TII fuel pump in a N/A ?? any differnce?
#7
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Darwin, NT, Australia
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The TII fuel pump does not overrun the N/A pressure regulator. You will not run any richer, it will not change anything at all really. You only need to change the pump when your putting down some much more serious power than a stock port engine would do.
Trending Topics
#8
IFO Forced Induction Slo
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Whoa
Whoa, whoa...whoa. Lets stop right here and set things straight. The NA fuel pump is rated at 1.3l/min which is 78lph. The TII fuel pump is rated at 2.2-3.3l/min which is 132-198lph. IF YOU HAVE A FUEL CONTROLLER, A FUEL PRESSURE REGULATOR AND BIGGER INJECTORS THEN A HIGHER FLOWING FUEL PUMP CAN ADD A GREAT AMOUNT OF HP. My step up is an APEXi Super AFC 2, an SX fuel pressure reg. , 2 Top Feed 720cc sec. injectors, stock prims. 30+HP on a NA with this set up...guess about 75% duty cycle on the secs. No rich idle either.
#9
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Darwin, NT, Australia
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You will NOT add power on a stock port engine..
Not even close... You need to have done some serious porting before you'll need to add fuel.
bigdv519, do you have back to back dyno runs to prove your 30+hp?
Because sorry, its not true (unless you have a heavily ported engine). You will also not need larger secondaries until your in the 200/250hp region.
#10
Lives on the Forum
Re: Whoa
Originally posted by bigdv519
Whoa, whoa...whoa. Lets stop right here and set things straight. The NA fuel pump is rated at 1.3l/min which is 78lph. The TII fuel pump is rated at 2.2-3.3l/min which is 132-198lph. IF YOU HAVE A FUEL CONTROLLER, A FUEL PRESSURE REGULATOR AND BIGGER INJECTORS THEN A HIGHER FLOWING FUEL PUMP CAN ADD A GREAT AMOUNT OF HP. My step up is an APEXi Super AFC 2, an SX fuel pressure reg. , 2 Top Feed 720cc sec. injectors, stock prims. 30+HP on a NA with this set up...guess about 75% duty cycle on the secs. No rich idle either.
Whoa, whoa...whoa. Lets stop right here and set things straight. The NA fuel pump is rated at 1.3l/min which is 78lph. The TII fuel pump is rated at 2.2-3.3l/min which is 132-198lph. IF YOU HAVE A FUEL CONTROLLER, A FUEL PRESSURE REGULATOR AND BIGGER INJECTORS THEN A HIGHER FLOWING FUEL PUMP CAN ADD A GREAT AMOUNT OF HP. My step up is an APEXi Super AFC 2, an SX fuel pressure reg. , 2 Top Feed 720cc sec. injectors, stock prims. 30+HP on a NA with this set up...guess about 75% duty cycle on the secs. No rich idle either.
-Ted
#11
IFO Forced Induction Slo
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well allow me to retort
Allow me to retract my previous imprudent statements. Thanks you. But back to the original, will a TII fuel pump dropped into an NA make any power. Not if you just put in the fuel pump. Now maybe if you wanted to run a wet nitrous system, then the TII fuel pump still wouldnt "make" hp, it would, however, it would help you from causing a lean environment due to a lower flowing pump. Am i know correct???
Im very sorry for having to say this, but one of my buddies figured if he drop a Walboro into his <looks both ways and whispers> crx, he would get hp. Well he didnt get any because I told him that adjusting his FPR higher would do nothing to make more hp. The car had already been tuned, so increasing fuel pressure didnt do much but make a richer AF ratio. But now when he adds the wet nitrous system, he wont be as worried about a lack of fuel pressure dut to a stock pump. Please dont bash me for using a crx as an example. I know i deserve it though...hehe...laters guys
Im very sorry for having to say this, but one of my buddies figured if he drop a Walboro into his <looks both ways and whispers> crx, he would get hp. Well he didnt get any because I told him that adjusting his FPR higher would do nothing to make more hp. The car had already been tuned, so increasing fuel pressure didnt do much but make a richer AF ratio. But now when he adds the wet nitrous system, he wont be as worried about a lack of fuel pressure dut to a stock pump. Please dont bash me for using a crx as an example. I know i deserve it though...hehe...laters guys
#12
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally Posted by bigdv519
IF YOU HAVE A FUEL CONTROLLER, A FUEL PRESSURE REGULATOR AND BIGGER INJECTORS THEN A HIGHER FLOWING FUEL PUMP CAN ADD A GREAT AMOUNT OF HP.
My step up is an APEXi Super AFC 2, an SX fuel pressure reg. , 2 Top Feed 720cc sec. injectors, stock prims. 30+HP on a NA with this set up...guess about 75% duty cycle on the secs.
BTW, injector duty cycle is measured, not guessed, and the primaries and secondaries fire at the same duty cycle. If you really did have that injector combo at 75%, your NA engine would be drowning in fuel.
#13
IFO Forced Induction Slo
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by NZConvertible
Adding more fuel does not ever make more power. Adding more fuel only allows you to increase the airflow, which will make more power.
Pure BS. Any power you got from this set-up was purely from leaning the mixtures out with the S-AFC (assuming it's properly tuned), which would've worked exactly the same without the big injectors and FPR, which were both totally unnecessary. It certainly wouldn't have been anywhere near 30hp either.
BTW, injector duty cycle is measured, not guessed, and the primaries and secondaries fire at the same duty cycle. If you really did have that injector combo at 75%, your NA engine would be drowning in fuel.
Pure BS. Any power you got from this set-up was purely from leaning the mixtures out with the S-AFC (assuming it's properly tuned), which would've worked exactly the same without the big injectors and FPR, which were both totally unnecessary. It certainly wouldn't have been anywhere near 30hp either.
BTW, injector duty cycle is measured, not guessed, and the primaries and secondaries fire at the same duty cycle. If you really did have that injector combo at 75%, your NA engine would be drowning in fuel.
#14
i am not a girl
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 1,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
unless you guys are making over 200 at wheels dont touch the stock fuel system, unless you are replacign a broken part. the only thing you should be woried about is havign too much fuel in an NA, if anything get the afc and lean it out some, properly with a wideband af meter.
#15
IFO Forced Induction Slo
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thats what CarBoy in Houston did for me. They leaned out my idle, and actaully increased my fuel from about 4500 rpms to redline. My SAFC shows a 12% increase in fuel (I think they increased my duty cycle, can anyone prove me wrong). Thats also because my old dyno showed a max hp at 5500 rpms. Nows its at 7K but only 10 higher than 5500 rpms. Answer for this: OLD ENGINE WITH AN UNBELIEVABLE COMPRESSION CHECK...79 psi in both rotors. Others have told me that they cant believe my seven even turns on!!!
Im sorry for not letting you know my max hp. Kinda embarrassed. Lets just say Im in the range of an old *** crx or something like that.
I got this question though.
There is a feller somewhere up north that has a GTUs running a 13.07. He has an upgraded pump(Denso I believe), 720 prims and 1600 secs, a SAFC, remapped ecu, jet v force fuel timing recal, and runs Sunoco 102 octane racing fuel. He also claims his duty cycle to be around 60%. If increased fuel doesnt help, then why did he do it, and how is he running 13's?
Im sorry for not letting you know my max hp. Kinda embarrassed. Lets just say Im in the range of an old *** crx or something like that.
I got this question though.
There is a feller somewhere up north that has a GTUs running a 13.07. He has an upgraded pump(Denso I believe), 720 prims and 1600 secs, a SAFC, remapped ecu, jet v force fuel timing recal, and runs Sunoco 102 octane racing fuel. He also claims his duty cycle to be around 60%. If increased fuel doesnt help, then why did he do it, and how is he running 13's?
Last edited by bigdv519; 01-11-05 at 03:24 AM.
#16
Lives on the Forum
Originally Posted by bigdv519
I got this question though.
There is a feller somewhere up north that has a GTUs running a 13.07. He has an upgraded pump(Denso I believe), 720 prims and 1600 secs, a SAFC, remapped ecu, jet v force fuel timing recal, and runs Sunoco 102 octane racing fuel. He also claims his duty cycle to be around 60%. If increased fuel doesnt help, then why did he do it, and how is he running 13's?
There is a feller somewhere up north that has a GTUs running a 13.07. He has an upgraded pump(Denso I believe), 720 prims and 1600 secs, a SAFC, remapped ecu, jet v force fuel timing recal, and runs Sunoco 102 octane racing fuel. He also claims his duty cycle to be around 60%. If increased fuel doesnt help, then why did he do it, and how is he running 13's?
2) supercharger
3) NOS
4) bridge or peripheral porting
5) full of ****
-Ted
#17
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally Posted by bigdv519
Did I properly ask to have my previous statements dismissed. I thought I did but just incase I didnt, ALLOW ME TO RETRACT MY STATEMENTS FROM THE BEGINNINg OF THE YEAR.
Thats what CarBoy in Houston did for me. They leaned out my idle, and actaully increased my fuel from about 4500 rpms to redline. My SAFC shows a 12% increase in fuel (I think they increased my duty cycle, can anyone prove me wrong).
Injector duty cycle is not something you adjust, it's simply the injector open time divided by the engine cycle duration. It's a number we calculate to see how hard the injectors are running, and is constantly varying as load and rpm vary. The ECU calculates the amount of time to open the injectors each cycle, and the S-AFC sends an altered airflow signal to the ECU to make it open the injectors longer or shorter as required.
There is a feller somewhere up north that has a GTUs running a 13.07. He has an upgraded pump(Denso I believe), 720 prims and 1600 secs, a SAFC, remapped ecu, jet v force fuel timing recal, and runs Sunoco 102 octane racing fuel. He also claims his duty cycle to be around 60%. If increased fuel doesnt help, then why did he do it, and how is he running 13's?
#18
IFO Forced Induction Slo
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe some other people should do some research and check out fc3s.org. The guys has time slips posted. The engine however is ported. I failed to mention that. Anyone care to do a little searching???
#19
IFO Forced Induction Slo
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by NZConvertible
Even mildly modded NA's run very rich under full load, and gain power from having fuel removed. Adding 12% more is just nuts. Do you have any idea what the AFR was at high rpm? Is it on your dyno graph?
Without even seeing the car, it's obvious he's running forced induction. If you put those injectors into an NA there'd be fuel pouring out the tailpipes even with the S-AFC turned down as far as it could go.
As for your "other" comment. My buddy has a 500hp truck. Is it fast, hell no!!! Its a big rig!!! MAYBE YOU SHOULD SEE THE CAR BEFORE YOU MAKE "SILLY" COMMENTS. Just maybe. Or maybe you should pm him and ask him where his "forced induction" is. His intake AND HEADERS look like they go to an NA. But your the smart one here, so go do your research.
Hey RETed, do the same.
Last edited by bigdv519; 01-11-05 at 04:20 AM.
#20
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
You would need your head examined if you thought even a wild NA 13B needed that much fuel. Whatever the facts are, the info you posted on that GTUs reeks of the brown stuff.
#21
Lives on the Forum
Originally Posted by bigdv519
Hey RETed, do the same.
I replied with very valid reasons why the car went that fast.
What's wrong with that?
Do you have some super secret method of extracting almost a 12-second time slip out of an FC?
Oh wait, I forgot another one...super lightening of the FC3S chassis down to under 2000 lbs.
I wasn't making any fun.
These are basically your only options of getting the car that fast.
I think you better LOOK at who you're arguing with.
Right now, you're not looking too good.
Why don't you ask the peanut gallery?
-Ted
#23
I have a TII fuel pump in my NA... it's sitting in the driver's side bin in case my stock fuel pump ever dies on me. It's not going in the tank unless my current fuel pump dies on me, or I suddenly end up with a heavily ported or turbo engine in my car.
-=Russ=-
-=Russ=-
#24
HAILERS
Join Date: May 2001
Location: FORT WORTH, TEXAS,USA
Posts: 20,563
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes
on
19 Posts
Originally Posted by White_FC
The TII fuel pump does not overrun the N/A pressure regulator. You will not run any richer, it will not change anything at all really. You only need to change the pump when your putting down some much more serious power than a stock port engine would do.