Time to sh*t or get off the pot, looking for your votes
#26
Sharp Claws
iTrader: (30)
Just another possibility..... Perhaps when you removed the original fly wheel you accidentally bumped the eccentric shaft and knocked the needle thrust bearings loose and out of their cages. Then upon retorqing of the new fly wheel the needle bearings got crushed or the cage got crushed thereby causing a vibration? Check your engine and tranny mounts also, I've had an engine mount break (rubber separated from the metal) and it caused weird vibrations.
~Mike.........
~Mike.........
vibrations can't always be compared one on one due to bearing wear and minor less imbalance issues such as rotor weight for example.
#27
NASA geek
iTrader: (2)
the front bearing stack is held in place by the front hub bolt, not the rear flywheel nut. you can spin the engine, beat on the e-shaft, do whatever you want and it won't fall out with just the flywheel loose.
vibrations can't always be compared one on one due to bearing wear and minor less imbalance issues such as rotor weight for example.
vibrations can't always be compared one on one due to bearing wear and minor less imbalance issues such as rotor weight for example.
Your right, not sure what I was thinking.
I personally think its his counter weight. If it has s4 rotors, why in the world use a s5 counter weight? The builder might have gotten lucky and had the absolute lightest s4 rotors (don't recall the stamps on the rotors to determine weights per series A,B,C?)and front counter weight, then found the heaviest S5 flywheel and it worked, but unlikely... but the stamp on the fly wheel does mean its meant for a S5..weird....
You CAN however tell which series rotors are in the engine WITHOUT breaking it down. Pull off the exhaust manifold and look through the ports and see if the rotor dishes are machined and uniform (S5) or ill-regular (not really symmetrical) and have a cast finish. This may be difficult to see due to carbon build up, so run the engine till its warmed up and let it pull some fresh water into it via vac line and revving it to 4~5k and holding it there for 10 minutes or so with a constant supply of water (just enough to keep it from stalling) before pulling the manifold off.
OR.... the simple solution is to put your stock flywheel back on it and drive the damned thing lol.
~Mike............
#29
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seneca, SC
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the front bearing stack is held in place by the front hub bolt, not the rear flywheel nut. you can spin the engine, beat on the e-shaft, do whatever you want and it won't fall out with just the flywheel loose.
vibrations can't always be compared one on one due to bearing wear and minor less imbalance issues such as rotor weight for example.
vibrations can't always be compared one on one due to bearing wear and minor less imbalance issues such as rotor weight for example.
#33
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seneca, SC
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pros versus Joes
So I asked some reputable companies to weight in.
The guys at "beat" said they thought I had put a S4 counterweight. I sent them pictures today to verify.
Their words
"I assume you saw "N370" on the stock flywheel you removed from the engine. Since the engine did not exhibit any notable vibration, you can assume that the balance with that flywheel was OK. The N370 number is used on '89~'91 RX7's - not the '88. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume the assembly is an '89~'91. The correct rear balance weight for that model is our part # 11466. This part has no identifying marks. The weight for an '88 - our part # 11463 - has a groove cut in the side of the eccentric mass on the "clutch" side of the counterweight for identification. I suspect that this is the weight you are using. If correct, changing the weight will fix your problem."
The guys at that fad diet place said I should check my transmission mounts, assuming the counterweight was correct.
Their words
"check the transmission mounts..
if the trans mission mounts are broken than that is the problem..
Engine will be fine long as the CW weights are correct for what set up you have plus it ran 9 years with no problems till now."
The guys at "beat" said they thought I had put a S4 counterweight. I sent them pictures today to verify.
Their words
"I assume you saw "N370" on the stock flywheel you removed from the engine. Since the engine did not exhibit any notable vibration, you can assume that the balance with that flywheel was OK. The N370 number is used on '89~'91 RX7's - not the '88. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume the assembly is an '89~'91. The correct rear balance weight for that model is our part # 11466. This part has no identifying marks. The weight for an '88 - our part # 11463 - has a groove cut in the side of the eccentric mass on the "clutch" side of the counterweight for identification. I suspect that this is the weight you are using. If correct, changing the weight will fix your problem."
The guys at that fad diet place said I should check my transmission mounts, assuming the counterweight was correct.
Their words
"check the transmission mounts..
if the trans mission mounts are broken than that is the problem..
Engine will be fine long as the CW weights are correct for what set up you have plus it ran 9 years with no problems till now."
#35
Money talks-mine says bye
iTrader: (18)
^ Agree you should check your tranny mounts (and rotor pockets), but I suspect that's not your core problem since the vibe appeared during the clutch/flywheel upgrade.
If you've got counterweight pics's why not post them for us forum fans to inspect?
Presuming the vibes are engine speed related as you noted in your original post and you've got the right CW, my vote is to remove the flywheel & Pressure Plate and get them balanced as an assembly. That's my next step.A serious auto machine shop should be able to do this since when flywheels get resurfaced, a rebalance is typically recommended (although nobody does this .
If you've got counterweight pics's why not post them for us forum fans to inspect?
Presuming the vibes are engine speed related as you noted in your original post and you've got the right CW, my vote is to remove the flywheel & Pressure Plate and get them balanced as an assembly. That's my next step.A serious auto machine shop should be able to do this since when flywheels get resurfaced, a rebalance is typically recommended (although nobody does this .
#37
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seneca, SC
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ID fornt counterweights
So I have a S6 rotating assembly and noticed there are no part numbers on the front counterweight (also the machined pocket you guys mentioned on the rotors)
How can I identify my front counterweight?
Also who rents a borascope? I would like to inspect my intake and ID my rotors.
Thanks again for all the responces
How can I identify my front counterweight?
Also who rents a borascope? I would like to inspect my intake and ID my rotors.
Thanks again for all the responces
#38
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seneca, SC
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So I asked some reputable companies to weight in.
The guys at "beat" said they thought I had put a S4 counterweight. I sent them pictures today to verify.
Their words
"I assume you saw "N370" on the stock flywheel you removed from the engine. Since the engine did not exhibit any notable vibration, you can assume that the balance with that flywheel was OK. The N370 number is used on '89~'91 RX7's - not the '88. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume the assembly is an '89~'91. The correct rear balance weight for that model is our part # 11466. This part has no identifying marks. The weight for an '88 - our part # 11463 - has a groove cut in the side of the eccentric mass on the "clutch" side of the counterweight for identification. I suspect that this is the weight you are using. If correct, changing the weight will fix your problem."
The guys at that fad diet place said I should check my transmission mounts, assuming the counterweight was correct.
Their words
"check the transmission mounts..
if the trans mission mounts are broken than that is the problem..
Engine will be fine long as the CW weights are correct for what set up you have plus it ran 9 years with no problems till now."
The guys at "beat" said they thought I had put a S4 counterweight. I sent them pictures today to verify.
Their words
"I assume you saw "N370" on the stock flywheel you removed from the engine. Since the engine did not exhibit any notable vibration, you can assume that the balance with that flywheel was OK. The N370 number is used on '89~'91 RX7's - not the '88. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume the assembly is an '89~'91. The correct rear balance weight for that model is our part # 11466. This part has no identifying marks. The weight for an '88 - our part # 11463 - has a groove cut in the side of the eccentric mass on the "clutch" side of the counterweight for identification. I suspect that this is the weight you are using. If correct, changing the weight will fix your problem."
The guys at that fad diet place said I should check my transmission mounts, assuming the counterweight was correct.
Their words
"check the transmission mounts..
if the trans mission mounts are broken than that is the problem..
Engine will be fine long as the CW weights are correct for what set up you have plus it ran 9 years with no problems till now."
"I just measured a '87~'88 rear weight outer flange at 13.70mm and a '89~'91 rear weight flange at 13.90mm. I do not believe that this technique is valid to establish what model weight you have - at least when that is your only criterion.
Front weights have not had part numbers for a very long time."
I take that as you have a S4 and you need a certified S5
#43
Sharp Claws
iTrader: (30)
most rotating assembly balance issues will have a harmonic rate, which basically means if you notice a vibration at 2k then you will notice it again at 4k. something such as worn bearings will not exhibit the same vibrations as a balance harmonic issue due to friction and other variances due to engine speed. if you only have a vibration at 2k and all the mounts, u-joints, tranny bearings etc all check out then you may actually have worn rotor bearings. counterbalance issues generally are noticable at 3 and again at 6k RPMs.
i do suggest you guys inspect the parts you removed as thoroughly as possible though, if the problems were never present before the light clutch installs then i still would think it is something in those assemblies that isn't adding up. the counterweights aren't impossible to distinguish but it doesn't mean that it is still out of the equation for being incorrect. i never did like how mazda did not stamp them with a part#.
i do suggest you guys inspect the parts you removed as thoroughly as possible though, if the problems were never present before the light clutch installs then i still would think it is something in those assemblies that isn't adding up. the counterweights aren't impossible to distinguish but it doesn't mean that it is still out of the equation for being incorrect. i never did like how mazda did not stamp them with a part#.
#46
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seneca, SC
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One day only!!!!!
SO I have a digital camera boroscope for tonight only!!!! How can I make sure I'm looking at the combustion chamber????
I figured if I see an apex seal on one side the other side should be on a combustion chamber. Does this make since????
Let me know before the clap-on guy takes his tool back!
I figured if I see an apex seal on one side the other side should be on a combustion chamber. Does this make since????
Let me know before the clap-on guy takes his tool back!
#47
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seneca, SC
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Colon cam
So I try aligning the apex seal on rotor 2 and looking through rotor one but I could not tell.
The features I can see are the apex seal and transition into the combustion chamber. On my S6 rotors the transition is machined (as is the whole face), from pictures I noticed the transition on S4 is cast.
So I found the transition and took a ton of pictures, here the best one.
So the transition has machining marks on both sides so I must have S5 rotors. Let me know if you agree.
This leads me to believe my counter weight is garbage, and or I damaged my stationary gear bearing while removing it. Either way I’m changing both when I take the trany out.
The features I can see are the apex seal and transition into the combustion chamber. On my S6 rotors the transition is machined (as is the whole face), from pictures I noticed the transition on S4 is cast.
So I found the transition and took a ton of pictures, here the best one.
So the transition has machining marks on both sides so I must have S5 rotors. Let me know if you agree.
This leads me to believe my counter weight is garbage, and or I damaged my stationary gear bearing while removing it. Either way I’m changing both when I take the trany out.
#50
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (16)
http://www.rebuildingrotaryengines.c...tting_end_play
If you don't have a dial indicator there is another method described in the FSM that uses a bolt. It's worth taking a minute and checking while your staring at the flywheel.