your FC hard to drive around town??
Originally posted by Erik
if his injectors are clogged how would it still pull hard otherwise?
if his injectors are clogged how would it still pull hard otherwise?
you guys also have to keep in mind that these cars have very low torque to them with a very high redline. These cars don't like to drive slow, they have very little torque at those rpms, so they are not going to drive well. And also i forgot who said it but these car do have very large throttle bodies. They are going to be very responsive, and will always have little traits to them like that.
Originally posted by hyperdaddy7
you guys also have to keep in mind that these cars have very low torque to them with a very high redline. These cars don't like to drive slow, they have very little torque at those rpms, so they are not going to drive well. And also i forgot who said it but these car do have very large throttle bodies. They are going to be very responsive, and will always have little traits to them like that.
you guys also have to keep in mind that these cars have very low torque to them with a very high redline. These cars don't like to drive slow, they have very little torque at those rpms, so they are not going to drive well. And also i forgot who said it but these car do have very large throttle bodies. They are going to be very responsive, and will always have little traits to them like that.
not so, na makes about 100lb-ft of tq at 3k rpm where a s2k makes about 50 and teh s2k has no such problem, just comparign the numbers we have way better low end. its the car in not proper running condition thats causing this, liek i said, wear on the drive train , fuel and tps sensor will all effect this...
Originally posted by Kahren
not so, na makes about 100lb-ft of tq at 3k rpm where a s2k makes about 50 and teh s2k has no such problem, just comparign the numbers we have way better low end. its the car in not proper running condition thats causing this, liek i said, wear on the drive train , fuel and tps sensor will all effect this...
not so, na makes about 100lb-ft of tq at 3k rpm where a s2k makes about 50 and teh s2k has no such problem, just comparign the numbers we have way better low end. its the car in not proper running condition thats causing this, liek i said, wear on the drive train , fuel and tps sensor will all effect this...
Originally posted by hyperdaddy7
you guys also have to keep in mind that these cars have very low torque to them with a very high redline. These cars don't like to drive slow, they have very little torque at those rpms, so they are not going to drive well. And also i forgot who said it but these car do have very large throttle bodies.
you guys also have to keep in mind that these cars have very low torque to them with a very high redline. These cars don't like to drive slow, they have very little torque at those rpms, so they are not going to drive well. And also i forgot who said it but these car do have very large throttle bodies.
And regarding the "large" TB, at small throttle inputs, only one Ø45mm throttle is being used. That's quite small!
Last edited by NZConvertible; Apr 9, 2002 at 05:43 PM.
Just do the easy things first. With no air leaks and idle & TPS settings good, a mostly stock rotary will purrrr. If the trans is in neutral, the throttle should pick up smoooth. Then you may go after driveline backlash.
Originally posted by ZenFox
What exactly is the function of the TPS? <--N00b question alert!
Er.. wait. Throttle Position Sensor. NM. I'm 'advanced'.
Still, what effect does it have on this discribed 'shuttering'?
What exactly is the function of the TPS? <--N00b question alert!
Er.. wait. Throttle Position Sensor. NM. I'm 'advanced'.
Still, what effect does it have on this discribed 'shuttering'?
Hmm none of the automatics(including my sister's) had that buckling issue. I wonder if a lighter flywheel would reduce the bucking effect for manual trannies.
Speaking of bucking I was driving my buddies 98' TT Supra and it was just as bad as my 90GXL when it comes to 3mph driving.
Speaking of bucking I was driving my buddies 98' TT Supra and it was just as bad as my 90GXL when it comes to 3mph driving.
Originally posted by ka8legend
Hmm none of the automatics(including my sister's) had that buckling issue.
Hmm none of the automatics(including my sister's) had that buckling issue.
I wonder if a lighter flywheel would reduce the bucking effect for manual trannies.
I was driving my buddies 98' TT Supra and it was
and as for the problem...i also believe that sounds like partially clogged injectors that flow well at high pressure and drip and sputter at low pressure. i havent experience that with an rx, but it sounds similar to a chevy i played with that had tb injection. a tb cleanup and clean injectors got it going nicely.
Yeah I figure since automatics are attached to flex plates which is even lighter than an aluminum flywheel, that it would buck less. But I forgot about the torque convertor which might help smooth things out a bit.
This thread is similar to NZconvertible: https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...threadid=35204
Originally posted by bingoboy
hehe off topic but where did your buddy get a 98 supra?
.
hehe off topic but where did your buddy get a 98 supra?
.
Originally posted by NZConvertible
That's the sort of opinion I'd expect from someone totally ignorant of the rotary engine, but not from an owner! Yes, compared to a big piston engine the rotary is short on torque, but that's because it's a small engine! Compare it to another small engine and you'll find it's got a perfectly acceptable amount of torque. Saying an RX-7 "doesn't like to drive slow" is nonsensical, it's quite capable of going as slow as any other car. A drive my car (the heaviest 7 made remember) in crawling rush hour traffic every day. I find it no more difficult in these conditions than any other small-engined car I've driven.
That's the sort of opinion I'd expect from someone totally ignorant of the rotary engine, but not from an owner! Yes, compared to a big piston engine the rotary is short on torque, but that's because it's a small engine! Compare it to another small engine and you'll find it's got a perfectly acceptable amount of torque. Saying an RX-7 "doesn't like to drive slow" is nonsensical, it's quite capable of going as slow as any other car. A drive my car (the heaviest 7 made remember) in crawling rush hour traffic every day. I find it no more difficult in these conditions than any other small-engined car I've driven.
I am just trying to help these people. i had the same problem i dumped like two cans of injector cleaner and it fixed my problem.
Originally posted by HAILERS
This thread is similar to NZconvertible: https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...threadid=35204
This thread is similar to NZconvertible: https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...threadid=35204
Originally posted by Six Rotors
So if you have close the throttle valve at high rpm,you get fuel cut on front and rear rotors.As you slowly open the throttle(or have it less closed),you get front rotor fuel cut only.
So if you have close the throttle valve at high rpm,you get fuel cut on front and rear rotors.As you slowly open the throttle(or have it less closed),you get front rotor fuel cut only.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turbo-minivan
General Rotary Tech Support
69
Feb 4, 2016 12:29 AM
Frisky Arab
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
13
Aug 18, 2015 05:30 PM



