MOP Position Sensor.
Thread Starter
Wait................What?
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh/Cary, NC - USA
MOP Position Sensor.
Yes, Ive searched. Read all 32 posts that came up.
Just a simple question about the position sensor.
The FSM states to read resistance between terminals Vc and E2.
I get 1300 ohms. Good.
Also says to "Add the resistance of terminals (Vo-E2) and (Vo-Vc)
Resisance: 1-2ohm"
Ok....
Um.
Huh?
If I do that, this is what I get.
Vo-E2: 540 ohms
Vo-Vc: 1692
Total: 2232 ohms.
so.... is the position sensor bad?
I do get a code 20 from my ECU, this is why Im checking it in the first place.
I dont know about the motor itself yet. Does the position sensor measure the position of the PUMP, or the ENGINE?
Also: what is the shaft coming out (the rectangle one) where the MOP meets the front cover?
Thanks,
Jon
Just a simple question about the position sensor.
The FSM states to read resistance between terminals Vc and E2.
I get 1300 ohms. Good.
Also says to "Add the resistance of terminals (Vo-E2) and (Vo-Vc)
Resisance: 1-2ohm"
Ok....
Um.
Huh?
If I do that, this is what I get.
Vo-E2: 540 ohms
Vo-Vc: 1692
Total: 2232 ohms.
so.... is the position sensor bad?
I do get a code 20 from my ECU, this is why Im checking it in the first place.
I dont know about the motor itself yet. Does the position sensor measure the position of the PUMP, or the ENGINE?
Also: what is the shaft coming out (the rectangle one) where the MOP meets the front cover?
Thanks,
Jon
It is supose to be in k-ohms. Muve you desimal point back 3 spaces.
e.i vc-e2 1300 ohms = 1.3 k-ohms
vo-ec 540 ohms = .54 k-ohms
vo-vc 1692 ohms = 1.69 k-ohms
If these are you actual numbers, they are within limitations.
When I add the resistance in my car and my friends I have never gotten the sum below 2 ohms. More like 2.2-2.4 ohms
e.i vc-e2 1300 ohms = 1.3 k-ohms
vo-ec 540 ohms = .54 k-ohms
vo-vc 1692 ohms = 1.69 k-ohms
If these are you actual numbers, they are within limitations.
When I add the resistance in my car and my friends I have never gotten the sum below 2 ohms. More like 2.2-2.4 ohms
Thread Starter
Wait................What?
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh/Cary, NC - USA
well.. there is no difference in me saying 1692 ohms and 1.69 ohms. Its irrevelant. Mine's actually a bit more 'precise'.
Good to hear about the addition being close to mine though
Good to hear about the addition being close to mine though
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LongDuck
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
12
Oct 7, 2015 08:12 PM
killerrx710
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
5
Sep 28, 2015 09:13 AM
killerrx710
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
1
Sep 24, 2015 10:57 PM




