3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Making 100% sure on wheels

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-01-22, 02:20 PM
  #26  
Urban Combat Vet

iTrader: (16)
 
Sgtblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mid-west
Posts: 12,030
Received 879 Likes on 619 Posts
Originally Posted by Bearicub;[url=tel:12528292
12528292]Then maybe I wont be able to get away from rolling the fenders. Oh well just another thing I need to do.
Not certain but you car appears to be lowered a little on those stock wheels. And I hesitate to contradict gracer7 but rolling isn’t necessarily mandated. Not great but this is the best pic I have handy…17x9 +48 (stock wheel off-set is +50) running 255/40 on adjustable height coilovers with no rolling and no rubbing. Just maybe not lowered as much or quite as ‘flush’ as some prefer. Your call…

The following users liked this post:
gracer7-rx7 (08-23-22)
Old 08-01-22, 02:24 PM
  #27  
Full Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Bearicub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: California
Posts: 60
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Sgtblue
Not certain but you car appears to be lowered a little on those stock wheels. And I hesitate to contradict gracer7 but rolling isn’t necessarily mandated. Not great but this is the best pic I have handy…17x9 + 48 running 255/40 on adjustable height coilovers with no rolling and no rubbing. Just maybe not lowered as much or quite as ‘flush’ as some prefer. Your call…

Those look great! I would just need to get some spacers and get longer studs. Great pic btw!
Old 08-01-22, 02:49 PM
  #28  
Urban Combat Vet

iTrader: (16)
 
Sgtblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mid-west
Posts: 12,030
Received 879 Likes on 619 Posts
My point is that in my experience if you can get close enough to stock off-set with your choice of wheel and still be satisfied with the look rolling isn’t needed. And I would try to avoid needing longer studs on the rear….it requires replacement of the split wheel bearing to get the old studs out. A guess is the new bearings would be about $130 ea.
The following users liked this post:
gracer7-rx7 (08-23-22)
Old 08-22-22, 08:37 PM
  #29  
Full Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Bearicub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: California
Posts: 60
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Update

And here’s where we are now =]

Thanks everyone for your help!
The following 3 users liked this post by Bearicub:
gracer7-rx7 (08-23-22), GtiKyle (08-22-22), Jesturr (08-22-22)
Old 08-22-22, 09:32 PM
  #30  
Uncle Rico

iTrader: (5)
 
GtiKyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Tacoma
Posts: 825
Received 428 Likes on 225 Posts
What are the specs of your wheels and tires? It looks good!
Old 08-23-22, 10:01 AM
  #31  
needs more track time

iTrader: (16)
 
gracer7-rx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bay Area CA
Posts: 9,209
Received 515 Likes on 353 Posts
Originally Posted by Sgtblue
And I hesitate to contradict gracer7 but rolling isn’t necessarily mandated. Not great but this is the best pic I have handy…17x9 +48 (stock wheel off-set is +50) running 255/40 on adjustable height coilovers with no rolling and no rubbing. Just maybe not lowered as much or quite as ‘flush’ as some prefer. Your call…
Lots of people have different experiences so you are very welcome to contradict. YMMV and all that.
The biggest issue for me was tight right turns into steep driveways like pulling into a gas station where the wheel was turned hard right and the suspension was compressing going up the driveway.
Also occasionally on big dips on back canyon roads driving probably faster than I should be for the mediocre road conditions.
The following users liked this post:
Sgtblue (08-23-22)
Old 08-23-22, 10:10 AM
  #32  
Urban Combat Vet

iTrader: (16)
 
Sgtblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mid-west
Posts: 12,030
Received 879 Likes on 619 Posts
^
And maybe the 3 extra (+) millimeters I have is just enough to be the difference maker. Otherwise we’re running the same wheel and tire.
Old 08-23-22, 10:52 AM
  #33  
needs more track time

iTrader: (16)
 
gracer7-rx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bay Area CA
Posts: 9,209
Received 515 Likes on 353 Posts
maybe. tire widths also vary by manufacturer too so a few variations to contend with...
Old 08-25-22, 04:08 PM
  #34  
Full Member
iTrader: (2)
 
zli944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: California
Posts: 210
Received 36 Likes on 24 Posts
17x9.5 +35 with 255 rt660s square
had some pretty bad rubbing in the front until the car was raised (not measured but to 2 finger widths-ish), camber was also set to -2.5 and -1.8. All the issues were in the front, rear was fine before and after height and camber changes.

This setup has less rubbing but on dips in side roads there is still rubbing. I also lightly rolled the very top of the fenders (between where the two screws go to hold the fender liner) since I bowed the metal out slightly doing exactly what gracer7 was describing, tight turns up driveways/stepped surfaces.
I think for track and street, this setup is fine but if you're a "touge monster", might need something else
Old 08-26-22, 11:17 AM
  #35  
Full Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Bearicub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: California
Posts: 60
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by GtiKyle
What are the specs of your wheels and tires? It looks good!
Sorry I took so long on this!

17x8 with 235/45 up front,
17x9 with 255/40 in the back

No rub at all =]
The following users liked this post:
MarcZ55 (08-28-22)




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:20 AM.