2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

need more power for 89 GXL

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-09-10, 05:09 AM
  #26  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Need more power? More like need more money. I recommend spending the money on college courses, and then you can spend tens of thousands of dollars on your car once you get a higher-paying job.
Old 06-09-10, 11:24 AM
  #27  
Rotary Retard

iTrader: (3)
 
rotary_bünta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Posts: 702
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Evil Aviator
Need more power? More like need more money. I recommend spending the money on college courses, and then you can spend tens of thousands of dollars on your car once you get a higher-paying job.
Old 06-09-10, 01:29 PM
  #28  
Full Member

iTrader: (3)
 
86base's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: south phoenix,az
Posts: 117
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Evil Aviator
Need more power? More like need more money. I recommend spending the money on college courses, and then you can spend tens of thousands of dollars on your car once you get a higher-paying job.
That is right, it just sucks to wait.
Old 06-09-10, 04:43 PM
  #29  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by 86base
That is right, it just sucks to wait.
Waiting only sucks if you are stuck with a lame Honda with a few ricer mods in a feeble attempt to emulate a sports car. The non-turbo RX-7 is an excellent car even in stock form. People who want "more power" but can't afford to pay $2,500 for a running Turbo II RX-7 are better off spending their money on reliability mods, and then spending the rest of their money attaining a better job.
Old 06-09-10, 10:13 PM
  #30  
Clean.

iTrader: (1)
 
ericgrau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 2,521
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by globalx59
so i can just throw a turbo II engine right in my car and not have to change anything else?
In case others haven't already been clear, only if you're lucky. A good portion of the time you buy one of those cheap motors and it needs a $3000 rebuild. Not to mention the time or money getting it into you car. The suggestion to sell your car and buy a TII might be a better idea. Or upgrade your NA for now. And I agree with whoever it was, do your scheduled maintenance first.
Old 06-10-10, 12:36 AM
  #31  
Mac Attack

iTrader: (5)
 
MaczPayne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: California
Posts: 5,668
Received 20 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Evil Aviator
Need more power? More like need more money. I recommend spending the money on college courses, and then you can spend tens of thousands of dollars on your car once you get a higher-paying job.
Truer words have never been spoken!
Old 06-10-10, 11:49 AM
  #32  
still love the FC

 
cbrinega's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Evil Aviator
Waiting only sucks if you are stuck with a lame Honda with a few ricer mods in a feeble attempt to emulate a sports car. The non-turbo RX-7 is an excellent car even in stock form. People who want "more power" but can't afford to pay $2,500 for a running Turbo II RX-7 are better off spending their money on reliability mods, and then spending the rest of their money attaining a better job.
Yes, the N/A RX-7 is a great, actual sports car! And it absolutely does not have the performance potential of a turbo car in terms of power, and certainly the horsepower per $ is better for a turbo. But the original poster did not really say how much power they want...

There is power to be gained in N/A form, and N/As are easier to modify than turbos without worrying about reliability issues. It still stands that exhaust, intake, and ECU tuning are good for an N/A, and you don't have to worry (or spend $ on) fuel mods, wastegates, intercoolers, cooling system, etc. And as long as you enjoy the car, who cares which route you choose. Plus finding a running T II for less than $4k seems unlikely in my experience unless you look for a very long time and get lucky.

Realistically, $1500 isn't going to go very far on an N/A or turbo car unless everything is in great working condition to start with and the owner can do the work on their own. Hopefully the original poster can decide on their approach from all the good info here on the forum.

---
A couple more websites for the original poster since they seem new to RX-7s:
http://www.pocketlogger.com/index.ph...age=2&ecu=S5NA
http://www.pineappleracing.com/
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
The Shaolin
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
9
09-14-15 07:50 PM
NCross
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
9
09-03-15 03:42 PM
Im faster
General Rotary Tech Support
4
08-19-15 02:57 PM



Quick Reply: need more power for 89 GXL



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:45 AM.