Finally installed 99-spec lip!! How I did it without drilling!
4 Attachment(s)
How I did it:
1. Removed all plastic tabs and locating pins on the SIDES of the 99 lip, after the brake ducts, using a sharp blade. The front ones fit the 93-95 bumper just fine. 2. Removed stock lip 3. Attached 2 side bolts for each half lip first and worked my way to the front, this made my life easier 4. Tightened everything up, note that I DID NOT drill any extra holes 5. I zip-tied the right and left side undertrays in the front as there's no place to bolt them in the 99 lip. The sides were bolted using stock locations Fit is not perfect, I'm debating whether to drill one extra hole on each side to make it fit better. I like how it looks though |
Nice to see exactly what my car will look like when I get the 99 lip :)
|
I'm trying to think of another sports car with a cheesy piece of plastic hanging off the front bumper that basically does absolutely nothing unless you are going 120 (and questionable what value it has even then)
I never understood modifications that do not improve performance....it's why I always shake my head at ricers |
99 front lips rock, I dont know what your talking about. Put one on your car and you will understand.
|
Originally Posted by FD from R1
I'm trying to think of another sports car with a cheesy piece of plastic hanging off the front bumper that basically does absolutely nothing unless you are going 120 (and questionable what value it has even then) I never understood modifications that do not improve performance.... |
it looks dumb to me.....and I see it as offering no real performance advantage whatsover....as I said, perhaps minor increase in downforce at 120+
gimmicky.... |
Originally Posted by FD from R1
I never understood modifications that do not improve performance....it's why I always shake my head at ricers
So MAZDA is a ricer company for making and installing these OEM parts on their cars in japan? |
neit,
Yep, its not required to drill any holes at all... its just reccomended for a better fit. Even if you drill holes, it will still fit shitty, its just because the profile of the 99-spec and the stock 93-98 bumpers is slightly different. |
I guess Im a ricer, according to FD from R1...
Well my car is all show and no go right now!!! |
Originally Posted by FD from R1
it looks dumb to me.....and I see it as offering no real performance advantage whatsover....as I said, perhaps minor increase in downforce at 120+ |
Originally Posted by FD from R1
I'm trying to think of another sports car with a cheesy piece of plastic hanging off the front bumper that basically does absolutely nothing unless you are going 120 (and questionable what value it has even then)
I never understood modifications that do not improve performance....it's why I always shake my head at ricers |
Originally Posted by SpeedKing
IMO, it *belongs* on the car, compared to the stock Touring/Base lip.
|
Rice, is in the Eye of the Beholder :D
|
1 Attachment(s)
I dont know what these people are talking about, the 99 spec lip is beautiful. I dont see how anyone can think it looks ricey.
https://www.rx7club.com/attachment.p...id=73302&stc=1 |
Originally Posted by FD from R1
it looks dumb to me.....and I see it as offering no real performance advantage whatsover....as I said, perhaps minor increase in downforce at 120+
gimmicky.... |
Originally Posted by Mahjik
Actually, I noticed more stability even at highway speeds. It's definitely functional.
|
Originally Posted by Section8
Interesting. Is that for the 99 or the stock lip? or are both functional?
|
In that case I better take the black tint off my car because I'm a ricer now.
Originally Posted by FD from R1
I'm trying to think of another sports car with a cheesy piece of plastic hanging off the front bumper that basically does absolutely nothing unless you are going 120 (and questionable what value it has even then)
I never understood modifications that do not improve performance....it's why I always shake my head at ricers I think its a better improvement over the shitty 1" lip that most come with. But I have to agree I think the R1 and R2, lip looks more agressive because they are a beefier lip. On top of that both were not only designed for more agressive appearance, but to direct more cold air into the radiator and intercooler even below 120mph, on top of the added benefit of downforce. |
it's their car let them do whatever they want to it, keep t stock, riced it out, it's their money.
|
Originally Posted by negative
I guess OEM is rice now? Moron...
|
I installed a 93 r1 lip on my base model yesterday and could have sworn I felt more stability on the highway, it just felt like the front was heavier and stuck to the ground more than it did driving it earlier that day with the 1" stock lip. My real goal was to increase stability over 120mph though since I'm taking it to the track on Friday. I've heard that sevens are weird over 120 due to front-end lift, so whatever downforce I can get up front is welcome.
Plus it looks much better than the stock base lip and not ricey at all. I'm not convinced on the 99+ lip though especially if it doesn't fit perfectly. |
With a just a bit of attention to the alignment, the only part that doesnt mate almost perfectly is the ends, which are about 1 cm longer (towards the tires).
I love the looks of mine: http://flathat.woodstream.net/Columb...ekim/FDsig.JPG |
Originally Posted by FD from R1
I'm trying to think of another sports car with a cheesy piece of plastic hanging off the front bumper that basically does absolutely nothing unless you are going 120 (and questionable what value it has even then)
I never understood modifications that do not improve performance....it's why I always shake my head at ricers Yeah it doesn't matter at 50 mph, but when I'm going 150, I sure love the planted feel! |
Originally Posted by jayk
......... I've heard that sevens are weird over 120 due to front-end lift, so whatever downforce I can get up front is welcome.
My preference would be to have the R1 lip. To me, it looks better with the 93-95 bumper. My only concerns are scraping it on curbs, and getting the car on my ramps when I work on it. I suspect that the downforce is similar with both. |
Originally Posted by FD from R1
I'm trying to think of another sports car with a cheesy piece of plastic hanging off the front bumper that basically does absolutely nothing unless you are going 120 (and questionable what value it has even then)
I never understood modifications that do not improve performance....it's why I always shake my head at ricers First of all, most of us when we see a riced out car, we immediately think its slow.. So, why not rice it out and make it go fast?? that would be something.. hmm.. |
LOL 99 spec lips are awesome. They make the front of the car look totally different IMO. But i guess if you have a 99 spec lip you are a ricer as FD from R1 has said. I love my 99 front lip
|
I think Jimlab posted actual windtunnel stats on the base/touring lip, r1 lip, and 99 lip somewhere on this board which showed that there is an actual difference between the 3 in downforce and drag.
|
Originally Posted by FD from R1
I'm trying to think of another sports car with a cheesy piece of plastic hanging off the front bumper that basically does absolutely nothing unless you are going 120 (and questionable what value it has even then)
I never understood modifications that do not improve performance....it's why I always shake my head at ricers Obviously, you dont know anything about light-weight aerodynamic cars. Motor-city-boy thinks it a shame Magnaflow doesn't make an OEM replacement for the FD. Oh yeah, my traction bars (just installed them...on my front lawn) are going to boost my gas mileage. BITCHIN! |
Mark's (YZF-R1, FD from R1, the ancient words) posts tends to have that effect on people. :p:
That said, I think putting a '99 front spoiler on a '93-'95 bumper A) looks like shit, B) looks like shit, C) looks like a cheap "me too" wanna-be attempt at updating the look of the car, and D) looks like shit. The styling does not fit the '93-'95 bumper AT ALL. If you want the '99 spec spoiler, buy the '99 spec bumper that goes with it. That's my opinion, and I'm sticking to it. :) |
Originally Posted by jimlab
If you want the '99 spec spoiler, buy the '99 spec bumper that goes with it. That's my opinion, and I'm sticking to it. :)
|
Originally Posted by Mahjik
What if you think the '99 bumper and lights suck, but you like the functionality of the '99 spec lip? ;)
|
I like the R1 lip better over the 99spec too...
I think the 99spec looks kinda flimsey but I do agree it looks good with the 99spec bumper. Speaking of anyone have an R1 lip for sale ? |
Originally Posted by jimlab
What does the '99 spoiler do that the '93-'95 R1 front spoiler doesn't? Provide a hair more downforce? Nothing you'd be able to notice or measure, especially at any sane speed. Mark did have a valid point this time.
Taste is different to everyone. What one person likes, someone else might not. I like the look of a properly attached '99 Spec lip to a '93-95 bumper. I still have yet to find a bumper I like myself over the stock '93-95 but that's another conversation. Some people don't like it, oh well. They just don't need to do it to their cars. ;) |
Originally Posted by Mahjik
Besides, getting a '99 Spec unused was much cheaper and easier than the stock lip the last time I priced them out (in case people are counting pennies).
I still have yet to find a bumper I like myself over the stock '93-95 but that's another conversation. https://www.rx7club.com/forum/attach...postid=1995155 |
Originally Posted by jimlab
Well, there's one justification. :)
I think the Border Type II is my favorite. https://www.rx7club.com/forum/attach...postid=1995155 I wonder what that would look like with the newer style lights? I'm not really a fan of fiberglass, but that has always been the only aftermarket front I would even consider.. |
Originally Posted by jimlab
I think the Border Type II is my favorite.
Originally Posted by jdhuegel1
I wonder what that would look like with the newer style lights?
|
Originally Posted by jdhuegel1
I wonder what that would look like with the newer style lights?
|
Originally Posted by jimlab
Mark did have a valid point this time.
my points are always valid....this is coming from the guy who thought radioisotope dating is "as accurate as a swiss watch" ;) |
Originally Posted by the ancient words
"this time"?
my points are always valid... this is coming from the guy who thought radioisotope dating is "as accurate as a swiss watch" ;) Of course, this is coming from a guy who thinks Noah packed up two of every animal to ride out the global flood while all the fish stayed in the sea (which miraculously maintained fresh, brackish, and salt zones for the comfort of the various species), and all the plants were somehow saved by hitching rides on floating bog-rafts... :rlaugh: |
Originally Posted by travisorus rex
I love how unstable this forum is. One person (this shithead) has a comment and everyone climbs in the ring to take pop-shots. It's great.:D Now its my turn...
Obviously, you dont know anything about light-weight aerodynamic cars. Motor-city-boy thinks it a shame Magnaflow doesn't make an OEM replacement for the FD. Oh yeah, my traction bars (just installed them...on my front lawn) are going to boost my gas mileage. BITCHIN! excuse me dickhead....my point was unless you are driving something like this http://www.koenigsegg.se/ or this http://www.noblecars.com/new-noble-site/index.html at 120+, a piece of plastic hanging off the front bumper is a complete waste of time little Mazda wanna-bes on this forum amaze me....if you are tracking your car, have at it |
Originally Posted by jimlab
I think we both know that the point I was trying to make was that atomic "events" are predictable and very well understood.
stick to V-8s Jim |
Originally Posted by the ancient words
what an asshole
|
Originally Posted by the ancient words
but radiosotope decay is not well understood and subject to a host of assumptions....that was the point....you were way outside your limited knowledge base and still are
|
Originally Posted by jdhuegel1
I wonder what that would look like with the newer style lights?
I'm not really a fan of fiberglass, but that has always been the only aftermarket front I would even consider.. |
Originally Posted by jimlab
Meaning what, that I don't have the Institute for Creation Research providing all of my data? :D
whoever it is....they're worthless :D |
I have a 99 lip on 93-95 bumper. The only thing I don't like about it, is that it doesn't fit properly. It looks like a cheap lip with bad fitment problems. It pissed me off so much, I just ended up buying the 99 bumper haha.
|
I think the best look was that guy that modified the 93 nose so the radiator opening/ducts were larger. BTW anybody know where that picture is ?
|
|
Originally Posted by the ancient words
what an asshole
excuse me dickhead....my point was unless you are driving something like this http://www.koenigsegg.se/ or this http://www.noblecars.com/new-noble-site/index.html at 120+, a piece of plastic hanging off the front bumper is a complete waste of time Little Mazda wanna-bes on this forum amaze me....if you are tracking your car, have at it Most people buy the 99 spec parts because they like how they look. That is usually what most car owners buy any exterior "enhancing" product. Mazda wanna-be or not, you're the brainiac who declared what a waste this "piece of plastic hanging off the front bumper" is...especially on this forum. |
Originally Posted by travisorus rex
I think it looks great.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:48 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands