mr2 turbo vs t2
05-01-05, 03:28 AM
#1
Rotary Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: seattle wa
Posts: 906
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
mr2 turbo vs t2
mr2 mods unknown 3 1/2 inch exhaust 15 psi
t2 street port stock turbo 3 inch turbo back exhaust back to two 2 and 1/4s greddy fmic and safc. throttle body mod under drive pullies
who will win??????
t2 street port stock turbo 3 inch turbo back exhaust back to two 2 and 1/4s greddy fmic and safc. throttle body mod under drive pullies
who will win??????
05-02-05, 01:57 AM
#6
i am legendary
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Funkspectrum
probably the TII. MR2 turbos are only dynoing at like ~160 170 HP...stock...
Trending Topics
05-02-05, 02:05 AM
#8
i am legendary
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gingenhagen
mr2 turbos had 200HP stock. And weigh in at only 2657 lbs. And have a MR drivetrain. I think those are several advantages they have over the FC.
05-02-05, 02:28 AM
#9
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Millville, NJ
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Frpm my experience, MR2s are overrated. One of my friends MR2 had nearly the same mods as my 7, and he said that he wish his car was as fast as mine, and another MR2 owning friend put 10K into his car and ran a 13.2..
05-02-05, 02:36 AM
#10
I am 2Furious
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NJ / Philly
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dDuB
I dunno where you're getting 2657 lbs from, but stock mr2 turbo's weighed in at over 2800 pounds. Maybe you're talking about the n/a mr2's??
05-02-05, 08:40 AM
#11
Rotary Apprentice
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dDuB
Stock mr2 turbos run 14.7 to 14.8ish... Stock TII is 15.2. HP isn't everything!
05-02-05, 10:26 AM
#12
it will be a good race but those damn toyota engines can handle dumb amounts of boost. If he has traction I think 15lbs is going to walk you, without missing shifts and all the other things that can happen while racing. Give it a shot
05-02-05, 10:37 AM
#13
i am legendary
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by NOPR
i thought stock t2's ran lower 14's? dont ask me where i got that from i have no idea but for some reason thats what i have in my head.
05-02-05, 03:07 PM
#19
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dDuB
Not anywhere on the internet I've seen. I've seen countless times it quoted as 15.2 for s4 and 15.0 to 15.1 for s5.
S4 C&D from '86, see www.iluvmyrx7.com (not up so I can't give exact date) 14.9
S5 14.9: http://www.car-stats.com
S5 SCI pg. 153 "Mazda RX-7: Gold Portfolio 1978-1991" 14.53! (best I can recall seeing)
S5 pg 155 "Mazda RX-7: Gold Portfolio 1978-1991" 14.85
05-02-05, 07:10 PM
#24
i am legendary
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gregk
who gives a ****... this board is full of stupid *******.
I couldn't agree more.
All the threads about "how fast is my car" or "how much power will this make" or "can i beat this car?!" get really ******* old.
05-02-05, 07:18 PM
#25
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dDuB
I couldn't agree more.
The intention of my point was more that a couple of tenths isn't a big deal.