a DOWNPIPE for your engine compartment: COOL LOOVERS and other heat fixes
#26
Will u do me a kindness?
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by bajaman
Another resurrected post from the past! But a good one. Balancing the inherent good looks of the FD with the practicality of hood vents is a tough one.
My favorite car of all time, the Jaguar E-type, had a beautiful louvered hood. This was a car than in the early 1960s had nearly identical performance, horsepower, and weight as the FD.
And it was noted early on it its development that 160 mph air has to have somewhere to go, and if could aid in cooling things down, so much the better!
Personally, I just can't abide ANY of the vented hoods on the market. Most of them make the beautiful FD pretty much INSTANTLY look like a HOTWHEELS or George Barris-on-acid creation.
Probably a better thing would be to manage the airflow throughout the entire car via a full-body undertray, utilizing effective diffusers at the rear of the car to take advantage of the normal low-pressure created there.
Good stuff that Howard did though for sure!
My favorite car of all time, the Jaguar E-type, had a beautiful louvered hood. This was a car than in the early 1960s had nearly identical performance, horsepower, and weight as the FD.
And it was noted early on it its development that 160 mph air has to have somewhere to go, and if could aid in cooling things down, so much the better!
Personally, I just can't abide ANY of the vented hoods on the market. Most of them make the beautiful FD pretty much INSTANTLY look like a HOTWHEELS or George Barris-on-acid creation.
Probably a better thing would be to manage the airflow throughout the entire car via a full-body undertray, utilizing effective diffusers at the rear of the car to take advantage of the normal low-pressure created there.
Good stuff that Howard did though for sure!
#27
Urban Combat Vet
iTrader: (16)
Originally Posted by the_glass_man
I agree, the old Mazdaspeed hood and FEED hood are about the only hoods that I would even consider using on my car and even then I still don't like the way they flow with the rest of the body.
#28
#29
2/4 wheel cornering fiend
With all due respect to Kevin and the ASP setup (I have a medium kit), I'm not that enthused about the provided "extension" piece to the duct mouth, which already comes in a pretty severe angle due to the FD engine compartment's design. The extension I was provided with in the kit is basically a crude 90-degree scoop attachment, and while I'm sure this helps direct some airflow in there, it's still a pretty severe angle, and the airflow is going to take a path of lesser resistance (i.e., the radiator-- which has a much thinner core specifically for that purpose--and any gaps that may be next to it). I think that may be the reason for the "1-3 mph" airflow speed readings Howard found, not so much the lack of exit area for airflow in the engine compartment.
I think an extension with smoother angles that extends all the way to the front of the radiator opening (to help separate the airflow/pressure of the IC and radiator) would help airflow speed through the IC tremendously. I'm going to try and fab something up in the near future.
I did something like this for my Greddy SMIC a while back, and while I don't have any testing numbers, the temperature of the IC body was significantly improved at lower speeds when I opened the hood.
I think an extension with smoother angles that extends all the way to the front of the radiator opening (to help separate the airflow/pressure of the IC and radiator) would help airflow speed through the IC tremendously. I'm going to try and fab something up in the near future.
I did something like this for my Greddy SMIC a while back, and while I don't have any testing numbers, the temperature of the IC body was significantly improved at lower speeds when I opened the hood.
#31
Damian and Andy might be breathing life into something I wanted to do years ago but never had time. Should be pretty awesome in form and function if it works out like I envisioned.
Last edited by Kevin T. Wyum; 08-13-06 at 05:42 PM.
#32
Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
wouldn't taking off the weatherstriping off the fire wall do the same thing? what about do the above and blocking off the hole above the stock innercooler intake? would that have any effect? or you could just put spacers on the hood hindges to raise the back of the hood up a little. just a thought if you don't want to cut holes in your nice expensive hood.
#33
Will u do me a kindness?
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by neopj3
wouldn't taking off the weatherstriping off the fire wall do the same thing? what about do the above and blocking off the hole above the stock innercooler intake? would that have any effect? or you could just put spacers on the hood hindges to raise the back of the hood up a little. just a thought if you don't want to cut holes in your nice expensive hood.
#34
To me.....the ultimate in radiator airflow optimization (with respect to directing it OUT of the engine bay) is to make a custom duct that connects the back of the radiator to the top of the hood and directs ALL of the airflow coming out of the radiator directly out of the engine bay. That's the way it's done in professional racing and should be highly efficient . It's the way a V mount SHOULD be done. Pictured below is the JGTC skyline engine bay and you can see the duct that I am talking about.
#35
Originally Posted by Kevin T. Wyum
Damian and Andy might be breathing life into something I wanted to do years ago but never had time. Should be pretty awesome in form and function if it works out like I envisioned.
Is it a secret?
#36
Originally Posted by fsae_alum
To me.....the ultimate in radiator airflow optimization (with respect to directing it OUT of the engine bay) is to make a custom duct that connects the back of the radiator to the top of the hood and directs ALL of the airflow coming out of the radiator directly out of the engine bay. That's the way it's done in professional racing and should be highly efficient . It's the way a V mount SHOULD be done. Pictured below is the JGTC skyline engine bay and you can see the duct that I am talking about.
#37
2/4 wheel cornering fiend
Originally Posted by fsae_alum
To me.....the ultimate in radiator airflow optimization (with respect to directing it OUT of the engine bay) is to make a custom duct that connects the back of the radiator to the top of the hood and directs ALL of the airflow coming out of the radiator directly out of the engine bay. That's the way it's done in professional racing and should be highly efficient . It's the way a V mount SHOULD be done.
It's more important to increase airflow through the IC since it has the thicker core, so it's easier to mount it on top and use a duct in the hood for that purpose, due to lack of room in the FD's engine compartment. It's the same reason that car pictured has the IC on top.
Last edited by Kento; 08-14-06 at 11:39 AM.
#38
Lives on the Forum
Originally Posted by fsae_alum
To me.....the ultimate in radiator airflow optimization (with respect to directing it OUT of the engine bay) is to make a custom duct that connects the back of the radiator to the top of the hood and directs ALL of the airflow coming out of the radiator directly out of the engine bay.
#39
Lives on the Forum
Originally Posted by the_glass_man
There are good many threads that explore this idea, but it all of them have come to the conclusion that because of the low pressure area next to the windshield...
#40
Lives on the Forum
Originally Posted by Kento
The reason for ducting the airflow on the exit side the radiator is not to "direct ALL of the airflow coming out of the radiator directly out of the engine bay", but to use the negative pressure created by the duct in the hood to help increase airflow speed through the radiator, making that heat exchanger much more "efficient".
#41
Originally Posted by Kento
The reason for ducting the airflow on the exit side the radiator is not to "direct ALL of the airflow coming out of the radiator directly out of the engine bay", but to use the negative pressure created by the duct in the hood to help increase airflow speed through the radiator, making that heat exchanger much more "efficient". If you can create enough of a negative pressure area on the exit side of the engine bay (or create more positive pressure on the face of the heat exchangers), the duct wouldn't be necessary.
It's more important to increase airflow through the IC since it has the thicker core, so it's easier to mount it on top and use a duct in the hood for that purpose, due to lack of room in the FD's engine compartment. It's the same reason that car pictured has the IC on top.
It's more important to increase airflow through the IC since it has the thicker core, so it's easier to mount it on top and use a duct in the hood for that purpose, due to lack of room in the FD's engine compartment. It's the same reason that car pictured has the IC on top.
#42
Originally Posted by DamonB
There are other dividends as well. It also sends the air exiting the radiator up over the car rather than allowing it to exit under the car. Another option many use is to duct the radiator exit into the front wheel wells, achieving the same goal.
Anyways....if you could go to a V-mount or a \\ mount and direct the airflow out through the top of the hood, that would help considerably in decreasing underhood temperatures. Unfortunately, this all costs $$$$....which by being FD owners, none of us typically have that much to spare!
#43
Lives on the Forum
Originally Posted by fsae_alum
to maintain attached flow over the top surface of the vehicle so that they can get clean air to feed into the rear wing.
#44
2/4 wheel cornering fiend
Originally Posted by DamonB
There are other dividends as well. It also sends the air exiting the radiator up over the car rather than allowing it to exit under the car. Another option many use is to duct the radiator exit into the front wheel wells, achieving the same goal.
#45
2/4 wheel cornering fiend
Originally Posted by fsae_alum
I understand that the primary goal of that setup is not to direct the heat out of the engine bay but rather to improve the overall efficiency of the cooling system through manipulation of pressure. It just so happens that by the way it is set up is ALSO directs all of the heated air exiting the intercooler out of the engine bay thus not contributing to a hot engine bay.
#46
~17 MPG
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by Kento
The engine in and of itself will contribute far more to underhood engine temps than the heated air exiting the IC and/or the radiator.
-s-
#47
Lives on the Forum
^ I think his simple point is that when discussing underhood temps the engine/turbos etc have a tremendously greater ability to heat their surroundings then the intercooler could ever hope to. Removing only intercooler exit air from underhood isn't going to show any difference in underhood temps, although the intercooler itself may become more efficient.
#48
2/4 wheel cornering fiend
You're forgetting about the engine block, the turbos and their associated manifolds, etc., radiating serious amounts of heat with actual surface temps that are far hotter than the exhaust airflow temps from the radiator/IC. At least the exhaust air from the radiator and/or IC provides "cooling" airflow through the engine bay. The exhaust airflow from the radiator/IC doesn't just "build up" and continually increase underhood temps; it has to go somewhere. Take that airflow completely out of the engine bay and you'll end up with nice mobile oven.
#50
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: 15143
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IIRC, the general rule of thumb for an IC engine is the fuel's energy goes to useful power, waste heat and pumping losses in roughly equal amounts. Guessing that the rotary does a bit worse on useful power versus waste heat seems pretty safe, so I'd say that ducting the radiator's exhaust might have some benefits. But, as Kento pointed out, that air is much cooler than the turbos or downpipe, and it can help to cool them. OTOH, I doubt the shortblock or heatsoaked UIM will benefit significantly from the rad's output.
I'll play with the heat in the intake charge after I eat.
I'll play with the heat in the intake charge after I eat.