2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

match porting pics!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 12, 2015 | 10:30 AM
  #26  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
Originally Posted by jjwalker
Maybe I need to get my eyes checked...

...but am I seeing butterflies in the intake for the 5th and 6th ports?


it's a european thing
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2015 | 10:48 AM
  #27  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by jjwalker
Maybe I need to get my eyes checked...

...but am I seeing butterflies in the intake for the 5th and 6th ports?
the EU S4 FC's are weird. they use a thermal reactor emissions system, like a pre 1981, US model. since the reactor is so big, they don't have room for the 6PI stuff, and need butterflies instead. the engine is also different, its almost a GSL-SE engine with coolant seals in the wrong place (in the irons, FC), and S4 rotors. since the 6PI is a butterfly those ports are like normal ports, and not like its been drilled like the US engines. they have a completely different control system, it seems to be an overgrown GSL-SE system, it uses a distributor, and a 12V AFM, but has 4 injectors like every other FC.

the S5 and FD engines are the same as the US versions. the cars are too, although they have different option packages.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2015 | 11:40 AM
  #28  
jjwalker's Avatar
MECP Certified Installer
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,176
Likes: 3
From: Mesquite, TX-DFW
Freaky!

A 12v AFM seems inefficient if that 12v reference is coming from the battery/alternator. So they used a junky distributor, a junky thermal reactor (better than 2 cats I suppose) an unreliable 12v afm with a more efficient 6 port system and fuel injection...makes sense.

I wonder what the power difference is.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2015 | 12:36 PM
  #29  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by jjwalker
Freaky!

A 12v AFM seems inefficient if that 12v reference is coming from the battery/alternator. So they used a junky distributor, a junky thermal reactor (better than 2 cats I suppose) an unreliable 12v afm with a more efficient 6 port system and fuel injection...makes sense.

I wonder what the power difference is.
actually the distributor/thermal reactor is pretty bulletproof, the reactor might literally be so. the reactor is basically just a normal exhaust manifold thats bigger. it works by using the air pump air and heat (hence the name) to basically get the unburned HC's to burn off. since its basically passive, it doesn't fail like a cat does.

the distributor is basically the same as the 1st gen, and those are dead reliable.

the AFM just gets a 12v reference from the ecu instead of 5v, its just as reliable, just a different sensor range than normal.

no power difference, they are all 146hp
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2015 | 01:18 PM
  #30  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
12v would have better resolution than 5v, but i have a feeling it is not an isolated 12v and that it fluctuates, which is not so good, where the 5v is filtered and stable.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GoodfellaFD3S
Interior / Exterior / Audio
10
Oct 30, 2015 04:47 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:39 PM.