3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

304whp... whats next?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 2, 2011 | 07:06 PM
  #26  
Hotwheelz's Avatar
Who say's i need a Van
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 609
Likes: 2
From: Whatsittoya
Originally Posted by Twin94FD
looks like its the stock fuel pump and 550 primaries and 850 secondaries... are those stock injectors? what would you guys recommend for fuel upgrades?

1)Denso or Walbro fuel pump
2)550/1300 super simple but good up to 400whp
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2011 | 07:31 PM
  #27  
Twin94FD's Avatar
Thread Starter
1 up, 5 down
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: MA
Originally Posted by Hotwheelz
1)Denso or Walbro fuel pump
2)550/1300 super simple but good up to 400whp
wouldnt 1300s be a little much for 300whp? any idea what duty cycle they would run?
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2011 | 07:43 PM
  #28  
blue87's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 255
Likes: 1
From: Dearborn, MI
I have a denso pump with 550 / 1300 making ~310 with stock twins and streetport at 10psi

I was playing with my boost controller the other day and peaked about 75% at 12psi 7500 rpm... running a litter richer than it probably should be. Car came with 4x850's but I didn't like the idle richness or driveability...

going larger on the secondaries shouldn't cause you any real problems and gives you room to play in the future...
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2011 | 07:44 PM
  #29  
Twin94FD's Avatar
Thread Starter
1 up, 5 down
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: MA
Originally Posted by blue87
I have a denso pump with 550 primarys and 1300 making ~310 with stock twins and streetport at 10psi

I was playing with my boost controller the other day and peaked about 75% at 12psi 7500 rpm... running a litter richer than it probably should be. Car came with 4x850's but I didn't like the idle richness or driveability...

going larger on the secondaries shouldn't cause you any real problems and gives you room to play in the future...
ok awesome... thanks for the info
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2011 | 08:37 PM
  #30  
Narfle's Avatar
Rx7 Wagon
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,978
Likes: 888
From: California
I've seen people push their injectors far beyond what you're reporting. Makes me wonder how rich your tune is.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2011 | 10:10 PM
  #31  
blue87's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 255
Likes: 1
From: Dearborn, MI
I guess he is probably close to 11:1 I was at 10.5:1 at just under 12psi because I am not tuned there and I was at 75% but I have about 32% more injector flow so his injectors would have been somewhere in the 95+% at the same place just ballparking with rough math...

Twin you don't have a wideband do you?
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2011 | 08:05 AM
  #32  
Twin94FD's Avatar
Thread Starter
1 up, 5 down
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: MA
Originally Posted by blue87
I guess he is probably close to 11:1 I was at 10.5:1 at just under 12psi because I am not tuned there and I was at 75% but I have about 32% more injector flow so his injectors would have been somewhere in the 95+% at the same place just ballparking with rough math...

Twin you don't have a wideband do you?
nah i dont but i can check out the dyno graph and look at the a/f ratios they tuned to... whats ideal a/f at wot for these rotaries?
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2011 | 11:39 AM
  #33  
blue87's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 255
Likes: 1
From: Dearborn, MI
Originally Posted by Twin94FD
nah i dont but i can check out the dyno graph and look at the a/f ratios they tuned to... whats ideal a/f at wot for these rotaries?
Depends on your goals and who you talk to. I will give a general run down but I am sure there are people that will disagree.

Basically you have two things to worry about:
1. Carbon Build up
2. Detonation

You want to go rich enough to prevent detonation but not too rich to avoid excessive carbon build up.

I have heard of people running in the 9 ~10 AFR area but this is waay too rich I believe. Without AI and other detonation control I would stay near 11:1.

You will make more power if you can lean it out a bit. I do't know where LBT is on a rotary but probably somewhere in the 12:1 ~ 13:1 area but the risk iof grenading the engine increases significantly and I would never run here withour A/I and race fuel or something else to protect against detonation. To give you a general rule of thimb idea every A/F richer gives you about an equivalent 5 octane increase in knock prevention, I don't know how true that holds once you start getting far away from stoic however?

Basically the simple anser and what I do in my car is I target 11:1 above 5psi. Above 10psi I hav it a little richer right now becuase I haven't tuned there and just want to be safe in case I get boost spikes or something, but I never deliberatly go below 11:1...

Some people have told me this is too rich and the spark need to be tuned better, but bascially I don't believe them. Spark doesn't matter if you get preignition detonation so I stay at 11:1 and sleep well at night .

jsut a disclaimer every engine and every tuner if different so do what you will to your own car, I take no responsibility
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2011 | 04:55 PM
  #34  
Twin94FD's Avatar
Thread Starter
1 up, 5 down
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: MA
Originally Posted by blue87
I guess he is probably close to 11:1 I was at 10.5:1 at just under 12psi because I am not tuned there and I was at 75% but I have about 32% more injector flow so his injectors would have been somewhere in the 95+% at the same place just ballparking with rough math...

Twin you don't have a wideband do you?
according to the dyno graph the afr stay around 11.5:1 then slowly taper to 10:1 by 6500rpm
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2011 | 01:00 PM
  #35  
Turblown's Avatar
Turn up the boost
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 236
From: Twin Cities, MN
Originally Posted by Twin94FD
looks like its the stock fuel pump and 550 primaries and 850 secondaries... are those stock injectors? what would you guys recommend for fuel upgrades?

http://www.turblown.net/store/index.php?productID=262

http://www.turblown.net/store/index.php?productID=63

( Will need two of the above fuel injectors, top feed fuel rail, fittings hose, and aeromotive a1000-6 fuel pressure regulator, and of course re-tune).
__________________
Rotary Performance Parts


Reply
Old Aug 5, 2011 | 11:10 PM
  #36  
Amberbeer's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 86
Likes: 1
From: Tampa
Those are the stock sizes. I'm somewhat skeptical of the torque number though. I wanna say I made around 300 at HP.

Assuming the engine is healthy, 340 is very possible with $3k in parts. Loose the emissions, say with a deserter, water injection and an aggressive tune you might do it.

If 340 isn't enough, you aren't going to be happy with 360 either, just saying. I've been where you are, just finished going single this week. Going to around 340 is a huge leap. Also that's wear weak parts start to fail. Doing everything right with all the gotcha's can send costs through the roof too.

Get use to it, while you research your next step thoroughly.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2011 | 09:24 AM
  #37  
Twin94FD's Avatar
Thread Starter
1 up, 5 down
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: MA
i think im just gonna upgrade the fuel pump and get 1300cc secondaries and a mid pipe then go get it tuned at kdr performance and call it a day until i have money to rebuild the motor and get a port...

just another quick question... whats the tube coming from the cat? is that for egr or something? what are you guys doing with that when running without a cat?

Last edited by Twin94FD; Aug 6, 2011 at 09:39 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2011 | 09:49 AM
  #38  
Hotwheelz's Avatar
Who say's i need a Van
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 609
Likes: 2
From: Whatsittoya
Originally Posted by Twin94FD
i think im just gonna upgrade the fuel pump and get 1300cc secondaries and a mid pipe then go get it tuned at kdr performance and call it a day until i have money to rebuild the motor and get a port...

just another quick question... whats the tube coming from the cat? is that for egr or something? what are you guys doing with that when running without a cat?


It's from the air pump. When i went to a strait pipe i left mine just sitting there, unattached to anything. Its impossible to remove because it snakes up and over the tranny. I finally blocked off emmisions and that tube is still there......it will be until i drop my tranny
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2011 | 11:56 AM
  #39  
Twin94FD's Avatar
Thread Starter
1 up, 5 down
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: MA
Originally Posted by Hotwheelz
It's from the air pump. When i went to a strait pipe i left mine just sitting there, unattached to anything. Its impossible to remove because it snakes up and over the tranny. I finally blocked off emmisions and that tube is still there......it will be until i drop my tranny
haha ok sounds good
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2011 | 06:45 PM
  #40  
KKMpunkrock2011's Avatar
dorito powered
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: Lincoln, NE
Originally Posted by Sgtblue
^Agreed. Don't know about 12 seconds...but it will hang with an E92 M3.
and how do YOU know that officer Jim? Would this possibly involve a certain FD owner with a car mothballed in Florida?

Originally Posted by Hotwheelz
It's from the air pump. When i went to a strait pipe i left mine just sitting there, unattached to anything. Its impossible to remove because it snakes up and over the tranny. I finally blocked off emmisions and that tube is still there......it will be until i drop my tranny
go to an exhaust shop, have them cut and clamp the end that is metal, then weld it shut.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2011 | 07:20 PM
  #41  
1QWIK7's Avatar
White chicks > *
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,146
Likes: 1
From: Secaucus, New Jersey
Def upgrade fuel and ignition. And if still not satisfied, go single turbo and have fun.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2011 | 10:51 AM
  #42  
Amberbeer's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 86
Likes: 1
From: Tampa
No need at all to do the ignition with his setup unless something is wrong.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2011 | 09:51 AM
  #43  
FX3S's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: LA/NYC
Fuel, Ignition, AI, Tune.

Then next step is pricey $5k+

IMO
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2011 | 11:29 AM
  #44  
muibubbles's Avatar
Bubblicious DEF.
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,273
Likes: 10
From: 732
Yes. those are stock. i was running 550/and what i believe was 1300. i was at around 9x% injector duty.. once i swapped to 1600 secondaries i was able to put it to 360

Mods id suggest...


-just getting new secondaries. 1600cc secondary injectors will be more then enough to reach your goals.
-Denso "supra" fuel pump
-FPR if you want to splurge
-add the fuel pump relay
-delete the fuel pump resistor (the coil pack looking thing UNDER the brake booster. just cut the coil out and loop the wires

dont listen to everyone about changing ignition. you'll be fine. if its working fine then DONT change it. IFFF there is a problem, switch to the T2 leading coil. cheapest solution and the t2 coils are hella better than the fd's
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2011 | 08:55 PM
  #45  
MOBEONER's Avatar
It's finally reliable
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,514
Likes: 10
From: NEW YORK CITY
take it back to KDR and ask for advise. The forum will give you many opinions but only ur tuner can tell you how he feels your car will do with his tune..
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2011 | 04:30 AM
  #46  
ttmott's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 398
Likes: 8
From: Space Coast Florida
Originally Posted by Twin94FD
looks like its the stock fuel pump and 550 primaries and 850 secondaries... are those stock injectors? what would you guys recommend for fuel upgrades?
First need to understand what the AFR's are at full load and the duty cycle you are seeing. If your AFR's are below 10.5 you may have a little room to add air if the system can add air. In order to ascertain if the system can add air need to look at the waste gate duty cycle. Regardless, with the setup you have I don't think you can get an order of magnitude change in output. Might also want to take a look at the knock frequency at full load; this is also an indication of how much margin you may have.

I would tend to stay on the fuel rich and low knock areas to preserve the engine; especially with operating in the upper ranges of the equipment you have. You are at a point with this setup that you need to throw a lot of money at it to get to the next level and stay reliable.

You do need to consider a stronger ignition at boost levels above 16 PSI. I have first hand experience and my combination is very similar to yours. This thread will take you through it: https://www.rx7club.com/power-fc-forum-47/high-load-stumble-909607/
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2011 | 05:28 AM
  #47  
Narfle's Avatar
Rx7 Wagon
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,978
Likes: 888
From: California
Originally Posted by Twin94FD
wow they are maxed... 95%... isnt like 76% what you want? i need to figure out what size they are and upgrade
Originally Posted by Twin94FD
according to the dyno graph the afr stay around 11.5:1 then slowly taper to 10:1 by 6500rpm
You've got some room in your tune. 10:1 is rich, even for a turbo rotary.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2011 | 11:11 AM
  #48  
Twin94FD's Avatar
Thread Starter
1 up, 5 down
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: MA
Originally Posted by muibubbles
Yes. those are stock. i was running 550/and what i believe was 1300. i was at around 9x% injector duty.. once i swapped to 1600 secondaries i was able to put it to 360

Mods id suggest...


-just getting new secondaries. 1600cc secondary injectors will be more then enough to reach your goals.
-Denso "supra" fuel pump
-FPR if you want to splurge
-add the fuel pump relay
-delete the fuel pump resistor (the coil pack looking thing UNDER the brake booster. just cut the coil out and loop the wires

dont listen to everyone about changing ignition. you'll be fine. if its working fine then DONT change it. IFFF there is a problem, switch to the T2 leading coil. cheapest solution and the t2 coils are hella better than the fd's
awesome thanks for all the info guys
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2011 | 11:18 AM
  #49  
Twin94FD's Avatar
Thread Starter
1 up, 5 down
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: MA
Originally Posted by MOBEONER
take it back to KDR and ask for advise. The forum will give you many opinions but only ur tuner can tell you how he feels your car will do with his tune..
kdr is over 5 hours from me but ill make the drive once i upgrade the fuel system... looking at the receipt from the previous owner when the car dynoed at 304whp it only says a $75 charge... so that was just for the 3 dyno runs and not a tune and i dont see any receipts for a tune... it made lower power at 10psi and then they made a pass at 12psi and it made 304whp... so looks like this thing is running without a tune which sketches me out a bit... the af ratio graph does look pretty eratic i would figure the tuner should be able to get the af ratios pretty consistent across the entire rpm range... any idea how much kdr usually charges for a tune?
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2011 | 11:33 AM
  #50  
phrost's Avatar
brap brap mf
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: clifton, NJ (north jersey)
Originally Posted by Twin94FD
kdr is over 5 hours from me but ill make the drive once i upgrade the fuel system... looking at the receipt from the previous owner when the car dynoed at 304whp it only says a $75 charge... so that was just for the 3 dyno runs and not a tune and i dont see any receipts for a tune... it made lower power at 10psi and then they made a pass at 12psi and it made 304whp... so looks like this thing is running without a tune which sketches me out a bit... the af ratio graph does look pretty eratic i would figure the tuner should be able to get the af ratios pretty consistent across the entire rpm range... any idea how much kdr usually charges for a tune?
KDR aka Speed1 charges $300 for a dyno tune starting sept 1st. I'm taking my rx to them.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:03 PM.