although I can't find the numbers or links anywhere, I have heard of some people with HF cats making as much or a little less than people with midpipes. One guy dynoed at KDR and found no change at all in going from a midpipe to a HF cat, just a little different curve. For dyno purposes I'm sure the midpipe would get you the high peak numbers that everyone wants to see. Like I said, I felt a bit more power up above 6K rpms with a midpipe but the car didn't feel as powerful overall as it does with my HF cat.

I know Rich (Goodfellas) dynoed at 337 rwhp with a midpipe at 13 psi and 368 rwhp with a HF cat at 15 psi - meaning they would be pretty close. I guess it just depends on the car. The Borla XR1 seems like the happy medium though.
When I had the HF cat in there I too noticed the overall difference in torque. As soon as I switched it to the midpipe muffler, I immediately noticed the difference. I'm just waiting for some decent weather (oh please) so I can do some solid tests!
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2002 | 07:42 PM
  #33  
Apexi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: EA
while on this topic, just wondering if anyone has actual numbers of what kind of power difference the following would typically make:

1. poor spark plugs
2. dirty intake filters
3. running a little too rich

From my experience, I know a loose plug wire can easily account for 50-60RWHP, and running too rich can account for 10-15RWHP. I don't have any experience or know what fouled plugs or dirty intake filters would do.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2002 | 03:05 PM
  #34  
Apexi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: EA
^
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2002 | 02:51 PM
  #35  
DRAG0NEER's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
From: bay area
Originally posted by Apexi
while on this topic, just wondering if anyone has actual numbers of what kind of power difference the following would typically make:

1. poor spark plugs
2. dirty intake filters
3. running a little too rich

From my experience, I know a loose plug wire can easily account for 50-60RWHP, and running too rich can account for 10-15RWHP. I don't have any experience or know what fouled plugs or dirty intake filters would do.
1. poor spark plugs ---> poor idle
2. dirty intake filters ---> can be verified visually and a piece of cake to replace
3. running rich ---> can be verified once you pull your spark plugs and if nothing is being done to solve it expect your cats to clog!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dona1326cosprings7
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
4
Oct 29, 2015 06:47 AM
Jingkun
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
1
Sep 28, 2015 01:53 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:34 AM.