2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

misfire/safc

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 18, 2004 | 12:36 PM
  #26  
ilike2eatricers's Avatar
I R SAD PANDA W/O BAW
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,061
Likes: 1
From: bay area
Originally Posted by Aaron Cake
Damn....Partial throttle? Do you remember what map your S-AFC was on?

This is the Achilles heal with an S-AFC set up as TPS referenced. You can be under boost, yet still on your "low throttle" map.
So does wiring the SAFC to the pressure sensor help to solve this problem since it reads boost in the form of voltage off the pressure sensor and then eventually learns max boost?
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2004 | 04:48 PM
  #27  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by Aaron Cake
This is the Achilles heal with an S-AFC set up as TPS referenced. You can be under boost, yet still on your "low throttle" map.
That would simply mean your low/high throttle points were set too high. You could make exacly the same mistake with the TPS input connected to the MAP sensor.

IMO the weakness of the S-AFC is not that it's too simple, it's that it's so much simpler than a full EMS that many people think they don't need professional advice or tuning to set one up.

Terrh, that's just a general comment, not aimed at you personally. Unless you think it should be...

Last edited by NZConvertible; Dec 18, 2004 at 04:50 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2004 | 10:51 AM
  #28  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
But if it's on the pressure sensor, the S-AFC will directly know the boost pressure. So it's user error if the "TPS" points are not set properly.

Problem with the S4 is the 1/4 range TPS. Can make setting up the S-AFC...interesting.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 12:04 AM
  #29  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by Aaron Cake
But if it's on the pressure sensor, the S-AFC will directly know the boost pressure. So it's user error if the "TPS" points are not set properly.
Exactly, and I don't think many people fully understand how that affects their high and low "throttle" settings. The TPS and MAP sensors both have a 0-5V output (approximately), with the MAP sensor's output corresponding to about -1atm to +1atm. So instead of 0% meaning no load (closed throttle) and 100% meaning full load (WOT), you get a zero-load reading of ~20% at idle (~16inHg) and a full-load reading that depends on your max boost (~80% at 10psi). You need to adjust the high and low throttle settings to take that into account. It's not difficult to work out, it's just not immediately obvious.

Personally on a turbo I'd set the high-throttle setting at 50% (i.e. 0 psig, when boost begins). The low-throttle setting would depend on how fast your turbo spools, but I think about 40% would be about right.

Problem with the S4 is the 1/4 range TPS. Can make setting up the S-AFC...interesting.
Not really. Remember that the ECU already changes fuelling according to load as well as rpm; the S-AFC's throttle settings just give you a bit more tuning scope in that area. If you tune your high-throttle settings at full load (as you should), the worst that will happen is that you'll be a bit richer than necessary at smaller throttle openings that are still using the high-throttle map (i.e. over ~25% throttle). During normal cruising you'll still be under that point. A full-range TPS would be nice, but I don't think it's essential.

Last edited by NZConvertible; Dec 20, 2004 at 12:13 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 09:17 AM
  #30  
Terrh's Avatar
Thread Starter
STUCK. I got SNOWNED!!!!!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 8,737
Likes: 20
From: Windsor, On
My car was set up with the TPS.

I had low set at 98% and high set at 99%, in practice, anything over ~15% throttle was in the high throttle map...

I think it happened at EXACTLY the 3800RPM changeover, but I'm still not sure what happened.
it's definatly blown though, you can see it in the boost/vacuum gauge.

I managed to limp it home (250KM!) only cost $60 on gas... hopefully the turbo survived without damage, I haven't pulled it off yet.


How can I prevent this from happening a third time? Obviously dyno time, but will dyno time be able to fix something that happened at part throttle?

Where should I set my timing to for the new motor?
I'm probably getting an s5 jspec, maybe an s4... whatever I can get the best deal on, because I'm out of money Going to get a payday advance JUST to get this motor, so obviously I can't afford another incident.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 09:52 AM
  #31  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
NZ: Good point.

Terrh: Timing should be stock. To prevent this is a little trickier. First step is to reference the TPS from the pressure sensor, and properly dyno tune it...But you know what I'm going to say with regards to the "final" solution....standalone.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 10:17 AM
  #32  
eViLRotor's Avatar
Brother of the Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,781
Likes: 2
From: Arkham Asylum
For the price of a few blown engines, you can almost buy one of those useless EMS thingies

There's a real standalone EMS revolution going in with all the RX-7's Ottawa. Bout time.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 04:19 PM
  #33  
Terrh's Avatar
Thread Starter
STUCK. I got SNOWNED!!!!!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 8,737
Likes: 20
From: Windsor, On
eViLRotor: I dunno about that.. this engine was basically free (they practically paid me to take it away, $150 for it + the whole smashed TII it was in)

The last engine wouldn't have went if not for #@$)(* boost creep... I thought that going to an s5 turbo would cure that but obvioulsy not.. next motor gets a ported wastegate s5 turbo with a boost controller set at ~11psi
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 04:37 PM
  #34  
eViLRotor's Avatar
Brother of the Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,781
Likes: 2
From: Arkham Asylum
Its all good man
Just keep that baby running

Maybe if we show you a few well running EMS cars, you might consider it some day
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 08:01 PM
  #35  
Terrh's Avatar
Thread Starter
STUCK. I got SNOWNED!!!!!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 8,737
Likes: 20
From: Windsor, On
I would LOVE an EMS..

the problem, as always, is that I work my *** off and am always broke anyways
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 08:05 PM
  #36  
eriksseven's Avatar
Make Money.
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,137
Likes: 9
From: Seattle
Originally Posted by Terrh
eViLRotor: I dunno about that.. this engine was basically free (they practically paid me to take it away, $150 for it + the whole smashed TII it was in)

The last engine wouldn't have went if not for #@$)(* boost creep... I thought that going to an s5 turbo would cure that but obvioulsy not.. next motor gets a ported wastegate s5 turbo with a boost controller set at ~11psi
Did the motor that just blew have a ported wastegate?
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 08:34 PM
  #37  
Terrh's Avatar
Thread Starter
STUCK. I got SNOWNED!!!!!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 8,737
Likes: 20
From: Windsor, On
no, stock s5 wastegate
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 10:48 PM
  #38  
gsracer's Avatar
EIT
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
what fuel pump were you running?
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 11:00 PM
  #39  
Terrh's Avatar
Thread Starter
STUCK. I got SNOWNED!!!!!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 8,737
Likes: 20
From: Windsor, On
FD pump/720 secondaries
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 11:23 PM
  #40  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Given the size of the pump and secondary injectors, and the OTT settings on the S-AFC, I don't think top-end fuelling is a problem. But you said it happened right at the secondary injector transition which may mean your primary injectors ran out of flow, or you got caught out by the brief lean condition you get at the transition when using mis-matched injectors with an S-AFC. You said you had +8% correction, but was that at all rpm/load points or just up top? What were the rest of the settings?
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 11:30 PM
  #41  
Ocelot's Avatar
Y00s a h000
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,913
Likes: 0
From: Central NJ
Why would you boost on an untuned motor with mods?
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2004 | 04:59 PM
  #42  
gsracer's Avatar
EIT
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by NZConvertible
Given the size of the pump and secondary injectors, and the OTT settings on the S-AFC, I don't think top-end fuelling is a problem. But you said it happened right at the secondary injector transition which may mean your primary injectors ran out of flow, or you got caught out by the brief lean condition you get at the transition when using mis-matched injectors with an S-AFC. You said you had +8% correction, but was that at all rpm/load points or just up top? What were the rest of the settings?
I agree that top end fueling definitely was not a problem, if anything at only 11 pounds on the stock turbo it should be retardedly rich. I personally think it makes a lot more sense to run a pair of 720cc primaries and keep the stock 550's in the secondaries for moderate mod's on the stock turbo.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2004 | 05:15 PM
  #43  
ilike2eatricers's Avatar
I R SAD PANDA W/O BAW
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,061
Likes: 1
From: bay area
Originally Posted by gsracer
I agree that top end fueling definitely was not a problem, if anything at only 11 pounds on the stock turbo it should be retardedly rich. I personally think it makes a lot more sense to run a pair of 720cc primaries and keep the stock 550's in the secondaries for moderate mod's on the stock turbo.
Isnt the problem with 720s in the primary with an SAFC2 that they cannot be controlled during cranking and will probably cause lots of flooding.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2004 | 05:22 PM
  #44  
gsracer's Avatar
EIT
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
I don't know how that myth got started. I've been running 4 x 720's now for nearly a year. First on the safc and now on the e-manage. I've never had flooding problems.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:12 PM.