2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

twin turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 07:04 PM
  #1  
1300ccTuner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
twin turbo

ok i can get a custom mani. and wondering has anybody ever seen a twin set up with s5 turbos. anybody have any insight on this.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 08:02 PM
  #2  
beefhole's Avatar
Boosted. I got BLOWN!!!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,742
Likes: 1
From: Queens, NY
No point.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 08:06 PM
  #3  
zxert's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: sacramento
just buy one good turbo.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2006 | 10:33 AM
  #4  
1300ccTuner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
it would be cheaper if i already have the turbos. im just wondering would if i can take the stock to lets say for argument 12psi then with double would that be equivlent to 24? yes yes single is better ive read that so many times in posts, but thats not what is being asked.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2006 | 10:35 AM
  #5  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
The turbos are TOO BIG to be used one per rotor, especially the turbine housing.

You sure you want to drive a car that doesn't start boosting until after 5kRPM?


-Ted
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2006 | 10:54 AM
  #6  
matts86fc3s's Avatar
southern style
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: warner robins, georgia
twin turbo sucks. only good for instant (pretty much) spooling. thats no fun. a good single turbo set up is better anyway. plus you get that kick in the *** feeling when it spools up
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2006 | 12:15 PM
  #7  
Parastie's Avatar
Mountain Rotary Mod
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,411
Likes: 0
From: Freaking Poland!!
Originally Posted by matts86fc3s
twin turbo sucks. only good for instant (pretty much) spooling. thats no fun. a good single turbo set up is better anyway. plus you get that kick in the *** feeling when it spools up
Instant boost is no fun? That just sounds retarded. Instant boost will give you a larger RPM range of power, which is what you want if your serious about cars.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2006 | 01:39 PM
  #8  
SureShot's Avatar
Seduced by the DARK SIDE
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 7,323
Likes: 2
From: Orange Park FL (near Jax)
What you're looking for sounds like what Mazda pretty well evolved for the 13BRE 3rd gen motor.
So look for a 3rd gen and you'll get a lighter weight car with a FMIC & twins.

Then don't be surprised after a year you start thinking about going to a single turbo for more power.

Last edited by SureShot; Feb 17, 2006 at 01:41 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2006 | 02:17 PM
  #9  
Parastie's Avatar
Mountain Rotary Mod
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,411
Likes: 0
From: Freaking Poland!!
It think it's more of a question as to what you want.
Do you want maximum possible power, or do you want power as quickly as possible.

Take the Bugatti Veyron, for example. It has 4 smaller turbos so it has boost at all RPMs, even though 2 large turbos would have given the same power (or possibly more). It's a balancing act , because 2 turbos could have even a larger spool lag then 1 turbo if they're too large. There's math to it somewhere, but i don't know what it would be.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2006 | 03:00 PM
  #10  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
We've covered this many, many times before with always the same argument. There's really no point unless you are specifically just trying to be unique. The extra complication and plumbing of a twin system is no advantage in these days of ball bearing turbos...
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2006 | 07:34 PM
  #11  
MaczPayne's Avatar
Mac Attack
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,668
Likes: 22
From: California
Not practical to the average builder, but for those who want to be set apart from the rest, Go for it I guess.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2006 | 07:53 PM
  #12  
1300ccTuner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
i just really want to be unique for this car. my other tII is the race one. i want this one to stand out.

so would they be too lagy together? reted was the only one to bring it up. i want something to be quick in the low rpms. is there a smaller turbo to go in front of the s5?

thanx for the replies
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2006 | 10:02 PM
  #13  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally Posted by 1300ccTuner
i just really want to be unique for this car. my other tII is the race one. i want this one to stand out.
It's been done already.

so would they be too lagy together? reted was the only one to bring it up. i want something to be quick in the low rpms. is there a smaller turbo to go in front of the s5?
I'm trying to run a pair of GT2835R's on my 13BT.
These things are NOT cheap!
If you'd seen the turbine sections, you'd laugh cause they are soooo small.
But when I worked the numbers, this is what should work...
The turbine sections are like half the size of the stock FC 13BT turbos...

-Ted
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skeese
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
65
Mar 28, 2017 03:30 PM
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
0
Aug 18, 2015 10:01 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:29 AM.