3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

bnr stage 3 ?'s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 07:10 AM
  #26  
matty's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,014
Likes: 40
From: CT
Originally posted by Mr rx-7 tt
I have seen 3 sets and not a one made more power than the stockers.

Here is what 362 rwhp gets you.
http://www.bridow.com/rx7/dragquick.html

Here is what 386 rwhp did (stock twins)
Anthonys 1993 Rx7 - 386 RWHP - 11.1@122.6 - Haltech Engine Management

One of the guys here on the forum made 402 hp on the stock block and the twins.

The dyno plot on Jasons forum is sae and not adjusted...

The B.S. gets old... the BNR's have yet to make any serious hp...I kept hearing 430 rwhp this and 465 that well what happened?
i used to think JUST like you man. I was one of the biggest skeptics on this board in regards to these turbos. Others have pounded into my head that the real benefit of upgrading is not to gain rwhp at said 15 psi but they enable you to run 17-19psi effeciently
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 07:15 AM
  #27  
matty's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,014
Likes: 40
From: CT
Originally posted by Mr rx-7 tt


2) There are a couple BNR's around here and all they have seen is my tail lights.
If you dont mind please provide some details of your car. What rwhp, traps, etc...

guys this is a great thread and long over do..lets keep it going...
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 07:20 AM
  #28  
matty's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,014
Likes: 40
From: CT
dd
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 07:20 AM
  #29  
matty's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,014
Likes: 40
From: CT
Originally posted by artguy
the bnrs...up by a handful of hp over the stock set but obviously running at a cooler temp due to the large wheels...better efficiency....yet unfinished design issues cloud their success...
the above looks like a good synopsis, but....how do we know they run at a cooler temp and will last?

and where is goodfellas...he loves these things.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 12:35 PM
  #30  
artguy's Avatar
WTB** Very Low Miles 94-95
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
From: Tejas
the temp thing...its math...larger wheels need to spin less in order to get the same flow right? of course I know nothing about math

the tests m2 did with their upgrades showed 25 degrees c in temp difference between them and the stockers. i dont know what the bnr temp differences are.


j
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 01:24 PM
  #31  
SPOautos's Avatar
Hey, where did my $$$ go?
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
From: Bimingham, AL
Originally posted by Mr rx-7 tt
1) Kevin Wyum trapped 126 ...

2) There are a couple BNR's around here and all they have seen is my tail lights.

3) Don't spar with me... I was building race motors when you were on your schwinn. Ask Willie Rodriguez...

4) Show me a dyno...I showed you a 386 rwhp car and everyone knows of the 402 hp car with the stockers here on the forum. Ask Badog what hp he made on the "stockers"...It's now your turn to show me the 425-465 rwhp bnr car dyno. If you are selling a product and you are claiming hp #'s then show them. Take your car to a local dyno and post them. How about this Saturday?

5) Think of the area I am in and think of who you sold your turbos to.

1) Sorry to break it to you but Kevin didnt trap 126 on stock twins they were upgraded by a shop to his specs and he wouldnt release the info as to what they were. Also, I was thinking it was a little less than 126 but might be wrong about that. In addition, from what I hear he was at an event at the time and had his car on a diet.

2) Explain how that is the turbos? How do we know everything else including thier tuning is "right"? There are pleanty of single turbo cars on the forum not making power, I guess we should use them as the yard stick to judge what those turbos are capable of....according to your thinking anyway.

3) So? What does that have to do with turbos? We supposed to respect you cause you claim to build "race engines"? It doesnt seem to be doing much for your dyno sheet.

4) The only dyno numbers that have been claimed are based one the dyno sheet thats been posted about 5000 times around this site. It can also be found at the RX7store as a link at the bottom of the stage3 page...like I mentioned in my last post. No one claimed any dyno numbers higher than my dyno. They claimed that dyno sheet and a 125mph trap with 100lbs of extra weight, granny shifting, and on 93 octane. If you work the math with the mph it leads to about 430ish. BUT, no one ever claimed it DYNOED 430ish.

5) Well, I cant reply to that cause I dont know who he sold turbos to or anything like that. I'm only commenting on my situation.

You never "kept" hearing anything other than what was done. I tell people exactly what my car does and thats it, nothing else. I've pointed this out to you before, you just keep acting like I havent.

STEPHEN

Last edited by SPOautos; Jul 25, 2003 at 01:37 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 03:28 PM
  #32  
artguy's Avatar
WTB** Very Low Miles 94-95
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
From: Tejas
Originally posted by SPOautos
1)

3) So? What does that have to do with turbos? We supposed to respect you cause you claim to build "race engines"? It doesnt seem to be doing much for your dyno sheet.


STEPHEN

OUCH ...right in the ballz with that one.

hahahha...you guys are hilarious!!
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2003 | 02:49 AM
  #33  
FEARED7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
"5) Think of the area I am in and think of who you sold your turbos too. " MR RX7 TT.

I tell you what, tell all the customers loacal to you that have the stage 3's, to come to Birmingham for the 2nd annual KAN Tuning Exhibition. We have about 10 planned on coming, 3 of my personal cars, and if more turn out, thats even better!

Bryan
www.bnrsupercars.com

Last edited by FEARED7; Jul 26, 2003 at 02:54 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2003 | 06:12 PM
  #34  
rotorbrain's Avatar
fart on a friends head!!!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,104
Likes: 2
From: sheppard AFB, TX
hey, i have first hand experience with the stage 3's. they are amazing. they spool like seq. twins except w/o the hesitation. i was gonna trade my to4e for his twins. they were that amazing. theres a guy out here in tennessee that will more than prove what they can do. his car is absolutely amazing and if bryan has the oil thing done and squared away by the tuning event then hell be there. ill be there regardless as i only have minor stuff to get done. im willing to place a bet on the bnr's as opposed to the stock twins. they WILL outperform the stock twins.

paul
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2003 | 12:21 AM
  #35  
kwikrx7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
From: Mechanicsburg, PA USA
The guy who bought my car said my FD had much more low-end torque and a better power band than any stock-turbo FD he's ever driven. The stockers provide good power and have been proven (with good tuning) to put down 380+ rwhp at 17-18 psi - but most will only see 340-360 rwhp with normal bolt-ons and streetport at 14-15 psi.

I don't understand how some of you guys can't see the benefit of upgraded twins. The power was instantly noticeable. At 3K rpms I could nail it and all of my damn CDs would shoot out of my CD case under my radio - this wouldn't happen when I was running the stockers non-seq at 14-15 psi.

I don't know of any 380 rwhp FDs at 15 psi running a HF cat that are running the stock turbos. I know Goodfellas got 368 with a HF cat but his car was a freak - some can't even achieve that with a midpipe. My car had conservative tuning from KDR - with Kan tuning it could have been over 390 rwhp - we'll never know.

But my stage 2s friggen ripped - they easily outpowered and outspooled my stock turbos - but they need to be run at 15-17 psi to get the benefit from them.

Also, look at artguy's primary turbo in seq - how many stock turbos have achieved 210 rwhp on the primary before transition? Most stockers at 15 psi will see 180-185 max.

I love these threads....
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2003 | 02:19 AM
  #36  
artguy's Avatar
WTB** Very Low Miles 94-95
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
From: Tejas
werd
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2003 | 11:23 AM
  #37  
Scrub's Avatar
bow leggin'
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,061
Likes: 5
From: Delaware
yes I have a stock ported motor...but they do not spool like sequential. Mine see full boost around 4200-4500 RPMS. I am not sure why the lag is so bad, sometimes it pisses me off and sometimes Im okay with it.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 01:11 AM
  #38  
FEARED7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
Hey Scrub. When the weather cools down, the car will wake up from hibernation! The stock port will not make much of a difference, but the good thing about a stock ported engine you can run more timing than a Street port. Mid range/bottom end can be improved by more timing and better A/F ratios. Tuning does some wonders. My car is a bit laggy, but I am running a base map so it needs some work done to it and I am sure then, it will rip. Above 5K, I couldn't ask for anything better. I did a second gear roll last night about 55 mph and I think I broke my ladder bar near my rear end . Love it when the drivetrain is near its max!
Bryan
www.bnrsupercars.com

Last edited by FEARED7; Jul 29, 2003 at 01:13 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 01:25 AM
  #39  
rotorbrain's Avatar
fart on a friends head!!!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,104
Likes: 2
From: sheppard AFB, TX
hey scrub. . . you need to get with some of the guys trying to get steve out to the NE. let him tune it and i KNOW youll see the reall bnr stage 3s.

paul
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 03:19 AM
  #40  
BoostedRex's Avatar
NorCal 7's Co-founder
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,130
Likes: 5
From: Rocklin, CA
Hey Paul, what's it cost to get Kan to your area and how big of group do you need? That info would be very nice to have, especially since I have never even met the guy. All I know is his reputation, and that's solid gold!

Zach
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 07:25 AM
  #41  
Scrub's Avatar
bow leggin'
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,061
Likes: 5
From: Delaware
Steve was just out here for rotorfest.....and he did tune my car
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 08:20 AM
  #42  
BoostedRex's Avatar
NorCal 7's Co-founder
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,130
Likes: 5
From: Rocklin, CA
Ouch, talk about not seeing that one coming.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 08:31 AM
  #43  
tomaszjc7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
From: Lemont, Il
Originally posted by kwikrx7
But my stage 2s friggen ripped - they easily outpowered and outspooled my stock turbos - but they need to be run at 15-17 psi to get the benefit from them.
I agree with kwikrx7, the major benefit to getting upgraded turbos is that they can handle higher psi at lower temps than the stock turbos resulting in more power w/out as much lag as a single. I ordered the Stage 2's from bryan a few weeks ago and I should be getting them this thursday... I talked to bryan yesterday about my setup (3mm seals, street ported, 1300ccc's, FMIC, Power FC, the stage 2's at 17-19psi) and he said I should be putting around 400hp down to the ground. Anyway, hope everything works out and after seeing that 386hp can get you 11's I cant wait to get to the strip and hopefully get kicked out!

-Tom
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2003 | 11:56 AM
  #44  
SleepR1's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 2
From: IN
What's the differences between Stage 2 and Stage 3 BNRs?
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2003 | 01:16 PM
  #45  
ZeroBanger's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,323
Likes: 1
From: Buckhead
if you want 400 rwhp, you need a single. BNR's are not going to get you 400 and they aren't going to last more than amonth.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2003 | 06:53 PM
  #46  
rotorbrain's Avatar
fart on a friends head!!!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,104
Likes: 2
From: sheppard AFB, TX
no comment. . . .
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2003 | 11:16 PM
  #47  
duboisr's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,171
Likes: 1
From: Nashville Tn
Does Garfinkle have the improved stage 3 set . He is installing something now . He is busy making parts and smilling .Rotorbrain may know and of course Feared7 knows
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2003 | 08:06 AM
  #48  
rotorbrain's Avatar
fart on a friends head!!!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,104
Likes: 2
From: sheppard AFB, TX
again. . . no comment. . .
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2003 | 02:45 PM
  #49  
unixpilot's Avatar
Check out my Mooseknuckle
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From: Houston TX
I can neither confirm no deny.........are you the re-incarnation of Ollie North?
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2003 | 04:28 PM
  #50  
DCrosby's Avatar
No it's not Turbo'd
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,511
Likes: 2
From: Los Angeles, Ca
So, ZeroBanger you obviously have BNR's and have tried this !? Since you speak so intently on the matter !

Also you'd think with Water Injection ANYTHING is possible... I thought with WI 500HP was possible with a stock setup and No IC ....
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LongDuck
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
12
Oct 7, 2015 08:12 PM
matty
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
40
Oct 6, 2015 09:13 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32 AM.