3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

GREDDY TYPE S BOV..nippples

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-06, 12:49 AM
  #1  
xx-Team-xx

Thread Starter
 
JDawG707's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fairfield, CA
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GREDDY TYPE S BOV..nippples

Just wondering if the sound will differ with the 2 nipple's. Has anyone tried to do the bottom nipple? my friend has it on his 240 and it flutters with the bottom nipple, and mine is on the top nipple and it sounds like 1 big Squeky Pshh..Comment of experience plz...dont want to try it myself until i get a okay.
Old 05-29-06, 08:28 AM
  #2  
xx-Team-xx

Thread Starter
 
JDawG707's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fairfield, CA
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bump^^
Old 05-29-06, 09:45 AM
  #3  
RX-7 Bad Ass

iTrader: (55)
 
DaleClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 15,399
Received 2,438 Likes on 1,509 Posts
Your buddy is an idiot . The bottom nipple goes under the BOV's diaphragm, the top nipple goes to the top of the diaphragm. When you let off the gas, if you have vacuum going to the top nipple and boost pressure pushing against the BOV's valve, the BOV will release and do it's job. If you have vacuum to the bottom nipple, it will HOLD IT CLOSED, and you'll get compressor surge - that's the keen noise your buddy is hearing. Compressor surge damages turbos and slows turbo response down.

The reason for the bottom nipple is twofold. First, you can use it as a pop-off valve, which is a dumb idea and gets pretty advanced. The second is to add a pre-throttle body boost source, which helps in very large boost applications.

Regardless, ignore the bottom nipple. Hook it up to the top one and be done with it.

Dale
Old 05-29-06, 09:50 AM
  #4  
Rotor Nut.

iTrader: (34)
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: RI
Posts: 2,163
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
dale have you ever tested the type s as a pop off valve? if so how was the outcome, i have an extra one, maybe ill use it for safety like this.
Old 05-29-06, 09:54 AM
  #5  
RX-7 Bad Ass

iTrader: (55)
 
DaleClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 15,399
Received 2,438 Likes on 1,509 Posts
Popoff valves are really a bad idea. When they open, you let the turbo spin itself up VERY high as it's unloaded, and it's really hard on the turbo. A proper boost control system is far better than a pop-off valve, IMHO.

Dale
Old 05-29-06, 10:33 AM
  #6  
xx-Team-xx

Thread Starter
 
JDawG707's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fairfield, CA
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaleClark
Your buddy is an idiot . The bottom nipple goes under the BOV's diaphragm, the top nipple goes to the top of the diaphragm. When you let off the gas, if you have vacuum going to the top nipple and boost pressure pushing against the BOV's valve, the BOV will release and do it's job. If you have vacuum to the bottom nipple, it will HOLD IT CLOSED, and you'll get compressor surge - that's the keen noise your buddy is hearing. Compressor surge damages turbos and slows turbo response down.

The reason for the bottom nipple is twofold. First, you can use it as a pop-off valve, which is a dumb idea and gets pretty advanced. The second is to add a pre-throttle body boost source, which helps in very large boost applications.

Regardless, ignore the bottom nipple. Hook it up to the top one and be done with it.

Dale
THANKS! alot now i can make fun of him...




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:22 PM.