3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Anybody used Slick50 products for a 13b engine before??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 24, 2008 | 12:11 PM
  #1  
Crybabii's Avatar
Thread Starter
new ***** rx7
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: bangkok, Thaialnd
Anybody used Slick50 products for a 13b engine before??

I am thinking of using slick50 engine and transmision treatment for my fd anybody used it before or reccomd it.. will it damage my engine??
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2008 | 12:18 PM
  #2  
'85GSL-SE's Avatar
I swear I didn't know.
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
From: Vic's Mom's House
^ haha, I watched a guy use it in his 12A a few years back here where I live because he used it in his piston engine and it worked there. So he proceeded and hey it worked great!, until he went WOT... The motor blew itself apart. It was damn hilarious yet tragic for the 12A at the same time and those are some tough little motors.

My recommendation keep it away from a rotary and it will be happy!
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2008 | 12:28 PM
  #3  
Crybabii's Avatar
Thread Starter
new ***** rx7
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: bangkok, Thaialnd
hahaha thought so.. so do you know of anything that will protect my seals and rotor housing?? and also my transimision.. manual by the way.. anyway i need to really protect the engine as I rev it up to 6-7k rpms most of the time.. my fd is almost stock..
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2008 | 12:35 PM
  #4  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by Crybabii
so do you know of anything that will protect my seals and rotor housing?? and also my transimision..
Proper maintenance. There is nothing wrong with revving the motor up when you drive it. Just keep up with the proper maintenance and use the proper fluids.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2008 | 01:35 PM
  #5  
Sgtblue's Avatar
Urban Combat Vet
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 12,160
Likes: 983
From: Mid-west
Arrow

http://www.fd3s.net/oil.html#ADD
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2008 | 02:17 PM
  #6  
MrNizzles's Avatar
NizzleMania Productions
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 686
Likes: 1
From: California
^^ From link above, I think this about sums up the effect of Slick 50 engine treatment:


NASA Lewis Research also ran tests on PTFE additives and they concluded that:

"In the types of bearing surface contact we have looked at, we have seen no benefit. In some cases we have seen detrimental effect. The solids in the oil tend to accumulate at inlets and act as a dam, which simply blocks the oil from entering. Instead of helping, it is actually depriving parts of lubricant."

Chief Chemist of Redline Synthetic Oil Company, Roy Howell, says:

"... to plate Teflon on a metal needs an absolutely clean, high temperature surface, in a vacuum. Therefore, it is highly unlikely that the Teflon in Slick 50 actually plates the metal surface. In addition the Cf (Coefficient of friction) of Teflon is actually greater than the Cf of an Oil Film on Steel. Also, if the Teflon did fill in 'craters' in the steel, than it would fill in the honing of the cylinder, and the oil would not seal the piston rings."



Might be worth it for lawnmowers ???
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2008 | 07:58 PM
  #7  
dgeesaman's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 12,313
Likes: 27
From: Hershey PA
Waste of money.

I met a guy who worked as an engine designer in Detroit. He works with tribology and metal wear on a daily basis. No BS.

Slick50 sells hard using a demonstration where they run two friction tests side by side. Of course one has their additive and the other doesn't. It LOOKS like they are both pieces of metal sliding in the oil, and indeed the non-Slick50 demonstration burns up and scores the metal in short order. This guy asked for them to lift the test rigs so he could see both sliding surfaces in the Slick50 demonstration. *They refused*. It's because Slick50 hides a roller in the one demonstration and not in the other. Nuff said.

Dave
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turbo-minivan
General Rotary Tech Support
69
Feb 4, 2016 12:29 AM
cdn
2nd Generation Non-Technical and pictures
0
Aug 11, 2015 08:59 PM
KAL797
Test Area 51
0
Aug 11, 2015 03:47 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:25 AM.