2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

are T2 and n/a afm's the same

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 26, 2002 | 02:05 PM
  #1  
Moxeys93RX7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: Darien CT
are T2 and n/a afm's the same

are the S4 T2 and S4 n/a afm's the same? im having problems and i think they are casued by the afm. only other one i can get my hands on is an n/a? will it work for troubleshooting?
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2002 | 02:14 PM
  #2  
Rotorific's Avatar
I dont know a damn thing
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 1
From: Evans, Ga
yes and no...no they are not the same but yes you can use the other afm for troubleshooting....also you might just need to check out your afm's solder points and make sure the afm when installed is seated properly....
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2002 | 02:00 AM
  #3  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
They're externally identical but have quite different calibration. If you have to use the wrong one, don't do any hard driving, because you're mixtures will be messed up.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2002 | 02:12 AM
  #4  
TonyTurboII's Avatar
Glock Lover
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
From: Currently residing in St Charles, MO
Ive read the TII AFM can read a bit more air, so take that into consideration when you press the gas.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2002 | 10:21 AM
  #5  
Roy James's Avatar
My cars louder than yours
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,969
Likes: 0
From: Augusta, GA
Originally posted by NZConvertible
They're externally identical but have quite different calibration. If you have to use the wrong one, don't do any hard driving, because you're mixtures will be messed up.
Oh ****, im in big trouble. LoL, i have a TII AFM on my 86 base and it was running 14.6s all day long at the track. So, i guess, im seriously fucked. Also, when under "hard driving" doesnt the ECU go into set fuel maps and pays no attention to the AFM or the O2? That is the impression i was under
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2002 | 01:02 AM
  #6  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally posted by Roy James
i have a TII AFM on my 86 base and it was running 14.6s all day long at the track. So, i guess, im seriously fucked.
I never implied the mixtures would be "seriously fucked", but they will be different if you swap AFM's, because they're calibrated differently and will send the ECU different signals at the same airflow.
Also, when under "hard driving" doesnt the ECU go into set fuel maps and pays no attention to the AFM or the O2?
In open-loop the O2 sensor is ignored, but the AFM is always the ECU's primary load sensor. Without it it doesn't have a clue what's going on. I said no hard driving because if an AFM swap caused leaner mixtures the chances of detonation is much greater under high load.

A 14.6sec NA is obviously pretty highly modded, so obviously the T2 AFM worked well for your car. I just don't like making random changes that I know will affect mixtures, but I don't know by how much.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rxlevi7
New Member RX-7 Technical
4
Sep 26, 2015 07:28 AM
mulcryant
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
10
Sep 9, 2015 05:24 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:40 AM.