S5 Convertible Rear Caliper Options
S5 Convertible Rear Caliper Options
I have searched about this in the forum, but haven't been able to find anything to help. My wife has a s5 Vert and the LR caliper is sticking causing issues. We have already rebuilt it, but it's still acting up. The calipers for the rear of these cars are getting harder to find. My question is are there any other cars where a rear caliper is close or able to be modified to fit on the rear of an FC? Any help would be greatly appreciated, and if there are any other questions, I'd be glad to try to answer. Thanks in advance!!
[QUOTE=wankel1988;12429652]The calipers for the rear of these cars are getting harder to find. My question is are there any other cars where a rear caliper is close or able to be modified to fit on the rear of an FC? /QUOTE]
That's a question I've been pondering myself. The Rx-8 looks to be of a similar design and the rotor width I believe( from my Rockauto searches) is the same. I'm sure it won't bolt on though I haven't held one in my hands yet. I've been thinking about buying a used one from Ebay and seeing what it would take to retrofit it.
That's a question I've been pondering myself. The Rx-8 looks to be of a similar design and the rotor width I believe( from my Rockauto searches) is the same. I'm sure it won't bolt on though I haven't held one in my hands yet. I've been thinking about buying a used one from Ebay and seeing what it would take to retrofit it.
Thats a thought, I really hadn't thought about a RX8, but looking at it, the possibility is there. I may have to check some of the salvage yards around here and see what I could come up with as well. Beyond that, I'm not sure. Thanks for the idea though!
Damn I didn't know the rear calipers were hard to find now. That's not a good sign.
It looks like you can still get caliper slide pins. Maybe a new set of those will keep it from binding?
Also, FWIW, the FD front calipers work. Rears are not interchangeable.
It looks like you can still get caliper slide pins. Maybe a new set of those will keep it from binding?
Also, FWIW, the FD front calipers work. Rears are not interchangeable.
Wait, really? I have a set of FD fronts on my FC, but still have yet to drive it since doing the conversion (from single piston front + solid rear to FD front + vented rear). Will the difference in piston size cause a noticeable difference in driving?
Quad piston FD caliper is 1" dia or 4 x 0.79 in^2 = 3.14 in^2 cross sectional area
Quad piston FC caliper is 1.4" dia or 4 x 1.54 in^2 = 6.2 in^2 cross sectional area
So in your case, there's no change in theoretical breaking performance since cross sectional area of front pistons are the same as FD 4-pistons. That was a cleaver move on your part. Replacing 4-piston FC calipers with 4-piston FD calipers would would lead to decrease in theoretical braking performance by about factor of two since cross sectional area of front pistons are half the area. This assumes no change in master cylinder.
Keep in mind that the FC is about 550 lbs heavier than the FD, so the FC's increase in breaking performance is a worthwhile improvement.
Last edited by Hot_Dog; Aug 21, 2020 at 06:13 PM.
Trending Topics
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
FC: RAYBESTOS RC3841 Bore Size 1.42
https://www.rockauto.com/en/moreinfo...192395&jsn=379
FD: RAYBESTOS FRC10383 Caliper Piston Diameter (IN) 1.000
https://www.rockauto.com/en/moreinfo...192496&jsn=446
Single piston front caliper is 2" dia or 1 x 3.14 in^2 cross sectional area
Quad piston FD caliper is 1" dia or 4 x 0.79 in^2 = 3.14 in^2 cross sectional area
Quad piston FC caliper is 1.4" dia or 4 x 1.54 in^2 = 6.2 in^2 cross sectional area
So in your case, there's no change in theoretical breaking performance since cross sectional area of front pistons are the same as FD 4-pistons. That was a cleaver move on your part. Replacing 4-piston FC calipers with 4-piston FD calipers would would lead to decrease in theoretical braking performance by about factor of two since cross sectional area of front pistons are half the area. This assumes no change in master cylinder.
Keep in mind that the FC is about 550 lbs heavier than the FD, so the FC's increase in breaking performance is a worthwhile improvement.
Quad piston FD caliper is 1" dia or 4 x 0.79 in^2 = 3.14 in^2 cross sectional area
Quad piston FC caliper is 1.4" dia or 4 x 1.54 in^2 = 6.2 in^2 cross sectional area
So in your case, there's no change in theoretical breaking performance since cross sectional area of front pistons are the same as FD 4-pistons. That was a cleaver move on your part. Replacing 4-piston FC calipers with 4-piston FD calipers would would lead to decrease in theoretical braking performance by about factor of two since cross sectional area of front pistons are half the area. This assumes no change in master cylinder.
Keep in mind that the FC is about 550 lbs heavier than the FD, so the FC's increase in breaking performance is a worthwhile improvement.
Regarding the weight, the FC weight varies from 2,696–3,492 lbs (according to Mazda RX-7 - Wikipedia) depending on trim line and FD weight varies from 2,685–2,954 lbs (same source) depending on trim line. So, the weight difference between the FC and FD can vary significantly depending on the trim lines (from 11 to 538 lbs) based on these numbers. Not my numbers so again don't shoot the messenger.
Last edited by Hot_Dog; Aug 22, 2020 at 09:55 PM.
Regarding the weight, the FC weight varies from 2,696–3,492 lbs (according to Mazda RX-7 - Wikipedia) depending on trim line and FD weight varies from 2,685–2,954 lbs (same source) depending on trim line. So, the weight difference between the FC and FD can vary significantly depending on the trim lines (from 11 to 538 lbs) based on these numbers. Not my numbers so again don't shoot the messenger.
I thought there use to be a sticky that listed the weights, not sure where it went...
See this thread:
https://www.rx7club.com/2nd-generati...istory-552354/
The weights are listed at the beginning and most are in the ballpark. Icemark commented later stating the S5 convertible weight listed was incorrect. The heaviest FC didn't make it over 3,100 lbs.
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Yeah, I agree. Mazda sources are always the best first choice. The Mazda RX7 Technical Data (TD) sheets are always my first source for data. The FC TD sheet (P. Braking System, TD-13) specifies the "wheel cylinder bore" (i.e., piston diameter) for all available braking configurations. However, the FD TD sheet (P. Braking System, TD-14) provides no specifications whatsoever for the "wheel cylinder bore".
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Yeah, I agree. Mazda sources are always the best first choice. The Mazda RX7 Technical Data (TD) sheets are always my first source for data. The FC TD sheet (P. Braking System, TD-13) specifies the "wheel cylinder bore" (i.e., piston diameter) for all available braking configurations. However, the FD TD sheet (P. Braking System, TD-14) provides no specifications whatsoever for the "wheel cylinder bore".
Just a heads up. Rockauto has rear calipers again. Unfortunately they only have the right side which doesn't help the O.P. That said maybe they will have left ones soon since some right ones popped up.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jjcobm
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
3
May 27, 2009 09:47 PM







