2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Rear Subframe Bushings & Spherical Arm Bearings - Confused

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-22-09, 12:59 AM
  #1  
Are you experienced?

Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
jjcobm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Rear Subframe Bushings & Spherical Arm Bearings - Confused

Alright,

So I was taking apart my subframe today, I ordered DTSS eliminators, and also happened to order a set of delrin rear control arm bushings.

I want to be able to adjust camber to have both sides even in the future, just to be able to have stock-like camber nothing extreme. I did some searching and from what I understood, if you run delrin/solid control arm bushings, you can't run camber adjusters.

I saw some members saying if you run the spherical control arm bearings (like what MMR has), you can adjust camber, but I am confused. Do these spherical bearings take the place of the delrin bushings I just ordered? I'm confused on this one.

Do you guys think if I use the delrin bushings for the control arms they will serve me good enough to keep the car close to stock camber, or would it be better to get the spherical bearings with individual camber adjusters?

By the way, I will also be running solid diff/subframe mounts on this (if you haven't already seen my build thread).
Old 12-22-09, 02:24 AM
  #2  
Rexistered User

iTrader: (8)
 
slomo85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also confused here... I was gonna call but if someone here knows already, let me know lol
Old 12-22-09, 02:56 PM
  #3  
Captain OCD

iTrader: (13)
 
SoloII///M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Glenwood, MD
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by jjcobm
I want to be able to adjust camber to have both sides even in the future, just to be able to have stock-like camber nothing extreme. I did some searching and from what I understood, if you run delrin/solid control arm bushings, you can't run camber adjusters.
Correct.

I saw some members saying if you run the spherical control arm bearings (like what MMR has), you can adjust camber, but I am confused. Do these spherical bearings take the place of the delrin bushings I just ordered?
Yes.

Do you guys think if I use the delrin bushings for the control arms they will serve me good enough to keep the car close to stock camber, or would it be better to get the spherical bearings with individual camber adjusters?

By the way, I will also be running solid diff/subframe mounts on this (if you haven't already seen my build thread).
If you're running solid subframe mounts you won't be able to use a single center camber link because that link relies on the subframe's ability to flex on its bushings to achieve a change in camber.

Similarly if you run a solid trailing arm bushing you cannot use the individual camber adjusters because they rely on some flex (or ability to pivot) at the rear control arm.

Best bet is to run the stock rubber bushings in the control arms, or spherical bearings, and the individual camber adjusters.
Old 12-22-09, 03:27 PM
  #4  
Are you experienced?

Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
jjcobm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ahhh, got you. One more thing, let's say I did run the solid rear lower control arm bushings, and solid subframe, dtss, diffmount. Would this most likely end up leaving me at stock camber (no coilover or dropped height on chassis) once I put everything together or would it still be best to just get the spherical bearings on the control arms and the camber adjusters?

I feel like I should of not ordered those rear control arm lower delrin bushings now.....
Old 12-22-09, 03:33 PM
  #5  
Fistful of steel

iTrader: (7)
 
LargeOrangeFont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: OC, So Cal
Posts: 2,202
Received 27 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by jjcobm
Ahhh, got you. One more thing, let's say I did run the solid rear lower control arm bushings, and solid subframe, dtss, diffmount. Would this most likely end up leaving me at stock camber (no coilover or dropped height on chassis) once I put everything together or would it still be best to just get the spherical bearings on the control arms and the camber adjusters?

I feel like I should of not ordered those rear control arm lower delrin bushings now.....
You will need the individual camber adjusters to even out or optimize the camber settings.
Old 12-23-09, 12:25 AM
  #6  
Rotary Revolutionary

iTrader: (16)
 
sharingan 19's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Jacksonville, Tampa & Tallahassee
Posts: 3,881
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by LargeOrangeFont
You will need the individual camber adjusters to even out or optimize the camber settings.
...which don't work w/ solid control arm bushings.

Im revamping my whole rear end as we speak, I have the MMR individual camber links, and UHWT driveline bushing set (w/ thin rubber spacers for the diff mounts to help isolate vibration). I'm leaving the stock bushings in for both the subframe and the RLCA's because
A) They allow use of the individual camber adjusters...
B) They are rarely the source of any handling problems...
C) Spherical bearings seem like another maintainance item to worry about...
D) In case I want to run a single camber adjuster instead (or in addition to) I will have that option. (I've heard that some people use the single link for rough adjustment and use the individual links to balance it out)
Old 12-23-09, 04:39 AM
  #7  
Are you experienced?

Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
jjcobm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
MN

Thanks for the replies everyone, it's cleared up my confusion!

Originally Posted by sharingan 19
...UHWT driveline bushing set (w/ thin rubber spacers for the diff mounts to help isolate vibration). I'm leaving the stock bushings in for both the subframe and the RLCA's because
A) They allow use of the individual camber adjusters...
B) They are rarely the source of any handling problems...
C) Spherical bearings seem like another maintainance item to worry about...
D) In case I want to run a single camber adjuster instead (or in addition to) I will have that option. (I've heard that some people use the single link for rough adjustment and use the individual links to balance it out)
(UHWT, I haven't heard of that/them before?)

This really helps me re-think about what I should do about the rear suspension. The reason I got the solid diff/subframe/dtss/RLCA bushings was because I want something that I can just put in there and not worry about it down the road later.

If the spherical bearings are going to be another maintanance item, I think I might skip out those. How often do people end up replacing spherical bearing control arm bearings by the way?

Also, on the rear control arms, there is a spherical bearing that hooks up to the hub at the top. With the DTSS bushing going solid, will these be ok in the long run, I didn't see anyone that sells replacements for these, but I would think with the DTSS being solid now, these will hardly get used at all so maybe they will be fine for a long time?

And now I am wondering, why would they sell the solid control arm bushings in the first place? I get that they will stiffen things up, but they are just going to pretty much limit what you can do to adjust your suspension anyways from what it understand...
Old 12-23-09, 06:35 PM
  #8  
Fistful of steel

iTrader: (7)
 
LargeOrangeFont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: OC, So Cal
Posts: 2,202
Received 27 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by jjcobm
Thanks for the replies everyone, it's cleared up my confusion!



(UHWT, I haven't heard of that/them before?)

This really helps me re-think about what I should do about the rear suspension. The reason I got the solid diff/subframe/dtss/RLCA bushings was because I want something that I can just put in there and not worry about it down the road later.

If the spherical bearings are going to be another maintanance item, I think I might skip out those. How often do people end up replacing spherical bearing control arm bearings by the way?

Also, on the rear control arms, there is a spherical bearing that hooks up to the hub at the top. With the DTSS bushing going solid, will these be ok in the long run, I didn't see anyone that sells replacements for these, but I would think with the DTSS being solid now, these will hardly get used at all so maybe they will be fine for a long time?

And now I am wondering, why would they sell the solid control arm bushings in the first place? I get that they will stiffen things up, but they are just going to pretty much limit what you can do to adjust your suspension anyways from what it understand...
He means UHMW - ultra high molecular weight plastic. Similar to delrin but with no self lubrication properties. Spherical bearings are no more of a maintenence item than delrin. They both can eventually wear out when used as suspension pivot bushings. The rear suspension in these cars binds easily. Using the factory rubber RCA bushings with individual camber adjusters will cause more suspension resistance, if not binding. The soild subframe, diff, and DTSS bushings will last forever. The rest of the bearings in the hub should be fine as well if they are still in decent shape.

Basically, get the spherical rear arm bearings, individual camber adjusters and be done with it. You don't need the center camber link at all with that setup, and you can't use it anyway because you have solid subframe bushings.
Old 12-23-09, 07:57 PM
  #9  
Are you experienced?

Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
jjcobm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by LargeOrangeFont
He means UHMW - ultra high molecular weight plastic. Similar to delrin but with no self lubrication properties. Spherical bearings are no more of a maintenence item than delrin. They both can eventually wear out when used as suspension pivot bushings. The rear suspension in these cars binds easily. Using the factory rubber RCA bushings with individual camber adjusters will cause more suspension resistance, if not binding. The soild subframe, diff, and DTSS bushings will last forever. The rest of the bearings in the hub should be fine as well if they are still in decent shape.

Basically, get the spherical rear arm bearings, individual camber adjusters and be done with it. You don't need the center camber link at all with that setup, and you can't use it anyway because you have solid subframe bushings.
Thanks for the reply,

I had some more time to think about the suspension setup this morning, the only thing that was stopping me from getting the spherical control arm bearings were the maintenance issue, but you've help me reassure my doubts.

I will be going with the spherical bearings and individual camber adjusters.

By the way one more thing

Does the stock toe adjustment work with those spherical bearings or will I also have to end up getting those hemi-joint toe adjusters like AWR sells? Just want to make sure I have everything so I can continue the build...

You guys have been helping me a lot, thanks!
Old 12-23-09, 08:33 PM
  #10  
Fistful of steel

iTrader: (7)
 
LargeOrangeFont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: OC, So Cal
Posts: 2,202
Received 27 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by jjcobm
Thanks for the reply,

I had some more time to think about the suspension setup this morning, the only thing that was stopping me from getting the spherical control arm bearings were the maintenance issue, but you've help me reassure my doubts.

I will be going with the spherical bearings and individual camber adjusters.

By the way one more thing

Does the stock toe adjustment work with those spherical bearings or will I also have to end up getting those hemi-joint toe adjusters like AWR sells? Just want to make sure I have everything so I can continue the build...

You guys have been helping me a lot, thanks!

You should not need the AWR style toe adjusters. I know the AWR rear LCA bearing retains the factory eccentric adjustability, and I believe the MMR does as well. I went with the MMR (it is in the mail), and it looks like it will retain the factory eccentric bolt to adjust toe as well.
Old 12-23-09, 08:38 PM
  #11  
Are you experienced?

Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
jjcobm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by LargeOrangeFont
You should not need the AWR style toe adjusters. I know the AWR rear LCA bearing retains the factory eccentric adjustability, and I believe the MMR does as well. I went with the MMR (it is in the mail), and it looks like it will retain the factory eccentric bolt to adjust toe as well.
Great, I think I am set then, will have to get those ordered in.... Thanks again for all the help everyone!
Old 09-13-10, 04:23 AM
  #12  
Full Member
iTrader: (13)
 
anarchyb52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: L town Indiana
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did you ever check to see what your rear camber was with all solid mounts? I have a full set of delrins I haven't installed yet and would like to know if i should just sell my rear control arm ones now and buy spherical bearings instead? I got mine in a set with the front delrin LCA bushings I bought so its not like I had much of a choice since they all came in a set.
Old 09-13-10, 09:47 AM
  #13  
Are you experienced?

Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
jjcobm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
No, I was curious about what it would be also. EDIT: I am running the spherical bushings now with no camber adjusters since I snapped my last adjusters during an autocross. I was thinking about running the solid LCA bushings on the rear, but also was curious as to the camber. It should be very close to stock if everything in the rear-subframe is on par.

I am suspecting the spherical bearing/bushings may be giving me some problems but I haven't had time to inspect. Only get occasional clunk if I hit hard bumps. May be something else.
Old 09-13-10, 01:35 PM
  #14  
Full Member
iTrader: (13)
 
anarchyb52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: L town Indiana
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds like the bearing needs replaced. MMR said they are fully replaceable on their website although they don't list just the bearing.
Old 09-13-10, 01:58 PM
  #15  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (2)
 
Furb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: E-L Netherlands
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i have solid subframe and control arm bushings and also the TC-sportline rear camber link.

i can adjust camber without any problems...
Old 09-13-10, 02:28 PM
  #16  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (6)
 
Nick_d_TII's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 1,620
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Need a picture in this thread, I'm getting confused. Feel free to mark up what your thinking...



The spherical rear arm bearings are where the toe cam bolt is, and the adjusters are the trailing arm control links near the center of the subframe.

When you shorten the control links (not sublink) it 'rotates' the trailing arm straightening out the wheel (adds camber), but puts stress on the other trailing arm mount (toe in adjusting cam). Is this correct?
Attached Thumbnails Rear Subframe Bushings & Spherical Arm Bearings - Confused-rear-suspension.jpg  
Old 09-13-10, 02:44 PM
  #17  
Sharp Claws

iTrader: (30)
 
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
any camber adjustment puts more force on the front bushings from lowering the car. namely the toe in pivot bushing. i wouldn't necessarily say it is enough to worry about though.
Old 09-13-10, 03:40 PM
  #18  
Are you experienced?

Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
jjcobm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by anarchyb52
Sounds like the bearing needs replaced. MMR said they are fully replaceable on their website although they don't list just the bearing.
Yeah... when I just put these not even a few months ago.... I wouldn't be surprised... If I do drop my subframe to replace those (if it is even the problem), I will definitely not bother with those fools....

Originally Posted by Furb
i have solid subframe and control arm bushings and also the TC-sportline rear camber link.

i can adjust camber without any problems...
Are you sure? Because you need the toe bushing (control arm bushing) to be able to pivot. You will basically have a suspension that is truly solid and can't pivot with that setup. TC-sportline rear camber link, not familiar, but if it's the single dogbone (sublink) style one, you need the SUBFRAME bushings to pivot. If it's the individual adjusters, you need the control arm to pivot.
Old 09-14-10, 02:23 AM
  #19  
Full Member
iTrader: (13)
 
anarchyb52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: L town Indiana
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IN

I see something. If the subframe spacers aren't solid it could pivot on them right? I have solid mounts and now looking at the pic I will have to buy the spacers to right? If so ugg just another thing to get.....

pic of solid bushings.


Uploaded with ImageShack.us

The individual camber adjusters are not a standard feature we have solid links from the factory which I circled in what was supposed to be red. The spacers are in Blue. I was wondering what geometry the lateral links control and/or why they don't make adjustable ones.


Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Last edited by anarchyb52; 09-14-10 at 02:48 AM.
Old 09-14-10, 10:23 AM
  #20  
Are you experienced?

Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
jjcobm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
AWR makes adjustable lateral links... Probably the setup I should of gone with in the first place
Old 09-14-10, 01:09 PM
  #21  
Full Member
iTrader: (13)
 
anarchyb52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: L town Indiana
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it what they have listed as a "toe link" ?
Old 09-14-10, 03:53 PM
  #22  
Are you experienced?

Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
jjcobm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yes.
Old 09-15-10, 02:07 PM
  #23  
Full Member
iTrader: (13)
 
anarchyb52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: L town Indiana
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do i still need the sub frame spacers with the solid mounts I have? Its just something I have been wondering.
Old 09-15-10, 02:31 PM
  #24  
Are you experienced?

Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
jjcobm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
No, the subframe spacer are needed to "stiffen" up the rubber bushings. You will have solid mounts so you can't do anything else to stiffen them up.
Old 09-16-10, 02:20 AM
  #25  
Full Member
iTrader: (13)
 
anarchyb52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: L town Indiana
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good deal. The pic makes the spacers look like hats that set on the bushing. I haven't got to taking the thing off yet so I didn't know. The fact that it is a "spacer" makes it sound like it changes the height of the sub frame also that's why I was asking.


Quick Reply: Rear Subframe Bushings & Spherical Arm Bearings - Confused



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:50 PM.