2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Yet another turbo question...but a little more interesting I think...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 12:53 AM
  #51  
Mason Rx7's Avatar
Dancing w/ teh devil...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Is there a way to run without a AFM? It seems like life would be a whole lot easier.

Hehe... Me = noob

Sometimes

It seems like if you were to run standalone you could run something different than a AFM. Such as a MAF off a newer car or such.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 12:58 AM
  #52  
Makenzie71's Avatar
Thread Starter
...94% correct.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 2
From: High Texas
Originally Posted by Mason Rx7
Is there a way to run without a AFM? It seems like life would be a whole lot easier.

Hehe... Me = noob

Sometimes

It seems like if you were to run standalone you could run something different than a AFM. Such as a MAF off a newer car or such.
Yeah, stand-alone or an Map ECU...a search will get you plenty of hits for both. For the $1000 or you'll spend doing it, I don't see a point unless you're hunting big numbers...but in that case you'll run an aftermarket EMS anyway.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 05:31 AM
  #53  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by Makenzie71
Wouldn't the air on the pressure side, being denser and moving faster, cause the AFM door to read higher?
It's not moving faster, it's actually moving a bit slower because of the higher density. Don't confuse pressure with velocity. Remember that at a given point in time the mass airflow is constant from the beginning of the intake all the way to the engine (unless you have a leak).

Last edited by NZConvertible; Oct 27, 2005 at 05:36 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 08:05 AM
  #54  
SonicRaT's Avatar
Super Raterhater
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Not sure which T25 they use, but the largest I can find info on flows about 38lbs/min combined, which should be somewhat ok up to around 14psi.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 08:52 AM
  #55  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally Posted by SonicRaT
Not sure which T25 they use, but the largest I can find info on flows about 38lbs/min combined, which should be somewhat ok up to around 14psi.
Do you happen to know the turbine A/R on that 38 lb/min turbo?
Cause a GT2835 does about 40 lb/min, and I find it hard to believe a smaller, non-GT-series turbo could flow that much...

T3 "Super 60" does 35, so you sure it was "38" and not "28"?
http://store.yahoo.com/cheapturbo/gat3su.html


-Ted

Last edited by RETed; Oct 27, 2005 at 08:55 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 08:56 AM
  #56  
SonicRaT's Avatar
Super Raterhater
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Originally Posted by RETed
Do you happen to know the turbine A/R on that 38 lb/min turbo?
Cause a GT2835 does about 40 lb/min, and I find it hard to believe a smaller, non-GT-series turbo could flow that much...


-Ted
That's combined between both turbos. Individually they're pretty much useless after 20lbs/min.

Last edited by SonicRaT; Oct 27, 2005 at 09:00 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 09:05 AM
  #57  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally Posted by SonicRaT
That's combined between both turbos. Individually they're pretty much useless after 20lbs/min.
Doh!
That makes a LOT more sense!


-Ted
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 10:07 AM
  #58  
ultradef's Avatar
Ready to Rock
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
From: Bergen County, NJ
Originally Posted by NZConvertible
I just posted what they were.
Here is some more info:

Originally posted by marklar182 from 300zxClub:

From nismo catalog for part #'s 14411-40P04 and 14411-40P13

Compressor:
T25 housing
A/R .48
T25 Wheel 60trim

Turbine:
T2 Housing
Manual- A/R .63
Auto- A/R .54 (This is for quick spool on the auto, but less top end.)
T2 Wheel 65trim (on manual Auto same?)

270deg Thrust bearing


Hell, give them a shot...according to those specs they are bigger than they looked (to me). I guess I'm just used to looking at the "huge" (relatively) turbos on rotaries. They're good for ~400 whp on a Z32...I couldn't find any info on how much air they flow.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 10:17 AM
  #59  
SonicRaT's Avatar
Super Raterhater
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
This?

Attached Thumbnails Yet another turbo question...but a little more interesting I think...-300zx.gif  
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 10:24 AM
  #60  
BOOSTED Vert
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,307
Likes: 0
From: Miami
Originally Posted by RETed
Zenki Z32's were rated at 300.
Kouki Z32's were rated at 320.

I still think the reason the VG30 went twins was cause of the V-configuration of the engine - it just was more practical than running all the pipes into a single - ala Grand National plumbing nightmare!


-Ted
Thats right... Which is why the kits for the new vq? motors are all twins. Not only does it offer simplicity, but also faster spool. Twin turbos are the way to go for almost any application... I would go with a smaller/larger setup for the best of both worlds...

Last edited by MARTIN; Oct 27, 2005 at 10:46 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 10:42 AM
  #61  
BOOSTED Vert
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,307
Likes: 0
From: Miami
Originally Posted by Makenzie71


I will be getting an SAFC so I suppose the only thing the AFM is going to be there for anyway is to keep the ECU happy. Ultimately, ANYTHING that frees up things in front of the turbos I'm all for.
Without the AFM you wouldnt be able to use the SAFC. Its not there "Just to keep the ECU happy". The safc changes the signal that the afm sends to the ecu.. If you want to get rid of the afm, get a standalone... ITs not as expensive as it used to be and definately worth every single penny.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 11:06 AM
  #62  
Makenzie71's Avatar
Thread Starter
...94% correct.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 2
From: High Texas
Originally Posted by MARTIN
Without the AFM you wouldnt be able to use the SAFC. Its not there "Just to keep the ECU happy". The safc changes the signal that the afm sends to the ecu.. If you want to get rid of the afm, get a standalone... ITs not as expensive as it used to be and definately worth every single penny.
I'm not interested in getting rid of the AFM and a good stand-alone is still over $1000...especially if you put tuning into the mix.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 11:14 AM
  #63  
Dom_C's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 0
From: Freeport, Maine
megasquirt
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 11:24 AM
  #64  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
i thought it was common knowledge that stock z32 turbos were regular ole T25's with a smaller hotside...

anyways, its a waste of time as far as i'm concerned.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 11:24 AM
  #65  
Mason Rx7's Avatar
Dancing w/ teh devil...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Originally Posted by Dom_C
megasquirt
That would be my route.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 11:26 AM
  #66  
BOOSTED Vert
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,307
Likes: 0
From: Miami
Originally Posted by Makenzie71
I'm not interested in getting rid of the AFM and a good stand-alone is still over $1000...especially if you put tuning into the mix.
I bought my MT for 700 brand new... You are still limited to the AFm regardless of what piggyback you use.. And you still need to tune.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 11:35 AM
  #67  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
its pretty cool that you're tyin to ball on a budget here, but i really think its gonna be over-complicated and not make enough results to be justify all that fabrication, especially when you can get the same power goal and spool accomplished with a stock turbo
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 11:53 AM
  #68  
SonicRaT's Avatar
Super Raterhater
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
It'd be better than the stock turbo. Not by much though.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 12:23 PM
  #69  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
point taken.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 12:26 PM
  #70  
SonicRaT's Avatar
Super Raterhater
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
I figure it'd be similar to a stage2 hybrid, good for roughly 300rwhp before it runs out of steam. Spool is who knows, if just adding the two together gives any idea I'd think it'd be similar to stock.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 02:43 PM
  #71  
Makenzie71's Avatar
Thread Starter
...94% correct.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 2
From: High Texas
Originally Posted by jacobcartmill
its pretty cool that you're tyin to ball on a budget here, but i really think its gonna be over-complicated and not make enough results to be justify all that fabrication, especially when you can get the same power goal and spool accomplished with a stock turbo
Project so far:

Turbos ~ $125 shipped to me (thanks jason!!)
Tubing ~ $20 worth, if that much, including hardpipes, downpipes and exhaust.

Plus, I'm going to try and design this around the S4 N/A intake assembly so that I might have a marketable kit.

From my point of view, I'm not out much money, it's only going to require 1 afternoon to fabricate everything and I might be able to make a decent bit of change from it later on. The only things I'm really making that aren't in the norm are the turbo manifold (incredibly easy with a plasma cutter) and the Y pipe for the intake tracts. Unless you can honestly tell me that a true dual exhaust, hard intercooler pipes, an SAFC and a little tuning are all pointless I'll probably keep going.

Ya know, who does make a direct bolt-on 6-port turbo kit? No one.

The project is riddled with reasons to do it, lol.

I appreciate all you guy's input and help on this!
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 07:14 PM
  #72  
SonicRaT's Avatar
Super Raterhater
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Originally Posted by Makenzie71
Project so far:
Ya know, who does make a direct bolt-on 6-port turbo kit? No one.
I do...
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 07:17 PM
  #73  
Makenzie71's Avatar
Thread Starter
...94% correct.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 2
From: High Texas
Yours bolts up to an otherwise stock N/A block? (except for oil feed/return, that is)
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 07:22 PM
  #74  
SonicRaT's Avatar
Super Raterhater
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Yes, though I went a bit further and replaced the intake manifolds/etc.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 07:27 PM
  #75  
Makenzie71's Avatar
Thread Starter
...94% correct.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 2
From: High Texas
I wasn't aware you made another manifold to go along with your setup...my mistake...
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:10 PM.