3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

HKS DP installed…

Old Oct 31, 2005 | 08:41 AM
  #1  
tphan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 886
Likes: 1
From: Dallas, Texas
Smile HKS DP installed…

Again, thanks for the abundant information available on this board, couldn’t have done the install without it.

Anyway, the pipe is on, test drove the car last night, everything seem to be good. So far I don’t notice any difference in sound…but the car seem to be a bit faster.

IMO leaving the studs on simplified the installation. HKS dp was well made which also help. Using stock hardware was fine too. Use plenty of WD40, Liquid Wrench, etc…overall the whole process was smooth without any major road block.

One important tip, allow yourself plenty of time…take a walk/come back later if something stuck.

Beside Apexi intakes, downpipe, next mod is a Racing Beat dual tip cat back…from the search I think the stock ECU will be ok. Don’t have a boost gauge yet but will get one probably before the catback installation. Will the car be ok with stock ecu with those mods?

TIA
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2005 | 08:53 AM
  #2  
Sweet7's Avatar
Anti-EMO!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
From: Hillbilly, Colorado
Get a boost gauge ASAP. Its a must whether you are bone stock or single-turbo. You'll fine fine on the stock ECU with those mods. It usually only when you are running full-exhaust(aka including midpipe) and intake that you start to see some boost spike.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2005 | 08:53 AM
  #3  
DaleClark's Avatar
RX-7 Bad Ass
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,622
Likes: 2,725
From: Pensacola, FL
Might need to look into a boost controller. With a cat-back and downpipe I had spiking at transition - boost controller solved that pronto. With an intake you'll likely have more of a problem.

Glad the downpipe went on well - I've installed 2 HKS downpipes, and the fit is GREAT on those.

Dale
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2005 | 08:53 AM
  #4  
DaveW's Avatar
Racecar - Formula 2000
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,034
Likes: 370
From: Bath, OH
Definitely get a boost gauge before you install the CB. You should be OK with the stock ECU AS LONG AS YOU KEEP THE BOOST BELOW ~10 PSI.

You may need to increase the WG pill size, or even install a boost controller (electronic or ball-spring-type manual controllers work better than needle-valve types) to keep the boost at this level.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2005 | 10:26 AM
  #5  
superfastrx7's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: Columbia,SC
Did you get your downpipe coated or wrapped? Just wondering. I am getting and HKS pipe and thinking about just dropping it in. What's the benefit of a cat back? How much louder would it be with it? Thanks.

Glad to know the installation was pretty much straight forward.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2005 | 10:40 AM
  #6  
DaveW's Avatar
Racecar - Formula 2000
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,034
Likes: 370
From: Bath, OH
Originally Posted by superfastrx7
Did you get your downpipe coated or wrapped? Just wondering. I am getting and HKS pipe and thinking about just dropping it in. What's the benefit of a cat back? How much louder would it be with it? Thanks.

Glad to know the installation was pretty much straight forward.
I got my (bought used) HKS DP Jet-Hot 2000 coated (inside & out) to insulate it and to prevent corrosion.

IIRC, a CB should be worth ~10HP. Noise level depends on the type - they vary quite a bit.

Last edited by DaveW; Oct 31, 2005 at 10:46 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2005 | 11:29 AM
  #7  
tphan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 886
Likes: 1
From: Dallas, Texas
Originally Posted by superfastrx7
Did you get your downpipe coated or wrapped? Just wondering. I am getting and HKS pipe and thinking about just dropping it in. What's the benefit of a cat back? How much louder would it be with it? Thanks.

Glad to know the installation was pretty much straight forward.
I was thinking about have it coated but back out...spent 8 bucks on a can of high heat...like Rynberg said...don't bother...it all burnt up in first 5 minutes.

There are some other good dp out there but I am very happy with the HKS.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2005 | 12:30 PM
  #8  
dgeesaman's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 12,313
Likes: 27
From: Hershey PA
Originally Posted by tphan
Beside Apexi intakes, downpipe, next mod is a Racing Beat dual tip cat back…from the search I think the stock ECU will be ok. Don’t have a boost gauge yet but will get one probably before the catback installation. Will the car be ok with stock ecu with those mods?

TIA
It will be close. I suggest you put on the boost gauge and monitor the boost before/after.

You might want to drill out the boost pills a touch or go MBC like DaveW said.

Dave
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2005 | 02:16 PM
  #9  
live4boost's Avatar
AKA ShepFC3
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake City, UT
I just installed a DP on my FD also. I already had intakes and a greddy catback. After I put the DP on my boost would spike to about 14 psi. So I had to go back to the stock catback to try to tame the boost creep. I still hit close to 14psi with the stock catback though. Ideally I would like to just port the wastegates, but I'm hoping there is an easier solution.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2005 | 02:45 PM
  #10  
DaveW's Avatar
Racecar - Formula 2000
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,034
Likes: 370
From: Bath, OH
Quote:
"I just installed a DP on my FD also. I already had intakes and a greddy catback. After I put the DP on my boost would spike to about 14 psi. So I had to go back to the stock catback to try to tame the boost creep. I still hit close to 14psi with the stock catback though. Ideally I would like to just port the wastegates, but I'm hoping there is an easier solution."

Porting the WG is not what you need. You need a boost controller (electronic or ball-spring MBC). With your mods, the stock WG is adequate.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2005 | 03:10 PM
  #11  
RX 4 Speed's Avatar
1993 VR FD Touring
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by DaveW
Definitely get a boost gauge before you install the CB. You should be OK with the stock ECU AS LONG AS YOU KEEP THE BOOST BELOW ~10 PSI.

You may need to increase the WG pill size, or even install a boost controller (electronic or ball-spring-type manual controllers work better than needle-valve types) to keep the boost at this level.
quick question for you guys... I was speaking to a tech at RX7.com. I was looking into a boost controller too. Since I have the same mods, except no intake. His comment was, if you wanted to control boost, you're better off getting a PFC or ECU upgrade, versus getting an electronic/manual boost controller. Is this true? According to him, boost controllers are good for increasing boost, not reducing boost... as in, for example, if someone is running 13 psi on stock ecu, he can't reduce to 10 psi using a mbc or ebc. I was like... I would think you could control or reduce boost to 10 psi by installing an ebc/mbc... Weird...
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2005 | 04:56 PM
  #12  
live4boost's Avatar
AKA ShepFC3
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake City, UT
Originally Posted by DaveW
Quote:
"I just installed a DP on my FD also. I already had intakes and a greddy catback. After I put the DP on my boost would spike to about 14 psi. So I had to go back to the stock catback to try to tame the boost creep. I still hit close to 14psi with the stock catback though. Ideally I would like to just port the wastegates, but I'm hoping there is an easier solution."

Porting the WG is not what you need. You need a boost controller (electronic or ball-spring MBC). With your mods, the stock WG is adequate.
From my understanding, boost creep is caused from you outflowing your wastegate. All that a boost controller does is increase your boost by reducing the amount of airflow to the wategate, thus it venting off less boost. This is mainly speaking from an FC perspective, so is there something different with the twins?
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2005 | 05:48 PM
  #13  
DaveW's Avatar
Racecar - Formula 2000
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,034
Likes: 370
From: Bath, OH
Originally Posted by live4boost
From my understanding, boost creep is caused from you outflowing your wastegate. All that a boost controller does is increase your boost by reducing the amount of airflow to the wategate, thus it venting off less boost. This is mainly speaking from an FC perspective, so is there something different with the twins?
With your mods, the WG should be able to handle the flow. The stock system uses the boost pills balanced against duty-controlled solenoids controlled by the ECU (the stock ECU does not use the actual boost pressure to control boost, it just uses an open loop map, which is not accurate with flow mods) to regulate the pressure seen by the WG and PC actuators.

An electronic or ball/spring manual boost controller makes boost control independent of the stock ECU, and therefore, much better controlled. You can use this controller to raise, maintain stock levels, or reduce boost below stock.

I use two ball/spring MBC's, one for the PC, and one for the WG. My mods are in my signature.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2005 | 08:37 PM
  #14  
Ripzta's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
These HKS dumpys are made for RHD FD3S. The US aftermarket 3" dumpys will actually flow better and make more HP because it doesn't have that kink for clearing the steering column on RHD. IMO US FDs will make more HP w/ stock twins.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2005 | 11:31 PM
  #15  
IRPerformance's Avatar
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 11,347
Likes: 321
From: NJ
DO NOT throw a catback on there before you address the ecu issue. Eventually you will blow up.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 02:03 AM
  #16  
DaiOni's Avatar
Wankler
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,565
Likes: 2
From: Kobe, Japan
with hks dp and catback (HKS sp) I got 14.7psi (spiking, but usually 14psi peaks).

Better to be careful, than stupid/sorry.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 10:52 AM
  #17  
live4boost's Avatar
AKA ShepFC3
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake City, UT
Originally Posted by DaveW
With your mods, the WG should be able to handle the flow. The stock system uses the boost pills balanced against duty-controlled solenoids controlled by the ECU (the stock ECU does not use the actual boost pressure to control boost, it just uses an open loop map, which is not accurate with flow mods) to regulate the pressure seen by the WG and PC actuators.

An electronic or ball/spring manual boost controller makes boost control independent of the stock ECU, and therefore, much better controlled. You can use this controller to raise, maintain stock levels, or reduce boost below stock.

I use two ball/spring MBC's, one for the PC, and one for the WG. My mods are in my signature.
Thanks for the info DaveW, that is very helpful. I have owned many FC's but this is the first FD. Do you have a diagram of your setup? Also what is the benefit of running one boost controller to the PC and one to the wastegate actuator? Are both needed, or just the wastegate actuator? I have made a pretty nice ball and spring MBC, so I will give that a try. So I'm guessing you also eliminated the pills also right?
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 11:18 AM
  #18  
DaveW's Avatar
Racecar - Formula 2000
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,034
Likes: 370
From: Bath, OH
Originally Posted by live4boost
1. Do you have a diagram of your setup?
2. Also what is the benefit of running one boost controller to the PC and one to the wastegate actuator? Are both needed, or just the wastegate actuator?
3. So I'm guessing you also eliminated the pills also right?
1. I don't have a diagram, but it's pretty simple:
a. The ball/spring MBC's go in the lines that had the pills originally.
b. The MBC inlets are fed by the two 6-mm lines coming from the turbo exit to the IC, and the controlled-pressure lines go to the PC and WG actuators.
c. The rubber tube from each actuator to its solenoid is plugged near the actuator (I used a "pill" with no hole stuffed into each rubber tube).

2. The advantage of running 2 MBC's is that you use one to control the primary boost level via the PC actuator. This, for me, eliminated any spiking and allowed me to dial in exactly what I wanted for primary boost (11 psi). The second one controls the WG (set at 10 psi).

3. The pills are no longer needed.

See this thread: https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.p...ost+controller

Last edited by DaveW; Nov 1, 2005 at 11:37 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 05:08 PM
  #19  
Retserof's Avatar
Original Owner
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 558
Likes: 87
From: America's Dairyland
I got boost spikes with just a Pettit downpipe. The post-transition spike was big enough that in cold weather (40F) I would hit the overboost fuel cut around 5,500- 6,000 rpm during 3rd gear runs.

I replaced the wastegate actuator pill with larger and larger Holley jets until I got it under control with a .072 " jet. Then I installed a Racing Beat twin tip catback and tested the car to see if it made any difference. I think I'll be OK without further changes in the pill diameter, but I'm not real happy with the initial spike on the primary turbo, so I may try a different pill size in the other actuator line.

Get an accurate boost gauge next and take it easy until you do something to limit those spikes.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gabescanlon
Interior / Exterior / Audio
1
Aug 11, 2015 05:59 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:54 AM.