3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

BNR Stage 3 Twin Turbo Upgrade

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 12:00 AM
  #101  
moconnor's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 97
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by Fsunoles06
Now if you choose not to tune for your WI setup, you have no problems if it fails on you, but at the cost of 30 whp.
No sensible person tunes for water injection on a rotary. It is a safety measure - no more.

So again, is 15 PSI really going to be that safe on pump gas consistantly? Probably not, unless you are sure you are getting 93 octane everytime at the pump. Even if you have those upgraded secondaries, you still can't guarantee the gas your putting in your car.

14 PSI more than likely will be a lot safer.
What about 14.5 psi? I get the strong feeling that you are pulling numbers out of your ***.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 12:24 AM
  #102  
Fsunoles06's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: Pearland/Houston
Originally Posted by moconnor
No sensible person tunes for water injection on a rotary. It is a safety measure - no more.



What about 14.5 psi? I get the strong feeling that you are pulling numbers out of your ***.

Of course people have tuned with WI. And its common sense lower boost is safer than higher boost. I'm just saying I don't think I would feel comfortable running higher than 14psi consistantly.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 10:29 AM
  #103  
matty's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,014
Likes: 40
From: CT
Originally Posted by Fsunoles06
I'm just saying I don't think I would feel comfortable running higher than 14psi consistantly.
you're wrong.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 10:32 AM
  #104  
Improved FD's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
From: NC
no, you're wrong.....or maybe you think you know more than howard coleman?
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 10:35 AM
  #105  
Improved FD's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
From: NC
dp
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 10:38 AM
  #106  
matty's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,014
Likes: 40
From: CT
Originally Posted by Improved FD
no, you're wrong.....or maybe you think you know more than howard coleman?
no u are ******* wrong. i am tired of debating this with you. i ran 15psi for 5 yrs. hundreds of guys here do. some guys run even more. u have had bad experiences with your car and blame boost or whatever reasons instead of blaming yourself. wake up.

i can quote a dozen people posting in recent threads in which thsi topioc was debated if u would like.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 11:09 AM
  #107  
BOTTLEFED's Avatar
Freudian slip
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
From: Pocatello, ID
Sorry to hi-jack this thread (it seems to be off-topic anyway)
I'm debating getting a set of used M2s vs new BNRs.
Other than the new/used aspect, what are the pros and cons of each?
I've done some searching on the forum, but no real comparisons were definitive and everything was speculation and personal accounts - no dyno results or numbers.
I'm planing on pulling as much power out of them, sequentially, as possible. So which would be the best to do this with?
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 11:28 AM
  #108  
ronarndt's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 691
Likes: 24
From: Catlett, VA USA
BNR vs Pettit

Bottlefed- Why did you switch from your Pettit twins? I have had mine for about two plus years and run 15psi with fast spool up and maintenance of steady 15 psi thru transition from primary to secondary turbo up to 7k rpm. I have toyed with going single, but would miss the low rpm capability that I now have. How did Pettit re-configure the internal dimensions on yours?

Has anyone had both the BNR and Pettit on the same car to compare performance?
Ron A.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 01:48 PM
  #109  
BoostCrzy's Avatar
Doritos on a toothpick
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 5
From: west palm beach, FL
Originally Posted by prescription 7
the guys who have done it successfully is only because they have properly tuned their cars and have invested in them to make them as reliably sound as possible.

isnt that the point?.....

I have been running stock twins on my stock port REMAN for 4 years now at 15+psi ....with a stock ECU!(aic) AND on stock "junk" 2mm apex seals(2mm apex seals are not junk...again its a user error issue).....so whats the problem??....do it right or dont do it....... Right??...lol.... Matty you are not alone...dont worry

Last edited by BoostCrzy; Nov 21, 2006 at 01:56 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 01:57 PM
  #110  
moconnor's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 97
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by BoostCrzy
I have been running stock twins on my stock ports for 4 years now at 15+psi
Here are the stock ECU's fuel cut numbers:

rpm max boost
1000 11.8
1500 11.8
2000 11.8
2500 11.8
3000 12.2
3500 12.4
4000 12.8
4500 13.3
5000 12.2
5500 11.3
6000 11.1
6500 10.7
7000 10.7

Something isn't stock if you are hitting 15psi. (Or your boost gauge is suspect.)
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 02:22 PM
  #111  
gracer7-rx7's Avatar
needs more track time
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,789
Likes: 810
From: Bay Area CA
He's using AIC (additional injector controller) injecting more fuel.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 02:53 PM
  #112  
BOTTLEFED's Avatar
Freudian slip
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
From: Pocatello, ID
Originally Posted by ronarndt
Bottlefed- Why did you switch from your Pettit twins? I have had mine for about two plus years and run 15psi with fast spool up and maintenance of steady 15 psi thru transition from primary to secondary turbo up to 7k rpm. I have toyed with going single, but would miss the low rpm capability that I now have. How did Pettit re-configure the internal dimensions on yours?

Has anyone had both the BNR and Pettit on the same car to compare performance?
Ron A.
I bought an RX6 thinking I would be happy with the response and simplification of a single setup, but after having it for awhile now, I miss the instant boost of the seq. and had them dialed in very well (check my sig for mods since I haven't changed it from the Pettit setup). I was only running about 13psi.
I love the Pettits but they have nowhere near the potential of the BNRs or M2s. As stated, I want to see how much power is possible out of a seq. setup. When I bought the Pettits, I called around and found that Pettit really didn't do anything to their turbos to make more power - they didn't even port the wastegate:?
The internals were modified by me after seeing what Pettit did (or did not do). I ported the wastegate and re-radiused the exh. housing. I also opened up the turbine outlets, and exh manifold inlets.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 03:06 PM
  #113  
BoostCrzy's Avatar
Doritos on a toothpick
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 5
From: west palm beach, FL
Originally Posted by moconnor

Something isn't stock if you are hitting 15psi. (Or your boost gauge is suspect.)

NEWS FLASH------ HKS released a new thingy called the Fuel Cut Defencer about 15 years ago.....look into it.

yes....stock ECU with AIC and FCD.....works like a champ!
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 01:28 AM
  #114  
Improved FD's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by matty
no u are ******* wrong.
you're such a punk

i am tired of debating this with you.
good, hit the road, then

i ran 15psi for 5 yrs
so we heard

hundreds of guys here do
ahhh....now it's "hundreds"....before it was "several"

why not go for "thousands" next thread?

u have had bad experiences with your car and blame boost or whatever reasons instead of blaming yourself. wake up.
you don't know anything about my car, so shut it

i can quote a dozen people posting in recent threads in which thsi topioc was debated if u would like.
and I can quote a dozen more...including Howard Coleman, who races these cars

btw your spelling sucks
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 08:15 AM
  #115  
matty's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,014
Likes: 40
From: CT
Originally Posted by Improved FD
you're such a punk



good, hit the road, then



so we heard



ahhh....now it's "hundreds"....before it was "several"

why not go for "thousands" next thread?



you don't know anything about my car, so shut it



and I can quote a dozen more...including Howard Coleman, who races these cars

btw your spelling sucks
send me a quote that says u cant run 15psi on the stockers from howard coleman.

call me a punk or whatever u want but the facts remain that u are wrong and i am right. boostcrzy runs 15psi and he is only one to chime in. most guys that have the fuel and tune run 15psi. stop crying. Mrrx7tt runs greater than 15 psi, yellowr1 does, me, goodfellas did, boostn7, g's 3rd gen, and thats justt o name a few. eeveryone that spends the time to build the car right does. even rynberg runs 15psi and i consider him to be a pretty conservative guy.

stop spewing your bad advice to noobs who want to make their car fast.

several people have sent me pms already telling me that u are an idiot. stop crying and open your eyes. what is your reasoning again for not runnign 15psi?

Last edited by matty; Nov 22, 2006 at 08:26 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 08:31 AM
  #116  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,818
Likes: 656
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
One thing to note: 15 psi on the stock twins isn't the same as 15 psi on a nice single, or 15 psi on the BNRs.

You're talking about the difference between 350 rwhp and 400 rwhp, which is substantial.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 09:27 AM
  #117  
Improved FD's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by matty
send me a quote that says u cant run 15psi on the stockers from howard coleman.
sure thing nutjob

first statement, post #1

https://www.rx7club.com/showpost.php...82&postcount=1

those of you w the stock boat-anchor turbo system... you ARE limited to 15 psi on pump. you are limited to 15 psi on racegas. that's because the OEM turbos cavitate (outside edge of compressor reaches supersonic and can't hold on to the air molecules: result super heated low density low oxygen charge from 15 on up) and make less hp.




Mrrx7tt runs greater than 15 psi, yellowr1 does, me, goodfellas did, boostn7, g's 3rd gen, and thats justt o name a few. eeveryone that spends the time to build the car right does. even rynberg runs 15psi and i consider him to be a pretty conservative guy.
as BDC said, there are many different factors that go into engine load, aside from measured boost pressure

and as I said, you may get away with it, you may not, but the bottom line is pump gas octane rating/quality varies enough to make it risky...why risk it? why see how close to the edge you can get? bragging rights on an internet forum?

stop spewing your bad advice to noobs who want to make their car fast.
right back at 'cha, punk

several people have sent me pms already telling me that u are an idiot. stop crying and open your eyes
stop whining like a jr. high kid, and post something logcal and well written here for ONCE

geez...
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 09:57 AM
  #118  
matty's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,014
Likes: 40
From: CT
Originally Posted by Improved FD
sure thing nutjob

first statement, post #1

https://www.rx7club.com/showpost.php...82&postcount=1

those of you w the stock boat-anchor turbo system... you ARE limited to 15 psi on pump. you are limited to 15 psi on racegas. that's because the OEM turbos cavitate (outside edge of compressor reaches supersonic and can't hold on to the air molecules: result super heated low density low oxygen charge from 15 on up) and make less hp.






as BDC said, there are many different factors that go into engine load, aside from measured boost pressure

and as I said, you may get away with it, you may not, but the bottom line is pump gas octane rating/quality varies enough to make it risky...why risk it? why see how close to the edge you can get? bragging rights on an internet forum?



right back at 'cha, punk



stop whining like a jr. high kid, and post something logcal and well written here for ONCE

geez...
cornball with the owned icon. grow up.

he says above 15psi.

whats better logic then my own experience genious? u are the only nay sayer about 15psi.

your arguement is thesilliest thing that i have heard. if u get crap gas you are blowing up wether u are runnign 15psi or 13psi. lol .wow dude u are an ***.

lol why run 15ps u ask? for bragging rights on the internet? is this how YOU think? WOW! u are truly an embarrassment to yourself! i run 15psi for the very reason everyone else does. to go faster! isnt that why we all mod our cars. if u want to go fast in these cars u have to crank up the boost. if u want to spend a ton of money only to go a bit faster like you do...well thats your own prerogative

Last edited by matty; Nov 22, 2006 at 10:07 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 10:07 AM
  #119  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
That's ENOUGH guys. Tone it down a few notches please. This is a thread about BNRs, not whether you can run 15 psi or more on pump gas. We just had two great informative non-pissing contest threads on this very topic. Post there if you want to keep discussing this but keep it civil. Thanks.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 11:05 AM
  #120  
ronarndt's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 691
Likes: 24
From: Catlett, VA USA
Bnr

Bottlefed wrote: The internals were modified by me after seeing what Pettit did (or did not do). I ported the wastegate and re-radiused the exh. housing. I also opened up the turbine outlets, and exh manifold inlets.

Hmmmm. When I ordered mine from Pettit, the internal modifications you list were done by them. They were unable to get any used cores to rebuild, so there was an extra charge for a new turbo to use as their starting point, plus additional charge for internal machine work and ceramic coating. I'm satisfied with what I got, but from what you describe, it sounds like it was a custom unit.
Ron A.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 12:19 PM
  #121  
BOTTLEFED's Avatar
Freudian slip
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
From: Pocatello, ID
I'm not trying to flame Pettit or anything, but have you opened up your "modified" twins?
If you do, you'll see that there is nothing really done inside. Compare it to a stock set and you'll notice a few grinding marks here and there but nothing to give one the impression that they will make more power.
As stated, they don't even port the wastgate. After a call to Pettit, I learned that none of the employees that worked there when they were selling these is employed there any longer. Cam answered a few questions but could only quote the old info posted on their site. Again, nothing about porting the wastegate or any major honing of the exh. housing.
My set is custom because I made it custom, not because of what Pettit did. My mods were done after talking with Bryan @ BNR and his recommendations.
Sorry for the rant, but it just upsets me that Pettit made claims that they made "power increasing" modifications and charged more than BNR's for a set of turbos that are nothing more than a fancy rebuild.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 05:48 PM
  #122  
Goukid2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn New York
M2? Who else makes a upgrade for the twins besides BNR? Petit? Thats new to me and Well i guess this would all be new to me since its only been 5 days that ive had the car.

I heard you talking about porting out the exhaust manifold? Is there any benefit in that? How much can you actually port out of the manifold? Does BNR do this as part of his upgrade? Im really liking what the stage 3 can do but I really want to see about 450RWHP Sequentially setup. Im thinking a ported exhaust manifold and a Half Bridge port rebuild instead of a street port will produce those numbers for me?? Im actually liking the fact that you guys are admitting to nothing spooling up as fast as the sequential setup. Not even the Apexi kit huh, good, more reasons for me to do the BNR. I know Mazda made this Sequential setup for a reason, im just gonna tweak it a bit.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 06:18 PM
  #123  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
You've had your car for 5 days. I would suggest slowing WAY down and actually learning about things before just jumping in.

You are never going to make any where near 450 rwhp sequentially. It is almost impossible to make 400 rwhp sequentially.

A half-bridge would be dumb with stock or modified twins. It would not make sense until getting into medium to bigger single turbos.

BNR are the only upgraded twins that are actual upgrades.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 06:34 PM
  #124  
matty's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,014
Likes: 40
From: CT
Originally Posted by rynberg
You've had your car for 5 days. I would suggest slowing WAY down and actually learning about things before just jumping in.

You are never going to make any where near 450 rwhp sequentially. It is almost impossible to make 400 rwhp sequentially.

A half-bridge would be dumb with stock or modified twins. It would not make sense until getting into medium to bigger single turbos.

BNR are the only upgraded twins that are actual upgrades.
+1. i8 couldnt have said it better. Do some searching man. there is a ton of info on this website some good stuff and alot of crap. guys like rynberg know what they are talkign about. get to know the guys that do and obviously pay more attention to their posts.

The only thing that i would add is given that you already are interested in getting 450rwhp i would strongly suggest looking into single turbo setups. the bnrs are pretty sick if u want to keep that stock appearance for emmissions purposes or have a goal of say 400rwhp with quick spool. but once u start talking about 450 and that u have only had the car for a couple of days i could tell that your thirst is going to grow beyond what a twin setup could do. Talk to Aspec tunning. The guy there knows a ton and makes some pretty sick kits that will better fit your goals i think.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2006 | 06:00 AM
  #125  
Goukid2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn New York
Why should i have to slow down? I just want the information. The first thing on my list honestly is to convert it to 5 speed. the turbo replacement will come much later down the line. Info is all i want.

And im not new to this game at all. i had my T2 for 6 years beofre i decided to sell her. I know what im doing, the only thing i need light shined on is info about the sequential setup because i know nothing about them. And a half brige would not be dumb with the stock twins. I have a buddy that has it right now as we speak, he's breaking the motor in so he has yet to actually get on it. Its what you want guy not what someone suggests.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:27 AM.