3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Compression Test Result Questions?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 26, 2004 | 04:46 PM
  #1  
shinchrono's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: San Marino, California
Compression Test Result Questions?

The previous owner of my FD says the compression test came out
9.6, 9.6, and 9.6 in front, and 9.4, 9.5, and 9.5 in the rear. as i was reading through the searches, i kept reading numbers in the 6's and 7's! i was wondering...does this mean the car is running a very high boost? if so i'm concerned about the engine running lean...

or is this a conversion from one compression unit to another? (?->psi, for example). i know the psi should be somewhere around 10, so is this a reasonable assumption? please help me with your wisdom

thanks!
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2004 | 04:49 PM
  #2  
bee's Avatar
bee
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
From: Austin Tx
lol,

Boost is in no way related to compression. If you have a boost gauge, you should be running a max of 10 psi of boost, assuming your car is stock. As for the compression, those are excellent numbers. So good that I would probably not believe them unless some documentation was provided by the person or place who performed the test.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2004 | 04:55 PM
  #3  
bee's Avatar
bee
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
From: Austin Tx
By the way, if your new to rotary ownership, you should really read everything on the following website. It will take you awile but the information is worth its weight in paladium.

http://robrobinette.com/
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2004 | 04:57 PM
  #4  
turbojeff's Avatar
Do it right, do it once
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,830
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, OR, usa
Actually many stock cars run 11-12psi on the first turbo, dropping to ~7psi by redline.

Otherwise I agree with bee, the boost and compression are two different things. Numbers in the 6s are really too low but within Mazda specs. Numbers in the 7s are acceptable, 8s are great and I don't think I've ever seen an engine with numbers all in the mid 9s. Compression depends on cranking speed and engine temp. Nominal cranking speed is 250rpm, if yours was cranked faster the compression would be higher.


Jeff
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2004 | 07:02 PM
  #5  
Nathan Kwok's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 4
From: Huntington Beach, CA, USA
In the past some dealers have converted the compression numbers over to a scale of 10, so 10 is perfect (normally 8.5 kg/cm^2 is considered perfect). Why someone would do this is beyond me I suppose it makes it easier to understand. The bottom line is, if there are no units listed and/or you cannot verify the test was done hot, then I wouldn't put much stock into the test. Either way though as long as the numbers are consistent with each other you should be fine.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
LunchboxSA22
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
37
Oct 26, 2015 10:53 AM
elfking
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
3
Aug 19, 2015 09:48 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:21 AM.