Max power for a twin turbo set up
#27
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Edwards, CA
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How is it possible to yield more power from Non-Sequential setup than a Sequential setup can from the exact same turbos?
#28
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA USA
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Seems that if you want more power then it's best to go non-seq (full) I was full non-seq before and there is a difference in flow with removing the flapper door and precontrol. If I were doing constant 1/4 mile runs or even runs on the highway I would definitely choose non-seq for a better midrange power.
I am like artguy and do not like non-seq as it is basically meant for racing so I switched back to seq. It is much more fun to drive around in town and carving up mountain roads. And it still gives me enough power in the mid-high range to pull on high-hp V8s. I think full non-seq might yield some more power up, but only 10 hp at the most and there really isn't much proof to prove that.
I am like artguy and do not like non-seq as it is basically meant for racing so I switched back to seq. It is much more fun to drive around in town and carving up mountain roads. And it still gives me enough power in the mid-high range to pull on high-hp V8s. I think full non-seq might yield some more power up, but only 10 hp at the most and there really isn't much proof to prove that.
#29
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Originally posted by kwikrx7
Seems that if you want more power then it's best to go non-seq (full) I was full non-seq before and there is a difference in flow with removing the flapper door and precontrol. If I were doing constant 1/4 mile runs or even runs on the highway I would definitely choose non-seq for a better midrange power.
I am like artguy and do not like non-seq as it is basically meant for racing so I switched back to seq. It is much more fun to drive around in town and carving up mountain roads. And it still gives me enough power in the mid-high range to pull on high-hp V8s. I think full non-seq might yield some more power up, but only 10 hp at the most and there really isn't much proof to prove that.
Seems that if you want more power then it's best to go non-seq (full) I was full non-seq before and there is a difference in flow with removing the flapper door and precontrol. If I were doing constant 1/4 mile runs or even runs on the highway I would definitely choose non-seq for a better midrange power.
I am like artguy and do not like non-seq as it is basically meant for racing so I switched back to seq. It is much more fun to drive around in town and carving up mountain roads. And it still gives me enough power in the mid-high range to pull on high-hp V8s. I think full non-seq might yield some more power up, but only 10 hp at the most and there really isn't much proof to prove that.
#31
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Qball, that's the most I've ever heard. Not that I don't believe you, but do you have a dyno to back that up? It seems you're able to get more power than anyone else. 13 psi is very conservative. What have you done to that monster???
#36
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: chattanooga tn
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I planned on running the stock turbos rebuilt with a rebuilt motor 2 peice 2mm seals and a street port with a intake and a three inch downpipe of some make. does anyone have a sugestion for this settup? I am also planning to run 15 to 17 psi after intake and piggy-back savc-r is tuned! does anyone have a prediction on rwhp?
thanks joe,
thanks joe,
#37
Lives on the Forum
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Rebuilt stock turbos will melt at 15-17 psi. Ask Artguy.
BTW, you can't use an S-AFC to run higher boost. The stock ecu shuts things down after 10.7 psi (in the upper rpm range). Also, the S-AFC is much too crude to safely tune a car, especially when you are boosting that high. You will need a stand-alone ecu, since you will also need larger injectors to run that much boost.
BTW, you can't use an S-AFC to run higher boost. The stock ecu shuts things down after 10.7 psi (in the upper rpm range). Also, the S-AFC is much too crude to safely tune a car, especially when you are boosting that high. You will need a stand-alone ecu, since you will also need larger injectors to run that much boost.
#38
Hey, where did my $$$ go?
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bimingham, AL
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by boost-in-rx7s93
I planned on running the stock turbos rebuilt with a rebuilt motor 2 peice 2mm seals and a street port with a intake and a three inch downpipe of some make. does anyone have a sugestion for this settup? I am also planning to run 15 to 17 psi after intake and piggy-back savc-r is tuned! does anyone have a prediction on rwhp?
thanks joe,
I planned on running the stock turbos rebuilt with a rebuilt motor 2 peice 2mm seals and a street port with a intake and a three inch downpipe of some make. does anyone have a sugestion for this settup? I am also planning to run 15 to 17 psi after intake and piggy-back savc-r is tuned! does anyone have a prediction on rwhp?
thanks joe,
My prediction is 150rwhp cause its gonna be blown up with a piggy back. How about instead of cutting up your wire harness to splice in a piggy just get a Power FC. You and your engine will be MUCH MUCH happier with that.
Also, what all mods do you have, your going to need a lot of supporting mods to run 15-17 like fuel injectors, fuel pump, intercooler, full exhaust, computer, clutch, ect, ect. Your not going to be able to safely run more than 13 iwth just a intake and downpipe even with the computer, especially in the summer, cuase the stock IC just wont cool worth a damn.
STEPHEN
Last edited by SPOautos; 04-18-03 at 09:57 AM.
#39
WTB** Very Low Miles 94-95
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tejas
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yes yes
the stock ic is a piece of ****...its choking your entire system and two full lbs of pressure drop is unacceptable.
listen to spo and rynberg and the others.
dont waste your money on a piggy back junkpile....get the pfc.
j
listen to spo and rynberg and the others.
dont waste your money on a piggy back junkpile....get the pfc.
j
#40
WTB** Very Low Miles 94-95
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tejas
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
carter...thanks...i appreciate your springtime barb...it was actually 80 two days agon...but thirty again yesterday.
it should be perfect by the time i pick my car up. mmm
it should be perfect by the time i pick my car up. mmm
#41
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Artguy - nice set up !!!! Good power too! I have 336 whp with similar but stock motor and turbo's. I'm trying to attain 450whp with a twin set up. I started this thread and the search continues....
Just wanted to give you some props!
Just wanted to give you some props!
#42
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: chattanooga tn
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MY seven will be broken in for teh first 1500 miles (proberly) so I will be running stock uther than a full exhaust 3inch downpiep three inch pipe running to a nurspec exhaust. I do want to use the twins for now even if I can only run 15 psi. I would plan on getting a fuel pump, larger injecters ( all four????), have a duel friction center force clucth with about 1000 miles of casual driving. ( no racing) I would also get the larger intercooler this summer when I would up the boost! I have heard by more than one sole that piggy abcks will work fine for less than 17. roy jonhson ran his with a t-78 at 17 psi I beleive! ( eh has blown up a few sometime along the way however) In other words I would run the car slowly (breakin) till this summer with no mods other than street port and full exhasut (clucth) I know I would have to watch teh boost guage to make sure that I am not running over 10.7 psi fopr the car would boost higher due to dp and street port! THen come summer I would do a intake front mount efficient to 17 psi and a avc-r i beleive modified bosot controller has a programmable fuel curve. Go to www.apexi.com
, or www.rx7.com (catalog)! I will do more resurch with the information yall have provided! this is why I am posting with the big guys.
My original plans were to go single but the 17 year old budget could only ddo it in peices 6 months rather than montha dn a half so I decided to do it right witht the twins! more torque and still has good times.
thanks guys, joe
, or www.rx7.com (catalog)! I will do more resurch with the information yall have provided! this is why I am posting with the big guys.
My original plans were to go single but the 17 year old budget could only ddo it in peices 6 months rather than montha dn a half so I decided to do it right witht the twins! more torque and still has good times.
thanks guys, joe
#44
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
boost-in-rx7s93,
I may want to sell my Apex front mount intercooler. I started this thread with the intent on getting 450rwhp and I may need to go with a larger intercooler. This one is in almost new condition and has polished end tanks. I can take photos for you. Could you drop me an email at goblue993@yahoo.com and let me know what you might want to pay. Thanks.
I may want to sell my Apex front mount intercooler. I started this thread with the intent on getting 450rwhp and I may need to go with a larger intercooler. This one is in almost new condition and has polished end tanks. I can take photos for you. Could you drop me an email at goblue993@yahoo.com and let me know what you might want to pay. Thanks.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
immanuel__7
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
89
09-05-15 10:23 AM