3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

230 hp, i want to be at 270-280

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 11, 2005 | 01:38 PM
  #26  
clayne's Avatar
PV = nRT
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,250
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand (was California)
http://robrobinette.com/cgi-bin/i/im...simplified.jpg

Or you can use the nipple that the dark red line goes into on the Y-pipe next to the CRV.
Reply
Old May 11, 2005 | 01:39 PM
  #27  
potatochobit's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
once you reach full boost, the stock intercooler doesnt really act as a bottle neck like some might think. it more affects immediate response and possibly a bit of lag at low boost levels compared to a nicer free flow through design.
Reply
Old May 11, 2005 | 01:55 PM
  #28  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Originally Posted by potatochobit
once you reach full boost, the stock intercooler doesnt really act as a bottle neck like some might think. it more affects immediate response and possibly a bit of lag at low boost levels compared to a nicer free flow through design.
Not quite true. The stocker has a large pressure drop in comparison to aftermarket ICs. There was just over 1 psi difference between my PFS and the stocker. That means that with the stocker, the turbos have to boost another 1+ psi to develop the same manifold boost. This makes the turbos work harder and hotter = less power, especially at boost levels above 10 psi.
Reply
Old May 11, 2005 | 02:09 PM
  #29  
RCCAZ 1's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,367
Likes: 86
From: Phoenix, AZ
Not to mention NO airflow thanks to the idiots dynotuning, and a nuclear heat-soaked engine bay.
Reply
Old May 11, 2005 | 02:11 PM
  #30  
John Magnuson's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 1
From: San Diego, CA
Note that she has a muffler installed on her midpipe so this might cause some additional restriction that helps prevent boost creep.
Reply
Old May 11, 2005 | 02:54 PM
  #31  
DaleClark's Avatar
RX-7 Bad Ass
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,622
Likes: 2,725
From: Pensacola, FL
Originally Posted by John Magnuson
Note that she has a muffler installed on her midpipe so this might cause some additional restriction that helps prevent boost creep.
Yeah, but hell I was getting creep with a stock airbox and stock main cat! Most mufflers installed on midpipes are straight-through - that could be a culprit, but it's doubtful.

Another possiblity is no pills in the wastegate lines - supposed to be 8psi, but creeping to 10 .

Dale
Reply
Old May 11, 2005 | 02:59 PM
  #32  
afterburn27's Avatar
Lets Go Hokies!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,727
Likes: 4
From: Greenville, SC
Originally Posted by DaleClark
Yeah, but hell I was getting creep with a stock airbox and stock main cat! Most mufflers installed on midpipes are straight-through - that could be a culprit, but it's doubtful.

Another possiblity is no pills in the wastegate lines - supposed to be 8psi, but creeping to 10 .

Dale
I am running full 3" open exhaust and intake with NO boost creep. I have some ball/spring controllers to prevent spikes and set the boost level, but I am one of the lucky few that for some reason or another don't get boost creep.
Reply
Old May 11, 2005 | 05:26 PM
  #33  
John Magnuson's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 1
From: San Diego, CA
Boost creep with a stock main cat? That's really odd. I'd say your situation is more unusual than the reverse (having no boost creep without a cat).

Her midpipe muffler is a straight through Magnaflow.
Reply
Old May 11, 2005 | 06:33 PM
  #34  
kuning's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: Rotors Vallhalla
With just the intake and catback (with centre muffler fitted) mods, how much power do you think my car can make running on stock boost? Do you think 190-200 hp is normal?
Reply
Old May 11, 2005 | 06:34 PM
  #35  
clayne's Avatar
PV = nRT
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,250
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand (was California)
No. Abnormal.
Reply
Old May 11, 2005 | 06:41 PM
  #36  
apneablue's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 2
From: North Coast
Originally Posted by kuning
With just the intake and catback (with centre muffler fitted) mods, how much power do you think my car can make running on stock boost? Do you think 190-200 hp is normal?
Isn't it 220 to the wheel stock?
Reply
Old May 11, 2005 | 06:53 PM
  #37  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Originally Posted by kuning
With just the intake and catback (with centre muffler fitted) mods, how much power do you think my car can make running on stock boost? Do you think 190-200 hp is normal?
The numbers we are looking at are Dynojet. Being down under, you are probably running on a Dynapack, which gives lower numbers -- I don't how the percentage off-hand.
Reply
Old May 11, 2005 | 06:54 PM
  #38  
John Magnuson's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 1
From: San Diego, CA
The 220s is typical for stock. It can vary a lot from car to car. I've seen 255 RWHP on a bone stock FD after the owner packed the intercooler with dry ice.
Reply
Old May 12, 2005 | 03:20 PM
  #39  
kuning's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: Rotors Vallhalla
I got it dynoed with Dyno Dynamics Dynamometer *well at least that's what it said on the printed out paper*. It came up with 189.2 hp ATW. I'm a bit worried with this figured coz the car had just gone through full service (spark plugs,fuel filter,oil filter,etc2). I'm assuming it's either the dyno giving low figures, possible boost leak (2nd this coz i asked the mechanic to inspect the car when i dropped her), or perhaps the centre muffler?
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 02:46 AM
  #40  
clayne's Avatar
PV = nRT
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,250
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand (was California)
189 is ridiculously low. Did you check to see the turbos were still THERE?

Honestly, do the boost leak check as I described above.
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 03:09 AM
  #41  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Dyno Dynamics reads about %15 lower than a Dynojet, which means his 190 ~ 220 rwhp on a Dynojet. That is about 20 hp on the low side for a fresh tuned-up FD with intake and cat-back.

There are many factors that can result in a lower output levels on a dyno....but I would definitely give the car a good look over. Are you sure you're hitting 10 psi, Kuning?
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2005 | 02:09 AM
  #42  
RX7LINK's Avatar
RX7FD3S
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 7
From: South Bay, North Cali.
Originally Posted by Meiogirl
what other things can i do to get 40 more hp without 'openning a new can of worms' persay? i figure 40 more HP will still keep in a safe range but give me a reason to have done the mods in the first place.
The mods you have should provide way more HP than that. Rotaries are the easiest to make power, so boost leak check is definitly #1, but yes, get a manual or electronic boost controller. it'll keep your boost solid even at stock boost level.

I totally agree with the suggestion about upgrading to FMIC, but aside from that, few other things such as Pulleys, Lightweight Flywheel, Voltage Stablizer, and LSD are smaller things (besides LSD), but they'll will definity noticeably increase your WHP.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2005 | 04:11 AM
  #43  
cloead's Avatar
sold--no longer in debt
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 11
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Originally Posted by DaleClark
When I first got my car, with JUST a cat-back and a downpipe (stock air box, stock air filter, etc) I got spikes when I hit the second turbo. I just can't imagine how you aren't spiking with your setup, or at least creeping to a higher boost.

I seriously doubt it's a restriction problem with the stock IC. If that was the case, you'd see LOTS of FD owners with stock ECU's and intake/exhaust not spiking and running a nice 10psi. That's just not the case.

Dale
I know what you're saying.. I think my car is retarded or something. I'm running 3" dp, stock gutted cat, and 3" catback. Also have the ebay intake hardpipes. I have my manual boost controllers set so I get a 13-10-13 pattern. I get no boost spikes and I creep to about 14.5psi in 4th and 5th. I put down 300rwhp heatsoaked as hell (intake temps at 130 degrees) at 13psi.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2005 | 07:02 AM
  #44  
Max13BREW's Avatar
FDrx7.com
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: Sydney Australia
Just to help put the Dyno dynamics dyno in perspective...
My S7 got 147rw KW stock standard in shootout mode on the dyno dynamics
Absolutely no mods to the car...18" heavy rims (Robbing power), mildly restricted cat (Blocked) and only running 6psi boost on the secondary turbo (Vacuum hoses stuffed)

147rwkw = approx 197rwhp....

With the 2nd turbo boosting to around 8psi (10-4-8) I got 161rwkw = approx 215rwhp.

Hope that helps with that ultra low Melbourne result..
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tylerx7fb
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
39
May 27, 2019 12:45 PM
RX7 8U
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
75
Oct 8, 2007 01:09 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:26 PM.