SAFC + Wideband = confused
#26
DONT FEED THE NOOBS
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: land of slow hondas .... TULSA, OK
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
would the fact you guys are in canada have anything to do with it... i dont like canadians either....jk..... are the ecus different???
#28
i am legendary
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SnowmanSteiner
Why should there be any deviance in a stock system. Obviously things are going to be different for each car, no manufacturer has that nor ever will have that down perfect. An FCD is lieing as well, it tells the ecu that it is at a different boost level, is that not lieing? How is the stock setup lieing to the ecu if that's the way the ecu was programmed to run, and it is getting the signals it is supposed to be getting?
- Steiner
- Steiner
#31
casio isn't here.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
so who has contacted apex'i with this info? someone with a wideband would be a good example of someone having a question for them. record some numbers, do various tests and email/write apex'i. not having a wideband yet, i'm curious of this.
#33
i am legendary
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So far the only people I've seen this happen to are me and foild. Before foild I had never heard of another person having this problem and thought I was the only one.
My problem was an odd one. On the dyno the AFR's worked backwards with the SAFC, like taking out fuel made them richer and adding fuel made them leaner, just like how foild was. But then for my emissions test leaning my car out, taking out fuel, made my car's emissions go down which would make me think it was working properly (ie taking out fuel really did lean it out), because for my emissions test I ran -20% at idle and -15% for 2k and 3k. It ran like ****, wanted to die, and my idle emissions rpm was 510 But my emissions went way down, so I was lead to believe it WAS working properly there. This has really confused me because of the dyno/wideband readings, but we'll see once I actually install my LM1, still haven't gotten around to doing that.
My problem was an odd one. On the dyno the AFR's worked backwards with the SAFC, like taking out fuel made them richer and adding fuel made them leaner, just like how foild was. But then for my emissions test leaning my car out, taking out fuel, made my car's emissions go down which would make me think it was working properly (ie taking out fuel really did lean it out), because for my emissions test I ran -20% at idle and -15% for 2k and 3k. It ran like ****, wanted to die, and my idle emissions rpm was 510 But my emissions went way down, so I was lead to believe it WAS working properly there. This has really confused me because of the dyno/wideband readings, but we'll see once I actually install my LM1, still haven't gotten around to doing that.
#34
casio isn't here.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the +/- is rather misleading as is. anyone else ever sit and watch (as safely as possible) their air correction percentage. for mine, you have to be at nearly or no throttle (so obviously i'm referring to lo-throttle settings) to actually acheive the given percentage. when i couldn't pass emissions (it was a year and month overdue, so somewhat an "asap" situation), i put 1600 at -50% and 2200 at -40%. i dont know what the actual air correction was because i didnt have that much time to waste on the dyno (though the guys were VERY nice to me; i ran so many times for free). when driving around town in lo-throttle, i watch the air correction. depending on how much throttle is given, the air correction (and therefore fuel) is minute compared to the setting. again, these are all lo-throttle; i've never watched hi-throttle air correction settings.
as long as all that senseless typing was, all i'm saying is that the X% air correction is usually (in lo-throttle) much less than what its set at. the closer to no throttle, the closer to the number you have it set at.
*these are for how my safcII is set up.
as long as all that senseless typing was, all i'm saying is that the X% air correction is usually (in lo-throttle) much less than what its set at. the closer to no throttle, the closer to the number you have it set at.
*these are for how my safcII is set up.
#35
i am legendary
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mine works fine, did you set the lo-throttle to be up to 98% and hi-throttle 99%? That's how mine is set and when I change the lo-throttle to say -15% for 1000rpm and below, and I'm sitting idling/not moving, it shows -15.0 correction on the s-afc.
#37
casio isn't here.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dDuB
Mine works fine, did you set the lo-throttle to be up to 98% and hi-throttle 99%? That's how mine is set and when I change the lo-throttle to say -15% for 1000rpm and below, and I'm sitting idling/not moving, it shows -15.0 correction on the s-afc.
like i said, there's that other setting for lo- and hi-throttle that mine is still similar to default. because i dont know much about it, and more because i dont have a wideband yet, i havent gotten too experimental. luckily i'm just an n/a and not too worried about popping.
#38
i am legendary
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have mine set up to change settings in 1000 rpm increments. The way the s-afc works is say you have -15% at 2000 and -10% at 3000, ok? What it does is inbetween 2000 and 3000 rpms it averages the correction based on what rpm it is at, ie closer to 2000 or 3000 and how close. So if you have -15% at 2000 and NO correction at 3000, it sees that as 0% correction at 3000 and of course when it averages the two it'll be off. This is why when tuning with the s-afc the numbers in the next increment should be close and the corrections throughout the rpm range should be somewhat gradual.
And my idle is 18.2% throttle thank you very much
And my idle is 18.2% throttle thank you very much
#39
DONT FEED THE NOOBS
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: land of slow hondas .... TULSA, OK
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i just installed my safc2 on saturday. I connected it to switch high and low maps using the pressure sensor.. WORKS AWESOME.. it kicks in when its needed my lo map is blank and my high map starts correcting at 3000. WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE fun fast car... just dont dare venture over 10 lbs... need to get my fuel pump in and injectors....
Last edited by gxlbiscuit; 12-13-04 at 09:02 PM.
#40
HAILERS
Join Date: May 2001
Location: FORT WORTH, TEXAS,USA
Posts: 20,563
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes
on
19 Posts
Originally Posted by foild
i doubt that
so.. i guess me and ddub are the only ones experiencng this prob?
so.. i guess me and ddub are the only ones experiencng this prob?
#42
casio isn't here.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dDuB
I have mine set up to change settings in 1000 rpm increments. The way the s-afc works is say you have -15% at 2000 and -10% at 3000, ok? What it does is inbetween 2000 and 3000 rpms it averages the correction based on what rpm it is at, ie closer to 2000 or 3000 and how close. So if you have -15% at 2000 and NO correction at 3000, it sees that as 0% correction at 3000 and of course when it averages the two it'll be off. This is why when tuning with the s-afc the numbers in the next increment should be close and the corrections throughout the rpm range should be somewhat gradual.
And my idle is 18.2% throttle thank you very much
And my idle is 18.2% throttle thank you very much
i drove ~40 miles with my safc tuned down to ~ -28%. it was all highway, so i was doing an experiment to save gas. i wasn't seeing upper -20s%, though, because i was on the throttle. most of the time it was -11% to -15% (at most).
as for idle, i dont consider idling having ANY physical throttle. if you're on the throttle, its revving, not idling, so this will be accurate of the setting on the safc. so your 18.2% may be a percentage between two numbers, but mine isn't because my lowest setting is 1000rpm, so my idle is the number i have set for 1000rpm (which right now is 0%).
#43
i am legendary
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not really following what you're trying to describe, but mine works fine so I dunno.
As for idle, what are you talking about? My throttle at IDLE not moving, no foot on the accelerator is 18.2%. That means my throttle plates are 18.2% open at idle with the car sitting not moving in my driveway with me even outside the car. This is technically revving it, why? Because I adjusted my idle via the throttle stop screw (however I had to use an aftermarket bolt that was longer). When you tighten it down it opens up the throttle plates and raises idle.
As for idle, what are you talking about? My throttle at IDLE not moving, no foot on the accelerator is 18.2%. That means my throttle plates are 18.2% open at idle with the car sitting not moving in my driveway with me even outside the car. This is technically revving it, why? Because I adjusted my idle via the throttle stop screw (however I had to use an aftermarket bolt that was longer). When you tighten it down it opens up the throttle plates and raises idle.
#44
casio isn't here.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i'm in no way arguing your 18.2%, though i think you're referring to throttle position as opposed to air correction.
my safc works fine, too, i was just saying that the percentage at XXXXrpm is dependant upon more than rpm (ie throttle) (on my safc). where am i losing ya? i'm saying its not a fixed number from my experiences with watching the safc.
set your correction at -10% (or something) at 2000 and 3000 (since yours goes by 1000rpm increments). drive your car at various throttle between those two rpms (or whatever two you decide). if yours is like mine, you wont see -10% between those two numbers, but a negative number between -10% and 0%; UNLESS you completely let off throttle, in which case it should read -10%.
my safc works fine, too, i was just saying that the percentage at XXXXrpm is dependant upon more than rpm (ie throttle) (on my safc). where am i losing ya? i'm saying its not a fixed number from my experiences with watching the safc.
set your correction at -10% (or something) at 2000 and 3000 (since yours goes by 1000rpm increments). drive your car at various throttle between those two rpms (or whatever two you decide). if yours is like mine, you wont see -10% between those two numbers, but a negative number between -10% and 0%; UNLESS you completely let off throttle, in which case it should read -10%.
#45
i am legendary
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Never said it was air correction, though I have run at -40 correction at idle before when I had some leaky/flooding injector problems.
I was originally referring to this:
And I was jokingly saying that my idle has 18.2% 'throttle' not correction.
I was originally referring to this:
Originally Posted by casio
yea, remember, idle = 0 throttle
#46
casio isn't here.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yea, i was getting confused between throttle and air correction when you said that.
uhg, why must text translation get so confusing??
do you know what i mean about the air correction being dependant on more than just rpm, though? i dont know what other factors it looks at, but i would imagine the pressure sensor would be one and throttle position.
i havent really read the manual, so how did you make your increments 1000? mine are 600. which safc do you have? i have the SAFCII (black).
uhg, why must text translation get so confusing??
do you know what i mean about the air correction being dependant on more than just rpm, though? i dont know what other factors it looks at, but i would imagine the pressure sensor would be one and throttle position.
i havent really read the manual, so how did you make your increments 1000? mine are 600. which safc do you have? i have the SAFCII (black).
#47
i am legendary
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a blue screen SAFC and I can either put mine in 500rpm increments or 1000, but I am limited to 8 increments I think, something like that.
Are you tuning yours via the pressure sensor then instead of rpm? Because mine is only tuned based on the rpm and it works just like it's supposed to. The main reason I probably don't understand what you're saying is because mine doesn't work like that.
Throttle position does play a role. Just like how it averages between rpms, if you are at say 60% throttle it'll take corrections from lo and hi depending on what % of throttle you have setup for lo and hi, and again average them. If there is no setting it sees this as 0 correction and still averages, as far as I know.
Are you tuning yours via the pressure sensor then instead of rpm? Because mine is only tuned based on the rpm and it works just like it's supposed to. The main reason I probably don't understand what you're saying is because mine doesn't work like that.
Throttle position does play a role. Just like how it averages between rpms, if you are at say 60% throttle it'll take corrections from lo and hi depending on what % of throttle you have setup for lo and hi, and again average them. If there is no setting it sees this as 0 correction and still averages, as far as I know.
#48
casio isn't here.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
see, i guess its cause of those two numbers (sorry, but ****! i dont know what theyre called) which represents lo-throttle and hi-throttle. like you said earlier, yours is at 98 and 99; if its the same as i'm thinking, mine has that, but thats not what my two numbers are set to. well that may be it; everytime i'm over my lo-setting, it goes to averaging the lo- and hi-throttle. your lo-throttle is set so high that you're always at lo- unless you're at WOT (99%+).
am i getting that right? i'm trying to understand this thing!
am i getting that right? i'm trying to understand this thing!
#50
casio isn't here.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ah yes, the narrowband. i have absolutely no experience with that. i'ma have to mess with those other two numbers and see how my air correction changes.