3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Catalytic Converter: Suggestions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-28-17, 10:00 AM
  #26  
I'm only asking questions

Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
MK3Brent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 498
Received 23 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by IRPerformance
461 whp/372 tq with our ported and studded motor, S360 single turbo kit, Bonez high flow cat, and Racing Beat catback. These numbers would equate to about 530hp on a Dynojet factoring in the 15% difference commonly found. The cat is not the issue.
Definitely not the original direction intended for this thread, but I am more than happy to help with education.

Wouldn't it be logical to say that w/o the cat, the numbers you posted could only be improved?
It would be interesting to see two back to back runs w/ and w/o the cat to show no difference at all.
Old 08-28-17, 10:02 AM
  #27  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (6)
 
7_rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 7,139
Received 37 Likes on 30 Posts
Does the Bonez not reduce/eliminate most of the smell? I was thinking about going with the Bonez this fall because my car stinks (midpipe)
Old 08-28-17, 10:35 AM
  #28  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (12)
 
moehler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,319
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by MK3Brent
Definitely not the original direction intended for this thread, but I am more than happy to help with education.

Wouldn't it be logical to say that w/o the cat, the numbers you posted could only be improved?
It would be interesting to see two back to back runs w/ and w/o the cat to show no difference at all.
I'm sure the cat reduces power over a midpipe. The point is that if want a cat (for smell, etc.) that you can still make good power with them.
Old 08-28-17, 10:36 AM
  #29  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (12)
 
moehler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,319
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by 7_rocket
Does the Bonez not reduce/eliminate most of the smell? I was thinking about going with the Bonez this fall because my car stinks (midpipe)
With an air pump, yes it eliminates 100% of the smell. W/o an air pump it eliminates most of the smell.
The following users liked this post:
7_rocket (08-28-17)
Old 08-28-17, 01:06 PM
  #30  
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 318 Likes on 190 Posts
Originally Posted by MK3Brent
Definitely not the original direction intended for this thread, but I am more than happy to help with education.

Wouldn't it be logical to say that w/o the cat, the numbers you posted could only be improved?
It would be interesting to see two back to back runs w/ and w/o the cat to show no difference at all.
We have seen gains up to 20 hp at this power level by replacing the high flow cat with a midpipe and installing a better flowing exhaust than the Racing Beat, which is on the restrictive side vs some of the other offerings on the market. My point is you can still make solid numbers with a high flow cat, unlike some who post ignorant comments that you can't or shouldn't run a cat above a certain power level with no factual data. Some people are willing to give up a few hp to remain compliant or avoid the smell of running catless. I'm actually going to dyno another car within the next few weeks with a similar setup to the one who's dyno sheet I posted, but with a Magnaflow midpipe and a different exhaust. I'll post the results when I get them.
The following 2 users liked this post by IRPerformance:
bajaman (08-29-17), MK3Brent (08-28-17)
Old 12-13-17, 10:06 AM
  #31  
Full Member

iTrader: (6)
 
Hi Im Simon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: so cal
Posts: 166
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Topolino
Recently went with a Vibrant Ultra High output cat (p/n 7830 from the link above) on my FD in conjunction with an EFR 7670 turbo. Have mostly used a Bonez high flow cat the last 10 yrs or so with Efini twins, and wanted to give the Vibrant unit a test run. Interestingly enough, we weren't able to boost higher than 10-11 psi on the new turbo setup. Not sure if the Vibrant cat is the primary restriction or not (but obviously no boost creep with it, either).

Seems to knock down the odors well-enough. Not sure if it can pass a legitimate emissions test, though.
Damn I thought the Vibrant cat would work well. I was looking into the Vibrant and HJS high flow cats. Anyone have any experience with HJS? The BMW and Porsche guys seem to love it and they are expensive, $600-1000 USD. I was mainly looking to get rid of the exhaust stink.

Universal catalysts - HJS Motorsport & Tuning
Old 12-15-17, 07:12 AM
  #32  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (6)
 
David Hayes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 6,505
Received 177 Likes on 120 Posts
I may be the only 3 rotor guy to run a cat on his/her car. Wanted to get rid of the stink so tried a few units. Settled on the MBS 100 cell unit and have had it installed for around 3 years:

High Flow Catalytic Converters - Mandrel Bending Solutions

Holds up to the heat of the rotary and eliminates a good bit of the stink. The 200 cell would eliminate more of the smell but I was worried about the restriction. And yes, you can make good power using a high-flow cat. Here is my dyno at 20 PSI:



Made 716 WHP and 570 ft. lbs.
Attached Thumbnails Catalytic Converter: Suggestions-img_20171004_0002.jpg  
The following 2 users liked this post by David Hayes:
cib24 (01-04-18), Natey (01-01-18)
Old 01-01-18, 02:25 PM
  #33  
Original Gangster/Rotary!


iTrader: (213)
 
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Posts: 30,525
Received 538 Likes on 325 Posts
David, do you have any pics of that converter installed on your setup? Assuming it's mounted pretty far downstream. The price sure as hell is right, and they seem to be nice and compact based on the pics on the site you linked to.

I may have to change my tune on this subject, once you stop learning and growing you may as well be six feet under, right?

Happy New Year all
Old 01-01-18, 04:27 PM
  #34  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (6)
 
David Hayes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 6,505
Received 177 Likes on 120 Posts
Hey Rich. I don't seem to have a pic handy but will take one - once the car comes back from the body shop. A lady with a 1994 Buick Roadmaster station wagon backed into me a few weeks ago and it crunched the left side of my bumper.

As I recall, the converter is placed forward in the midpipe, not back, but I'd need to verify this as the work was done some time ago. Has held up well and cleans up most of the rotary stink. Zach at Addicted and I think there is little to no impact of the converter on WHP. If you were to use a higher cell count one (say 400 or higher) you'd definitely get a restriction so it's a matter of using a lower cell count and giving up some of its cleaning abilities.
Old 01-04-18, 06:06 AM
  #35  
Senior Member

 
cib24's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 335
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
People need to stop thinking that a cat is going to inhibit your ability to make power. High flow cats are not really that much of a restriction at all and like IR Performance says, at 450, 500, 600, whatever horsepower you aren't going to notice 10 or 20 hp. You probably wouldn't even notice that difference on a car with stock twins.

Manufacturers today have cars like the Corvette pushing 700+ horsepower and they have 2-4 cats. Set your exhaust up right and you will have plenty of flow and stay away from the headaches and poison to your lungs and the environment associated with running catless.
The following users liked this post:
NJ-JDM (01-04-18)
Old 03-06-19, 06:23 PM
  #36  
JDM Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
FEED AFFLUX v5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 915
Received 196 Likes on 149 Posts
Resurrecting an old thread here, but does anyone know if SMB are still in business?

The website either errors out or displays poorly whenever I try......

Thanks!
Old 03-06-19, 10:45 PM
  #37  
Rotary Motoring

iTrader: (9)
 
BLUE TII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 8,209
Received 763 Likes on 505 Posts
FEED AFFLUX v5
Resurrecting an old thread here, but does anyone know if SMB are still in business?

The website either errors out or displays poorly whenever I try......

Thanks!


I read on this site that Marcus Read who sells FD parts on Facebook has contacts with SMB and might be able to get batches of exhausts made.

https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=527820134

I had to put my 3" resonated SMB highflow cat on my car to stop the boost creep with stock twins. It will run 12psi with the SMB high flow cat, but was creeping to 17psi with 4" downpipe back open exhaust. I tried a 3" resonated midpipe and even with that it was creeping to 15 or 16psi.

So anyone that says highflow cat flows well- not really; but it can be a useful restriction.

Problem is, I just looked at the SMB cat and its starting to lose its shape finally after running with no emissions (airpump). Don't know how much longer it will last with my abuse. It blows some big flames through it if I just wing it up to the 9,000rpm rev-linit which I was not expecting.
The following users liked this post:
FEED AFFLUX v5 (03-07-19)
Old 03-07-19, 04:00 PM
  #38  
43 yrs of driving My 7's

iTrader: (1)
 
mikejokich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Alabama
Posts: 414
Received 108 Likes on 69 Posts
Originally Posted by BLUE TII







I read on this site that Marcus Read who sells FD parts on Facebook has contacts with SMB and might be able to get batches of exhausts made.

https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=527820134

I had to put my 3" resonated SMB highflow cat on my car to stop the boost creep with stock twins. It will run 12psi with the SMB high flow cat, but was creeping to 17psi with 4" downpipe back open exhaust. I tried a 3" resonated midpipe and even with that it was creeping to 15 or 16psi.

So anyone that says highflow cat flows well- not really; but it can be a useful restriction.

Problem is, I just looked at the SMB cat and its starting to lose its shape finally after running with no emissions (airpump). Don't know how much longer it will last with my abuse. It blows some big flames through it if I just wing it up to the 9,000rpm rev-linit which I was not expecting.
I had an SMB cat for several years too. They begin to melt at the higher temps of our rotary exhaust. The deformation you are seeing in the honeycomb is the melting. The air pump is not necessary for a metal cat and this lack of an air pump did not affect the SMB cat per say except for it may have slightly decreased the exhaust temp from the pump air introduced. Likely negligible. After my SMB melted, I bought the newer Vibrant GESI UHO cat. Higher melting temp, 300 cell rather than the SMB 100 cell, and rated for 500 hp. Simply better.
Mike

Last edited by mikejokich; 03-07-19 at 04:01 PM. Reason: typo




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:14 PM.