2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Some NA-T questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-08-09, 07:08 PM
  #26  
...94% correct.

Thread Starter
 
Makenzie71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: High Texas
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
That's the thing...if I'm going to do it I want the 2.1 series chip installed. Which means I would have to do the S4 TII ECU. Which means quite a bit of rewiring.
Old 06-08-09, 08:47 PM
  #27  
Top Down, Boost Up

iTrader: (7)
 
RotaryRocket88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 8,718
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Unfortunately, the S5 NA Rtek 2.0 doesn't have the ability to switch to MAP based timing like the S4 TII 2.1. It would certainly make it easier on you. But I can supply you with the stock S4 TII LOAD based timing maps, which you could use as a starting point.

This is the 2560-7168 RPM, 68-100% load range from the lead timing map, which is the area numbers are pulled from under boost. You can also see the small amount of timing I have pulled from the map to account for the boost I am running.



From the datalogging I have done, the timing under boost seems to usually fall very close to the highest load values in the base map. The timing adjustments that the ECU makes based on boost seem to be pretty minor. The only time (so far) that I've seen it really come into play is when I load up a tall gear and get into high boost below 3500 RPM. Under these conditions, I have seen 4-5* pulled from the base map, while all other times it seems to be limited to 1* or less.

I'll eventually copy down the entire lead and trailing maps, but for now, this is all I've needed.
Old 06-08-09, 09:00 PM
  #28  
...94% correct.

Thread Starter
 
Makenzie71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: High Texas
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Thanks so much! All of that is hieroglyphics to me, but thanks all the same! That'll give me a starting point at least.
Old 06-10-09, 12:30 AM
  #29  
Manual Rack

iTrader: (50)
 
FelixIsGod29X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Wanaque NJ
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hate to highjack the thread but i have a simple question. Im going S4 NA-T soon and i heard if you use a S4 T2 ECU it will have timing maps that are a mixture of safe and aggressive. Can i plug in the S4 T2 ECU with T2 injectors and a safc and be ok. Besides the a/f and fuel pump do i need the S4 T2 throttle body and MAF since its a different ecu?
Old 06-10-09, 01:42 PM
  #30  
Top Down, Boost Up

iTrader: (7)
 
RotaryRocket88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 8,718
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by FelixIsGod29X
Hate to highjack the thread but i have a simple question. Im going S4 NA-T soon and i heard if you use a S4 T2 ECU it will have timing maps that are a mixture of safe and aggressive. Can i plug in the S4 T2 ECU with T2 injectors and a safc and be ok. Besides the a/f and fuel pump do i need the S4 T2 throttle body and MAF since its a different ecu?
Go back and read the thread. I'm the one the said the stock S4 TII timing was a mix of safe and aggressive. Is it safe enough for 9.4:1 rotors? I wouldn't try it. An SAFC has no timing adjustment ability (if anything it makes it worse).
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
_Tones_
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
10
05-25-21 05:37 AM
Nosferatu
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
09-05-15 02:13 PM



Quick Reply: Some NA-T questions



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:39 PM.