2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

S4 NA Air Intake temp sensor failure - will this cause a change in fueling?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2010 | 06:52 PM
  #1  
LargeOrangeFont's Avatar
Thread Starter
Fistful of steel
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 27
From: OC, So Cal
S4 NA Air Intake temp sensor failure - will this cause a change in fueling?

I have a S4 NA with the following mods -

Street Port
Intake (K&N)
Header and catback
RTEK 2.0

I installed a different AFM in my car recently. I can see on the RTEK that I am getting error #4 - Intake air temp sensor failure. This is the temp sensor that is in the AFM. I have a couple questions. The ECU now assumes that the intake temp is 66.9 degrees all the time. This is the default behavior for the #4 error.

1 - Is this sensor replaceable if I have a good one out of another AFM?

2 - Would this sensor failure drastically affect my AFRs as intake temps change?

I was at a track day last weekend, and when I started a run the car was at 12:1 AFR under load. By the end of the run the car was at 16:1 AFR under load and power dropped off noticeably. This was over a 20 minute period, the car slowly tapered leaner and leaner. I know the intake air temp will change probably 30-40 degrees or more over a run. It was about 70 degrees outside.

The only difference from before was the AFM and I had to retune the car for the new AFM because my old AFM was broken. The main problem is that the car won't stay consistent.

Thanks,
Ashley
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2010 | 07:07 PM
  #2  
farberio's Avatar
NASA-MW ST4
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,800
Likes: 3
From: Norcal, Bay Area
It makes sense that the ecu defaults to 1 temp, Mazda probably picked something that wouldn't throw in too much fuel, and something that wouldn't cause dangerous lean conditions.

Though I am a bit surprised that your car leaned out over time vs getting richer.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2010 | 12:29 PM
  #3  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,857
Likes: 3,243
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
1. yes, its actually really easy. once you pop the top off the afm (the black plastic one, and be careful it needs to go back on) the temp sensor just pops out

2. it should change fueling. if you really wanna know do some searching for henrik. but anyways the ecu takes afm signal and the air temp signal and combines them into "load" , fueling is based on load.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2010 | 12:54 PM
  #4  
Turbo II Rotor's Avatar
Who Shot the Sheriff?
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,858
Likes: 2
From: Aurora, CO
It should run richer if the default temp is lower than the temperature of the air the engine is seeing. You said it was getting leaner and leaner throughout the track day makes me think fuel system related possibly? Maybe crap in the tank was getting disturbed and slowly clogging the fuel filter during the day causing fuel pressure to drop? Just a thought.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2010 | 10:15 PM
  #5  
LargeOrangeFont's Avatar
Thread Starter
Fistful of steel
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 27
From: OC, So Cal
Originally Posted by Turbo II Rotor
It should run richer if the default temp is lower than the temperature of the air the engine is seeing. You said it was getting leaner and leaner throughout the track day makes me think fuel system related possibly? Maybe crap in the tank was getting disturbed and slowly clogging the fuel filter during the day causing fuel pressure to drop? Just a thought.
The fuel system is good. Fuel filter and the in tank prefilter are both clean. Fuel pump is good and fuel pressure regulator is good. I can make the car run 11:1 AFRs under high load if I add fuel via the RTEK, so I don't believe this is a fuel supply or delivery issue.


Also, I tried to drive it yesterday and it was in the low 50s ambient. The car was running very very rich (10.1 AFRs) at light load, around 3K RPM. The car was warmed up by idling in the driveway. I drove down the street and turned around because it was nearly undriveable because it was so rich. Maybe I need another AFM entirely.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2010 | 08:50 AM
  #6  
2slow4stock's Avatar
The waiting game......
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,275
Likes: 3
From: North Aurora
You can try and see if it helps. I'm sure it will.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alphawolff
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
17
Nov 17, 2015 05:57 PM
immanuel__7
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
89
Sep 5, 2015 10:23 AM
befarrer
Microtech
3
Aug 22, 2015 05:52 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:10 PM.