2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

twin turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-16-06, 07:04 PM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
1300ccTuner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Orlando
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
twin turbo

ok i can get a custom mani. and wondering has anybody ever seen a twin set up with s5 turbos. anybody have any insight on this.
Old 02-16-06, 08:02 PM
  #2  
Boosted. I got BLOWN!!!

iTrader: (29)
 
beefhole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 3,742
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
No point.
Old 02-16-06, 08:06 PM
  #3  
Junior Member

 
zxert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: sacramento
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just buy one good turbo.
Old 02-17-06, 10:33 AM
  #4  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
1300ccTuner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Orlando
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it would be cheaper if i already have the turbos. im just wondering would if i can take the stock to lets say for argument 12psi then with double would that be equivlent to 24? yes yes single is better ive read that so many times in posts, but thats not what is being asked.
Old 02-17-06, 10:35 AM
  #5  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
The turbos are TOO BIG to be used one per rotor, especially the turbine housing.

You sure you want to drive a car that doesn't start boosting until after 5kRPM?


-Ted
Old 02-17-06, 10:54 AM
  #6  
southern style

 
matts86fc3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: warner robins, georgia
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
twin turbo sucks. only good for instant (pretty much) spooling. thats no fun. a good single turbo set up is better anyway. plus you get that kick in the *** feeling when it spools up
Old 02-17-06, 12:15 PM
  #7  
Mountain Rotary Mod

 
Parastie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Freaking Poland!!
Posts: 2,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by matts86fc3s
twin turbo sucks. only good for instant (pretty much) spooling. thats no fun. a good single turbo set up is better anyway. plus you get that kick in the *** feeling when it spools up
Instant boost is no fun? That just sounds retarded. Instant boost will give you a larger RPM range of power, which is what you want if your serious about cars.
Old 02-17-06, 01:39 PM
  #8  
Seduced by the DARK SIDE

 
SureShot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orange Park FL (near Jax)
Posts: 7,323
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
What you're looking for sounds like what Mazda pretty well evolved for the 13BRE 3rd gen motor.
So look for a 3rd gen and you'll get a lighter weight car with a FMIC & twins.

Then don't be surprised after a year you start thinking about going to a single turbo for more power.

Last edited by SureShot; 02-17-06 at 01:41 PM.
Old 02-17-06, 02:17 PM
  #9  
Mountain Rotary Mod

 
Parastie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Freaking Poland!!
Posts: 2,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It think it's more of a question as to what you want.
Do you want maximum possible power, or do you want power as quickly as possible.

Take the Bugatti Veyron, for example. It has 4 smaller turbos so it has boost at all RPMs, even though 2 large turbos would have given the same power (or possibly more). It's a balancing act , because 2 turbos could have even a larger spool lag then 1 turbo if they're too large. There's math to it somewhere, but i don't know what it would be.
Old 02-17-06, 03:00 PM
  #10  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 109 Likes on 92 Posts
We've covered this many, many times before with always the same argument. There's really no point unless you are specifically just trying to be unique. The extra complication and plumbing of a twin system is no advantage in these days of ball bearing turbos...
Old 02-17-06, 07:34 PM
  #11  
Mac Attack

iTrader: (5)
 
MaczPayne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: California
Posts: 5,668
Received 20 Likes on 10 Posts
Not practical to the average builder, but for those who want to be set apart from the rest, Go for it I guess.
Old 02-17-06, 07:53 PM
  #12  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
1300ccTuner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Orlando
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i just really want to be unique for this car. my other tII is the race one. i want this one to stand out.

so would they be too lagy together? reted was the only one to bring it up. i want something to be quick in the low rpms. is there a smaller turbo to go in front of the s5?

thanx for the replies
Old 02-17-06, 10:02 PM
  #13  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by 1300ccTuner
i just really want to be unique for this car. my other tII is the race one. i want this one to stand out.
It's been done already.

so would they be too lagy together? reted was the only one to bring it up. i want something to be quick in the low rpms. is there a smaller turbo to go in front of the s5?
I'm trying to run a pair of GT2835R's on my 13BT.
These things are NOT cheap!
If you'd seen the turbine sections, you'd laugh cause they are soooo small.
But when I worked the numbers, this is what should work...
The turbine sections are like half the size of the stock FC 13BT turbos...

-Ted
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skeese
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
65
03-28-17 03:30 PM
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
0
08-18-15 10:01 PM



Quick Reply: twin turbo



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:57 PM.