3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Full Non-Sequential with 99 spec RZ twins?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 11:37 AM
  #26  
DMoneyRX-7's Avatar
Derek
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,011
Likes: 4
From: Treasure Coast, FL
If i was you i would do it, non sequential w/ 99 spec. They put out more boost equaling more hp. With help of bolt ons and a pfc im pretty sure you would get alot less lag. I have a non sequential and going to do just that. Later once my turbos start going out i will put in 99 spec's or BNR's.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 11:54 AM
  #27  
saxyman990's Avatar
Place your ad here...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,336
Likes: 2
From: Dayton, OH
Well, I'm truely sorry that you feel that way, but you are honestly reading way too much into this. First, I never stated that upgraded solenoids were a new idea created by me (I first started looking into them about 2 yrs ago, and there were a few others that had done so long before me). I never sidestepped any question. You asked where you can buy them, and I told you from me. Although there are several companies that offer off-the-shelf solenoids (and I'm sure you can find some that are very similar to the ones I use), the operators that I use are built to my specifications. I gained distributor status because I could get all the components at a much cheaper price (which includes decreasing taxes somewhat) and supply them to FD owners at a LOWER price then they could get on their own. As I stated before, I increased the price only enough to help defer other misc costs. I made basically nothing on the sale of these (and that is the cold-hard truth). Shoot, I got tons of e-mails from individuals asking for help and recommendations. For various reasons, I recommended to many of them that they just keep their stock solenoids (for an example, just look at post number 18 in this thread where I recommended to herblenny to just use his stock solenoids. If I was only interested in making money on these, then I would have fought my hardest to take him in as a customer).

I make plenty of money in my other jobs, that I have no desire/need to try to make a small profit off of something like this. If you think that my primary motives were founded on nothing but a desire to make a buck, then you obviously don't know me very well.

Good luck,
-Rob
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 01:08 PM
  #28  
HDP's Avatar
HDP
Thread Starter
A Fistfull of Dollars!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,322
Likes: 6
From: HuntsVEGAS, AL
Originally Posted by saxyman990
Well, I'm truely sorry that you feel that way, but you are honestly reading way too much into this. First, I never stated that upgraded solenoids were a new idea created by me (I first started looking into them about 2 yrs ago, and there were a few others that had done so long before me). I never sidestepped any question. You asked where you can buy them, and I told you from me. Although there are several companies that offer off-the-shelf solenoids (and I'm sure you can find some that are very similar to the ones I use), the operators that I use are built to my specifications. I gained distributor status because I could get all the components at a much cheaper price (which includes decreasing taxes somewhat) and supply them to FD owners at a LOWER price then they could get on their own. As I stated before, I increased the price only enough to help defer other misc costs. I made basically nothing on the sale of these (and that is the cold-hard truth). Shoot, I got tons of e-mails from individuals asking for help and recommendations. For various reasons, I recommended to many of them that they just keep their stock solenoids (for an example, just look at post number 18 in this thread where I recommended to herblenny to just use his stock solenoids. If I was only interested in making money on these, then I would have fought my hardest to take him in as a customer).

I make plenty of money in my other jobs, that I have no desire/need to try to make a small profit off of something like this. If you think that my primary motives were founded on nothing but a desire to make a buck, then you obviously don't know me very well.

Good luck,
-Rob
No, I do not know you, and I am sorry if the assumptions I made are incorrect. I can only take situations at face value and interpret them to the best of my ability unless everything is explained and laid out in front of me. And from my interpretation, everything was addressed and then some except where to purchase the solenoids. If they can be made to your specifications, why would they not be able to be made to any other's specs? That was my only qualm.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 02:15 PM
  #29  
saxyman990's Avatar
Place your ad here...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,336
Likes: 2
From: Dayton, OH
Originally Posted by HDP
If they can be made to your specifications, why would they not be able to be made to any other's specs? That was my only qualm.
Sure, they can be. But why? The whole idea is that there really is no point. I've already gone through the trouble of developing/designing/specing them, and have jumped through the hoops necessary to obtain them at a distributor's cost. All in an effort to help out a few FD owners get a system that would otherwise be a complete waste of their time to build on their own. If you don't want to take advantage of that, and you would rather design and build your own system, then go right ahead. This is no different than those that want to build their own VMIC, or engine mounts, rather than purchasing pre-fabbed parts. But IMHO, that DIY mentality coupled with some incorrect assumptions is really no reason to start flaming another individual.

Take care,
-Rob
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2008 | 06:46 PM
  #30  
brad89au's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: Australia
i will be using 99 twins in non sequential mode when i have finished my rebuild. only reason for it is to get used to the lag of a single cause i'm converting when the funds build up again after the rebuild bill oh and the turbos were free with the car - theyre not that hard to find here in aus :P
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2008 | 07:09 PM
  #31  
dial8's Avatar
Registered User
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,090
Likes: 0
From: Pacifica
Originally Posted by brad89au
i will be using 99 twins in non sequential mode when i have finished my rebuild. only reason for it is to get used to the lag of a single cause i'm converting when the funds build up again after the rebuild bill oh and the turbos were free with the car - theyre not that hard to find here in aus :P
Dude, the thread is years old...but good luck with the build...
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2008 | 07:11 PM
  #32  
FDSeoul's Avatar
Corea FD
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,378
Likes: 1
From: San Diego
Non-seq is the easy way out of fixing problems with the car.
said it like a champ!!!!!!! learn to fix your damn FD's people and know what the hell youre getting into before wacking the beauty into a beast!!! IMO stock setup is the only way to go far as a "daily driver" fd goes.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 11:17 PM
  #33  
rx7will's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,301
Likes: 3
From: San Francisco, CA
I ran my 99 spec turbos non sequential. It was the worst think i ever did to my car. My sequential was working perfectly. I wanted to try it because the 99s were suppose to spool faster, so i thought the non sequialtial lag would not be that bad. I almost went the full non sequential, but i decided to put it back to sequential. I was much happier with the sequential system.

One thing that no one ever mentioned was that the car will be a lot louder with the non sequential. My car was really annoying at freeway cruise. It was hurting my ears, but it was fine when it was sequential. I was running a down pipe, high flow cat and pfs exhaust.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 11:31 PM
  #34  
Monkman33's Avatar
Goodfalla Engine Complete
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,243
Likes: 42
From: Kennewick, Washington
If you want to run non seq... just go single and limit the boost to 9-10psi.

otherwise, fix the sequential system.

You lose much more low end versus what you gain in the top end.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2008 | 11:33 AM
  #35  
Montego's Avatar
Don't worry be happy...
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 6,901
Likes: 842
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by FDSeoul
said it like a champ!!!!!!! learn to fix your damn FD's people and know what the hell youre getting into before wacking the beauty into a beast!!! IMO stock setup is the only way to go far as a "daily driver" fd goes.

or if get tired of always fixing it . I had a perfectrly working sequential system started crapping out on me. Replaced all the vacuum lines worked fine for about 3 years. Then about avery 3-6 months a problem would surface. Deal with that for about two years so I decided to give non-seq a try.

Verdict: bah, lag and boost threshold really sucks but it was really nice as far as reliability.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2008 | 04:47 PM
  #36  
96fd3s's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,092
Likes: 5
From: NZ
i never undstand why people want to go non sequential.

I mean you build boost instantly when sequential on the first turbo, then it switches to using both turbos anyway higher in the rpm range.
Iv never driven a non sequential FD but i can never get my head around why you would want to get rid of the instant boost in favour of no boost untill you would usually be on both turbos anyway?
to me it just seems like it creates unnessacary lag with no benefits other then the possibility of better gas milage and a more simple system
it seems by the time the non seq guys are building boost, a seq FD would already be hauling *** and long gone.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2008 | 02:54 PM
  #37  
93RX7-europa's Avatar
~Insane Burnout
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
From: Off the grid
Hey Rob, are you still making the solenoid kit?
If so how much? Do you have any current pics of the kit?
Thanks
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2008 | 03:01 PM
  #38  
RX7 RAGE's Avatar
Bann3d. I got OWNED!!!
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,015
Likes: 68
From: San Diego, CA
Just downshift...that's the key to non sequential.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2008 | 03:04 PM
  #39  
Monkman33's Avatar
Goodfalla Engine Complete
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,243
Likes: 42
From: Kennewick, Washington
Why the hell would you spend 3k on twins...... just to run the non seq? they are less efficient all around than a single... and you can run a single at low boost all day and make more power than the twins due to efficiency, charge temps, etc.

buying 99 specs to go non seq is pointless. just buy a single and be done with it.

The key to non-seq is fixing your sequential system.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2008 | 03:06 PM
  #40  
RX7 RAGE's Avatar
Bann3d. I got OWNED!!!
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,015
Likes: 68
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by Monkman33
Why the hell would you spend 3k on twins...... just to run the non seq? they are less efficient all around than a single... and you can run a single at low boost all day and make more power than the twins due to efficiency, charge temps, etc.

buying 99 specs to go non seq is pointless. just buy a single and be done with it.

The key to non-seq is fixing your sequential system.
Who the hell is spending 3k on twins?
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2008 | 03:09 PM
  #41  
Monkman33's Avatar
Goodfalla Engine Complete
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,243
Likes: 42
From: Kennewick, Washington
From the first post:

Originally Posted by HDP
I have thought about converting to N.S. when I install my new RZ twins
Need I say more?
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2008 | 03:12 PM
  #42  
RX7 RAGE's Avatar
Bann3d. I got OWNED!!!
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,015
Likes: 68
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by Monkman33
From the first post:



Need I say more?
99 spec twins are NOT 3k. For this amount of money, you should go BNRs instead since it's cheaper.

http://rx7.com/store/rx7/fdturbo.html
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2008 | 03:15 PM
  #43  
Monkman33's Avatar
Goodfalla Engine Complete
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,243
Likes: 42
From: Kennewick, Washington
Originally Posted by RX7 RAGE
99 spec twins are NOT 3k. For this amount of money, you should go BNRs instead since it's cheaper.

http://rx7.com/store/rx7/fdturbo.html
Oh, sorry... 2600. lol

My point stands. Thanks for the $400 correction when we are talking about new turbos here.. with the BNRs only running $2350. (I know this for sure )
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2008 | 12:52 AM
  #44  
RA8225's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,141
Likes: 46
Originally Posted by FDSeoul
said it like a champ!!!!!!! learn to fix your damn FD's people and know what the hell youre getting into before wacking the beauty into a beast!!! IMO stock setup is the only way to go far as a "daily driver" fd goes.
Why the hell would you want to go through the headache each time you have a boost problem and trying to diagnose all those vacuum lines
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2008 | 03:50 AM
  #45  
brad89au's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Originally Posted by Monkman33
Why the hell would you spend 3k on twins...... just to run the non seq? they are less efficient all around than a single... and you can run a single at low boost all day and make more power than the twins due to efficiency, charge temps, etc.

buying 99 specs to go non seq is pointless. just buy a single and be done with it.

The key to non-seq is fixing your sequential system.
my 99 spec twins came with my car for freeeeeeeee
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2008 | 01:44 PM
  #46  
Monkman33's Avatar
Goodfalla Engine Complete
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,243
Likes: 42
From: Kennewick, Washington
Great, so now you want to run the equivalent of an INNEFICIENT single?

Seriously. You have 99 spec twins. run them sequentially. Non-seq IS NOT a faster car. Yes it requires you to learn more. Yes it requires you to use your brain more. No, it is not faster in 99% of driving.

No point.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2008 | 01:47 PM
  #47  
Monkman33's Avatar
Goodfalla Engine Complete
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,243
Likes: 42
From: Kennewick, Washington
Originally Posted by 7_rocket
Why the hell would you want to go through the headache each time you have a boost problem and trying to diagnose all those vacuum lines
Why the hell would you want to make your car slower in 99% of driving situations?

Seriously, there is no strong argument as to why to go non-seq.

pro non-seq:
Less troubleshooting
Less knowledge required

Against nonseq:
slower 99% of the time on a street driven vehicle.
low end suffers

Against Seq:
Required to learn more
Required to know your car better
Required to more troubleshooting IF something goes wrong

Pro seq:
How the car was designed.
faster in 99% of driving
Friggin fun!

Really dude. I mean... Really?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skeese
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
65
Mar 28, 2017 03:30 PM
Turblown
Single Turbo RX-7's
0
Aug 14, 2015 04:48 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:12 AM.