2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

when the secondaries kick at what rate do the primary's run at?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 20, 2002 | 10:18 PM
  #1  
Rpeck's Avatar
Thread Starter
What R U thinking self?
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
From: Stockton, CA
Question when the secondaries kick in, at what rate do the primary's run at?

when the secondaries kick in what rate do the primary's run at?


I am trying to do some serious fuel caculations here.. but I need to know what % of flow rate the primaries run at once the secondaries have kicked in?

anyone know?

Last edited by Rpeck; Nov 20, 2002 at 10:42 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2002 | 11:11 PM
  #2  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
The primaries fire sequentially up to 3800rpm, then (if the load is high enough) all four batch fire at half the pulsewidth the primaries were firing at before the changeover.
So say the primaries were running at 70% duty cycle, at 3800rpm all four would then fire at 35%. This means the amount of fuel flowing increases linearly without a dip or jump as the secondaries come in.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2002 | 12:47 AM
  #3  
HIMNI Racing's Avatar
Rick James
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
From: Under The Hood In FL
no ****!!!! didn't know that.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2002 | 01:13 AM
  #4  
Rpeck's Avatar
Thread Starter
What R U thinking self?
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
From: Stockton, CA
NZ, how does that work if you are using a S-AFc to "fool" the computer? does a 5% cut at a rpm range cut it 5% across the board? or just cut the secondaries? I was caculating total CC, minus normal injectors total CC, and creating my percentage, at a typical 5.5 PSI setup .. then I was going to go from there .. just to test my "running too rich" theroy.

total 2200cc Base, 1440+2000 = 3440, subtract and divide that buy the original.

550 and 720 = 23.6% but do a 550 550 720 720 and get 13ish

then do 720 720 1000 1000 with 550 550 550 550
and you need to know % load.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2002 | 03:51 AM
  #5  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally posted by Rpeck
NZ, how does that work if you are using a S-AFc to "fool" the computer? does a 5% cut at a rpm range cut it 5% across the board? or just cut the secondaries?
An S-AFC alters the airflow meter signal, not the fuel injector signals. So the ECU will just fire the injectors based on the "tricked" airflow signal it's receiving.
Things become tricky with staged injectors of different sizes. With a normal injector set-up if you put in bigger (but identical) injectors you could apply the same correction accross the boord and the car would run as it had before. But with different sized injectors coming in at 3800rpm you need to change that correction at that point.
To get 2 x 720's to perform like 2 x 550's you need to apply a -24% correction below 3800rpm. To get 2 x 720's and 2 x 1000's to perform like 4 x 550's you need to apply a -36% correction above 3800rpm. That should have everything acting like stock. Use those figures as a base and tune from there.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2002 | 01:20 PM
  #6  
Turblown's Avatar
Turn up the boost
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 236
From: Twin Cities, MN
Originally posted by NZConvertible
The primaries fire sequentially up to 3800rpm, then (if the load is high enough) all four batch fire at half the pulsewidth the primaries were firing at before the changeover.
So say the primaries were running at 70% duty cycle, at 3800rpm all four would then fire at 35%. This means the amount of fuel flowing increases linearly without a dip or jump as the secondaries come in.
Too bad stock ecu's can't handle bigger injectors, because they already have some very nice abilities, batch firing etc.
__________________
Rotary Performance Parts



Last edited by Turblown; Nov 21, 2002 at 01:24 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2002 | 08:46 PM
  #7  
zenkiFC's Avatar
Danger to Manifold
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Havelock, NC
since the safc only modifies the afm signal,wouldnt you only be able to run injectors up to the stock ecu's limit of about 64% no matter what size the are? ive been wondering about this for a while,does anyone know?
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2002 | 10:43 PM
  #8  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally posted by zenkiFC
since the safc only modifies the afm signal,wouldnt you only be able to run injectors up to the stock ecu's limit of about 64% no matter what size the are?
I've yet to see anybody prove the ECU can't run past this figure, particularly since I've never heard of any other stock ECU having this problem. I think this figure is just what the primary injectors are doing at 3800rpm at stock power levels.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2002 | 11:36 PM
  #9  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
I thought that all 4 ran at 50% if the load was high enough for the secondary pair to come on... guess i have been living a lie... i'm going to end it all
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2002 | 12:13 AM
  #10  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally posted by 1Revvin7
Too bad stock ecu's can't handle bigger injectors, because they already have some very nice abilities, batch firing etc.
Actually, batch firing is the "old" way of doing it, and is much simpler. Modern EFI use sequential injection for better idle, lower emissions and more power.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2002 | 12:20 AM
  #11  
HOZZMANRX7's Avatar
Driving RX7's since 1979
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (43)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 6,096
Likes: 9
From: So Cal where the OC/LA/SB counties meet
'84 & '85 EFI Wankles

Explain how the flow rate works on the '84 and '85 GSL-SE's since they are of a two injector design. Curious as they also are of a 6 port design.

Does the flow rate vary at different RPM levels?

Last edited by HOZZMANRX7; Nov 23, 2002 at 12:28 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2002 | 04:42 AM
  #12  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Re: '84 & '85 EFI Wankles

Originally posted by HOZZMANRX7
Explain how the flow rate works on the '84 and '85 GSL-SE's since they are of a two injector design.
They work just like any other EFI engine. They have one injector per rotor just like piston engines have one injector per piston. Remember two those injectors are each much bigger than the four fitted to FC's. The 12A Turbo ran a similar two-injector set-up using even bigger (800cc/min) injectors. These are great drop-in upgrades for modded FC's, as four of them will support over 450hp!
Curious as they also are of a 6 port design.
It makes no difference since the injectors are mounted in the primary ports just like the primary injectors in the FC.
Does the flow rate vary at different RPM levels?
Again, just like any other EFI engine, the ECU controls injector opening to adjust fuel flow according to load and rpm.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2002 | 07:05 AM
  #13  
renns's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 4
From: Ontario, Canada
Interesting thread... I've replaced the stock ECU in my n/a 86 with the Megasquirt kit. This controller has two injector drivers, bank1, bank2. The system can be set to batch fire or alternate fire the two banks. This works well on most efi systems, but not on the rotary as its system is designed for staged injection. I've been experimenting a modified version of the embedded code that allows for two VE maps to be entered, one for each injector bank. Using this method, I can now define the rpm/map combination which will bring the secondaries on-line, just like the stock system.

Question1: In my staged injection setup, the primaries are batch fired. The car seems to run and idle fine. Do other standalone systems typically batch-fire as well? Anyone try to get a batch-fired primary system through an emissions test?

Question2: I've got my setup configured now to feather in the secondary injectors, starting at extremely low pulse widths, and essentially adding to flow of the primaries. Again, what is commonly done with aftermarket ecus on this front? Advantages/disadvantages of 'feathering' secondaries vs Mazdas method?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Queppa
New Member RX-7 Technical
11
Nov 18, 2024 03:47 AM
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
Wolf_
Single Turbo RX-7's
3
Aug 11, 2015 04:23 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:11 AM.