3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

How well do you all think the FDs are compared to today's cars

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-03-10, 11:10 AM
  #26  
Senior Member

iTrader: (9)
 
serbRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: ny
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i am absolutely obsessed with my FD....its a head turner where ever you go...and its still one of the best handling cars in the world...

as far as interior goes i love it just what you need simple and tasteful.... i got one of the best preserved ones i still didn't come across another FD with as good interior as mine...i actually hate the interiors on the newer modern cars it all that plastic and colors i hate it...

they look like they were designed by gypsy space robots tripping on LSD....from the future..

rx7 is definitely drivers car...
Old 11-03-10, 11:22 AM
  #27  
REVIT

 
REVIT93RX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Sports Cars

I for one cannot find a new car today that meets this criteria:

1. 2 seat rear drive
2. Manual trans
3. Less than 3000 lbs
4. Great looks
5. Handles like a dream
6. Less than 40k US dollars

So, I took my 17 year old car and rebuilt it from the ground up. Worth every penny I spent when sitting behind the wheel.
Old 11-03-10, 12:27 PM
  #28  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by REVIT93RX7
I for one cannot find a new car today that meets this criteria:

1. 2 seat rear drive
2. Manual trans
3. Less than 3000 lbs
4. Great looks
5. Handles like a dream
6. Less than 40k US dollars

So, I took my 17 year old car and rebuilt it from the ground up. Worth every penny I spent when sitting behind the wheel.
Keep in mind that in the early 90's, the FD3S was considered a fairly expensive car for it's time. You can find original price stickers of almost 40k for a Touring model at that time. Supra's were a little more expensive, Corvettes were in that range, Porsches were already pretty high. That would be probably around $70k if it were a new car today. You will always get more for your money buying used. Even more, the older you get but you begin to miss out on other things in doing so (like warranties , new technology, etc).

However, your 6 pieces of criteria could have been satisfied with a Solstice GXP with the SCCA approved suspension package. May not end up as fast as a modified FD, but that wasn't one of your 6 requirements.
Old 11-03-10, 02:06 PM
  #29  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by gmonsen
mahjik... I have been thinking about taking a Solstice and swapping in a decent engine and getting the SCCA kit, etc... They are probably the nicest little platform around and I love the body design. What do they weigh?

I would love to put a little BMW straight six in there. I know there's somebody that has been offering a strong LSX swap at some astronomical price, but I think a strong six might be the better motor for the car.

Gordon
From what I understand, they are in the 2800lb range all stock. To be honest, with a little lightening, I don't know that I would bother with an engine swap. The GXP puts it about 260 hp. Lighten it a little and you have a fairly peppy car. Granted, it won't be an Exige S, but not too bad for the money. The Solstice has been doing extremely well in several classes in SCCA since it's introduction. It's a nice little all around car. I've toyed with the idea of buying one for the summer and then selling it in the fall.
Old 11-03-10, 03:07 PM
  #30  
Junior Member

 
serial's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: King of Prussia, PA
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the FD will hold true and not look "dated" for quite some time. Between the weight, power, very low center of gravity, it's of the nicer side of the spectrum by far. If Mazda were to re-release this car, new, they could leave the body alone. The interior would only need minor tweaks, such as navigation and satellite, to be top rated. I like the interior's styling a lot. A modernized engine such as the RX-8's would go a long way as well. I can't think of a single car from that era that wouldn't need a total re-vamp to be re-released in 2012. The FD RX-7's flaws in modern society are minimal and trivial at best, so I'd say for sure it's withstood the test of time.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rotor_veux
Build Threads
46
06-12-18 10:39 AM
thatfbtho
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
13
08-29-15 10:51 AM
gtcd
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
30
08-19-15 02:44 AM
86glxNA
New Member RX-7 Technical
3
08-15-15 01:45 PM



Quick Reply: How well do you all think the FDs are compared to today's cars



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:05 PM.