Forget LS1 and 13B Why not Renesis?
#26
LS6 Convert
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by tbielobockie
Turbines are great for steady state operation but miserable when the application requires rapid changes in RPM.
Same reason turbos suck on sports cars.
Turbines are great for steady state operation but miserable when the application requires rapid changes in RPM.
Same reason turbos suck on sports cars.
Look, assclown, if you have to dilute this thread with your trolling .... you could at least back it up with some relevant data.
#27
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What is applicable for a full on race car doesn't convert to a great road going street car.
Those race cars never have to run in traffic and most importantly only have to be reliable for the duration of one race. Street cars have to last for years...
Those race cars never have to run in traffic and most importantly only have to be reliable for the duration of one race. Street cars have to last for years...
Originally posted by redrotorR1
Gee ... I guess that's why the Porsche GT2 is such a terrible sports car and that's why Audi is THE dominant force in ALMS racing .... 'cuz turbos suck SOOOOO bad.
Look, assclown, if you have to dilute this thread with your trolling .... you could at least back it up with some relevant data.
Gee ... I guess that's why the Porsche GT2 is such a terrible sports car and that's why Audi is THE dominant force in ALMS racing .... 'cuz turbos suck SOOOOO bad.
Look, assclown, if you have to dilute this thread with your trolling .... you could at least back it up with some relevant data.
#28
LS6 Convert
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Porsche GT2 IS a street car. And I can name half a dozen other street cars that run high horsepower, reliable turbocharged applications ....
Here, lemme help you .... open mouth, insert foot.
Here, lemme help you .... open mouth, insert foot.
#29
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey jackass...
No turbocharged car can match the throttle response of a normally asperated one.
Turbocharging is an excuse for not designing the engine right in the first place.
It's a hack.
No turbocharged car can match the throttle response of a normally asperated one.
Turbocharging is an excuse for not designing the engine right in the first place.
It's a hack.
Originally posted by redrotorR1
The Porsche GT2 IS a street car. And I can name half a dozen other street cars that run high horsepower, reliable turbocharged applications ....
Here, lemme help you .... open mouth, insert foot.
The Porsche GT2 IS a street car. And I can name half a dozen other street cars that run high horsepower, reliable turbocharged applications ....
Here, lemme help you .... open mouth, insert foot.
#31
built my own engine
Originally posted by tbielobockie
Hey jackass...
No turbocharged car can match the throttle response of a normally asperated one.
Turbocharging is an excuse for not designing the engine right in the first place.
It's a hack.
Hey jackass...
No turbocharged car can match the throttle response of a normally asperated one.
Turbocharging is an excuse for not designing the engine right in the first place.
It's a hack.
#32
No it's not Turbo'd
I would think detonation in a Turbo Diesel is much less of an issue, since THAT's how a Diesel works, just it tries to raise the compression as the Power stroke approaches, and then the compression or the "Glow" Plug will ignite the car, when cold, but once warmed up diesel no longer needs a ignition device... (Disclaimer to not get flamed) Unless I'm way off here....
#33
Turbocharging is an excuse for not designing the engine right in the first place.
turbocharging is an excuse for poorly designing an engine??? ROFL i dont think so. Its meant to squeeze more power out of a smaller powerplant, keeping weight down and maximizing the power/weight ratio. Plus when you purposely build motors for forced induction, they own everything on the road. Not to mention they are MORE managable in traffic, because the torque is only there when u want it to be.
-Zach
#34
DRIVE THE ROTARY SPORTS
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CA (Bay Area)
Posts: 4,150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by tbielobockie
Hey jackass...
No turbocharged car can match the throttle response of a normally asperated one.
Turbocharging is an excuse for not designing the engine right in the first place.
It's a hack.
Hey jackass...
No turbocharged car can match the throttle response of a normally asperated one.
Turbocharging is an excuse for not designing the engine right in the first place.
It's a hack.
the turbo is a light weight way to increase HP instead of increasing the size (and therefore weight) of your engine. please ask yourself why porsche didnt use a V10 on the GT2, or why mazda didnt use a W16 in the rx7.... weight... its all abought weight! how would the GT2 handle with the viper motor behind the seat? the answer seems obvious to me dont talk **** about turbocharged cars untill you hop out of your Mustang GT and actually drive one
Last edited by RotorMotor; 12-26-03 at 05:36 PM.
#35
exactly my point rotormotor! Take a 500hp n/a motor in a car, and then take a 500hp turbo motor in the same car. The split second better throttle response of the n/a wont matter because the turbocharged car will be pushing less weight around. Not to forget, turbo cars have MASSIVE torque (talking pistons here ) through the entire rev range, so the turbo car will definitely murder the n/a car on a track.
Edit: Just to cover porsche's *** from being flamed about the Carrera GT using a V-10, should he even know/pick up on that, its for homolgation reasons for a LeMans racecar
Edit: Just to cover porsche's *** from being flamed about the Carrera GT using a V-10, should he even know/pick up on that, its for homolgation reasons for a LeMans racecar
#36
DRIVE THE ROTARY SPORTS
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CA (Bay Area)
Posts: 4,150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i was just trying to use a made up example... i had no idea that the carera uses a V10.... however it is still not as fast as as the GT2, or 911turbo so i think my point still stands. i wonder what the weight differences are between the gt2 and the carrera GT?
anyway, im glad most of us are on the same page.... FI engine = less weight
anyway, im glad most of us are on the same page.... FI engine = less weight
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Carrera GT weighs about the same as a GT2.
Anyway I drove an RX-8 today and while the motor is nice it definitely does not have the low-end power that the FD produces with its turbos. It's nice and smooth and perfectly happy to operate at high revs but I don't see how you could get much more power out of the thing while staying normally aspirated.
If you want to make an FD that is about the same quickness as stock but with a vastly different powerband and a lot less complexity then I guess a Renesis swap would be a decent idea but otherwise I would skip it.
Anyway I drove an RX-8 today and while the motor is nice it definitely does not have the low-end power that the FD produces with its turbos. It's nice and smooth and perfectly happy to operate at high revs but I don't see how you could get much more power out of the thing while staying normally aspirated.
If you want to make an FD that is about the same quickness as stock but with a vastly different powerband and a lot less complexity then I guess a Renesis swap would be a decent idea but otherwise I would skip it.
#38
Think of the possibilities! I've read about a Turbo Charged Renesis engine getting 1,400 HP!!! So why not? If you can put a LS1 Engine in a Rx7, you should be able to put a Renesis in too! Eh..eh..eh?
The Renesis is basically a non-turbo, streetported, 13B with higher compression rotors and higher redline. I doubt that it has tons of potential.
#39
rotor motor, the carrera uses the same f-6 that all the 911 models use....the Carrera GT im talking about is their new $500,000 supercar, which uses a v-10. Its the fastest production porsche to date. But anyway thats way off topic and im also glad everyone agrees that FI is the way to go.
EDIT: Also, IIRC, doesnt lemans and other racing sanctioning bodies put restrictions on turbocharged cars?? I also remember reading about the Group B racing back in the late 80's that when calculating maximum engine capacity, FI cars had a penalty of 1.5 or something...which is why Porsches 959's engine was a 2.85L, the biggest a FI engine could be, but also the most powerful in that class BECAUSE of FI! So if the grandest racing sanctions in the world put restrictions on FI cars...isnt that recognizing their superiority and making an attempt at leveling the playing field???
EDIT: Also, IIRC, doesnt lemans and other racing sanctioning bodies put restrictions on turbocharged cars?? I also remember reading about the Group B racing back in the late 80's that when calculating maximum engine capacity, FI cars had a penalty of 1.5 or something...which is why Porsches 959's engine was a 2.85L, the biggest a FI engine could be, but also the most powerful in that class BECAUSE of FI! So if the grandest racing sanctions in the world put restrictions on FI cars...isnt that recognizing their superiority and making an attempt at leveling the playing field???
Last edited by teamstealth; 12-26-03 at 06:57 PM.
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The car they are referring to has a 3 rotor in it.
"The Renesis is basically a non-turbo, streetported, 13B with higher compression rotors and higher redline. I doubt that it has tons of potential."
I hope you're ready to eat your words, because you will have to. First, it's nothing like a normal 13B, though it is the same -basic- design (rotary). You ought to do some reading before you make judgments like that. Just with changing the fuel delivery (and not meeting cat. longevity) we have it near stock 3rd gen speeds. With a high temp cat. and some other mods. we can surpass stock HP output of the 3rd gen. Even slightly modified 3rd gens. such as mine. All this NA!
You will see this on the street in a month or two. A lot of RX-8s are about to get faster. Yes, it's not easy. The ECU controls almost everything on the RX-8 and will go into "limp mode" when you just spin the tires for more than 3-4 sec. But when you don't it's deceptively fast.
Keep your mind open, grasshopper.
"The Renesis is basically a non-turbo, streetported, 13B with higher compression rotors and higher redline. I doubt that it has tons of potential."
I hope you're ready to eat your words, because you will have to. First, it's nothing like a normal 13B, though it is the same -basic- design (rotary). You ought to do some reading before you make judgments like that. Just with changing the fuel delivery (and not meeting cat. longevity) we have it near stock 3rd gen speeds. With a high temp cat. and some other mods. we can surpass stock HP output of the 3rd gen. Even slightly modified 3rd gens. such as mine. All this NA!
You will see this on the street in a month or two. A lot of RX-8s are about to get faster. Yes, it's not easy. The ECU controls almost everything on the RX-8 and will go into "limp mode" when you just spin the tires for more than 3-4 sec. But when you don't it's deceptively fast.
Keep your mind open, grasshopper.
#41
flying apex seal
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cyprus
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
N/A cars have a limit on power. After reaching that limit the only way to produce more hp's is a turbocharger
If you want serious power then why not get a turbo designed car on the first place? with low compression and strong internals? And if you still want even more power then you can upgrade the turbo with a bigger one without changing all the parts you need to convert a N/A to turbo.
I used to own a Honda integra before and i spend more than 15K on it to built a powerfull N/A engine. After changeing all the internals + peripherals (High compression pistons,light conrods, stage 3 camshafts, valves,valve springs, retainers, ecu, throttle,headers,exhaust,inlet manifolds, head gusket etc etc) i decided that i needed more power and the only way was forced induction but unfortunately i had to spend twice as much on the stage i was. I had to build the engine from the beginning so i sold it and bought myself a turbo car with great potential(my FD). Also N/A cars don't give you the kick on the seat feeling like a turbo car. Also about V8's with massive torque and weight = wheel spin so on the track or the drag strip they have no chance against a turbo car.
End of story.
If you want serious power then why not get a turbo designed car on the first place? with low compression and strong internals? And if you still want even more power then you can upgrade the turbo with a bigger one without changing all the parts you need to convert a N/A to turbo.
I used to own a Honda integra before and i spend more than 15K on it to built a powerfull N/A engine. After changeing all the internals + peripherals (High compression pistons,light conrods, stage 3 camshafts, valves,valve springs, retainers, ecu, throttle,headers,exhaust,inlet manifolds, head gusket etc etc) i decided that i needed more power and the only way was forced induction but unfortunately i had to spend twice as much on the stage i was. I had to build the engine from the beginning so i sold it and bought myself a turbo car with great potential(my FD). Also N/A cars don't give you the kick on the seat feeling like a turbo car. Also about V8's with massive torque and weight = wheel spin so on the track or the drag strip they have no chance against a turbo car.
End of story.
Last edited by racer1; 12-26-03 at 11:15 PM.
#42
Z06 powered FD
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,883
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by tbielobockie
Hey jackass...
No turbocharged car can match the throttle response of a normally asperated one.
Turbocharging is an excuse for not designing the engine right in the first place.
It's a hack.
Hey jackass...
No turbocharged car can match the throttle response of a normally asperated one.
Turbocharging is an excuse for not designing the engine right in the first place.
It's a hack.
The fastest 0-60mph car I've ever seen is turbo.
Tell me why one of the best engine builders in the world(Lingenfelter) made a twin turbo kit? I guess he's just stupid or GM made a terrible motor and he had to turbo it.
#43
Z06 powered FD
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,883
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by tbielobockie
Hey jackass...
No turbocharged car can match the throttle response of a normally asperated one.
Turbocharging is an excuse for not designing the engine right in the first place.
It's a hack.
Hey jackass...
No turbocharged car can match the throttle response of a normally asperated one.
Turbocharging is an excuse for not designing the engine right in the first place.
It's a hack.
The fastest 0-60mph car I've ever seen is turbo.
Tell me why one of the best engine builders in the world(Lingenfelter) made a twin turbo kit? I guess he's just stupid or GM made a terrible motor and he had to turbo it.
#44
I'm a CF and poop smith
Originally posted by GsrSol
That's flat out bullshit.
The fastest 0-60mph car I've ever seen is turbo.
Tell me why one of the best engine builders in the world(Lingenfelter) made a twin turbo kit? I guess he's just stupid or GM made a terrible motor and he had to turbo it.
That's flat out bullshit.
The fastest 0-60mph car I've ever seen is turbo.
Tell me why one of the best engine builders in the world(Lingenfelter) made a twin turbo kit? I guess he's just stupid or GM made a terrible motor and he had to turbo it.
#45
yeah the Lingenfelter Vette is a perfect example. Why didnt he just Rip out that LS6 and put a HUGE v-12 in there? O wait....when you twin turbo that LS6 it makes 1200 STREETABLE horsepower! Not to mention the fastest street car in the world at 8.96 @156mph for a QUARTER MILE! And it keeps the z06's amazing handling characteristics because the weight was not dramatically altered.
#46
Yes it is for sale.
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Houston Club's Resident Lush.
Posts: 1,905
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Ok all you motor heads out there in rotary land. This is my two cents on the argument.
Turbo chargers are superior to N/A engines becasue they allow for more air to feed into the engine.
Cubic displacement is the only substitute for turbo chargers.
If you don't like your turbo chargers you are in the wrong section and reading about the wrong car.
If you want instantanious throttle responce go buy a Honda.
If you want a V8, go buy a corvette.
Third gens came with turbo chargers for a reason, they allow one of the smallest displacement engines (1.3 liters) to out perform almost everything else on the road. You can't name one small displacement (under 2 liters) car out there that can consistantly out perform a 3rd gen without either the use of a turbo charger or a super charger. They don't exist.
Thats my two cents on the matter.
Turbo chargers are superior to N/A engines becasue they allow for more air to feed into the engine.
Cubic displacement is the only substitute for turbo chargers.
If you don't like your turbo chargers you are in the wrong section and reading about the wrong car.
If you want instantanious throttle responce go buy a Honda.
If you want a V8, go buy a corvette.
Third gens came with turbo chargers for a reason, they allow one of the smallest displacement engines (1.3 liters) to out perform almost everything else on the road. You can't name one small displacement (under 2 liters) car out there that can consistantly out perform a 3rd gen without either the use of a turbo charger or a super charger. They don't exist.
Thats my two cents on the matter.
#49
I hope you're ready to eat your words, because you will have to. First, it's nothing like a normal 13B, though it is the same -basic- design (rotary). You ought to do some reading before you make judgments like that. Just with changing the fuel delivery (and not meeting cat. longevity) we have it near stock 3rd gen speeds. With a high temp cat. and some other mods. we can surpass stock HP output of the 3rd gen. Even slightly modified 3rd gens. such as mine. All this NA!
Since it has side exhaust ports and better fuel economy, Mazda made the ports bigger, thus doing a form of a "streetport" which bumps up power dramastically. The exhaust manifold also doesnt have to be as restrictive aswell for fuel economy reasons, so theres more power there aswell.
Then Mazda added higher compression and lighter rotors for a few more ponies, then they setup the motor to take 9K safely. And as we all know, more revs= more horsepower as long as the motor can keep up.
So basically the Renesis is a streetport 13B with higher compression rotors and a higher redline which is more fuel efficient.
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the only thing you guys are arguing over is semantics because one of you said "basically." When you think about it, the Wankel has a lot less stuff in it that you can actualy go about changing. Perhaps the order of magnitude of a change necessary to classify the difference as more than "basic" is indeed smaller than when comparing piston engines, perhaps not.