3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Attention '95 owners (the last US FD)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 2, 2008 | 02:08 PM
  #26  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by internal comsucktion engi
I agree 100% Gordon..... though, (to add) I believe the main cause of the "down fall" of the FD in the states was, incompetence and ignorance on the part of dealerships nation wide. Proper education and training was never accomplished thoroughly on the part of mazda/ford international.

-J
that is why we have the rx8 now.

although to be fair, if you didnt live in an area where FD's sold, do you expect a truck mechanic to fix the turbo system on a car he's only seen a pitcher of once?

those are the kind of tech who can find a vacuum leak on a chevy, but cant on a rotary.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2008 | 03:28 PM
  #27  
Torque South's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Good point. Lord knows I ain't no rocket scientist either.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2008 | 05:37 PM
  #28  
JM1FD's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by gmonsen
Anyone know how to post a video? I sure don't.
I would suggest that you upload it to YouTube then post a link to it here.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2008 | 06:36 PM
  #29  
seven lust's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
From: tenn
If I remember right mine was a silver 95 r2 and was titled in may of 96, or around there. I think it had a number of 455 but I could be off , as it has been awhile.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2008 | 08:07 PM
  #30  
SLOASFK's Avatar
Top's always down
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,841
Likes: 2
From: Spain
Gordon, you can e-mail the video to me and I can upload it to my youtube account.

PM me and I'll send you my e-mail address

-B
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2008 | 08:00 PM
  #31  
JConn2299's Avatar
reliable performance
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 383
Likes: 1
From: MA, USA
Originally Posted by Julian

And by fear of read outs .. I too ment the car would need modifying at $$$. Many n/a cars went over to OBDII for just a few dollars cost of the system vs. going back to the drawing borad and developing the Renesis engine.



The car easily met the emission standards of the time. Massachusetts has the same standards as California and my car came in well under the limits at the smog test station.

The cost involved was putting in the OBD II system itself. One published report said it would have cost Mazda 5 million dollars to develop the software programming and the minor amount of hardware needed to put an OBD II system in the FD. That's not a big deal when you're selling 25,000 626's. But with only 500 '95 RX-7's selling slowly it added quite a bit to the cost.

Still, manufacturers are often willing to take losses on cars that are image leaders. When Ford took over Mazda one executive was quoted as saying they lost money on the 3rd Gen. And Ford reportedly lost money on every Ford GT sold.
But they figured the image building for the brand was worth it.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2008 | 10:08 PM
  #32  
Julian's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 5
From: Longview, Texas
Originally Posted by JConn2299
The car easily met the emission standards of the time. Massachusetts has the same standards as California and my car came in well under the limits at the smog test station.
I never claimed that the car didn't meet the emission standards of the time. Mazda meet and exceeded the full letter of the law, just as did all the other turbo cars of the time. Just that OBDII had the capability of giving the government access to the real driving conditions; for which the car manufacturer could be held accountable.Very few if any turbo cars of the day would meet the emission standards under a boost condition.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2008 | 02:18 PM
  #33  
Enthalpy's Avatar
Completely Rotarded
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: Katy, Texas
12/95 white PEP
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2008 | 04:48 PM
  #34  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by JConn2299
.

Still, manufacturers are often willing to take losses on cars that are image leaders. When Ford took over Mazda one executive was quoted as saying they lost money on the 3rd Gen. And Ford reportedly lost money on every Ford GT sold.
But they figured the image building for the brand was worth it.
i bet in 1995 they had lost money, but i wonder if it balanced out by now? they have sold a lot of parts...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RX7-RR
Introduce yourself
8
Jun 10, 2018 11:40 AM
Bauer778
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
10
Nov 4, 2015 04:42 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:43 AM.