3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Compression Test Result Questions?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-26-04, 04:46 PM
  #1  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
shinchrono's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Marino, California
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Compression Test Result Questions?

The previous owner of my FD says the compression test came out
9.6, 9.6, and 9.6 in front, and 9.4, 9.5, and 9.5 in the rear. as i was reading through the searches, i kept reading numbers in the 6's and 7's! i was wondering...does this mean the car is running a very high boost? if so i'm concerned about the engine running lean...

or is this a conversion from one compression unit to another? (?->psi, for example). i know the psi should be somewhere around 10, so is this a reasonable assumption? please help me with your wisdom

thanks!
Old 10-26-04, 04:49 PM
  #2  
bee
Senior Member

 
bee's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Austin Tx
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lol,

Boost is in no way related to compression. If you have a boost gauge, you should be running a max of 10 psi of boost, assuming your car is stock. As for the compression, those are excellent numbers. So good that I would probably not believe them unless some documentation was provided by the person or place who performed the test.
Old 10-26-04, 04:55 PM
  #3  
bee
Senior Member

 
bee's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Austin Tx
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
By the way, if your new to rotary ownership, you should really read everything on the following website. It will take you awile but the information is worth its weight in paladium.

http://robrobinette.com/
Old 10-26-04, 04:57 PM
  #4  
Do it right, do it once

iTrader: (30)
 
turbojeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Eugene, OR, usa
Posts: 4,830
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
Actually many stock cars run 11-12psi on the first turbo, dropping to ~7psi by redline.

Otherwise I agree with bee, the boost and compression are two different things. Numbers in the 6s are really too low but within Mazda specs. Numbers in the 7s are acceptable, 8s are great and I don't think I've ever seen an engine with numbers all in the mid 9s. Compression depends on cranking speed and engine temp. Nominal cranking speed is 250rpm, if yours was cranked faster the compression would be higher.


Jeff
Old 10-26-04, 07:02 PM
  #5  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Nathan Kwok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Huntington Beach, CA, USA
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
In the past some dealers have converted the compression numbers over to a scale of 10, so 10 is perfect (normally 8.5 kg/cm^2 is considered perfect). Why someone would do this is beyond me I suppose it makes it easier to understand. The bottom line is, if there are no units listed and/or you cannot verify the test was done hot, then I wouldn't put much stock into the test. Either way though as long as the numbers are consistent with each other you should be fine.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
07-01-23 04:40 PM
LunchboxSA22
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
37
10-26-15 10:53 AM
elfking
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
3
08-19-15 09:48 PM



Quick Reply: Compression Test Result Questions?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:12 AM.