2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Let's Try This Again Shall We? carb q's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 2, 2002 | 12:04 AM
  #51  
crossbar17's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From: Wales, ME
dellorto DHLA 48 carb, know where i can get one all??
Reply
Old May 2, 2002 | 07:36 AM
  #52  
FPrep2ndGenRX7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
From: AL
Well, I asked for a war and certainly got one. Thanks for the entertainment everyone, especially Teds and NZ's comebacks.

Someone mentioned the SDS(www.sdsefi.com). Ted knows I like this unit. That combined with a 1st gen distributor will be an improvement over stock FI. Probably more gain with the Haltech since you can control your ignition and don't need the 1st gen distributor.

Its your money crossbar17, you spend it the way you want to. Teds suggestion on the Racing Beat catalog is a good idea.
Reply
Old May 2, 2002 | 07:52 AM
  #53  
Turblown's Avatar
Turn up the boost
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 236
From: Twin Cities, MN
Originally posted by NZConvertible
Airflow produces power, not how you introduce the fuel. The stock ECU requires the airflow meter (it can’t be bypassed) and this will eventually limit the engine’s airflow potential. So if a carb and its manifold is big enough to outflow the stock AFM/TB/manifold it will produce more peak power. However because a carb can’t meter fuel anywhere near as well as EFI, it’ll probably lose power through the low- and mid-range, and will have the slower, rougher throttle response. Chuck on programmable EFI (no AFM) and it’s a whole new game. Any carb big enough to outflow that set-up would drive terrible at anything other than WOT and high rpm.
ok, thanks. now i understand, good thing i read this thread, my buddy is about to go carbbed, I'll have to tell him to save his $$$. I had a carb on my olds, and let me say that my experience with that was horrible.
__________________
Rotary Performance Parts


Reply
Old May 2, 2002 | 10:10 AM
  #54  
HN's Avatar
HN
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: las vegas
i just got an email from a guy who's selling one. pm me and i'll forward it.
Reply
Old May 2, 2002 | 10:42 AM
  #55  
Samps's Avatar
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
If you used a Haltech. Couldn't you simply attach the air filter directly to the throttle body, thus increasing the flow. I know the heat may hurt, but it would almost be like having a carb with fuel injection, and an awesome computer to control it.
Reply
Old May 2, 2002 | 11:03 AM
  #56  
FPrep2ndGenRX7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
From: AL
Originally posted by Samps
If you used a Haltech. Couldn't you simply attach the air filter directly to the throttle body, thus increasing the flow. I know the heat may hurt, but it would almost be like having a carb with fuel injection, and an awesome computer to control it.
With the Haltech and the SDS you can eliminate the AFM. You can use the factory tube or replace it with a custom tube or maybe modify one of the ricer ones available. I've seen it done both ways with similiar results.
Reply
Old May 2, 2002 | 05:00 PM
  #57  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally posted by Samps
If you used a Haltech. Couldn't you simply attach the air filter directly to the throttle body, thus increasing the flow. I know the heat may hurt, but it would almost be like having a carb with fuel injection, and an awesome computer to control it.
This might flow more air, but powe rwill be down because of the hot are being sucked in. Remember this is right on top of the exhaust manifold! A 3” tube placing the filter in the corner of the engine bay will have minimal restriction and allow a proper cold air box to be constructed, which will give much better results.
Actually, I’ll add this to my list of disadvantages of a carb. Unless to fabricate an airbox around the filter, you’ll be sucking hot air and lowering power potential.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2002 | 12:37 AM
  #58  
mattrx7N/A's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: OR
You dont need a distributor with a carb , I run a weber and use the stock 87 DIS. I paid $150 for my weber which did give me about a 20 hp gain but I also get 10 miles to the gallon. So if you can find a carb cheap cool but if not dont waste your money.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2002 | 12:00 PM
  #59  
RBCRX7's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: MASSACHUSETTS
i have an 87 rx-7 w/ a carbed 13b that was dynoed at 248rwhp!!! i also plan on doing either an sc or nos.
good luck crossbar let me know how it comes out....
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2002 | 03:16 PM
  #60  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
Originally posted by RBCRX7
i have an 87 rx-7 w/ a carbed 13b that was dynoed at 248rwhp!!!
Cough Cough
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
scissorhands
New Member RX-7 Technical
5
Oct 8, 2015 01:17 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:01 PM.