how to generate more down force up front?
#1
DRIVE THE ROTARY SPORTS
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CA (Bay Area)
Posts: 4,150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
how to generate more down force up front?
well, rear downforce is easy... just buy a big *** ricer wing and you can have all the downforce you want in the back. add to that a diffuser under the gastank (some say its worth it some say not) to smooth out flow under the rear of the car and thats about all you can do... short of engineering some sort of venturie tunnels to SUCK the car down.
anyway, downforce in the back is easier to obtain... but the problem is when you add a huge stupid ricer wing to the back, you make the front end lighter, making the situation up front even worse than with no spoiler at all. so considering we can easily add basically however much D.F. to the rear.... how can we plant the front better at high speeds?
ill throw out 2 things to start:
1) smoothing out flow under the front of the car (which damian has been exploring recently with some coustom underbody pannels)
2) the addition of the '99 front lip (or equivalant sort of splitter)... it does have a good pitch to it, but im not sure how much downforce it actually generates... i believe the main benefit of the lip is to evacuate some air to the sides of the car where the little "side flares" are.
basically the purpose of this thread is to talk about and explore new/old methods for generating downforce in the front of the car(with an emphasis on minimized additional resistance, although that IS one of the big tradeoffs to downforce).... so... lets talk. -heath
anyway, downforce in the back is easier to obtain... but the problem is when you add a huge stupid ricer wing to the back, you make the front end lighter, making the situation up front even worse than with no spoiler at all. so considering we can easily add basically however much D.F. to the rear.... how can we plant the front better at high speeds?
ill throw out 2 things to start:
1) smoothing out flow under the front of the car (which damian has been exploring recently with some coustom underbody pannels)
2) the addition of the '99 front lip (or equivalant sort of splitter)... it does have a good pitch to it, but im not sure how much downforce it actually generates... i believe the main benefit of the lip is to evacuate some air to the sides of the car where the little "side flares" are.
basically the purpose of this thread is to talk about and explore new/old methods for generating downforce in the front of the car(with an emphasis on minimized additional resistance, although that IS one of the big tradeoffs to downforce).... so... lets talk. -heath
#2
The Laser Man
Lowering the car will help from negative pressure building up under the car.... we can imagine the car being like an airplane wing... Downforce for the front end... I guess building a wider body will help dramatically.... more surface area...more pressure builds on top of the car. my 2 cents.
Trending Topics
#10
DRIVE THE ROTARY SPORTS
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CA (Bay Area)
Posts: 4,150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i know... but its kind of a shot in the dark without propper testing. im not opposed, BUT (especially when it comes to stability at insanely high speeds) im a bit worried to add un-tested stuff that could upset the front and possibly lead to a high speed disaster. not saying that i wouldnt try out things, just that id like a way to measure WHAT effect its having on the car before i take it even faster. i have an old beat up bumper assembaly that i wouldnt mind swapping onto my running FD if i could have a way to measure effects of different alterations to it... well i guess there is always seat of the pants measuring as well.
another question: as far as air vents such as on the elise, gt-40, and various other cars... are they just used for cooling, or does the internal angle of the outlet add any downforce??
another question: as far as air vents such as on the elise, gt-40, and various other cars... are they just used for cooling, or does the internal angle of the outlet add any downforce??
Last edited by RotorMotor; 11-02-04 at 03:16 PM.
#13
Do It! Do It!
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Crofton, MD
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just search google and you'll find some universal ones.
( http://shop.store.yahoo.com/sgpracin.../caficaun.html )
I might just be tempted to try and fab some on my own, I need a new project anyway.
( http://shop.store.yahoo.com/sgpracin.../caficaun.html )
I might just be tempted to try and fab some on my own, I need a new project anyway.
Last edited by jsplit; 11-02-04 at 03:18 PM.
#14
Forever Modified
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: WA
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would think ducted hoods (like the scoot hood) and also, channeled mirrors like ones on re-amemiya vehicles would also contribute to downforce. Since the air that flows through the ducts would help stabalize the vehicle.
#15
Senior Member
#17
Insane Burnout
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Pleasanton, CA
Posts: 1,568
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I saw this on JT imports.
FEED Original bumper fin set
so for those of you with the 99 spec front end, you can get cannards to aid in front end downforce.
Now if only someone fabricated some for the 93-95 front end. Any takers? Damian?
FEED Original bumper fin set
so for those of you with the 99 spec front end, you can get cannards to aid in front end downforce.
Now if only someone fabricated some for the 93-95 front end. Any takers? Damian?
#18
Lives on the Forum
Originally Posted by RotorMotor
another question: as far as air vents such as on the elise, gt-40, and various other cars... are they just used for cooling, or does the internal angle of the outlet add any downforce??
Ride height in and of itself doesn't contribute downforce. Rake contributes downforce.
#19
but nothing beats some high speed dynamic testing. remember the benz race cars flying off the track? you would think those guys would have a handle on things but **** happens
#20
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York, N.Y.
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Take a look at the Nov. issue of Racecar Engineering (it's a Brittish mag.). There is an article on just this subject (front end downforce). Oct issue delt with air dams, this one is on splitters.
#21
kill it with BOOMSTICK!
Originally Posted by R. Gambino
Take a look at the Nov. issue of Racecar Engineering (it's a Brittish mag.). There is an article on just this subject (front end downforce). Oct issue delt with air dams, this one is on splitters.
Why not go world of outlaw's style and put one of those tuner wings in the front of the car to?
#22
What about the ducts on the front of the Porsche GT2 bumper? Those would be pretty easy to replicate with a duct coming off the back of a FMIC/SMIC and just pull the duct upwards. Might have to duct it into a vented hood like the KS or MazdaSpeed....just a thought
http://hk.geocities.com/forte_lsm/im...orsche/GT2.jpg
http://hk.geocities.com/forte_lsm/im...orsche/GT2.jpg
Last edited by teamstealth; 11-02-04 at 06:55 PM.
#23
How does the Mazdaspeed GT-C front bumper measure up for downforce? I know it's good for increased airflow into the engine bay, but is the (rather aggressive) lip on the bottom effective?
#24
DRIVE THE ROTARY SPORTS
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CA (Bay Area)
Posts: 4,150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DamonB
Yes to both. The air that enters the inlet is ducted through the cooler(s) and when sent down a properly designed exit duct can be used to generate downforce on the front as well. This is at the expense of sending heated air over the car which tends to effect things in the rear. This is why nearly every clean sheet of paper racecar uses hip radiators and carefully controls where the warmed air is routed.
Ride height in and of itself doesn't contribute downforce. Rake contributes downforce.
Ride height in and of itself doesn't contribute downforce. Rake contributes downforce.
#25
^ a little less complicated version of that idea
What about the people that have a V mount setup....They could take damian's new underbelly tray, cut a duct in on the bottom with a very small lip to catch air from underneath the car, and force it upwards through the radiator. Then build a short splitter from the bumper inlet to seal off the top of the radiator and the bottom of the IC, then build a duct from the top of the IC up through the vented hood. That way you'll have two sealed, ducted inlets (bottom of car through the rad/ic, and one from the front going over the face of the rad and up through the ic)
What about the people that have a V mount setup....They could take damian's new underbelly tray, cut a duct in on the bottom with a very small lip to catch air from underneath the car, and force it upwards through the radiator. Then build a short splitter from the bumper inlet to seal off the top of the radiator and the bottom of the IC, then build a duct from the top of the IC up through the vented hood. That way you'll have two sealed, ducted inlets (bottom of car through the rad/ic, and one from the front going over the face of the rad and up through the ic)