3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

"It's Back" 2016 RX7

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-17-14, 03:47 PM
  #76  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

iTrader: (19)
 
Natey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 4,455
Received 1,421 Likes on 735 Posts
Originally Posted by the internets
The Rolex 24 Hours of Daytona is the first race of the new TUDOR United SportsCar Championship, and the series has opened the door for a variety of alternative fuels and ideas in the Prototype class. One of the most written-about green race cars on the 24 Hours of Daytona entry list is the 2014 Mazda Prototype race car, operated by Speedsource and driven by the same four drivers who gave Mazda nine wins in the short-lived Grand Am GX class.

The Mazda Prototype racer will compete in the LMP2 class, and will utilize a production-based 2.2 liter turbodiesel engine making some 450 horsepower and 580 ft-lbs of torque. It’s worth noting that Mazda is the only diesel competitor thus far, despite the inherent advantages that come with the torque-heavy, fuel-efficient motors. With a 186 MPH top speed and an unwavering commitment to motorsports, I have high expectations for Mazda’s diesel race car this weekend, and all season in general.
Old 02-17-14, 04:01 PM
  #77  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

iTrader: (17)
 
neit_jnf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Around
Posts: 3,902
Received 183 Likes on 132 Posts
Mazda could make a flex fuel rotary and market it as a green alternative

more aggressive tuning for better performance running on ethanol but with flex capability for gasoline ethanol blends in any ratio.

don't rotaries run on anything? they could market it as multi fuel, gas/diesel/ethanol... NG? Propane?
Old 02-17-14, 04:05 PM
  #78  
Senior Member

 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 682
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by professor_speed
Mazda is out racing diesels not rotaries this will never happen. DX-7 perhaps?
I try to keep an open mind, but honestly diesels do not appeal to me. For a given power level, they will be heavier and more expensive and much lower-revving than a gasoline engine. They will get much better fuel mileage, though... But for a lightweight minimalist sports car, gasoline engines are a better overall solution IMO.

Before anybody goes on about how diesels won LeMans, you have to take into account that the rules were structured to ensure that they would.

Diesel = the ANTI-rotary!
Old 02-17-14, 04:18 PM
  #79  
Irregular Here

iTrader: (14)
 
7dust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alvin, TX
Posts: 3,075
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
No turbo = turd.

I ain't buyin.

As a matter of fact, anyone who buys one and logs onto RX7 Club gets trolled. Forever. New rule. I just made it up so its official.
Old 02-17-14, 05:37 PM
  #80  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
HiWire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,499
Received 211 Likes on 148 Posts
Originally Posted by ZDan
VX-7! That would be cool.... See my post #932 here
Yes, your post got me thinking. Obviously, Porsche thinks there is potential with the V4, too. The Subaru boxer-4 design might achieve similar design objectives, but a modern turbo V4 might make an even smaller, lighter package.


Originally Posted by neit_jnf
Don't rotaries run on anything? They could market it as multifuel, gas/diesel/ethanol... NG? Propane?
Mazda has been experimenting with the hydrogen rotary for a few years. I hope they are making good progress.

Mazda RX-8 Hydrogen RE - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hynor


I'm tired of the negativity and squabbling in the other thread... funny/sad because we mostly want the same thing in the end

Last edited by HiWire; 02-17-14 at 05:40 PM.
Old 02-17-14, 06:37 PM
  #81  
TT LS1 in the works

 
professor_speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: MN
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ZDan
I try to keep an open mind, but honestly diesels do not appeal to me. For a given power level, they will be heavier and more expensive and much lower-revving than a gasoline engine. They will get much better fuel mileage, though... But for a lightweight minimalist sports car, gasoline engines are a better overall solution IMO.

Before anybody goes on about how diesels won LeMans, you have to take into account that the rules were structured to ensure that they would.

Diesel = the ANTI-rotary!

Actually the diesel should be about the same weight as a rotary (maybe less) All aluminum, plastic valve cover and intake manifold, racing version goes one step further with a compacted graphite block, Id take the compound turbo 450hp,580ft/lbs 5200rpm Diesel over a rotary that that spins to 9000rpm makes 250hp an pathetic torque.
Old 02-17-14, 08:57 PM
  #82  
Cheap Bastard

iTrader: (2)
 
adam c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Posts: 8,370
Received 50 Likes on 42 Posts
I like the looks of the blue picture. Kinda like a small Camaro.
Old 02-18-14, 07:13 AM
  #83  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

iTrader: (17)
 
neit_jnf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Around
Posts: 3,902
Received 183 Likes on 132 Posts
hydrogen/propane/cng needs additional/different fuel tanks which add weight complexity and reduce interior space.

flex gasoline to e100 with appropriate tuning makes more sense with "green rotary" marketing
Old 02-18-14, 09:17 AM
  #84  
Senior Member

 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 682
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by professor_speed
Actually the diesel should be about the same weight as a rotary (maybe less) All aluminum, plastic valve cover and intake manifold, racing version goes one step further with a compacted graphite block, Id take the compound turbo 450hp,580ft/lbs 5200rpm Diesel over a rotary that that spins to 9000rpm makes 250hp an pathetic torque.
Same tech vs. same tech (if the diesel gets to use lightweight materials, so does the rotary), same power vs. same power, the rotary will almost certainly be lighter-weight and less expensive. Of course it will also consume a LOT more fuel and have a much shorter lifespan!

But still, at the 250 or at the 450hp level, I'd rather have a 9000+rpm rotary than a 5000rpm diesel in my sports car. For an over-the-road truck, diesel all the way!

Last edited by ZDan; 02-18-14 at 09:30 AM.
Old 02-18-14, 09:55 AM
  #85  
All out Track Freak!

iTrader: (263)
 
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Charlottesville VA 22901
Posts: 10,672
Received 412 Likes on 250 Posts
Originally Posted by ZDan
Same tech vs. same tech (if the diesel gets to use lightweight materials, so does the rotary), same power vs. same power, the rotary will almost certainly be lighter-weight and less expensive. Of course it will also consume a LOT more fuel and have a much shorter lifespan!

But still, at the 250 or at the 450hp level, I'd rather have a 9000+rpm rotary than a 5000rpm diesel in my sports car. For an over-the-road truck, diesel all the way!
A rotary engine is a must for anything called an RX...... but I just want a light weight sports car with 300 to 400 HP and I don't care what engine is in it or who makes the damn thing I just want some big auto company to make a light weight AFFORDABLE (under 75k) bare bones sports car.

The lotus isn't that car. In my opinion the Elise and Exige are way over priced. I'd rather build a kit car or buy something else.

If more and more companies continue to focus on weight and removing the BS and replacing it with track BS it could happen sooner rather than later

I wouldn't be surprised if Ford has another badass track only mustang in a couple of years.

As said before it's a wonderful time to be a car guy

Kia may design this one: Detroit Auto Show 2014: Is Kia Entering The Sports Car Market With The GT4 Stinger?
Old 02-18-14, 10:59 AM
  #86  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
HiWire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,499
Received 211 Likes on 148 Posts
I saw the new Mustang prototype at the car show... the 2015 Mustang is certainly a candidate, with its independent rear suspension and 3 engine choices. After it's stripped for the track, it should be competitive.

I hope the next version of the Camaro sheds some weight and bulk.

Last edited by HiWire; 02-18-14 at 11:18 AM.
Old 02-18-14, 02:12 PM
  #87  
cuz everyone's 99...

iTrader: (9)
 
00SPEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 544
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Fritz Flynn

As said before it's a wonderful time to be a car guy
says the dude with money
Old 02-18-14, 02:40 PM
  #88  
All out Track Freak!

iTrader: (263)
 
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Charlottesville VA 22901
Posts: 10,672
Received 412 Likes on 250 Posts
Originally Posted by 00SPEC
says the dude with money
I'm also OLD (49) and got it the old fashion way LOL
Old 02-18-14, 02:44 PM
  #89  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,805
Received 2,577 Likes on 1,831 Posts
Originally Posted by HiWire
I saw the new Mustang prototype at the car show... the 2015 Mustang is certainly a candidate, with its independent rear suspension and 3 engine choices. After it's stripped for the track, it should be competitive.
no need to build a racecar, ford sells a Grand Am legal car (full cage, special engine, suspension, and fuel tanks), its on page 2 of the motor sports catalog.
Old 02-18-14, 02:52 PM
  #90  
All out Track Freak!

iTrader: (263)
 
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Charlottesville VA 22901
Posts: 10,672
Received 412 Likes on 250 Posts
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
no need to build a racecar, ford sells a Grand Am legal car (full cage, special engine, suspension, and fuel tanks), its on page 2 of the motor sports catalog.
Yep and hopefully they will keep it going with the new model

Dodge also does this with the viper and of course Porsche, fingers crossed on chevy jumping aboard with the c7
Old 02-18-14, 03:19 PM
  #91  
SEMI-PRO

iTrader: (2)
 
ZoomZoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,865
Received 36 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
no need to build a racecar, ford sells a Grand Am legal car (full cage, special engine, suspension, and fuel tanks), its on page 2 of the motor sports catalog.
What is also cool about Ford is they sell a complete chassis for some of the 60's model Mustangs so you can basically keep rolling those new out of a garage somewhere for as long as they keep doing it.

I might buy a new FD chassis to throw my swap into over the 20 year old cars we are left with.
If Mazda won't build a better Sports car at least let me.
Old 02-19-14, 06:20 AM
  #92  
Mission Impossible

iTrader: (3)
 
ALPSTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Istanbul / Sydney
Posts: 1,353
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Read this:
I Just Don't Even Believe Reports About A New Mazda RX-7 Anymore

On top of this the automotive industry has gone in different direction. I think Mazda can build another RX7; it's as easy as putting a gutless but environmentally friendly rotary engine in and sticking an RX7 emblem on one of their upcoming coupes. However making it as legendary and as competitive as the old ones is almost impossible in today's standards and in Mazda's current financial situation. Maybe if they decided to take on the Lexus approach (read: LF-A) and make no money on each car they sold...
Old 02-19-14, 09:40 AM
  #93  
All out Track Freak!

iTrader: (263)
 
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Charlottesville VA 22901
Posts: 10,672
Received 412 Likes on 250 Posts
Originally Posted by ALPSTA
Read this:
I Just Don't Even Believe Reports About A New Mazda RX-7 Anymore

On top of this the automotive industry has gone in different direction. I think Mazda can build another RX7; it's as easy as putting a gutless but environmentally friendly rotary engine in and sticking an RX7 emblem on one of their upcoming coupes. However making it as legendary and as competitive as the old ones is almost impossible in today's standards and in Mazda's current financial situation. Maybe if they decided to take on the Lexus approach (read: LF-A) and make no money on each car they sold...
Yep he is preaching to the choir
Old 02-19-14, 09:50 AM
  #94  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
HiWire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,499
Received 211 Likes on 148 Posts
I have no problem with the rumor mill. If Mazda executives want to publicly speculate about their ongoing rotary R&D project, that is fine. I don't really care when Mazda releases their next RX-7, if ever, but if they do, it better be good. Driving enthusiasts aren't going to be suckered into buying another RX-8 again.

The power guys are right – you can't fool yourself into thinking you've got a performance car when minivans and mid-range sedans are beating you off the line every time.
Old 02-19-14, 10:01 AM
  #95  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (5)
 
Tem120's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Miami
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by HiWire
I have no problem with the rumor mill. If Mazda executives want to publicly speculate about their ongoing rotary R&D project, that is fine. I don't really care when Mazda releases their next RX-7, if ever, but if they do, it better be good. Driving enthusiasts aren't going to be suckered into buying another RX-8 again.

The power guys are right – you can't fool yourself into thinking you've got a performance car when minivans and mid-range sedans are beating you off the line every time.
I know this is bad and Sad .. But One of the reasons I went the way of the FD , when i had my miata was this .. I was at a light . and this pontiac G6 was next to me i needed to get on the lane they were in so I figured ok I'll just cut them off!! like an arss hole in a sports car ! (normally I'm not THAT guy ) and well after the light was green the G6 didnt want to let me in .. and well that pontiac G6 beat my miata pretty hard off the line . being driven by 2 middle aged women hah. It was embarrassing
Old 02-19-14, 10:55 AM
  #96  
Senior Member

 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 682
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
250hp and 2600 lb. => 105mph in the quarter. Not exactly minivan territory...

I'm all for a 350-450hp variant, but IMO there should be a reasonably-priced base version.

If acceleration performance from a stoplight is critically important, there are plenty of cars on the market that do that well. What the market lacks is small, simple, reasonably-priced, reasonably-lightweight sports cars.

The best sports cars to me have never been about 0-60, 1/4-mile, or stoplight drags. Do you think the typical 1st/2nd-gen NA RX-7 owner gave a rat's **** that a contemporary Corvette would kill it in a straight line?

Keep it small, keep it simple, keep it light. Then add turbo(s) and/or rotor(s)...
Old 02-19-14, 11:04 AM
  #97  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

iTrader: (17)
 
neit_jnf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Around
Posts: 3,902
Received 183 Likes on 132 Posts
Originally Posted by HiWire
Driving enthusiasts aren't going to be suckered into buying another RX-8 again.
Why so much hate for the 8? Because it doesn't do 12 or 13's in the quarter? It handles great, won many comparos and accolades from magazines and has always been praised as one of the best balance and handling cars since it came out. And while a lot of you guys criticize it, the Renesis is the most powerful NA rotary ever in production while meeting emissions (up to 2011) and it is so smooth.

The R3 got renewed praise and was named one of the best handling cars under $100k by C&D beating some serious cars.

http://www.caranddriver.com/comparis...rx-8-r3-page-6

I've driven it several times and I love it, the only reason I don't own one is for the same reason I drive a 250k miles 2000 protege... can't afford it yet. I will get one eventually, even if there's a new 7 out there. Hopefully by then I can afford both.
Old 02-19-14, 12:32 PM
  #98  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
HiWire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,499
Received 211 Likes on 148 Posts
I actually like the RX-8. But it's a camel car – if they had made it as a 2-door, 2-seater, with the attendant rigidity and weight reduction advantages, it would have made a better sports car with more attractive proportions and better performance.

Faced with a choice between an FD or an RX-8, I didn't hesitate for a moment to buy my FD.

The RX-8 is not 2,600 lbs.
Old 02-19-14, 12:38 PM
  #99  
Senior Member

 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 682
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I would have bought an RX-8 instead of my S2000 if the fuel mileage weren't so horrendous. I was commuting 70-100 miles/day at the time...
Old 02-19-14, 12:59 PM
  #100  
Senior Member

iTrader: (2)
 
getgone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 331
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
I'm not dissing anyone's desires, but you are not going to get 350 hp to the asphalt in a 2700-2800 pound car. And a manufacturer would be insane to put that in the hands of the average motorist. I think 300 hp in a 2700 pound car is the outside with some form of launch control, and Mazda could build that if the economics ever made sense.


Quick Reply: "It's Back" 2016 RX7



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:17 PM.