2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Why are the after market oil cooler lines -10AN

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-13, 11:01 PM
  #26  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (8)
 
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Morristown, TN (east of Knoxville)
Posts: 11,576
Received 25 Likes on 18 Posts
Originally Posted by jjwalker
I know this is just preventative maintenance but...

Oil cooler lines actually failing is like a leprechaun sharing his gold.

In my almost 5 years here, I have heard of only a few threads about failed oil cooler lines. It's usually the wax pellet that dies first.
That information is totally, absolutely, and thoroughly incorrect IMO.

I have known of many cars with leaking and busted oil cooler lines (sometimes this results in the loss of an engine, since a busted hose means total and immediate oil pressure loss).

On the other hand, in 13 years I have never heard of or seen a bad eshaft oil pellet. Builders including myself shim or eliminate them, but they seem to be a very reliable part.
Old 04-09-13, 11:32 AM
  #27  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,826
Received 2,594 Likes on 1,842 Posts
i see oil cooler hoses fail, but mostly they just are leaking. catastrophic failure with no warning seems really rare.

i've seen bad thermal pellets too, my first FC had one, and i have seen plenty of other FC's trailing smoke on the way to work in the morning.

it has been a while since i've seen a bad thermal pellet, maybe most of the bad ones are off the road....
Old 04-09-13, 11:50 AM
  #28  
Theoretical Tinkerer

iTrader: (41)
 
RXSpeed16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Norcal/Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,589
Received 46 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by Jet-Lee
We do have different opinions, except mine is based on my daily experience of designing commercial fluid systems using ammonia, steam, water (and like fluids) and ... wait for it ... oil. I haven't done the math for this specific case because I've done enough math to know the generalization off the top of my head.
I don't work in the industry, but I know enough to calculate the head losses across a few connections and lengths of pipe. I just would like to know for my own curiosity. Hell, I'll probably end up proving you right. Could you please look up some parameters that would help solve this by hand? Specifically I need the velocity of the oil in the system (I have no idea what the stock pump's volume flow rate is), Density of oil at 200 deg F and 90 psi, surface roughness of the SS braided piping (e), and dynamic viscosity (mu) of oil at 200 deg F.


Originally Posted by Jet-Lee
Why change what's making money? Stock lines are small, the companies offer larger sizes, people buy them, why add another product to their shelves/inventory for the stockers to screw up orders with when their existing stock of inventory is working fine?

I'm sure if there were a huge run of people demanding -8AN lines, they might make them, but apparently there isn't or they don't care to (as outlined above).
I find no fault with the system and no reason for them to change/add a product. But I take issue with your assumption that they looked at -8 and -10 and then chose -10 because it is superior and worth the cost. No benefit, at more cost to the customer, with no extra profit is pretty poor business.

Originally Posted by Jet-Lee
You're not considering both ends of the line. Going from the engine to the oil cooler, using a -8AN hose w/fittings, you're restricting the passage down (smaller than stock) then opening it back up to a larger than stock hose; then you're restricting it down (smaller than stock) and back up again to stock at the other end. That's two spots in one line where the oil passage is smaller than stock; there's two lines.

With the -10AN fittings and hose, you don't have the restriction down to smaller-than-stock; it only enlarges then restricts back down at the end only to the stock size and no less.
Pumping losses occur whether the pipe is expanding or contracting. So -10 has 4 changes, -8 has 6. However two of those -8 are through an orifice that is 97% the same size as the original. Those are negligible compared to the four connections that are 75% (-8 hose) and 60% (-10 hose) of the original hose diameter. <-Revised those since I was using the fitting diameter not the hose diameter. And the -10 hose is only about 50% worse than -8 in transition, not the 10x previously stated. My bad.

Originally Posted by Jet-Lee
The ratio number is irrelevant in regard to flow as the system can only flow as much as its most restrictive point will allow. Your area ratios only apply to friction in the system in regard to the pumps output capabilities, which we've already agreed is not an issue.
How is it irrelevant? It is a pressure loss (head loss, pumping loss, whatever we're calling it) and has the same effect on the system as the viscous friction created in enclosed piping. They either both matter or neither of them do.

Originally Posted by Jet-Lee
Which what is a bigger factor? The "less pressure drop through larger tubing" does have merit because it's true, I just don't care to spend my time calc'ing it out to satisfy someone's curiosity when I have other people paying me (nicely) to do theirs. Sorry.
I will gladly do all the calculations, I just need some data that I don't have easy access to. Since you're in the industry, I'd appreciate it if you looked up a few values and shared them.

Originally Posted by Jet-Lee
If there's an oil passage in the pump system smaller than these that we're talking about (besides the jets), then this entire thread is just a moot point as that passage is the limiting factor and the hoses matter nothing at all as long as they're larger.
It is most definitely a moot point. But I'm interested in why is it a moot point. I just want to compare the turbulence created by stepping up the tubing from stock to -10 hose vs a 3% change in orifice diameter.

Originally Posted by clokker
How many oil line replacements do you think they sell in a year?
Would the sales volume justify the inventory increase?
I dunno, 5 maybe. You're point is correct that it doesn't make sense to change over now. At the inception of the product there was a choice to make either size. Both perform exactly the same, require the same labor to make and have the same profit margin. Only difference is $10 cheaper raw materials. Essentially selling the same product at 190 vs 200. Economics says you'll sell more of a cheaper product. This completely ignores the fact that in reality it's fractions of a sale per year.
Old 04-09-13, 12:15 PM
  #29  
Unconventional
iTrader: (1)
 
Jet-Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Visalia, CA
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm tired of wasting my time with you, look it up for yourself. I have nothing to gain by researching the information or doing the calculations for you, especially since you aren't paying for my engineering time.
Old 04-09-13, 12:30 PM
  #30  
Cake or Death?

iTrader: (2)
 
clokker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mile High
Posts: 10,249
Received 63 Likes on 53 Posts
Originally Posted by RXSpeed16
You're point is correct that it doesn't make sense to change over now. At the inception of the product there was a choice to make either size.
That's an assumption you really can't make, retail decisions can be made for a variety of whimsical reasons.
I doubt any of the companies are making the lines in-house, makes more sense to sub to a specialist operation. One day Corksport (or RB or Mazdatrix) calls Mike's Hose Emporium to get some oil hoses fabbed up and Mike just happens to have a lot of dash ten laying around but dash eight would be shipped in ( causing a delay and potentially higher price), so the purchaser thinks, "When have we ever gone wrong with bigger? and the deal is done.
After the first batch is sold the original order is replaced and suddenly, dash ten is institutionalized as the hose of choice.

Not saying it happened like that but it could have been just that capricious.
Old 04-09-13, 01:49 PM
  #31  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (8)
 
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Morristown, TN (east of Knoxville)
Posts: 11,576
Received 25 Likes on 18 Posts
Old 04-09-13, 02:04 PM
  #32  
Unconventional
iTrader: (1)
 
Jet-Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Visalia, CA
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RotaryResurrection
I'm not blocked from your website but you're image isn't a broken link:

403 Forbidden

Access to this resource on the server is denied!
Powered By LiteSpeed Web Server
LiteSpeed Technologies is not responsible for administration and contents of this web site!
-edit-
Weird, if I navigate your heirarchy and click on the image link, it comes up. If I right-click your image and "Open in new tab", it's 403'd...
Old 04-09-13, 02:32 PM
  #33  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (8)
 
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Morristown, TN (east of Knoxville)
Posts: 11,576
Received 25 Likes on 18 Posts
Originally Posted by Jet-Lee
I'm not blocked from your website but you're image isn't a broken link:



-edit-
Weird, if I navigate your heirarchy and click on the image link, it comes up. If I right-click your image and "Open in new tab", it's 403'd...
This new "viglink" **** that 7club/8club has instituted blows goats. It seems to screw up half of the image links I post. The other half work perfectly.
Old 04-09-13, 04:11 PM
  #34  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (6)
 
Nick_d_TII's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 1,620
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
[edit]WTH? now the image shows up?
[img]

I have -10 mazdatrix lines and they work great, know why, because they work.
Old 04-09-13, 04:18 PM
  #35  
version 2.0

iTrader: (17)
 
texFCturboII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 3,590
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by jjwalker
I know this is just preventative maintenance but...

Oil cooler lines actually failing is like a leprechaun sharing his gold.

In my almost 5 years here, I have heard of only a few threads about failed oil cooler lines. It's usually the wax pellet that dies first.
I used an rx8 oil pressure regulator on my last build with stock oil cooler lines. They popped randomly a week later with no signs of failure beforehand and left oil all over the parking lot one day... Not trying to be a dick, just sayin it happens.
Old 04-09-13, 04:40 PM
  #36  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (8)
 
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Morristown, TN (east of Knoxville)
Posts: 11,576
Received 25 Likes on 18 Posts
Originally Posted by texFCturboII
I used an rx8 oil pressure regulator on my last build with stock oil cooler lines. They popped randomly a week later with no signs of failure beforehand and left oil all over the parking lot one day... Not trying to be a dick, just sayin it happens.
Since the rx8 runs the same pressure regulator as all FC's, it was just coincidence.

FD's on the other hand run 115psi.
Old 04-09-13, 07:44 PM
  #37  
Rotary Power

iTrader: (15)
 
wthdidusay82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Dinwiddie, Va
Posts: 3,706
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by RotaryRocket88

I wouldn't call it rare. The original lines are partially rubber hose, and rubber does not last forever when subjected to 20+ years of heat. The OEM lines on my car leaked, then the rebuilt lines I had leaked. I'm on set # 3 now (corksport braided).
I'm only using stock lines just to get my car going, upgrading anything for preventive maintenance is ideal but not everyone can afford to.

I plan on getting those lines as well as their Turbo inlet duct, and possibly the radiator panel.

I did have their intake piping for my s4 NA as well as a cnced Maf adapter, the adapter was nice but the intake piping rubbed on the strut tower >.<
Old 04-09-13, 11:36 PM
  #38  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (8)
 
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Morristown, TN (east of Knoxville)
Posts: 11,576
Received 25 Likes on 18 Posts
Originally Posted by wthdidusay82
I'm only using stock lines just to get my car going, upgrading anything for preventive maintenance is ideal but not everyone can afford to.

I plan on getting those lines as well as their Turbo inlet duct, and possibly the radiator panel.

I did have their intake piping for my s4 NA as well as a cnced Maf adapter, the adapter was nice but the intake piping rubbed on the strut tower >.<
You don't need their radiator panel, the factory put plastic ones on your car that seal/function better and are free.
Old 04-10-13, 06:25 AM
  #39  
Rotary Power

iTrader: (15)
 
wthdidusay82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Dinwiddie, Va
Posts: 3,706
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by RotaryResurrection

You don't need their radiator panel, the factory put plastic ones on your car that seal/function better and are free.
I just got those the other day, I just thought the cork sport looks nice.
Old 04-10-13, 04:39 PM
  #40  
version 2.0

iTrader: (17)
 
texFCturboII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 3,590
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by RotaryResurrection
Since the rx8 runs the same pressure regulator as all FC's, it was just coincidence.

FD's on the other hand run 115psi.
I was unaware of that. I guess I was misinformed, it must have been an FD regulator then, oil pressure was at 120 psi. at startup then dropped to around 110psi.
Old 04-22-13, 09:58 AM
  #41  
Living on the North Coast

Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
DeaconBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Avon Lake
Posts: 600
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Update: The -8 AN swept fittings and metric adapter fittings came in the other day and they actually had a 0.382" ID rather than the previously noted 0.375" ID, so there is no flow restriction compared to the factory hose fittings.

I dismounted the oil cooler and drained it over night. I made some simple mounting bracket extensions out of aluminum angle stock to lower it about 1” so that I can use swept AN fittings with the new oil cooler lines that I am making and to have enough clearance with the A/C condenser lines. I have a set of CorkSport braided SS aftermarket oil cooler lines, but I don't like the banjo fittings (same as the stock lines). I also don’t like the forged 90 degree AN fittings on the Racing Beat aftermarket SS oil cooler lines because they restrict flow too much (2 PSI drop pre fitting). So I made a set of oil cooler lines using swept -8 AN fittings, adapters fittings and Parker Hannifin 836 High Temp blue push-on hose. The hose is rated to 400 PSI and 300 degree F. I reused the foam protective sleeves from the factory oil cooler lines and added nylon spiral wrap for more abrasion resistance. The 120 degree and 45 degree angled swept fittings all worked out very well and helped to produce a nice neat and clean installation.

I also installed the Racing Beat "street" oil pressure regulator kit along with their oil filter spacer / adapter which has two gauge ports. I finish off the oil system upgrade by installing the PineApple Racing cast aluminum competition baffled oil pan. I was amazed at how much oil remained in the factory stamped steel oil pan after draining, as well as the amount that remains in the oil cooler and lines as well as in the engine passages during an oil change. No wonder why fresh oil looks so dark / dirty right after an oil change.
Attached Thumbnails Why are the after market oil cooler lines -10AN-dsc00919-640x480-.jpg   Why are the after market oil cooler lines -10AN-dsc00920-640x480-.jpg   Why are the after market oil cooler lines -10AN-dsc00929-640x480-.jpg   Why are the after market oil cooler lines -10AN-dsc00925-640x480-.jpg   Why are the after market oil cooler lines -10AN-dsc00932-640x480-.jpg  

Why are the after market oil cooler lines -10AN-dsc00914-640x480-.jpg  

Last edited by DeaconBlue; 04-22-13 at 10:02 AM.
Old 04-22-13, 10:08 AM
  #42  
Living on the North Coast

Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
DeaconBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Avon Lake
Posts: 600
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
While I was under there I also installed the Mazda competition engine mounts to go along with the Mazda competition trany mount bushings. Everything looks good with no clearance issues.
Attached Thumbnails Why are the after market oil cooler lines -10AN-dsc00936-640x480-.jpg   Why are the after market oil cooler lines -10AN-dsc00934-640x480-.jpg  
Old 04-22-13, 10:19 AM
  #43  
MECP Certified Installer

 
jjwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Mesquite, TX-DFW
Posts: 3,176
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The mazda comp mounts are nice. I installed some when I rebuilt my engine and they are great.

BTW, what the hell is that line that runs by the oil cooler that just loops around back into the engine compartment? i noticed it a few weeks ago when i was under the car, but never really investigated what they where. Part of it can be seen in your 5th picture from the left you posted.
Old 04-22-13, 10:35 AM
  #44  
Cake or Death?

iTrader: (2)
 
clokker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mile High
Posts: 10,249
Received 63 Likes on 53 Posts
Originally Posted by jjwalker
BTW, what the hell is that line that runs by the oil cooler that just loops around back into the engine compartment?
Power steering cooler line.
Old 04-22-13, 10:40 AM
  #45  
MECP Certified Installer

 
jjwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Mesquite, TX-DFW
Posts: 3,176
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by clokker
Power steering cooler line.
Kind of figured, just never noticed it before.
Old 04-22-13, 12:40 PM
  #46  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (8)
 
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Morristown, TN (east of Knoxville)
Posts: 11,576
Received 25 Likes on 18 Posts
Originally Posted by DeaconBlue
Update: The -8 AN swept fittings and metric adapter fittings came in the other day and they actually had a 0.382" ID rather than the previously noted 0.375" ID, so there is no flow restriction compared to the factory hose fittings.

I dismounted the oil cooler and drained it over night. I made some simple mounting bracket extensions out of aluminum angle stock to lower it about 1” so that I can use swept AN fittings with the new oil cooler lines that I am making and to have enough clearance with the A/C condenser lines. I have a set of CorkSport braided SS aftermarket oil cooler lines, but I don't like the banjo fittings (same as the stock lines). I also don’t like the forged 90 degree AN fittings on the Racing Beat aftermarket SS oil cooler lines because they restrict flow too much (2 PSI drop pre fitting). So I made a set of oil cooler lines using swept -8 AN fittings, adapters fittings and Parker Hannifin 836 High Temp blue push-on hose. The hose is rated to 400 PSI and 300 degree F. I reused the foam protective sleeves from the factory oil cooler lines and added nylon spiral wrap for more abrasion resistance. The 120 degree and 45 degree angled swept fittings all worked out very well and helped to produce a nice neat and clean installation.

I also installed the Racing Beat "street" oil pressure regulator kit along with their oil filter spacer / adapter which has two gauge ports. I finish off the oil system upgrade by installing the PineApple Racing cast aluminum competition baffled oil pan. I was amazed at how much oil remained in the factory stamped steel oil pan after draining, as well as the amount that remains in the oil cooler and lines as well as in the engine passages during an oil change. No wonder why fresh oil looks so dark / dirty right after an oil change.
In this thread: armchair engineers.

At least you've set up your car so that you'll be able to sleep well at night knowing there is no pressure drop or change in the original flow rate of your oiling system.
Old 04-22-13, 08:21 PM
  #47  
Living on the North Coast

Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
DeaconBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Avon Lake
Posts: 600
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by RotaryResurrection
In this thread: armchair engineers.

At least you've set up your car so that you'll be able to sleep well at night knowing there is no pressure drop or change in the original flow rate of your oiling system.
Well with the ID of the new hoses being larger that the factory hard lines and the lower restriction of the swept fittings vs. the factory banjo fittings - the new oil cooler hoses should offer more flow potential and less flow restriction then the factory lines. That is important with the new higher oil pressure by-pass regulator setup.
Old 04-23-13, 05:54 AM
  #48  
Captain OCD

iTrader: (13)
 
SoloII///M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Glenwood, MD
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by RotaryResurrection
In this thread: armchair engineers.
This coming from the guy who thinks that current can "bleed off in cars with high resistance."

lol.
Old 04-23-13, 11:39 AM
  #49  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (8)
 
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Morristown, TN (east of Knoxville)
Posts: 11,576
Received 25 Likes on 18 Posts
Originally Posted by SoloII///M
This coming from the guy who thinks that current can "bleed off in cars with high resistance."

lol.
I have no idea of what you are talking about?

My point is that it seems to me like more "engineering thought" has been put into the oil lines on what is apparently a near-stock naturally aspirated car making <200hp than a most single turbo FD's.

It just seems as though there are so many other areas of maintenance, modification, or cosmetics that could use such attention, rather than debating the last 1/10th of 1% of flow through oil cooler lines.
Old 04-23-13, 12:08 PM
  #50  
Captain OCD

iTrader: (13)
 
SoloII///M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Glenwood, MD
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Oh nothing.. just more "armchair engineering" from another thread.


Quick Reply: Why are the after market oil cooler lines -10AN



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:27 AM.