3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

is it me or does the 93 look better than the 94! pics requested

Old Jun 9, 2004 | 10:25 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Euless
is it me or does the 93 look better than the 94! pics requested

is it me or is the 93> 94+
Old Jun 9, 2004 | 10:28 PM
  #2  
Black97VR4's Avatar
FEARED
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
From: Winchester, VA
Its you. They're the same, atleast lookswise.
Old Jun 9, 2004 | 10:28 PM
  #3  
OneBadRx7's Avatar
Lucky
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 818
Likes: 0
From: Dubuque, Iowa
huh? On the exterior there is no difference that I am aware of, as long as you are comparing similar models of course.
Old Jun 9, 2004 | 10:29 PM
  #4  
ijneb's Avatar
FOR SALE
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
From: Central Florida
Thats great and all, but the only differences are the 94 and 95 models have less ticks on the dash guages, and the glove compartment lookds different, and the interior panels were a little different.

Other than that, there is no real difference. If you were talking 93 vs 99 spec then yea...


-Ben
Old Jun 10, 2004 | 01:12 AM
  #5  
Toadman's Avatar
Nomad Mod
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 359
Likes: 6
From: The O.C.
93=Driver's side airbag only.
Old Jun 10, 2004 | 01:23 AM
  #6  
SpeedKing's Avatar
Power Trippin'
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,128
Likes: 1
From: Land of The Quick
is it me or does the 93 look better than the 94! pics requested

It's you and you're crazier than a three dollar bill.

As mentioned, any visual changes were done mainly with the interior.

Other than that, here are the differences for the '94 cars:

http://beyondtheredline.fd3s.net/1994.html

Call me biased, but '94s > '93s.
Old Jun 10, 2004 | 06:03 AM
  #7  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From: Las vegas
I also prefer the 94 but both cars did not have any differences when it comes to the exterior.
Old Jun 10, 2004 | 07:16 AM
  #8  
mrb63083's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,748
Likes: 1
From: Dallas
what a silly question
Old Jun 10, 2004 | 07:25 AM
  #9  
InsaneGideon's Avatar
Still on 1st engine
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,176
Likes: 1
From: SoCal
Originally posted by RX7_21
I also prefer the 94 but both cars did not have any differences when it comes to the exterior.
...except for the supposedly better paint on the 94+'s.

But hey, (very few) 93's were available in CYM!


...a silly question, indeed.
Old Jun 10, 2004 | 07:37 AM
  #10  
dubulup's Avatar
development
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 7
From: Lafayette, LA
1995 is where it's at
Old Jun 10, 2004 | 08:43 AM
  #11  
apexkw's Avatar
in slow, out fast!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,388
Likes: 0
From: Florida
i like the 93 better. i think the dash seems to flow better.
Old Jun 10, 2004 | 08:44 AM
  #12  
areXseven's Avatar
il Cosa Nostra e vivo!!
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,096
Likes: 1
From: Dove le cose sono fatte il vecchio moda il senso
Except for the Passenger-Side airbag and better finish on interior plastic components,... it's the same awesome vehicle.
Old Jun 10, 2004 | 08:46 AM
  #13  
areXseven's Avatar
il Cosa Nostra e vivo!!
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,096
Likes: 1
From: Dove le cose sono fatte il vecchio moda il senso
Originally posted by dubulup
1995 is where it's at
You lucky bass-turd.
Old Jun 10, 2004 | 10:23 AM
  #14  
matty's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,014
Likes: 40
From: CT
damn forum


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:00 AM.