3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

2005 RE Amemiya GT300 in air tunnel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 17, 2005 | 12:30 AM
  #51  
FL 93 RX7's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 47
Likes: 1
From: NC
Good wind tunnel info here

http://observe.arc.nasa.gov/nasa/aer...nel_parts.html
Reply
Old May 20, 2005 | 02:03 AM
  #52  
Xeros's Avatar
I'm sorry wha?
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 1
From: Wisconsin
What about a hooking up a cooler to the tranny? And not worry too much?
and then mount it somewhere it will get some good air flow?...Or even a fan?
Reply
Old May 20, 2005 | 11:23 AM
  #53  
IamRobbyah's Avatar
wants some ube
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
From: North Bay/Cali
Originally Posted by krackerx7
i have a book that tells about the differnt types of windtunnels they use for that testing theirs a few differnt types i just need to get it back from a friend. i was at JGTC in december and out of all the cars the 7 was the loudest
^^Agreed... I was in the pits all day, both days. What an honor that was. The Amemiya car did a burn-out 2 feet away from me. I was completely deaf for a good 3 minutes. It was amazingly loud. If noise had sex appeal, that 3 rotor was a screaming orgasm.
Reply
Old May 20, 2005 | 11:23 AM
  #54  
Scrub's Avatar
bow leggin'
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,061
Likes: 5
From: Delaware
you can do that, but to do that you need an external pump...I believe a few of RE-As cars have that along with a tranny cooler...but that ups the cost supstantially.
Reply
Old May 20, 2005 | 03:32 PM
  #55  
FDNewbie's Avatar
Sponsor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 4
From: Tampa, FL
Originally Posted by IamRobbyah
^^Agreed... I was in the pits all day, both days. What an honor that was. The Amemiya car did a burn-out 2 feet away from me. I was completely deaf for a good 3 minutes. It was amazingly loud. If noise had sex appeal, that 3 rotor was a screaming orgasm.
Not to get off topic, but how are you guys getting in the pits, and other guys got into the garage area... I want in, too!

Dan, how necessary is a tranny cooler? Oh and don't all non-R model FD's have a tranny cooler (vs the R's that come w/ dual oil coolers)?
Reply
Old May 20, 2005 | 04:59 PM
  #56  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Originally Posted by FDNewbie
Dan, how necessary is a tranny cooler? Oh and don't all non-R model FD's have a tranny cooler (vs the R's that come w/ dual oil coolers)?
Not necessary, only auto FDs have a tranny cooler. The manual tranny case has cooling fins, which provides all the cooling it needs. If you seal off the bottom of the car completely, the tranny might not get ventilated enough, hence the cooler comment.

Personally, I'd be a lot more worried about the 1500F exhaust pipe now sandwiched between the underplate and the underside of the car, than the tranny, but that's just me!

Also, anyone trying to go to these lengths of "backyard" aero tuning are fools, IMO. For one thing, no such tuning is necessary even for typical track driving, and secondly, you would have no clue about what exact aero effect you are achieving. Lowering the car and running a front lip/rear wing are about the only reasonable aero tweaking you can accomplish without being a member of a serious racing team.
Reply
Old May 20, 2005 | 06:05 PM
  #57  
Eep's Avatar
Eep
brap
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
From: Riverside, corona ca
at jgtc

Originally Posted by FDNewbie
Not to get off topic, but how are you guys getting in the pits, and other guys got into the garage area... I want in, too!

Dan, how necessary is a tranny cooler? Oh and don't all non-R model FD's have a tranny cooler (vs the R's that come w/ dual oil coolers)?
Reply
Old May 20, 2005 | 08:02 PM
  #58  
FDNewbie's Avatar
Sponsor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 4
From: Tampa, FL
Originally Posted by rynberg
Not necessary, only auto FDs have a tranny cooler. The manual tranny case has cooling fins, which provides all the cooling it needs. If you seal off the bottom of the car completely, the tranny might not get ventilated enough, hence the cooler comment.
Thanks Rynberg. I couldn't remember off-hand if it was autos only or not. Hmm...so in a manual touring or base, there's just a empty gap on the other side, where the 2nd oil cooler or tranny cooler would be? Interesting...

Personally, I'd be a lot more worried about the 1500F exhaust pipe now sandwiched between the underplate and the underside of the car, than the tranny, but that's just me!
Point well taken.

Also, anyone trying to go to these lengths of "backyard" aero tuning are fools, IMO. For one thing, no such tuning is necessary even for typical track driving, and secondly, you would have no clue about what exact aero effect you are achieving. Lowering the car and running a front lip/rear wing are about the only reasonable aero tweaking you can accomplish without being a member of a serious racing team.
I'm not trying to do this myself. Damian's promised to try it and test it out at the gazillion road courses he goes to. I think that's a reasonable method, since it would be track tested, and I'd think he could feel whether the car felt more or less stable, whether it was faster or slower, etc. Critique of this?

Originally Posted by Eep
at jgtc
I'm not a retard lol. I KNOW you didn't go to Japan and come back I was at JGTC too...flew clear cross country. It was AMAZING. That said, still, how did you guys get "back stage passes" so to speak? Ppl in the pits, people in the garage, people chilin w/ and interviewing Mr. Amemiya, etc...?? Hook a brother up!
Reply
Old May 24, 2005 | 02:38 PM
  #59  
Xeros's Avatar
I'm sorry wha?
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 1
From: Wisconsin
Well the reason I brought up this small off topic question of under panles was because a guy with a stock integra GS-R did it an took a second off his Q mile. It was on TV, don't remember what the hell it was though. Thats why I decided to ask. Track testing it like that is what I was going for.
Reply
Old May 24, 2005 | 04:50 PM
  #60  
Kento's Avatar
2/4 wheel cornering fiend
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 3
From: Pasadena, CA
Originally Posted by Xeros
Well the reason I brought up this small off topic question of under panles was because a guy with a stock integra GS-R did it an took a second off his Q mile. It was on TV, don't remember what the hell it was though. Thats why I decided to ask. Track testing it like that is what I was going for.
Sorry, but there's absolutely no way a stock Integra will drop a second off its ET just by aerodynamics. Aerodynamics only plays a meaningful role in the quarter-mile when trap speeds are in the 150+ mph category.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2005 | 12:17 PM
  #61  
M104-AMG's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,857
Likes: 6
From: FL
In this thread, someone mentioned the various types of wings, some optimized for short courses.

Check them out here:

http://www.indycar.com/tech/wings.php

There's also the new to F1 Centreline Downwash Generating (CDG) rear wing, which is basicaly two smaller wings aft the rear-wheel, but it got the "thumbs down" from the FIA tech chiefs, so it probably won't go into effect until 2008:

http://www.formula1.com/news/3870.html
http://www.fia.com/mediacentre/Press...241005-01.html
http://www.crash.net/uk/en/news_view...d=1&nid=122884

:-) neil

[sorry neil, that big'ol pic was driving me crazy so I posted a smaller version below - dgeesaman]

Last edited by dgeesaman; Dec 14, 2005 at 01:26 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2005 | 01:09 PM
  #62  
wptrx7's Avatar
Newb Photog
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,171
Likes: 0
From: new jersey
Man is this picture big enough and why does everyone always bring up old threads?
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2005 | 01:25 PM
  #63  
dgeesaman's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 12,313
Likes: 27
From: Hershey PA
Man is this picture big enough and why does everyone always bring up old threads?
Fixed the pic. Old threads are often the best threads. A new and original topic gets better thought and input than when it's been done several times over. Experts and people with firsthand experience are not there to answer every thread. People who don't search never realize that the quality goes up as you get closer to original information.


Attached Thumbnails 2005 RE Amemiya GT300 in air tunnel-1782256506__cdg_graphic_1.jpg  

Last edited by dgeesaman; Dec 14, 2005 at 01:29 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2005 | 04:22 PM
  #64  
rockshox's Avatar
-
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
well im pretty sure the bernoulli principle is a fact not a theory, but youre correct in that there is more to it than purely the air foil. What youre talking about is angle of attack. You could put a angled plane in the airstream and create downforce due to the angle of attack and its equal and opposite reaction to pushing the air up. the downside to this method is the drag it creates. I think most spoilers use a combination of these effects.

Originally Posted by galognu
There are lots of facts, and not facts in this thread about the aerodynamic priciples expaining downforce for the wing on this awesome 7.

Rob, the AF engineer, whom I personally know to be a good guy, and is not only knowleageable in his field of engineering, but also in the workings of a rotary engine, explained in textbook manner the most common priciple, the pro Bernoulli, or air foil theory.

I said theory, because amazingly, this is not fully proven. Recently, there is another theory of lift based primarily on Newton's third law, (for every action there is an equal and oposite reaction). You can actually see in the picture the air being deflected up away from the wing, thus pushing down on the wing, and creating downforce.

In the end, it is likely a combination of both these priciples.

Although I am not an engineer, (I'm just a general surgeon), I was also in the AF because of my love for aviation. Too bad that love did not coincide with my field of expertice which also did not coincide with military thinking. I'll be glad to discuss that in private with anyone thinkng about a military career.

Anyways, that car is totally awesome!!

Galo
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2005 | 04:24 PM
  #65  
rockshox's Avatar
-
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Also, the F1 CDG wing concept's purpose was to decrease downforce and to decrease turbulence behind the car to facilitate passing. In current F1 if one car follows another too closely it will lose much of its front downforce.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2005 | 06:30 PM
  #66  
Harold93's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Yokosuka Japan
the wing on your car is the opposit of a plane. on a plane the top of the wing is sloped to speed up the air moving accross it while the bottom craets drag with the air this differance creats lift on your car it does the oppisite the air underneath is moving faster and the top of the wing defelcts the air to creat the drag to creat down force. they work together not just one face ot the wing pushing down. that is a bad *** car though RE has a shop about 25 min away and they have a red one there that they race down in chiba the thing has 22" wheels on i am not sure if those are the same but it gives you an idea of how far those roatry gods can take a car i have 17's and they get close to the wheel wells. RE-A rocks
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 05:03 AM
  #67  
WARTHOG's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Near Silverstone F1 Race TRack UK
Is this body kit sold State side and if so by who???????

I want one
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:03 PM.