3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

400rwh w/engine & stock turbos(non-seq)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-28-03, 02:08 PM
  #76  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
RX7Elmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also back to one of stephen's original questoins, what was your timing set at? Just curious. Thanks.

Danny
Old 01-29-03, 01:20 PM
  #77  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
Boostn7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Union, NJ
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HEHE....INFO.....INFO

Leading advance @ full torque set at 12 degrees...
believe it or not...I NEVER changed leading timing....did mess w/ everything
Still going over my dyno run logs...

Knock #s were all below 50.....need to make sure the knock sensor is working
Old 01-30-03, 04:21 PM
  #78  
Stay tuned...

iTrader: (3)
 
AnthonyNYC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1997
Location: West Islip, Long Island NY
Posts: 2,917
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by Boostn7
HEHE....INFO.....INFO

Leading advance @ full torque set at 12 degrees...
believe it or not...I NEVER changed leading timing....did mess w/ everything
Still going over my dyno run logs...

Knock #s were all below 50.....need to make sure the knock sensor is working
What about trailing split? How close is too close

Anthony
Old 01-30-03, 07:50 PM
  #79  
NYC's Loudest FD

 
RX794's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think that Boostn7 will keep some things under wraps until some more research is done on what was done that day on the dyno in regard to the ignition timing.
Old 01-30-03, 10:53 PM
  #80  
RX-Parts

iTrader: (3)
 
SPEED_NYC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 2,368
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by RX794
I think that Boostn7 will keep some things under wraps until some more research is done on what was done that day on the dyno in regard to the ignition timing.
you guys are no fun
does that mean i'm sworn to silence too?
Old 01-31-03, 02:19 AM
  #81  
NYC's Loudest FD

 
RX794's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by SPEED_NYC


you guys are no fun
does that mean i'm sworn to silence too?
I think it's more like a little bit more R&D needs to be done before anyone says anything that can or might hurt something, that's all.
Old 01-31-03, 01:41 PM
  #82  
Indifferent

iTrader: (3)
 
Jodeny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Long Island,NY
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by RX794


I think it's more like a little bit more R&D needs to be done before anyone says anything that can or might hurt something, that's all.
I agree. There is so much accurate information floating around on this forum. I would hate to see someone share something that actually worked.
John
Old 02-03-03, 08:40 AM
  #83  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Badog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Bannished
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
John,

Congrats!

Was that corrected horsepower?

Would you mind posting a log of your dyno run? It wouldn't be giving away thing, but it would go along way to shutting down the critics. It would show max INJ duty cycle through out the run, intake air temp., and RPM and knock besides other things. Oh, if might show AFR if you have that being logged, right?

Tony
Old 08-28-07, 09:46 AM
  #84  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

iTrader: (13)
 
jamespond24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Pittsburg, KS.
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Boostn7
Ernie: Would you believe me if I told you the air temps were rock solid on every dyno run???
Actually they would drop 3-4 degrees Celcius by the end of 4th gear pull......Greddy 3 row for you
I agree about the turbos self-grenading but as far as the engine I'll keep an eye everything.
I monitored everything.....knock, air temps, inj duty...so on

I made over 40 passes on the dyno...mostly 3rd gear pulls...just the last few were 4th gear.
What killed was shitty plugs at the begining....then with used NGK 11 in there it was a roll again.

There's no secrets about my car...nothing special...anyone could duplicate the set up...

My mods have been listed before....here it is again:

Stock motor & turbos (non-seq)
PowerFC ECU w/ datalogit
Greddy 3 row front mount
Greddy PE cat-back
Greddy pulleys
Greddy Elbow(intake)
Crane Hi-6
mid pipe,, down pipe
300m chromoly axles
turboII diff
NGK 11 plugs
EVC IV boost controller...newest addition

I think that's it.........

The rest is tunning.....
Any chance of sharing or showing the IGL & IGT? Hell the whole map would be great
Old 08-28-07, 09:55 AM
  #85  
Senior Member

iTrader: (3)
 
spiritrmazda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Irvine
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Damn, that kicks @$$.
Old 08-28-07, 10:05 AM
  #86  
pistons are for sissies

 
cld1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NoVA
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
this thread is four and a half years old i wonder if those turbos lasted
Old 08-28-07, 10:35 AM
  #87  
Senior Member

iTrader: (3)
 
spiritrmazda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Irvine
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wasn't this the guy that had a video of him doing like 10.4 in the 1/4 mile before his engine's last breath?
Old 08-28-07, 10:46 AM
  #88  
Junior Member
 
Team Mischief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Whitby
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Someone should just put up the compressor maps for the stock twins...

That should give you the surge line, and the true mathematical effciencies of the turbos at what CFM and at what pressures...

This will ultimately give you the correct range to stay within for optimal turbo life.
Old 08-28-07, 04:57 PM
  #89  
Senior Member

 
3rd Gen Jeremy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Memphis
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anybody talk to that guy about how long his turbos / engine lasted?
Old 08-28-07, 05:50 PM
  #90  
Top's always down
iTrader: (5)
 
SLOASFK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Spain
Posts: 4,841
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The OP is still active. he was online today. Ask him yourself
Old 04-16-09, 01:42 PM
  #91  
dominican boost junkie
 
janrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dominican Republic
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Apart of killing the turbos at this level. is there a risk of damaging the engine or other components?
Old 04-22-09, 10:59 AM
  #92  
dominican boost junkie
 
janrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dominican Republic
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
anyone? anyone?
Old 04-22-09, 11:14 AM
  #93  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by janrx7
Apart of killing the turbos at this level. is there a risk of damaging the engine or other components?
People run single turbo setups with similar components just fine. As long as everything else is in check (A/F, charge temps, etc), then the components/engine will be fine.
Old 04-22-09, 01:35 PM
  #94  
dominican boost junkie
 
janrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dominican Republic
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My friend's FD put 397whp@17psi with non-seq turbos and the mods in my signature. Apart from the turbos, we have the same setup. I am in the process of turning my turbos to non-seq and retuning hoping for at least 385whp.
Old 04-22-09, 07:31 PM
  #95  
F'n Newbie...

iTrader: (6)
 
fendamonky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Nokesville, Va
Posts: 3,928
Received 313 Likes on 228 Posts
You don't *need* to go non-seq to get these power levels on twins. You just need lots of intelligent supporting mods and a damn good tune.

I'm currently running (sequentially) 340rwhp (at 1.2bar) as measured by a Dyno-Dynamics brand dyno. This dyno type will typically show 15-18% lower power figures then the traditional American dyno. That translates into just about 400 at the wheels.

Aside from Injectors and Solenoids needing replacing everything is running fine on mine.
Old 04-23-09, 11:50 AM
  #96  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (16)
 
93RedDragonFD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by fendamonky
You don't *need* to go non-seq to get these power levels on twins. You just need lots of intelligent supporting mods and a damn good tune.

I'm currently running (sequentially) 340rwhp (at 1.2bar) as measured by a Dyno-Dynamics brand dyno. This dyno type will typically show 15-18% lower power figures then the traditional American dyno. That translates into just about 400 at the wheels.

Aside from Injectors and Solenoids needing replacing everything is running fine on mine.

^ Are you running any water/other type of injection to support this setup. I'm curious because i plan on tuning my setup on streetport/stock twins(non-seq.) on about 1 bar and would like to know if i have the correct mods to support this power safely with the help of a good tuner.

Thanks,
Zach
Old 04-23-09, 02:10 PM
  #97  
dominican boost junkie
 
janrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dominican Republic
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 93RedDragonFD
^ Are you running any water/other type of injection to support this setup. I'm curious because i plan on tuning my setup on streetport/stock twins(non-seq.) on about 1 bar and would like to know if i have the correct mods to support this power safely with the help of a good tuner.

Thanks,
Zach
What mods do you have?
Old 04-23-09, 02:29 PM
  #98  
F'n Newbie...

iTrader: (6)
 
fendamonky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Nokesville, Va
Posts: 3,928
Received 313 Likes on 228 Posts
Originally Posted by 93RedDragonFD
^ Are you running any water/other type of injection to support this setup. I'm curious because i plan on tuning my setup on streetport/stock twins(non-seq.) on about 1 bar and would like to know if i have the correct mods to support this power safely with the help of a good tuner.

Thanks,
Zach
Yes, currently I'm running the Aquamist 1S water injection system. I'm running 50/50 Meth/Demineralized water, it's set to engage at .9 bar.

Water injection is DEFINITELY a worthwhile investment!!
Old 04-23-09, 05:07 PM
  #99  
Original Gangster/Rotary!


iTrader: (213)
 
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Posts: 30,529
Received 539 Likes on 326 Posts
Keep in mind Fendamonkey is running BNRs, which are a full 20% larger than stock wrt compressor wheel, turbine wheel, and shaft sizing.

JD/Boostn7s car was optimized with the stock twins, and it won't be easily duplicated.

Hoping to make a true (125+ mph trap speeds) 400 rwhp on the stock twins over a long period of time isn't feasible IMHO.
Old 04-24-09, 01:58 PM
  #100  
dominican boost junkie
 
janrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dominican Republic
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BNRs will get 400whp easily. I managed to get 361whp at 17psi sequential turbos. Like i said earlier, i am converting to non-seq, removing flaps, retuning at 17 or 18psi looking for at least 385whp.....at this with race gas(sunoco gt plus)

i will keep you posted with results.


Quick Reply: 400rwh w/engine & stock turbos(non-seq)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:12 AM.