2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

need more power for 89 GXL

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 9, 2010 | 05:09 AM
  #26  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Need more power? More like need more money. I recommend spending the money on college courses, and then you can spend tens of thousands of dollars on your car once you get a higher-paying job.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2010 | 11:24 AM
  #27  
rotary_bünta's Avatar
Rotary Retard
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 702
Likes: 1
From: 3rd rock from the sun
Originally Posted by Evil Aviator
Need more power? More like need more money. I recommend spending the money on college courses, and then you can spend tens of thousands of dollars on your car once you get a higher-paying job.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2010 | 01:29 PM
  #28  
86base's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 116
Likes: 1
From: south phoenix,az
Originally Posted by Evil Aviator
Need more power? More like need more money. I recommend spending the money on college courses, and then you can spend tens of thousands of dollars on your car once you get a higher-paying job.
That is right, it just sucks to wait.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2010 | 04:43 PM
  #29  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally Posted by 86base
That is right, it just sucks to wait.
Waiting only sucks if you are stuck with a lame Honda with a few ricer mods in a feeble attempt to emulate a sports car. The non-turbo RX-7 is an excellent car even in stock form. People who want "more power" but can't afford to pay $2,500 for a running Turbo II RX-7 are better off spending their money on reliability mods, and then spending the rest of their money attaining a better job.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2010 | 10:13 PM
  #30  
ericgrau's Avatar
Clean.
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,521
Likes: 3
From: Huntington Beach, CA
Originally Posted by globalx59
so i can just throw a turbo II engine right in my car and not have to change anything else?
In case others haven't already been clear, only if you're lucky. A good portion of the time you buy one of those cheap motors and it needs a $3000 rebuild. Not to mention the time or money getting it into you car. The suggestion to sell your car and buy a TII might be a better idea. Or upgrade your NA for now. And I agree with whoever it was, do your scheduled maintenance first.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2010 | 12:36 AM
  #31  
MaczPayne's Avatar
Mac Attack
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,668
Likes: 22
From: California
Originally Posted by Evil Aviator
Need more power? More like need more money. I recommend spending the money on college courses, and then you can spend tens of thousands of dollars on your car once you get a higher-paying job.
Truer words have never been spoken!
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2010 | 11:49 AM
  #32  
cbrinega's Avatar
still love the FC
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, Ohio
Originally Posted by Evil Aviator
Waiting only sucks if you are stuck with a lame Honda with a few ricer mods in a feeble attempt to emulate a sports car. The non-turbo RX-7 is an excellent car even in stock form. People who want "more power" but can't afford to pay $2,500 for a running Turbo II RX-7 are better off spending their money on reliability mods, and then spending the rest of their money attaining a better job.
Yes, the N/A RX-7 is a great, actual sports car! And it absolutely does not have the performance potential of a turbo car in terms of power, and certainly the horsepower per $ is better for a turbo. But the original poster did not really say how much power they want...

There is power to be gained in N/A form, and N/As are easier to modify than turbos without worrying about reliability issues. It still stands that exhaust, intake, and ECU tuning are good for an N/A, and you don't have to worry (or spend $ on) fuel mods, wastegates, intercoolers, cooling system, etc. And as long as you enjoy the car, who cares which route you choose. Plus finding a running T II for less than $4k seems unlikely in my experience unless you look for a very long time and get lucky.

Realistically, $1500 isn't going to go very far on an N/A or turbo car unless everything is in great working condition to start with and the owner can do the work on their own. Hopefully the original poster can decide on their approach from all the good info here on the forum.

---
A couple more websites for the original poster since they seem new to RX-7s:
http://www.pocketlogger.com/index.ph...age=2&ecu=S5NA
http://www.pineappleracing.com/
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
The Shaolin
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
9
Sep 14, 2015 07:50 PM
NCross
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
9
Sep 3, 2015 03:42 PM
Im faster
General Rotary Tech Support
4
Aug 19, 2015 02:57 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:45 PM.