2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Whats Wrong With This Pic?

Old Feb 8, 2010 | 08:30 PM
  #1  
sciff5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: ma
Whats Wrong With This Pic?

My last Autox













WAY too much body roll

Running Racing Beat Springs Kyb Agx struts and RB front sway bar and 235/40/17 Falken Azenis 615s up front and 255s out back DTSS eliminators and about 1-1.5 degrees negative camber out back. Car has terrible understeer. I was having a very hard time pushing the car. If I tried to go harder into corners it would just understeer and the rear end never approached the limits of grip unless I gunned it and rotated the back with throttle.

I had to trail brake a lot to get it to turn in at all but I really wasnt getting the most from all 4 tires and the suspension because it felt like the fronts gave way, way too soon. I let an instructor drive the car at the end of the day who usually drives a miata and he was even more frustrated than me and barely any faster. THen handed the car to another instuctor who has been to nationals and won I believe a few times in his Dstock civic SI and he somehow jabbed the brakes much harder before hitting the corner but not enough to lock up the front tires and the car just turned in MUCH harder. He was about 8 seconds faster than either me or the other instructor his first time ever driving the car. You can expect that the car was rolling much harder when he was driving it.

I found out that I need camber adjustment out front and I need to reduce body roll a TON. I'm looking into setups. Hoping to spend less than 1k and sell of the current setup. I really want a Koni/GC setup or ISCs setup with custom valved bilsteins but when you can get megan and BC coilovers for like 800-900$ new they are hard to beat I just dont know how bad the valving is on those cheap coilovers. I know its bad I just dont know how bad or how much it really matters to guy whos not competitive to begin with.

Wanted to get input on what you guys recommend. I hate the body roll but I also take this car to the drag strip and put 27" slicks under it when there so some weight transfer would be nice. I also drive it to and from the autox an hour or so as well as on the weekends.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2010 | 08:53 PM
  #2  
altec_fc3s's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: SW. MI
Hood pins?
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2010 | 08:58 PM
  #3  
sciff5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: ma
the hood pins are awsome.. way too much roll in the corners
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2010 | 09:05 PM
  #4  
ifryrice's Avatar
Sequentially broken
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 448
Likes: 1
From: Wisconsin
Wow, that's a lot of roll. I ran almost an identical setup (but with 16's all around), and didn't have nearly that much roll. I was running the old Azenis tires and would usually push on entry into moderate oversteer as I rolled through. It took some serious fiddling around with the damper settings. I think I was running 3 or 4 up front and the rear at 7 or 8. It was about the only setup I could get where the car would even remotely want to be free, it wanted to push through everything (though I didn't have nearly the roll you're having). I played with tire pressures a bit and was able to get a pretty decent compromise, but still not much to my liking. How many miles d you have on the hardware? Stock sways/etc?

At first I was about to say your hood was what's wrong with the pic, it's the wrong color!
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2010 | 09:07 PM
  #5  
djchiptoothsfc's Avatar
dj
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
From: elmhurst ny
Get coil overs. RB is a really good brand but there is no replacement for coil overs.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2010 | 09:12 PM
  #6  
Turbo II Rotor's Avatar
Who Shot the Sheriff?
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,858
Likes: 2
From: Aurora, CO
You only have a front sway bar correct? Get one for the rear as the front sway bar will induce more understeer.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2010 | 09:21 PM
  #7  
sciff5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: ma
Rear bar gives the car less than desirable charachteristics. It likes to push and then snap oversteer with the rear bar at least without it the car pushes and then breaks the back end out much more progressivly with power.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2010 | 11:19 PM
  #8  
rotorkid's Avatar
A jug fills drop by drop.
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: 661
That and running 235 up front and 255 in the back can have a tendeance to create understeer cause the front tires break soon than what the back can get close to. Or something like that. Coilovers and front and rear sway bars
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 06:41 AM
  #9  
Turbo II Rotor's Avatar
Who Shot the Sheriff?
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,858
Likes: 2
From: Aurora, CO
Yeah, don't run staggered tire sizes. Go 255 front and rear.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 03:23 PM
  #10  
frijolee's Avatar
the implications matter
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
From: Tustin, CA
RB front bar is too much to be running without anything in back. I've tried it (on stiffer springs admittedly) and had the same understeer issues you ran into. STaggered tires only make it worse.

If you insist on no rear bar, up your spring rates to a 9/7 split and run a stock bar front w/ nothing in back.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 05:02 PM
  #11  
SpeedOfLife's Avatar
rotors excite me
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 9
From: Central Iowa
Make sure your sway bar end links are in good shape. If the rubber bushings are shot or God forbid the links/bolts are broken or missing then that would explain a lot. If they're not in bad shape but still stock you could always upgrade the links. I built my own out of spherical bearings so there's pretty much no give to my links.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 05:39 PM
  #12  
cyberxn's Avatar
Remove this account
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
From: REMOVE MY ACCOUNT
The Bottom of your 9 is missing Im almost sure that's what it could be
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 05:46 PM
  #13  
Nick_d_TII's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 6
From: Beaverton, OR
SS Rx-7

Kinda tippy like a boat. Ha ha!
Attached Thumbnails Whats Wrong With This Pic?-rxocean.jpg  
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 06:40 PM
  #14  
iamxeddiex's Avatar
Wankel
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: Spartanburg, SC
I have just installed Tokico Blues and RB springs and like them a lot but wish I had (coilovers). I heard a lot of bad things about the KYB AGX adjustables. I have base KYB on my lowered Explorer and that thing handles like a champ with some Saleens on 255/55/18's. I think your body roll looks worst than my 80K 22 year old oem set-up, all 4 shocks were blown but I had strut bars at the same time. Strut bars are like anti-understeer bars.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 09:30 PM
  #15  
SpeedOfLife's Avatar
rotors excite me
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 9
From: Central Iowa
Now that I've thought about it, here's a pic of my '7 during an AutoX. I believe I had my KYB AGX adjustables and Intrax progressive rate lowering springs installed, plus my spherical bearing sway bar end links on all four corners. And a dude in the passenger seat. Note the cant of the pavement, I don't think I'm rolling quite as much. Oh and I was running stock size tires, probably my Bridgestone Potenzas (I want wider and grippier, those came with the car, but tires are ******* expensive and I'm ******* broke).
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 09:33 PM
  #16  
sciff5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: ma
Originally Posted by Nick_d_TII
Kinda tippy like a boat. Ha ha!
LOL

Pics really capture how much body roll there is but in motion it doesnt look as bad. That being said I cant stand it at all. Even my daily driver is dropped so I want my sports car to really handle like a sports car.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTfgkm7V-8s
(instructor driving)
I wish I had pics of the body roll with him driving. He was hitting the corners SOOO much harder than I was able to. I wish I had pics of the body roll with him driving.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1GtO9JGkCoY
(me driving, slow but still rolly polly
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 09:37 PM
  #17  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
try some poly bushings and crank the AGX's down on the dampening.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 10:00 PM
  #18  
Black91n/a's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,707
Likes: 6
From: BC, Canada
Check your sway bar end links! One may have broken or come loose. I had this happen to me once shortly after I installed my RB front bar and I got a lot of body roll and it didn't handle well.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 11:14 PM
  #19  
sciff5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: ma
The AGXs were full stiff and they work perfect. But struts dont really control body roll, the springs and sways do.

Sway bar endlinks are fine, its always been a rolly polly.

Poly bushings are good and I am replacing them slowly, but again dont really play anthing but an extreamly minor roll in understeer and body roll
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 11:38 PM
  #20  
iamxeddiex's Avatar
Wankel
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: Spartanburg, SC
Originally Posted by sciff5
The AGXs were full stiff and they work perfect. But struts dont really control body roll, the springs and sways do.

Sway bar endlinks are fine, its always been a rolly polly.

Poly bushings are good and I am replacing them slowly, but again dont really play anthing but an extreamly minor roll in understeer and body roll
Are you or have you ever used strut bars?
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 06:59 AM
  #21  
sciff5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: ma
Originally Posted by iamxeddiex
Are you or have you ever used strut bars?
Do you meen strut tower braces? I'm guessing your joking around but I'm not getting it. but no I dont have them and they wouldent help with body roll
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 11:33 AM
  #22  
LargeOrangeFont's Avatar
Fistful of steel
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 27
From: OC, So Cal
Short of coilovers, to fix your problem you will need camber plates, eliminate your tire stagger, and put a rear sway bar on the car. Try an OEM Turbo rear bar to start. You need close to -3 degrees of camber up front to get any grip and keep you from running on the shoulders of the front tires.

All that is in addition to making sure all your bushings, endlinks and mounts are in good shape. Short of that, most of your problems are caused by your alignment, tire stagger and sway bar choices.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 02:10 PM
  #23  
jdmsuper7's Avatar
Looks ahead!
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 1
From: Ephrata, PA
^what black91 and orangefont said

I personally would go back to the stock front bar.

Get camber plates and bump them in as far as you can. These cars need a ton of camber to work well.

Get a square tire setup. When I first started auto-x I had a 205/225 stagger and it seemed like the car would never bite. Switched to 225s all around and *poof* much more balanced handling.

The body roll isn't causing the handling issues, the alignment probably is. Look at stock class cars. I'm sure there are many a S2000 on stock springs that are running much faster than you with just as much body roll.

edit: is that at Devens?
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 07:14 PM
  #24  
sciff5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: ma
Originally Posted by jdmsuper7
^what black91 and orangefont said

I personally would go back to the stock front bar.

Get camber plates and bump them in as far as you can. These cars need a ton of camber to work well.

Get a square tire setup. When I first started auto-x I had a 205/225 stagger and it seemed like the car would never bite. Switched to 225s all around and *poof* much more balanced handling.

The body roll isn't causing the handling issues, the alignment probably is. Look at stock class cars. I'm sure there are many a S2000 on stock springs that are running much faster than you with just as much body roll.

edit: is that at Devens?
Yup and devens is a fast course. on a tight course I'de have even more issues.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 11:33 PM
  #25  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
Originally Posted by sciff5
The AGXs were full stiff and they work perfect. But struts dont really control body roll, the springs and sways do.

Sway bar endlinks are fine, its always been a rolly polly.

Poly bushings are good and I am replacing them slowly, but again dont really play anthing but an extreamly minor roll in understeer and body roll
if you think poly bushings dont play in body roll then you haven't seen old bushings at work... mine felt like i added new suspension to the car when i installed them and the cornering was much more crisp with less roll.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:36 AM.