2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

S5 Convertible Rear Caliper Options

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 16, 2020 | 01:26 PM
  #1  
wankel1988's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 168
Likes: 2
From: Reidsville NC
S5 Convertible Rear Caliper Options

I have searched about this in the forum, but haven't been able to find anything to help. My wife has a s5 Vert and the LR caliper is sticking causing issues. We have already rebuilt it, but it's still acting up. The calipers for the rear of these cars are getting harder to find. My question is are there any other cars where a rear caliper is close or able to be modified to fit on the rear of an FC? Any help would be greatly appreciated, and if there are any other questions, I'd be glad to try to answer. Thanks in advance!!
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2020 | 09:59 AM
  #2  
Dak's Avatar
Dak
Information Regurgitator
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 208
From: Sparta TN. United States
[QUOTE=wankel1988;12429652]The calipers for the rear of these cars are getting harder to find. My question is are there any other cars where a rear caliper is close or able to be modified to fit on the rear of an FC? /QUOTE]

That's a question I've been pondering myself. The Rx-8 looks to be of a similar design and the rotor width I believe( from my Rockauto searches) is the same. I'm sure it won't bolt on though I haven't held one in my hands yet. I've been thinking about buying a used one from Ebay and seeing what it would take to retrofit it.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2020 | 06:00 PM
  #3  
wankel1988's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 168
Likes: 2
From: Reidsville NC
Thats a thought, I really hadn't thought about a RX8, but looking at it, the possibility is there. I may have to check some of the salvage yards around here and see what I could come up with as well. Beyond that, I'm not sure. Thanks for the idea though!
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2020 | 01:45 PM
  #4  
AGreen's Avatar
Trunk Ornament
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 2
From: Goose Creek, SC
Damn I didn't know the rear calipers were hard to find now. That's not a good sign.

It looks like you can still get caliper slide pins. Maybe a new set of those will keep it from binding?

Also, FWIW, the FD front calipers work. Rears are not interchangeable.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2020 | 02:05 PM
  #5  
Hot_Dog's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 231
From: Alexandria, VA
Originally Posted by AGreen
Also, FWIW, the FD front calipers work. Rears are not interchangeable.
That's good to know about the FD front calipers. However, the FD front caliper pistons are smaller than the FC. FD are 1" versus FC which are 1.4".
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2020 | 02:49 PM
  #6  
WondrousBread's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 5 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 597
From: Beeton, Ontario
Originally Posted by Hot_Dog
That's good to know about the FD front calipers. However, the FD front caliper pistons are smaller than the FC. FD are 1" versus FC which are 1.4".
Wait, really? I have a set of FD fronts on my FC, but still have yet to drive it since doing the conversion (from single piston front + solid rear to FD front + vented rear). Will the difference in piston size cause a noticeable difference in driving?
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2020 | 05:59 PM
  #7  
Hot_Dog's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 231
From: Alexandria, VA
Originally Posted by WondrousBread
Wait, really? I have a set of FD fronts on my FC, but still have yet to drive it since doing the conversion (from single piston front + solid rear to FD front + vented rear). Will the difference in piston size cause a noticeable difference in driving?
Single piston front caliper is 2" dia or 1 x 3.14 in^2 cross sectional area
Quad piston FD caliper is 1" dia or 4 x 0.79 in^2 = 3.14 in^2 cross sectional area
Quad piston FC caliper is 1.4" dia or 4 x 1.54 in^2 = 6.2 in^2 cross sectional area

So in your case, there's no change in theoretical breaking performance since cross sectional area of front pistons are the same as FD 4-pistons. That was a cleaver move on your part. Replacing 4-piston FC calipers with 4-piston FD calipers would would lead to decrease in theoretical braking performance by about factor of two since cross sectional area of front pistons are half the area. This assumes no change in master cylinder.

Keep in mind that the FC is about 550 lbs heavier than the FD, so the FC's increase in breaking performance is a worthwhile improvement.



Last edited by Hot_Dog; Aug 21, 2020 at 06:13 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2020 | 12:09 PM
  #8  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by Hot_Dog
That's good to know about the FD front calipers. However, the FD front caliper pistons are smaller than the FC. FD are 1" versus FC which are 1.4".
that is incorrect, the FC and FD have the same size pistons, 36.1mm or 1.42" i think they literally are the same part number. pretty sure they take the same rebuild kit too



Reply
Old Aug 22, 2020 | 02:38 PM
  #9  
Hot_Dog's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 231
From: Alexandria, VA
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
that is incorrect, the FC and FD have the same size pistons, 36.1mm or 1.42" i think they literally are the same part number. pretty sure they take the same rebuild kit too
That's what I got off the Rockauto website.

FC: RAYBESTOS RC3841 Bore Size 1.42
https://www.rockauto.com/en/moreinfo...192395&jsn=379

FD: RAYBESTOS FRC10383 Caliper Piston Diameter (IN) 1.000
https://www.rockauto.com/en/moreinfo...192496&jsn=446
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2020 | 08:09 PM
  #10  
90FC's Avatar
Dark Side
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 443
Likes: 11
From: Indiana
Originally Posted by Hot_Dog
Single piston front caliper is 2" dia or 1 x 3.14 in^2 cross sectional area
Quad piston FD caliper is 1" dia or 4 x 0.79 in^2 = 3.14 in^2 cross sectional area
Quad piston FC caliper is 1.4" dia or 4 x 1.54 in^2 = 6.2 in^2 cross sectional area

So in your case, there's no change in theoretical breaking performance since cross sectional area of front pistons are the same as FD 4-pistons. That was a cleaver move on your part. Replacing 4-piston FC calipers with 4-piston FD calipers would would lead to decrease in theoretical braking performance by about factor of two since cross sectional area of front pistons are half the area. This assumes no change in master cylinder.

Keep in mind that the FC is about 550 lbs heavier than the FD, so the FC's increase in breaking performance is a worthwhile improvement.
The FD and FC 4-Piston caliper pistons are the same size. The FC is heavier than the FD for some models (S5 turbos, Verts, etc), but not 550 lbs heavier.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2020 | 09:42 PM
  #11  
Hot_Dog's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 231
From: Alexandria, VA
Originally Posted by 90FC
The FD and FC 4-Piston caliper pistons are the same size. The FC is heavier than the FD for some models (S5 turbos, Verts, etc), but not 550 lbs heavier.
Yeah, I went back to the Rockauto website and checked p/n's for the FC and FD front caliper rebuild kits (as j9fd3s mentioned) and p/n's are the same. So, Rockauto screws-up again with presenting data on FC and FD front caliper sizes. So, don't shoot the messenger.

Regarding the weight, the FC weight varies from 2,696–3,492 lbs (according to Mazda RX-7 - Wikipedia) depending on trim line and FD weight varies from 2,685–2,954 lbs (same source) depending on trim line. So, the weight difference between the FC and FD can vary significantly depending on the trim lines (from 11 to 538 lbs) based on these numbers. Not my numbers so again don't shoot the messenger.

Last edited by Hot_Dog; Aug 22, 2020 at 09:55 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2020 | 12:41 AM
  #12  
90FC's Avatar
Dark Side
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 443
Likes: 11
From: Indiana
Originally Posted by Hot_Dog
Regarding the weight, the FC weight varies from 2,696–3,492 lbs (according to Mazda RX-7 - Wikipedia) depending on trim line and FD weight varies from 2,685–2,954 lbs (same source) depending on trim line. So, the weight difference between the FC and FD can vary significantly depending on the trim lines (from 11 to 538 lbs) based on these numbers. Not my numbers so again don't shoot the messenger.
Yeah those numbers are inflated. The FD sounds about right, but no FC weighed 3,500 lbs.

I thought there use to be a sticky that listed the weights, not sure where it went...

See this thread:

https://www.rx7club.com/2nd-generati...istory-552354/

The​ weights are listed at the beginning and most are in the ballpark. Icemark commented later stating the S5 convertible weight listed was incorrect. The heaviest FC didn't make it over 3,100 lbs.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2020 | 10:20 AM
  #13  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by Hot_Dog
Yeah, I went back to the Rockauto website and checked p/n's for the FC and FD front caliper rebuild kits (as j9fd3s mentioned) and p/n's are the same. So, Rockauto screws-up again with presenting data on FC and FD front caliper sizes. So, don't shoot the messenger..
Rockauto just shows you the unedited catalog for whatever brand you're looking at, and these things vary from decent, to being from Mars. for any spec it is best to just use the Mazda manuals, they are correct, everyone else is suspect

Reply
Old Aug 24, 2020 | 11:06 AM
  #14  
Hot_Dog's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 231
From: Alexandria, VA
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
Rockauto just shows you the unedited catalog for whatever brand you're looking at, and these things vary from decent, to being from Mars. for any spec it is best to just use the Mazda manuals, they are correct, everyone else is suspect
Yeah, I agree. Mazda sources are always the best first choice. The Mazda RX7 Technical Data (TD) sheets are always my first source for data. The FC TD sheet (P. Braking System, TD-13) specifies the "wheel cylinder bore" (i.e., piston diameter) for all available braking configurations. However, the FD TD sheet (P. Braking System, TD-14) provides no specifications whatsoever for the "wheel cylinder bore".
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2020 | 12:05 PM
  #15  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by Hot_Dog
Yeah, I agree. Mazda sources are always the best first choice. The Mazda RX7 Technical Data (TD) sheets are always my first source for data. The FC TD sheet (P. Braking System, TD-13) specifies the "wheel cylinder bore" (i.e., piston diameter) for all available braking configurations. However, the FD TD sheet (P. Braking System, TD-14) provides no specifications whatsoever for the "wheel cylinder bore".
lol it was in the service highlights book, which is the only place i looked.... that is the pitfall with the Mazda stuff, its usually there, but there are a lot of books it can be in
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2020 | 11:47 PM
  #16  
Dak's Avatar
Dak
Information Regurgitator
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 208
From: Sparta TN. United States
Just a heads up. Rockauto has rear calipers again. Unfortunately they only have the right side which doesn't help the O.P. That said maybe they will have left ones soon since some right ones popped up.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jjcobm
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
3
May 27, 2009 09:47 PM
jorx7
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
4
Aug 28, 2003 09:17 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:36 AM.