2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

N/A to Turbo conversion power wise

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 09:54 PM
  #1  
sevenfc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
From: kodiak
N/A to Turbo conversion power wise

Alright i have a question to all fc fans that have had there n/a's converted to a turbo.

Exactly how much power differences is there such as pulling wise with the n/a to turbo, i know turbo gives more power but i am converting my na to turbo and i just want to know how faster it will be or do u feel way more pull from the turbo conversion. I mean i want it to be well worth it having the conversion so just wanted to check...thanks
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 10:02 PM
  #2  
SnipeD_RNA's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: Washington
Its a lot of work and money, but yes when the turbo spools hang on.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 10:31 PM
  #3  
ErixHvn's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
From: Crawfordville, FL , South of Tally
forced induction + hi-comp rotors= Zoom zoom
Just a little harder to run higher boost w/ out detonation than low compression ratio rotors IMHO.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2006 | 11:27 AM
  #4  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
The first thing I noticed, even at low boost, was a major improvement of torque. From low RPM to the redline the torque curve flattened a LOT. Then when I turned up the boost, the fun really began....
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ChrisRX8PR
Single Turbo RX-7's
18
Aug 21, 2015 01:56 PM
Frisky Arab
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
13
Aug 18, 2015 05:30 PM
KAL797
Test Area 51
0
Aug 11, 2015 03:47 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:37 PM.