evans coolant report- part 1
#1
evans coolant report- part 1
it has been a few weeks since moving to evans and so far so good, I removed the pressure cap lower seal a few days ago and am now running a no pressure system. Seems ot have no air bubbles, no leaks, and maintains a proper level. (no funny rushing water/bubbling sounds like before either)
I have the temp gauge linearization mod so I can really see any temp fluctuations, and the evans does get it up to tmp faster (better heat transfer) and also has kept it pretty cool. Also, I autocrossed it today and had it on redline most of the time, so it got pretty hot, but never got close to the H mark, just hovered around 3/4 the way up, until the fans came on and that would drop it quick.
Last few days have been cool hear in MN (40-50 degrees) , so the real test is if it hold up in the 100 degree temps, .... I will report more as I see hotter days.
NOTE:
The evans DOES expand more than normal coolant, so you dont need a lot in the overflow, otherwise when it heats up it will expand and vent out of the overflow if you have it to full, when cold my overflow shows only the last few bars...when warmed up it shows 3/4 full. Just keep a small bottle of extra evans in a storage bin, just in case... cuz you cant 'just add water' if there is trouble :-)
I have the temp gauge linearization mod so I can really see any temp fluctuations, and the evans does get it up to tmp faster (better heat transfer) and also has kept it pretty cool. Also, I autocrossed it today and had it on redline most of the time, so it got pretty hot, but never got close to the H mark, just hovered around 3/4 the way up, until the fans came on and that would drop it quick.
Last few days have been cool hear in MN (40-50 degrees) , so the real test is if it hold up in the 100 degree temps, .... I will report more as I see hotter days.
NOTE:
The evans DOES expand more than normal coolant, so you dont need a lot in the overflow, otherwise when it heats up it will expand and vent out of the overflow if you have it to full, when cold my overflow shows only the last few bars...when warmed up it shows 3/4 full. Just keep a small bottle of extra evans in a storage bin, just in case... cuz you cant 'just add water' if there is trouble :-)
#4
Originally posted by Scrub
How long did it take you to do the conversion? Also where is the drain plug for the block? I was thinking about changing to Evans when I get a new radiator in the next couple of weeks.
How long did it take you to do the conversion? Also where is the drain plug for the block? I was thinking about changing to Evans when I get a new radiator in the next couple of weeks.
here is a thread with a pic of the engine block plug...
https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...t+engine+block
#6
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: evans coolant report- part 1
Originally posted by damian
Last few days have been cool hear in MN (40-50 degrees) , so the real test is if it hold up in the 100 degree temps, .... I will report more as I see hotter days.
Last few days have been cool hear in MN (40-50 degrees) , so the real test is if it hold up in the 100 degree temps, .... I will report more as I see hotter days.
Trending Topics
#9
Rotary Enthusiast
Re: evans coolant report- part 1
Originally posted by damian
I have the temp gauge linearization mod so I can really see any temp fluctuations, and the evans does get it up to tmp faster (better heat transfer) and also has kept it pretty cool.
I have the temp gauge linearization mod so I can really see any temp fluctuations, and the evans does get it up to tmp faster (better heat transfer) and also has kept it pretty cool.
Actually, pure water has better heat transfer capabilities than NPG or any chemical coolant. The fact that NPG doesn't transfer the heat away from the block as fast is what makes the car warm up faster.
#11
Rotary Enthusiast
I think there is a major misunderstanding of the term "heat transfer".
1. The process of evaporazation removes large amounts of heat (ie. when water evaporates from your skin suface you feel cooler). The latent heat of evaporazation is over 700cals per gram of water (and it only takes 1cal per gram of water to increase the temp of the fluid 1 degC).
2. Air by nature is an insulater. And when water evaporates it is pretty much mostly air. That is what most people call hot spots. When this happens, there is NO (or very little) heat transfer happening. So the heat transfer rate of water is no longer relavent here. When in liquid state, water has the best heat transfer rate. This is why a typical cooling system is pressurized to increase the boiling point of the water/coolant mix to maintain (force) the liquid state.
3. The reason why NPG is better is due to the high boiling point, not the heat transfer rate. Because of the high boiling point, NPG stays in the liquid form. So eventhough it has less heat transfer capability than water, it will not boil and form an air blanket around hot spots, and become a thermal insulator.
NPG properties
I hope all this techno babble is understandable
1. The process of evaporazation removes large amounts of heat (ie. when water evaporates from your skin suface you feel cooler). The latent heat of evaporazation is over 700cals per gram of water (and it only takes 1cal per gram of water to increase the temp of the fluid 1 degC).
2. Air by nature is an insulater. And when water evaporates it is pretty much mostly air. That is what most people call hot spots. When this happens, there is NO (or very little) heat transfer happening. So the heat transfer rate of water is no longer relavent here. When in liquid state, water has the best heat transfer rate. This is why a typical cooling system is pressurized to increase the boiling point of the water/coolant mix to maintain (force) the liquid state.
3. The reason why NPG is better is due to the high boiling point, not the heat transfer rate. Because of the high boiling point, NPG stays in the liquid form. So eventhough it has less heat transfer capability than water, it will not boil and form an air blanket around hot spots, and become a thermal insulator.
NPG properties
I hope all this techno babble is understandable
Last edited by Trexthe3rd; 04-07-03 at 10:21 PM.
The following users liked this post:
sledgie (04-21-20)
#12
Rotary Enthusiast
yes and no
Originally posted by Trexthe3rd
FYI
Actually, pure water has better heat transfer capabilities than NPG or any chemical coolant. The fact that NPG doesn't transfer the heat away from the block as fast is what makes the car warm up faster.
FYI
Actually, pure water has better heat transfer capabilities than NPG or any chemical coolant. The fact that NPG doesn't transfer the heat away from the block as fast is what makes the car warm up faster.
regarding warm-up, t-stat closed, it takes x amount of energy to warm both the coolant and the metal engine. the NPG+ has much lower specific heat vs water or even egw. In closed loop warm-up, NPG+ rises relatively quickly from 50F to 180F, since it removed less BTU's from the running engine to get that rise. The coolant warms quickly per the gauge, but the block metal will not be as uniformly warmed near 180 as if water or egw had been used, which would take more time.
Evans notes that the NPG+ improved overall heat transfer rate vs old NPG, by reducing viscosity and improveing thermal conductivity, and water or egw mix both are better than NPG+ for these two critical parameters.
Point is, NPG+ is not a great heat transfer fluid. But it has a very high boiling point without needing high pressure to get it, and allows an engine to run at higher sustained hp levels and metal temps where excess local boiling and very hot spots would have limited high pressure water or egw brews. The catch is that both coolant and metal temps with NPG+ will then be higher, but pineapple experience is that this is ok.
#13
Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Turtle Creek, Pa, USA (Sub of Pittsburgh)
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is just an odd thought. It is way past my bed time so I'm just thinking weird things...
Does anyone think that having a low or zero pressure cooling system would have some minor adverse affect on the coolant seals ability to hold back combustion pressures. What is the bigger cause of the seal failures water pressure blowing into the combustion chamber or combustion gasses blowing into the coolant chamber. Those poor seals one part gets sucked in during the intake cycle and then a part is pushed out during compression stage and then a nother 1/3 or more of the seal is under real high pressure after combustion... Impressive that they hold as long as they do... I'm going to bed now and cross my fingers about my own water seals and the water/waterwetter combo that I use...
Does anyone think that having a low or zero pressure cooling system would have some minor adverse affect on the coolant seals ability to hold back combustion pressures. What is the bigger cause of the seal failures water pressure blowing into the combustion chamber or combustion gasses blowing into the coolant chamber. Those poor seals one part gets sucked in during the intake cycle and then a part is pushed out during compression stage and then a nother 1/3 or more of the seal is under real high pressure after combustion... Impressive that they hold as long as they do... I'm going to bed now and cross my fingers about my own water seals and the water/waterwetter combo that I use...
Last edited by RX7FAN; 04-07-03 at 11:50 PM.
#14
Slower Traffic Keep Right
iTrader: (5)
Originally posted by RX7FAN
This is just an odd thought. It is way past my bed time so I'm just thinking weird things...
Does anyone think that having a low or zero pressure cooling system would have some minor adverse affect on the coolant seals ability to hold back combustion pressures. What is the bigger cause of the seal failures water pressure blowing into the combustion chamber or combustion gasses blowing into the coolant chamber. Those poor seals one part gets sucked in during the intake cycle and then a part is pushed out during compression stage and then a nother 1/3 or more of the seal is under real high pressure after combustion... Impressive that they hold as long as they do... I'm going to bed now and cross my fingers about my own water seals and the water/waterwetter combo that I use...
This is just an odd thought. It is way past my bed time so I'm just thinking weird things...
Does anyone think that having a low or zero pressure cooling system would have some minor adverse affect on the coolant seals ability to hold back combustion pressures. What is the bigger cause of the seal failures water pressure blowing into the combustion chamber or combustion gasses blowing into the coolant chamber. Those poor seals one part gets sucked in during the intake cycle and then a part is pushed out during compression stage and then a nother 1/3 or more of the seal is under real high pressure after combustion... Impressive that they hold as long as they do... I'm going to bed now and cross my fingers about my own water seals and the water/waterwetter combo that I use...
#16
Trexthe3rd, great info....
I was jesting when i mentioned the water would boil before transfering the heat... :-)
also, when I say that ngp 'transfers' heat better that water, I ment as a full working system, meaning, the as a whole the cooling system is managing heat transfer better because there are no localized hot spots or 'vaporization' points, even though at a substance level, water does 'transfer' heat better...and even though you may runn a bit higher average tmps with ngp, you are much safer than water at extream temps because of ngp's very high boiling point...the block stays evenly heated, where as with water you get the uneven spots and the uneven expanding/warping = seal exposure = seal failure
...plus you never have to change it :-) (hehehehe, I had to toss that in there)
I was jesting when i mentioned the water would boil before transfering the heat... :-)
also, when I say that ngp 'transfers' heat better that water, I ment as a full working system, meaning, the as a whole the cooling system is managing heat transfer better because there are no localized hot spots or 'vaporization' points, even though at a substance level, water does 'transfer' heat better...and even though you may runn a bit higher average tmps with ngp, you are much safer than water at extream temps because of ngp's very high boiling point...the block stays evenly heated, where as with water you get the uneven spots and the uneven expanding/warping = seal exposure = seal failure
...plus you never have to change it :-) (hehehehe, I had to toss that in there)
The following users liked this post:
sledgie (04-21-20)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kyo
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
3
08-14-15 02:00 PM