3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Dyno results: M2 Stage3 vs. Pettit Unlimited

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 11:03 AM
  #1  
cruiser's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
From: Slovenia, Europe
Dyno results: M2 Stage3 vs. Pettit Unlimited

From Saturdays dyno day.

@10psi
M2 Stage3:

Pettit:


Pettit @13psi:


This is a DimSport dyno, without retarder/brake. Similar to dynojet.

After I put in HKS TP, I'm going back to make another run @13psi.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 11:49 AM
  #2  
adam c's Avatar
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,368
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Looks like the M2 and the Pettit are about the same. I have always guessed that would be the case.

Did you cool down the intercooler between runs? Looks like heat soak has significantly effected the last run.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 11:50 AM
  #3  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,804
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Interesting, why does the graph stop at 6700 rpm?
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 12:10 PM
  #4  
OKRX-7's Avatar
A.K.A. The Saint
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
From: Enid, Oklahoma
I am just guessing its an auto since it says 4 speed and 3.9 gear ratio.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 01:05 PM
  #5  
cruiser's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
From: Slovenia, Europe
Nah... the operator didnt calibrate it correctly (it uses aproximation of revs - doesnt pick them from the coil).
At around 6900RPM it should be actually around 7500RPM, where I left off, as I wasnt making any power anymore.

There was about 5-10mins between runs with big vent in front of the car blowing into IC (also had opened hood).

Last measurement was strictly ignition related. If youoverlay both printouts from 10 and 13psi, the latter has much better power up to ignition breakup.

It also seems that these measurements are normalised/averaged, as ignition breakup usually shows as small jumps in the power curve.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 01:10 PM
  #6  
OKRX-7's Avatar
A.K.A. The Saint
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
From: Enid, Oklahoma
Does the E-spec run a 3.9 rearend then?
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 01:18 PM
  #7  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Hmmm, interesting. Depending on your mods, you might have a problem since most of the people here in the states dyno'ing with the Pettit ECU are closer to 320rwhp at 13 PSI.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 01:36 PM
  #8  
scratchjunkie's Avatar
sexy no jutsu
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 0
From: planet arium
those numbers are not too shabby besides the last dyno @13psi. what level octane were you running on your dyno?
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 02:33 PM
  #9  
cruiser's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
From: Slovenia, Europe
Originally Posted by Mahjik
Hmmm, interesting. Depending on your mods, you might have a problem since most of the people here in the states dyno'ing with the Pettit ECU are closer to 320rwhp at 13 PSI.
In my experience there's 10-15rwhp increase per 1psi of boost.
And if HKS TP gets rid of my high RPM ignition breakup, I should be able to run 13psi, thus around 310-320rwhp I think/hope.

I think measurement at 10psi is quite good. 280rwhp/268lfs-ft tq.

There's a problem alright
But the point is that there's not much difference in M2 Stage3 and Pettit Unlimited ECU.

However, I run midpipe (which M2 doesnt suggest, or so they say).
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 02:38 PM
  #10  
cruiser's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
From: Slovenia, Europe
Originally Posted by scratchjunkie
those numbers are not too shabby besides the last dyno @13psi. what level octane were you running on your dyno?
I have put in some 100 octane. But thats a little bit different to US octane numbers. I think its like 95 octane in US or so.

"91 RON octane is equivalent to 87 CLC octane"
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 02:40 PM
  #11  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by cruiser
But the point is that there's not much difference in M2 Stage3 and Pettit Unlimited ECU.
According to other existing dynos, there is a difference. I've yet to see a M2 ECU (without a piggyback) make 340rwhp+.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 02:45 PM
  #12  
cruiser's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
From: Slovenia, Europe
Well... then at least at 10psi there wasnt a difference.

And also I have ignition breakup at higher boost regardless of ECU

340rwhp on Pettit ECU is just plain awesome
That was probably at 14psi though.

Maybe I'll put in some octane booster and try it out just for the bragging rights, lol.

But keep in mind my motor has about 40k miles on it and turbos about 85k.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 02:54 PM
  #13  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by cruiser
Well... then at least at 10psi there wasnt a difference.

And also I have ignition breakup at higher boost regardless of ECU
That's one reason why I said something else is probably going on. You shouldn't have break-up at those power levels.

Originally Posted by cruiser
340rwhp on Pettit ECU is just plain awesome
That was probably at 14psi though.
Yes, those are numbers running 14-15 PSI which I way I mentioned you should be around 320rwhp at 13 PSI with the Pettit ECU.


Originally Posted by cruiser
But keep in mind my motor has about 40k miles on it and turbos about 85k.
Unless you have low compression, you shouldn't be dropping off that much power unless something else is wrong.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 02:59 PM
  #14  
Rated R1's Avatar
Oji San
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
From: Lexington, SC
I wonder what the injector duty cycles were like for each computer? 115%?
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 03:03 PM
  #15  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Here's someone who dyno'd a Pettit ECU on a stock ported motor:

Originally Posted by oakridgerx7
Dynoed the car today
Dyno Jet dyno

12 psi. 324hp and 309 torque 11.8 AFR
14.5 psi 334hp and 317 torque 12.5 AFR
16 psi 341hp and 319 torque. 12.8 AFR(let out of it)
check sign for mods.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 03:05 PM
  #16  
cruiser's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
From: Slovenia, Europe
Originally Posted by Rated R1
I wonder what the injector duty cycles were like for each computer? 115%?
Why ? At 280rwhp there should be still plenty % left
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 03:06 PM
  #17  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by cruiser
Why ? At 280rwhp there should be still plenty % left
There is a very big misconception about high injector duty cycles here on the forum...
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 03:07 PM
  #18  
cruiser's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
From: Slovenia, Europe
Originally Posted by Mahjik
Unless you have low compression, you shouldn't be dropping off that much power unless something else is wrong.
Its ignition related, I'm 99% sure.
I see no other explanation that I made 10rwhp more @10psi compared to 13psi.
New plugs, new plug wires, new grounds.
At 10psi its perfect, smooth, powerful.
At 13psi it stumbles. And not as its shown on the graph, but more abruptly, then picks up but its already lost its momentum and thus low hp reading.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 03:14 PM
  #19  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
There could be many reasons (i.e. fuel problem, coil not working properly at higher levels, etc) but what I was indicating is that an ignition amp if it fixes the problem is just really masking it. You shouldn't be getting any break-up, if that's the problem, at those power levels.

I've seen guys run the stock ignition much higher without problems.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 03:23 PM
  #20  
Kento's Avatar
2/4 wheel cornering fiend
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 3
From: Pasadena, CA
Originally Posted by Mahjik
Here's someone who dyno'd a Pettit ECU on a stock ported motor
Mahjik, those numbers were with a MP, correct?
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 03:25 PM
  #21  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by Kento
Mahjik, those numbers were with a MP, correct?
IIRC, yes. That's why I suggested he should be near 320 at 13 PSI when the MP was at 324 at 12 PSI.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 03:29 PM
  #22  
Kento's Avatar
2/4 wheel cornering fiend
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 3
From: Pasadena, CA
Originally Posted by Mahjik
IIRC, yes. That's why I suggested he should be near 320 at 13 PSI when the MP was at 324 at 12 PSI.
Thanx, I was just curious about the numbers (I run a Pettit ECU); not trying to stick my nose into the debate.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 03:31 PM
  #23  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
No problem. RTS3GEN dyno'd his car with a Pettit ECU and Pettit ported engine (all the bolt-ons) and got 359rwhp at 15 PSI (he also has a 11.77 run at 14 PSI).
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 04:38 PM
  #24  
cruiser's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
From: Slovenia, Europe
Originally Posted by Mahjik
There could be many reasons (i.e. fuel problem, coil not working properly at higher levels, etc) but what I was indicating is that an ignition amp if it fixes the problem is just really masking it. You shouldn't be getting any break-up, if that's the problem, at those power levels.

I've seen guys run the stock ignition much higher without problems.

Any hints what to look for or where to look ?

What can cause car to stumble at higher boost ?

Too bad they cant do AFR readings, it would tell a lot.

Can there be a bad coil. Isnt coil like its either working or its not ? Can it be something inbetween ?

I have an old O2 sensor inthere, but it shouldnt matter in higher revs.

Really, I'm stumped.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 04:59 PM
  #25  
Bill B's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 388
Likes: 3
From: Plantation, Florida
Originally Posted by Rated R1
I wonder what the injector duty cycles were like for each computer? 115%?
Duty cycle should be 89-92 unless someone screwed with it.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:46 PM.